(Im)Politeness in Vedic Sanskrit

References

1. Allen, W. Sidney
   1953 Phonetics in Ancient India. London, New York and Toronto: Oxford University Press and Geoffrey Cumberledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bax, Marcel and Dániel Z. Kádár
   2011 “The Historical Understanding of Historical (Im)politeness: Introductory Notes”. Special issue ofJournal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1/2): 1–24. 10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.01bax
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.01bax [Google Scholar]
3. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
   1987 “Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different?” Journal of Pragmatics11 (2): 131–146. 10.1016/0378‑2166(87)90192‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90192-5 [Google Scholar]
4. Brick, David
   2016 “Bhoḥ As a Linguistic Marker of Brahmanical Identity”. Journal of the American Oriental Society136 (3): 567–590. 10.7817/jameroriesoci.136.3.0567
   https://doi.org/10.7817/jameroriesoci.136.3.0567 [Google Scholar]
5. Bronkhorst, Johannes
   2011 Buddhism in the Shadow of Brahmanism (Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section Two South Asia). (Volume241.) Leiden and Boston: Brill.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bronkhorst, Johannes
   2016 How the Brahmins Won: From Alexander to the Guptas. (Handbook of Oriental Studies. Section Two South Asia). (Volume301.) Leiden and Boston: Brill. 10.1163/9789004315518
   https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004315518 [Google Scholar]
7. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 (1978) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
8. Delbrück, Berthold
   1968 (1888) Altindische Syntax. (Syntaktische Forschungen, 5.) (‘Old Indian Syntax (Sintactical Researches, 5)’). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Deshpande, Madhav M.
   1993 “Loka: The Linguistic World o f Patanjali”. InMadhav M. Deshpande (ed.), Sanskrit & Prakrit: Sociolinguistic Issues, 17–32. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dickey, Eleanor
    2001 “Kypie, ΔΕΣΠΟΤΑ, Domine. Greek Politeness in the Roman Empire”. The Journal of Hellenic Studies1211: 1–11. 10.2307/631824
    https://doi.org/10.2307/631824 [Google Scholar]
11. Dobbins, K. Warton
    1968 “Two Gandhāran Reliquaries”. East and West18 (1/2): 151–162.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Findly, Ellison Banks
    1985 “Gārgī at the King’s Court: Women and Philosophic Innovation in Ancient India”. InEllison Banks Finley and Yvonne Yazbeck Haddad (eds), Women, Religion and Social Change, 37–58. Albany, New York: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gonda, Jan
    1975 A History of Indian Literature 1.1 Vedic Literature (Saṃhitās and Brāhmaṇas). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Handy, Christopher
    2016 Indian Buddhist Etiquette and the Emergence of Ascetic Civility. (PhD thesis.) Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster University. Accessed15 May 2022at: hdl.handle.net/11375/20471
    [Google Scholar]
15. Handy, Christopher
    2019 “Supercilious Monk at Kiṭāgiri: Early Indian Politeness and Buddhist Monastic Law”. Special Issue ofJournal of Historical Politeness20 (2): 244–262. 10.1075/jhp.00031.han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00031.han [Google Scholar]
16. Härtel, Herbert and Jeannine Auboyer
    1985 Propyläen Kunstgeschichte Band 21: Indien und Südostasien (‘Propylaeums of the History of Art [if literal] / Portal to the Art History, Volume 21: India and Southeast Asia’). Berlin: Propyläen Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hastings, Adi M.
    1995 “Review of L. van De Walle, Pragmatics and Classical Sanskrit: A Pilot Study in Linguistic Politeness (1993)”. Language71 (3): 658–659. 10.2307/416270
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416270 [Google Scholar]
18. Hastings, Adi M.
    2003 “Simplifying Sanskrit”. Pragmatics13 (4): 499–513. 10.1075/prag.13.4.03has
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.13.4.03has [Google Scholar]
19. Hettrich, Heinrich
    1988 Untersuchungen zur Hypotaxe im Vedischen (Untersuchungen zur indogermanischen Sprachen — und Kulturwissenschaft, neue Folge 4) (‘Research on Hypotaxis in Vedic (Research on Indo-European Linguistics and Cultural Studies, Series 4)’). Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110892123
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110892123 [Google Scholar]
20. Hock, Hans Henrich
    1982 “The Sanskrit Quotative: A Historical and Comparative Study”. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences12 (2): 39–85.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Houben, Jan E. M.
    1996 “Socio-Linguistic Attitudes Reflected in the Work of Bhartṛhari and Later Grammarians”. InJan E. M. Houben (ed.), Ideology and Status of Sanskrit: Contributions to the History of the Sanskrit Language, 157–193. Leiden, New York and Köln: Brill. 10.1163/9789004644779_010
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004644779_010 [Google Scholar]
22. Jamison, Stephanie
    1991 “The Syntax of Direct Speech in Vedic”. InHans Henrich Hock (ed.), Studies in Vedic Syntax: A Volume in Honor of the Centennial of Speijer’s Sanskrit Syntax, 95–112. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Jamison, Stephanie
    2007 The Rig Veda between Two Worlds. Le Ṛgveda entre deux mondes. Quatre conférences au Collège de France en mai 2004 (‘The Ṛgveda between Two Worlds: Four Lectures at the Collège de France in May 2004’). Paris: De Boccard.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Jamison, Stephanie and Joël P. Brereton
    2014 The Rigveda: The Earliest Religious Poetry of India. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kádár, Daniel Z. and Kim Ridealgh
    2019 “Exploring (Im)Politeness in Ancient Languages: An Introduction”. Special issue ofJournal of Historical Politeness20 (2): 169–185. 10.1075/jhp.00027.kad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00027.kad [Google Scholar]
26. Leech, Geoffrey
    2007 “Politeness: Is There an East-West Divide?” Journal of Politeness Research31: 167–206. 10.1515/PR.2007.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.009 [Google Scholar]
27. Lühr, Rosemarie
    2008 “Competitive Indo-European Syntax”. InGisella Ferraresi and Maria Goldbach (eds), Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction, 121–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.302.07luh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.302.07luh [Google Scholar]
28. Lühr, Rosemarie
    2012 “Komplementsätze im Indoiranischen” (‘Completive Sentences in Indo-Iranian’). Historische Sprachforschung1251: 227–241. 10.13109/hisp.2012.125.1.227
    https://doi.org/10.13109/hisp.2012.125.1.227 [Google Scholar]
29. Mayrhofer, Manfred
    1992 Etymologisches Wörterbuch des altindoarischen (‘Etymological Dictionary of Old Indo-Aryan’). (VolumeI1.) Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mayrhofer, Manfred
    1996 Etymologisches Wörterbuch des altindoarischen (‘Etymological Dictionary of Old Indo-Aryan’). (VolumeII1.) Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Oberlies, Thomas
    2001 Pāli: A Grammar of the Language of the Theravāda Tipiṭaka with Concordance to Pischel’s Grammatik der Prakrit-Sprachen (Indian philology and South Asian Studies). (Volume31.) Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110870930
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110870930 [Google Scholar]
32. Olivelle, Patrick
    1998 The Early Upaniṣads: Annotated Text and Translation. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195124354.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195124354.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
33. Olivelle, Patrick
    2000 Dharmasūtras. The Law Codes of Āpastamba, Gautama, Baudhāyana, and Vasiṣṭha. Annotated Text and Translation. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Olivelle, Patrick
    2005 Manu’s Code of Law: A Critical Edition and Translation of the Mānava-Dharmaśāstra. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Pan, Yuling and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2011 “Historical vs. Contemporary Chinese Linguistic Politeness”. Journal of Pragmatics43 (6): 1525–1539. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018 [Google Scholar]
36. Renou, Louis
    1956 Histoire de la langue Sanskrite (‘A History of the Sanskrit Language’). Paris and Lyon: IAC.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Ridealgh, Kim and Andreas H. Jucker
    2019 “Late Egyptian, Old English and the Re-Evaluation of Discernment Politeness in Remote Cultures”. Journal of Pragmatics1441: 56–66. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.012 [Google Scholar]
38. Ridealgh, Kim and Luis Unceta Gómez
    2020 “Potestas and the Language of Power: Conceptualising an Approach to Power and Discernment Politeness in Ancient Languages”. Journal of Pragmatics1701: 231–244. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.011 [Google Scholar]
39. Rubio Orecilla, Francisco Javier
    . In press. “Reported Speech in Vedic Sanskrit”. InStef Spronck and Daniela Elisabetta Casartelli eds Reported Speech: New fieldwork — and Corpus-based Studies, Studies in Diversity Linguistics. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Searle, John R.
    1975a “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts”. Language, Mind, and Knowledge. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science71: 344–369. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/185220
    [Google Scholar]
41. Searle, John R.
    1975b “Indirect Speech Acts”. InPeter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 59–82. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004368811_004
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_004 [Google Scholar]
42. Thieme, Paul
    1963 “Agastya und Lopāmudrā” (‘Agastya and Lopāmudrā’). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft1131: 69–79.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Unceta Gómez, Luis
    2009 La petición verbal en latín. Estudio léxico, semántico y pragmático (‘The Verbal Request in Latin. A Lexical, Semantic and Pragmatic Study’). Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Unceta Gómez, Luis and Łukasz Berger
    (eds) 2022 Politeness in Ancient Greek and Latin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009127271
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009127271 [Google Scholar]
45. Van de Walle, Lieve
    1993 Pragmatics and Classical Sanskrit: A Pilot Study in Linguistic Politeness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.28
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.28 [Google Scholar]
46. Viti, Carlotta
    2007 “Ibridismo nell’espressione del discorso riportato in area indiana” (‘Hybridity in the Expression of Reported Speech in the Indian Area’). Studi e Saggi Linguistici451: 117–139.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Wackernagel, Jakob and Albert Debrunner
    1975 (1930) Altindische Grammatik. Band III: Nominalflexion, Zahlwort, Pronomen (‘Old Indian Grammar. Vol. III: Nominal Inflection, Numerals, Pronouns’). Göttingen: VandenHoeck & Ruprecht.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Witzel, Michael
    1987 “On the Localisation of Vedic Texts and Schools (Materials on Vedic śakhas, 7)”. InGilbert Pollet (ed.), India and the Ancient World: History, Trade and Culture before A.D. 650. P.H.L. Eggermont Jubilee Volume, 173–213. Leuven: Departement Oriëntalistiek.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Witzel, Michael
    1995 “Early Indian History: Lingustic and Textual Parameters”. InGeorge Erdosy (ed.), The Indo-Aryans of Ancient South Asia: Language, Material Culture and Ethnicity, 85–125. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110816433.85
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110816433.85 [Google Scholar]
50. Witzel, Michael
    2011 “Gandhāra and the Formation of the Vedic and Zoroastrian Canons”. InJan Houben (ed.), Travaux du Symposium International Le Livre. La Roumanie. Europe. Troisième édition — 20 à 24 Septembre 2010. Vol. III: Études Euro — et Afro-Asiatiques (‘Proceedings of the International Symposium “The Book. Romania. Europe”. Third edition — September 20 to 24, 2010. Vol. III: European and Afro-Asian Studies’), 490–532. Bucarest: Bibliothèque de Bucarest.
    [Google Scholar]