Authorial voice in addressing the readership

References

1. Breese, Sidney
   1884 The Early History of Illinois, from its Discovery by the French, in 1673, until its Cession to Great Britain in 1763. Including the Narrative of Marquette’s Discovery of the Mississippi. Chicago: E.B. Myers & Company.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brodie, Sir Benjamin Collins
   1880 Ideal Chemistry: A Lecture. London: Macmillan and Co.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Faraday, Michael
   1861 A Course of Six Lectures on the Chemical History of a Candle: To which is Added a Lecture on Platinum. New York: Harper & Brothers, Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Griffin, John Joseph
   1834 Chemical Recreations. A Series of Amusing and Instructive Experiments which may be Performed with Ease, Safety, Success and Economy. To which is Added The Romance of Chemistry, an Inquiry into the Fallacies of the Prevailing Theory of Chemistry, with a New Theory and a New Nomenclature. Glasgow: Printed for R. Griffin and Co., London: Thomas Tegg & Son.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Justice, Elizabeth
   1739 A Voyage to Russia: Describing the Laws, Manners, and Cuſtoms, of that Great Empire, as Govern’d, at this Preſent, by that Excellent Princeſs, the Czarina. Shewing the Beauty of her Palace, the Grandeur of her Courtiers, the Forms of Building at Petersburgh, and other Places: with ſeveral Entertaining Adventures, that Happened in the Paſſage by Sea, and Land. York: printed by Thomas Gent.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Lucas, Charles
   1763 A Cursory Examination of the Methodical Synopsis of Mineral Waters, &c. and of the Argument of Sulphur or no Sulphur in Waters Discussed &c. By Which The Most Material of the Manifold Errors, Inconsistencies and Misinterpretaions of their Author are Fairly, though Briefly, Layed Open. In a Letter to the Celebrated John Rutty, M.D. Seriously recommended to the Perusal of the Reading Subscribers to the Doctor’s Works, By C. Lucas, M.D. Author of the Essay on Waters, Published in the Year 1756, and of the Analysis of Doctor Rutty’s Methodical Synopsis of Mineral Waters; Published in the Year 1757. Dublin: Printed for George and Alexander Ewing.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Marcet, Jane Haldimand
   1806 Conversations on Chemistry. In which Elements of that Science are Familiarly Explained and Illustrated by Experiments in Two Volumes. Vol II: On Compound Bodies. London: Printed for Longman, Hurst, Rees and Orme, Paternoster Row.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Packe, Christopher
   1708 Medela Chymica: or, an Account of the Vertues and Uses of a Select Number of Chymical Medicines Adapted to the Cure of the most Chronick and Rebelious Diseases To which is Subjoyned a Brief History of Cures Effected by Them. As also, An Essay upon the Acetum Acerrimum Philosophorum, or Vinegar of Antimony, with some Experiments made Therewith. London: Printed for John Lawrence at the Angel in the Poultrey.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Smyth, William
   1840 Lectures on Modern History, from the Irruption of the Northern Nations to the Close of the American Revolution. (In two volumes. Vol II.) Cambridge: J. & J.J. Deighton.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Stock, Joseph
    1800 A Narrative of what Passed at Killalla, in the County of Mayo, and the Parts Adjacent, During the French Invasion in the Summer of 1798. By an Eye Witness. Dublin: printed by T. Baylis.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Tyrrell, James
    1704 The General History of England both Ecclesiastical and Civil: Containing the Reign of Richard II, Taken from the Most Ancient Records, Manuscripts and Printed Historians, with an Appendix… (Vol III, second part.) Printed forW. Rogers. London.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ädel, Annelie
    2022 “Writer and Reader Visibility in Humanities Research Articles: Variation across Language, Regional Variety and Discipline”. English for Specific Purposes (January): –. 10.1016/j.esp.2021.09.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.09.001 [Google Scholar]
13. Atkinson, Dwight
    1999 Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Banks, David
    2010 The Development of Scientific Writing: Linguistic Features and Historical Context. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Barsaglini Castro, Anabella and Daniel Valcarce
    2020 “The Coruña Corpus Tool: Ten Years On”. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural: –.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Biber, Douglas
    1988 Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
17. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan
    1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bolinger, Dwight
    1979 “Pronouns in Discourse”. InTalmy Givón (ed.), Discourse and Syntax, –. Leiden: E.J. Brill. 10.1163/9789004368897_013
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_013 [Google Scholar]
19. Bondi, Marina
    2014 “Changing Voices: Authorial Voice in Abstracts.” InMarina Bondi and Rosa Lorés Sanz (eds), Abstracts in Academic Discourse: Variation and Change, –. Peter Lang: Berlin. 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0701‑2/23
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0701-2/23 [Google Scholar]
20. Bondi, Marina
    2018 “Dialogicity in Written Language Use: Variation across Expert Action Games”. Discourse Studies: –. 10.1075/ds.31.08bon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.08bon [Google Scholar]
21. Chamonikolasová, Jana
    1991 “Pronouns, Functional Sentence Perspective and Intonation”. Brno Studies in English: –.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Crespo, Begoña
    2019 “How Intimate Was the Tone of Female History Writing in the Modern Period? Evidence from the Corpus of History English Texts”. InIsabel Moskowich, Begoña Crespo, Luis Puente-Castelo and Leida Maria Monaco (eds), Writing History in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.225.10cre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.225.10cre [Google Scholar]
23. Crespo, Begoña and Isabel Moskowich
    2020 “Astronomy, Philosophy, Life Sciences and History Texts: Setting the Scene for the Study of Modern Scientific Writing”. English Studies (): –. 10.1080/0013838X.2020.1798635
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2020.1798635 [Google Scholar]
24. Duszak, Anna
    1997 “Cross-Cultural Academic Communication: A Discourse Community View”. InAnna Duszak (ed.), Culture and Styles of Academic Discourse, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110821048.11
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110821048.11 [Google Scholar]
25. Flowerdew, John and Simon Ho Wang
    2015 “Identity in Academic Discourse”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics: –. 10.1017/S026719051400021X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719051400021X [Google Scholar]
26. Flynn, Elizabeth A.
    1988 “Composing as a Woman”. College Composition and Communication (): –. 10.58680/ccc198811146
    https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198811146 [Google Scholar]
27. Francis, Becky, Jocelyn Robson and Barbara Read
    2001 “An Analysis of Undergraduate Writing Styles in the Context of Gender and Achievement”. Studies in Higher Education (): –. 10.1080/03075070120076282
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076282 [Google Scholar]
28. Gotti, M.
    2010 “A New Genre for a Specialized Community: The Rise of the Experimental Essay”. InHeidrun Dorgeloh and Anja Wanner (eds), Syntactic Variation and Genre, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110226485.1.85
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226485.1.85 [Google Scholar]
29. Gramley, Stephan and Kurt-Michael Patzold
    1992 A Survey of Modern English. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Gross, Alan G., Joseph E. Harmon and Michael Reidy
    2002 Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the Seventeenth Century to the Present. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195134544.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195134544.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
31. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2004 The Language of Science. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Halliday, Michael A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976 Cohesion in English. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Harmon, Joseph E. and Alan G. Gross
    2010 The Craft of Scientific Communication. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226316635.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226316635.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
34. Harwood, Nigel
    2005 “We Do Not Seem to Have a Theory... The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill this Gap: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing”. Applied Linguistics (): –. 10.1093/applin/ami012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012 [Google Scholar]
35. Hoey, Michael
    1991 Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Huizinga, Johan
    1984 Men and Ideas: History, the Middle Ages, the Renaissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400858088
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400858088 [Google Scholar]
37. Hyland, Ken
    1996 “Writing without Conviction: Hedging in Science Research Articles”. Applied Linguistics (): –. 10.1093/applin/17.4.433
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.4.433 [Google Scholar]
38. Hyland, Ken
    1998 Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.54
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.54 [Google Scholar]
39. Hyland, Ken
    1999 “Disciplinary Discourses: Writer Stance in Research Articles”. InChristopher N. Candlin and Ken Hyland (eds), Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices, –. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hyland, Ken
    2000 Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interaction in Academic Writing. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Hyland, Ken
    2001 “Humble Servants of the Discipline? Self-Mention in Research Articles”. English for Specific Purposes (): –. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00012‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0 [Google Scholar]
42. Hyland, Ken
    2005 “Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse”. Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445605050365
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365 [Google Scholar]
43. Hyland, K.
    2008 “Genre and Academic Writing in the Disciplines”. Language Teaching (): –. 10.1017/S0261444808005235
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005235 [Google Scholar]
44. Hyland, Ken
    2015 “Genre, Discipline and Identity”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes (): –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005 [Google Scholar]
45. Hyland, Ken and Feng Jiang
    2016 “Change of Attitude? A Diachronic Study of Stance”. Written Communication (): –. 10.1177/0741088316650399
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316650399 [Google Scholar]
46. Ivanič, Roz
    1998 Writing and Identity: The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/swll.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/swll.5 [Google Scholar]
47. Ivanič, Roz and David Camps
    2001 “I am How I Sound: Voice as Self-Representation in L2 Writing’. Journal of Second Language Writing (): –. 10.1016/S1060‑3743(01)00034‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00034-0 [Google Scholar]
48. Lynch, Catherine and Mary Strauss-Noll
    1987 “Mauve Washers: Sex Differences in Freshman Writing”. English Journal (): –. 10.2307/818322
    https://doi.org/10.2307/818322 [Google Scholar]
49. Martin, James R. and Peter R. R. White
    2005 “Engagement and Graduation: Alignment, Solidarity and the Construed Reader”. InJames R. Martin and Peter R. R. White (eds), The Language of Evaluation, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910_3
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910_3 [Google Scholar]
50. Matsuda, Paul Kei and Christine M. Tardy
    2007 “Voice in Academic Writing: The Rhetorical Construction of Author Identity in Blind Manuscript Review”. English for Specific Purposes (): –. 10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.10.001 [Google Scholar]
51. Moskowich, Isabel
    2013 “Eighteenth-Century Female Authors: Women and Science in the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing”. Australian Journal of Linguistics (): –. 10.1080/07268602.2013.857570
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2013.857570 [Google Scholar]
52. Moskowich, Isabel
    2019 “An Introduction to CHET, the Corpus of History English Texts”. InIsabel Moskowich, Begoña Crespo, Luis Puente-Castelo and Leida Maria Monaco (eds) Writing History in Late Modern English: Explorations of the Coruña Corpus, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.225.03mos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.225.03mos [Google Scholar]
53. Moskowich, Isabel
    2020 “Personal Pronouns in CHET and CECheT: Authorial Presence and other Nuances Revealed”. Studies about Languages: –. 10.5755/j01.sal.1.37.24809
    https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.1.37.24809 [Google Scholar]
54. Moskowich, Isabel, Inés Lareo, Paula Lojo-Sandino and Estefanía Sánchez-Barreiro
    (compilers) 2019 Corpus of History English Texts. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña. https://ruc.udc.es/dspace/handle/2183/21849
    [Google Scholar]
55. Moskowich, Isabel, Luis Puente-Castelo and Leida Maria Monaco
    (compilers) 2022 Corpus of English Chemistry Texts. A Coruña: Universidade da Coruña. 10.17979/spudc.9788497498388
    https://doi.org/10.17979/spudc.9788497498388 [Google Scholar]
56. Mühlhäusler, Peter and Rom Harré
    1990 Pronouns and People: The Linguistic Construction of Social and Personal Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Narayan, Kirin
    2012 Alive in the Writing: Crafting Ethnography in the Company of Chekhov. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226567921.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226567921.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
58. Perloff, Richard M.
    2003 The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the 21st Century. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Porter, Theodore and Dorothy Ross
    2003 “Introduction, Writing the History of Social Science”. InDavid C. Lindberg, Roy Porter, Ronald L. Numbers, Theodore M. Porter and Dorothy Ross (eds), The Cambridge History of Science, –. (Volume 7: The Modern Social Sciences.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CHOL9780521594424.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521594424.002 [Google Scholar]
60. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Robson, Jocelyn, Becky Francis and Barbara Read
    2002 “Writers of Passage: Stylistic Features of Male and Female Undergraduate History Essays”. Journal of Further and Higher Education (): –. 10.1080/0309877022000021757
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877022000021757 [Google Scholar]
62. Rubin, Donald L. and Kathryn Greene
    1992 “Gender-Typical Style in Written Language”. Research in the Teaching of English (): –. 10.58680/rte199215447
    https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199215447 [Google Scholar]
63. Sanderson, Tamsin
    2008 Corpus, Culture, Discourse. Tübingen, Germany: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Seoane, Elena
    2016 “Authorial Presence in Late Modern English Philosophical Writing: Evidence from CEPhiT.” InIsabel Moskowich-Spiegel, Gonzalo Camiña, Inés Lareo and Begoña Crespo (ed.), ‘The Conditioned and the Unconditioned’: Late Modern English Texts on Philosophy, –. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/z.198.07seo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.198.07seo [Google Scholar]
65. Spangenburg, Ray and Diane K. Moser
    1994 The History of Science in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Facts On File.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Suau-Jiménez, Francisca
    2020 “Closeness and Distance through the Agentive Authorial Voice: Construing Credibility in Promotional Discourse” IJES (): –. 10.6018/ijes.416301
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.416301 [Google Scholar]
67. Tse, Polly and Ken Hyland
    2008 “‘Robot Kung Fu’: Gender and Professional Identity in Biology and Philosophy Reviews”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.002 [Google Scholar]
68. Wales, Katie
    2003 “Second Person Pronouns in Contemporary English: The End of a Story or Just the Beginning?” InFéliz Blanco and José Amenós (eds), Pronombres de segunda persona y formas de tratamiento en las lenguas de Europa (‘Second Person Pronouns and Forms of Address in the Languages of Europe’). Accessed21 March 2019at: https://cvc.cervantes.es/lengua/coloquio_paris/ponencias/pdf/cvc_wales.pdf
    [Google Scholar]