1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Historical Pragmatics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Chinese “face”-related expressions in Peking and Teochew Opera scripts
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents a historical contrastive pragmatic study of the use of Chinese “face”-related expressions in Peking and Teochew Opera scripts. The rationale behind this investigation is that contemporary Mandarin and the Minnan Dialect operate with very different inventories of “face”-related expressions, and it is worth considering whether this difference also applies to historical language use, and, if so, how. Studying this matter is particularly relevant for historical pragmatic research because “face”-related expressions have been under-represented in the field. Our study is based on a corpus of nineteen Peking Opera scripts and a comparable corpus of nineteen Teochew Opera scripts, dating from the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The results of our analysis show that the historical Mandarin corpus operates with a duality of the “face”-related expressions and , in a similar way to modern Mandarin, even though we also found differences between the ways in which these expressions were used in former times and at present. Yet such differences are eclipsed if we contrast historical Mandarin with the Teochew scripts where we found a very different “face” duality than in Mandarin, namely a duality of and . This duality also differs from what one can witness in present-day Minnan.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.23020.che
2024-02-29
2024-12-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jhp.23020.che
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/jhp.23020.che/jhp.23020.che.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.23020.che&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bargiela-Chiappini, Francesca
    2003 “Face and Politeness: New (Insights) for Old (Concepts)”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00173‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00173-X [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1978 “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena”. InEsther N. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 1987 Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chan, Angela, Stephanie Schnurr and Olga Zayts
    2018 “Exploring Face, Identity and Relationship Management in Disagreements in Business Meetings in Hong Kong”. Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0036
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0036 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang, Wei-Lin Melody and Michael Haugh
    2011 “Strategic Embarrassment and Face Threatening in Business Interactions”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.009 [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, Jiejun, Dániel Z. Kádár and Juliane House
    2022 “‘Face’ Expressions in the Minnan Dialect of Chinese”. Language Sciences (2022): . 10.1016/j.langsci.2022.101510
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2022.101510 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Li-Hsin, Jennifer Pasion Loverio and Ching-Cheng Shen
    2021 “The Role of Face (mien-tzu) in Chinese Tourists’ Destination Choice and Behaviors”. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management (): –. 10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.08.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, Rong
    2001 “Self-Politeness: A Proposal”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00124‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00124-1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen
    2011 “Nineteenth-Century English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of the Individual Self”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.03cul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.03cul [Google Scholar]
  10. Goffman, Erving
    1955 “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction”. Psychiatry (): –. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gu, Yueguo
    1990 “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90082‑O
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082-O [Google Scholar]
  12. Haugh, Michael and Carl Hinze
    2003 “A Metalinguistic Approach to Deconstructing the Concepts of ‘Face’ and ‘Politeness’ in Chinese, English and Japanese”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(03)00049‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00049-3 [Google Scholar]
  13. He, Yun
    2012 “Different Generations, Different Face? A Discursive Approach to Naturally Occurring Compliment Responses in Chinese”. Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2012‑0003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2012-0003 [Google Scholar]
  14. He, Lin, Rong Chen and Ming Dong
    2023 “Humorous Mockery: How to Amuse and Be Polite at the Same Time”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.04.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.04.007 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hinze, Carl
    2005 “The Importance of Chinese miàn and liǎn as Emic Categories”. InFrancesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Maurizio Gotti (eds), Asian Business Discourse, –. Berlin: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 2012 “Chinese Politeness is Not About ‘Face’: Evidence from the Business World”. Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2012‑0002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2012-0002 [Google Scholar]
  17. House, Juliane and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2021 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954587
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954587 [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu, Hsien Chin
    1944 “The Chinese Concepts of ‘Face’”. American Anthropologist (): –. Available online at: www.jstor.org/stable/662926. 10.1525/aa.1944.46.1.02a00040
     https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1944.46.1.02a00040 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker
    1995 “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics”. InAndreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.04jac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.04jac [Google Scholar]
  20. Jin, Yaoji 金耀基
    2006 “‘Mian’, ‘chi’ yu Zhongguoren xingwei zhi fenxi‘面’、‘耻’与中国人行为之分析” [‘An Analysis of “Mian”, “Shame” and the Behaviour of Chinese People’]. Zhongguo shehui xinlixue pinglun中国社会心理学评论 [‘Chinese Social Psychological Review’] (): –. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?FileName=GSXL200601004&DbName=CCJDTEMP
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jucker, Andreas
    2011 “Positive and Negative Face as Descriptive Categories in the History of English”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.08juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.08juc [Google Scholar]
  22. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2019 “Politeness and Impoliteness in Chinese Discourse”. InChris Shei (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis Routledge, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315213705‑14
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213705-14 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kádár, Dániel Z. and Yuling Pan
    2012 “Chinese ‘Face’ and Im/Politeness: An Introduction”. Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2012‑0001
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2012-0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. King, Ambrose Yeo-chi and John T. Myers
    1977 “Shame as an Incomplete Conception of Chinese Culture: A Study of Face”. Social Research Centre, Occasional Paper No. 63. The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Available online at: www.hkiaps.cuhk.edu.hk/eng/pdf/src/SRC_OP63.pdf
  25. Kinnison, Li Qing
    2017 “Power, Integrity, and Mask – An Attempt to Disentangle the Chinese Face Concept”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.015
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.015 [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, Hui
    2020 “Towards an Emic Understanding of Mianzi Giving in the Chinese Context”. Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2017‑0052
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0052 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin, Yu-tang
    1936/2010 “Wu guo yu wu min吾国与吾民” [‘My Country and My People’]. Nanjing: Jiangsu wenyi chubanshe.
  28. Lu, Xun
    1934 “Shuo “mianzi” 说“面子” [‘On face’]. InLu Xun (ed.), Qiejie ting zawen且介亭杂文 [‘Essays of Qie Jie Ting’], –. Beijing: Renmin wenxue chubanshe.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Mao, Luming Robert
    1994 “Beyond Politeness Theory: ‘Face’ Revisited and Renewed”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90025‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90025-6 [Google Scholar]
  30. Meurman-Solin, Anneli
    2012 “Historical Dialectology: Space as a Variable in the Reconstruction of Regional Dialects”. InJuan Manuel Hernández-Campoy and Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics, –. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118257227.ch25
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118257227.ch25 [Google Scholar]
  31. O’Driscoll, Jim
    2017 “Face and (Im)Politeness”. InJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)Politeness, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_5
     https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_5 [Google Scholar]
  32. Pan, Yuling
    2011 “Cantonese Politeness in the Interviewing Setting”. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication (): –. 10.1075/japc.21.1.02pan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/japc.21.1.02pan [Google Scholar]
  33. Pan, Yuling and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2011 Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Qi, Xiaoying
    2011 “Face: A Chinese Concept in a Global Sociology”. Journal of Sociology (): –. 10.1177/1440783311407692
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783311407692 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ruhi, Şükriye and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2012 “‘Face’ across Historical Cultures: A Comparative Study of Turkish and Chinese”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.02ruh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.02ruh [Google Scholar]
  36. St. André, James
    2013 “How the Chinese Lost ‘Face’”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.015
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.015 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sifianou, Maria
    2011 “On the Concept of Face and Politeness”. InFrancesca Bargiela-Chiappini and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), Politeness across Cultures, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230305939_3
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305939_3 [Google Scholar]
  38. Su, Hsi-Yao
    2009 “Code-Switching in Managing a Face-Threatening Communicative Task: Footing and Ambiguity in Conversational Interaction in Taiwan”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.007 [Google Scholar]
  39. Su, Hsi-Yao and Wan-Hsin Lee
    2022 “Metadiscourse of Impoliteness, Language Ideology, and Identity: Offense-Taking as Social Action”. Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2019‑0013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2019-0013 [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, Jiayi and Helen Spencer-Oatey
    2015 “The Gains and Losses of Face in Ongoing Intercultural Interaction: A Case Study of Chinese Participant Perspectives”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  41. Yin, Xiaojie 殷晓杰
    2009 “‘Mian’ yu ‘lian’ de lishi jingzheng yu gongshi fenbu “面”与“脸”的历时竞争与共时分佈” [‘The Diachronic Competition and Synchronic Distributing between “Mian (面)” and “Lian (脸)”’]. Hanyushi Xuebao汉语史学报 (): –. CNKI:SUN:HYSB.0.2009‑00‑021
     https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:HYSB.0.2009-00-021 [Google Scholar]
  42. Yu, Ning
    2001 “What Does Our Face Mean to Is?” Pragmatics and Cognition (): –. 10.1075/pc.9.1.02yu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.9.1.02yu [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang, Ping
    2021 “From Silence to Positive Self-presentation: Gradual Emergence of Negative Face Wants in Kǒngguīzú’s (恐归族) Intergenerational Conflicts with Their Family Elders”. Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/pr‑2018‑0009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2018-0009 [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhou, Ling and Shao-jie Zhang
    2017 “How Face as a System of Value-Constructs Operates through the Interplay of Mianzi and Lian in Chinese: A Corpus-based Study”. Language Sciences: –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.08.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhu, Ziyuan 祝子媛
    2013 “‘Lian’ yu ‘mian’ de ciyi yanbian yanjiu “脸”与“面”的词义演变研究” [“Research on the Semantic Change of ‘Lian’ and ‘Mian’”]. Nanning Zhiye Jishu Xueyuan Xuebao南宁职业技术学院学报 (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.23020.che
Loading
Chinese “face”-related expressions in Peking and Teochew Opera scripts
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.23020.che
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.23020.che
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.23020.che
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: historical contrastive analysis ; Minnan ; Peking Opera ; “face”-related expressions ; Mandarin ; Teochew Opera

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error