1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Historical Pragmatics
  4. Volume 26, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 26, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1566-5852
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper offers a diachronic analysis focussing on the different uses and forms that the expression acquired throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. It makes an original contribution to the study of historical pragmatics by drawing on data traditionally examined in the field of linguistic landscape studies and produced during a global health crisis, resulting in an innovative, real-time study of pragmatic change in progress.

Drawing on a corpus of 3,032 public signs photographed in London between March 2020 and December 2021, the paper shows how the expression was used as a wish and a parting formula in the early stages of the pandemic, and then reverted to a directive function on signs implementing containment measures, illustrating a trend opposed to that typically found in historical pragmatics. It also discusses the variability characterising the data, and the ambiguity of the expressions that are analysed, typical of ongoing pragmatic change.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.23029.ogi
2024-12-03
2026-07-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jhp.23029.ogi
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aijmer, Karin
    1997 “I think — an English Modal Particle”. InToril Swan and Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds), Modality in Germanic Languages: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, 1–47. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110889932.1
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889932.1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Angermeyer, Philipp Sebastian
    2017 “Controlling Roma Refugees with ‘Google-Hungarian: Indexing Deviance, Contempt, and Belonging in Toronto’s Linguistic Landscape”. Language in Society46 (2): 159–183. 10.1017/S0047404516001020
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516001020 [Google Scholar]
  3. Archer, Dawn
    2010 “Speech Acts”. InAndreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 379–417. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214284.6.379
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284.6.379 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnovick, Leslie K.
    1999 Diachronic Pragmatics: Seven Case Studies in English Illocutionary Development. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.68
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.68 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bach, Kent and Robert M. Harnish
    1979 Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Backhaus, Peter
    2005 “Signs of Multilingualism in Tokyo: A Diachronic Look at the Linguistic Landscape”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language175–1761: 103–121. 10.1515/ijsl.2005.2005.175‑176.103
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2005.2005.175-176.103 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bella, Spyridoula and Eva Ogiermann
    2022 “Accounts as Acts of Identity: Justifying Business Closures on Covid-19 Public Signs in Athens and London”. Pragmatics32 (4): 620–647. 10.1075/prag.21033.bel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21033.bel [Google Scholar]
  8. 2024 “Pragmatics in the Service of Marketing: The Case of COVID-19 Semi-commercial Public Signs”. Journal of Pragmatics2211: 32–53. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.12.011 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blommaert, Jan
    2013 Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783090419
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090419 [Google Scholar]
  10. Blommaert, Jan and Ico Maly
    2016 “Ethnographic Linguistic Landscape Analysis and Social Change”. InKarel Arnaut, Jan Blommaert, Ben Rampton and Massimiliano Spotti (eds), Language and Superdiversity, 191–211. New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. British National Corpus
    British National Corpus 2014 Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Available online at: www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/news.xml?ID=BNC2014
  12. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  13. Culpeper, Jonathan and Elena Semino
    2000 “Constructing Witches and Spells: Speech Acts and Activity Types in Early Modern England”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics1 (1): 97–116. 10.1075/jhp.1.1.08cul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.08cul [Google Scholar]
  14. Culpeper, Jonathan and Dawn Archer
    2008 “Requests and Directness in Early Modern English Trial Proceedings and Play Texts, 1640–1760”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 45–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.05cul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.05cul [Google Scholar]
  15. Culpeper, Jonathan and Jane Demmen
    2011 “Nineteenth-Century English Politeness: Negative Politeness, Conventional Indirect Requests and the Rise of the Individual Self”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics12 (1–2): 49–81. 10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.03cul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.03cul [Google Scholar]
  16. Department of Health and Social Care
    Department of Health and Social Care 2020 “Face Coverings Mandatory in Shops, Supermarkets, Shopping Centres and Enclosed Transport Hubs from Friday”. Published23 July 2020. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/face-coverings-mandatory-in-shops-supermarkets-shopping-centres-and-enclosed-transport-hubs-from-friday
  17. Eley, Louise
    2019 Linguistic Landscape: An Interactional Perspective. (Unpublished PhD thesis.) London: King’s College London.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ellis, Brett
    2020 “Why is it Only Shoppers Have to Wear Masks in Supermarkets?” Published6 September 2020. Accessed25 September 2023at: https://www.echo-news.co.uk/news/18701373.shoppers-wear-masks-supermarkets/
  19. Ferenčík, Milan
    2018 “Im/politeness on the Move: A Study of Regulatory Discourse Practices in Slovakia’s Centre of Tourism”. Journal of Pragmatics1341: 183–198. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.011 [Google Scholar]
  20. Feyaerts, Kurt and Geertrui Heyvaert
    2021 “Welcome Back, We’ve Missed You! Humanized Business Communication in Shop Window Messages during Early 2020-Lockdown”. Languages6 (2): 1–26. 10.3390/languages6020104
     https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6020104 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fries, Udo
    1998 “Dialogue in Instructional Texts”. InRaimund Borgmeier, Herbert Grabes and Andreas Jucker (eds), Proceedings of the Anglistentag 1997, Giessen, 85–96. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Gorter, Durk
    2013 “Linguistic Landscapes in a Multilingual World”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics331: 190–212. 10.1017/S0267190513000020
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190513000020 [Google Scholar]
  23. Han, Yanmei
    2021 “Situated Impoliteness Revisited: Blunt Anti-Epidemic Slogans and Conflicting Comments during the Coronavirus Outbreak in China”. Journal of Pragmatics1781: 31–42. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hickey, Raymond
    2010 “Language Change”. InMirjam Fried, Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren (eds), Variation and Change. Pragmatic Perspectives, 171–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.6.13hic
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.6.13hic [Google Scholar]
  25. Huebner, Thom
    2009 “A Framework for the Linguistic Analysis of Linguistic Landscapes”. InElana Shohamy and Durk Gorter (eds), Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery, 70–87. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Isosävi, Johanna
    2023 “Finnish and French Public Signs from Commercial Premises during the Covid-19 Pandemic”. Pragmatics and Society14 (2): 301–328. 10.1075/ps.22012.iso
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22012.iso [Google Scholar]
  27. Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas Jucker
    1995 “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics”. InAndreas Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 3–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.04jac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.04jac [Google Scholar]
  28. Jaworski, Adam and Crispin Thurlow
    2010 “Introducing Linguistic Landscape”. InAdam Jaworski and Crispin Thurlow (eds), Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space, 1–40. London: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Jia, Mian and Yi Zhao
    2023 “Fear Appeals in Chinese Public Signs of COVID-19 Prevention in Local Communities”. Pragmatics and Society14 (2): 281–305. 10.1075/ps.22009.jia
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22009.jia [Google Scholar]
  30. Jucker, Andreas
    2008 “Historical Pragmatics”. Language and Linguistics Compass2 (5): 894–906. 10.1111/j.1749‑818X.2008.00087.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00087.x [Google Scholar]
  31. 2019 “Speech Act Attenuation in the History of English: The Case of Apologies”. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics4 (1): 1–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Jucker, Andreas and Irma Taavitsainen
    2008 “Apologies in the History of English: Routinized and Lexicalized Expressions of Responsibility and Regret”. InAndreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 229–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.12juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.12juc [Google Scholar]
  33. 2013 English Historical Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748644704
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748644704 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jucker, Andreas, Gerold Schneider, Irma Taavitsainen and Barb Breustedt
    2008 “Fishing for Compliments: Precision and Recall in Corpus-linguistic Compliment Research”. InAndreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 273–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.15juc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.15juc [Google Scholar]
  35. Kasanga, Luanga A.
    2010 “Streetwise English and French Advertising in Multilingual DR Congo: Symbolism, Modernity, and Cosmopolitan Identity”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language2061: 181–205. 10.1515/ijsl.2010.053
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2010.053 [Google Scholar]
  36. Klosa-Kückelhaus, Annette
    (ed.) 2021 Sprache in der Coronakrise. Dynamischer Wandel in Lexikon und Kommunikation (‘Language in the Corona Crisis. Dynamic Change in the Lexicon and in Communication’). Mannheim: Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche Sprache.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kohnen, Thomas
    2002 “Towards a History of English Directives”. InAndreas Fischer, Gunnel Tottie and Hans Martin Lehmann (eds), Text Types and Corpora: Studies in Honour of Udo Fries, 165–175. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 2008 “Directives in Old English: Beyond Politeness?” InAndreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 27–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.04koh [Google Scholar]
  39. Labov, William
    1994 Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors. (Volume11.) Oxford: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Lally, Kate
    2023 “‘Stay Safe’ Warning as Rare Disease is on the Rise in the UK”. Published22 April 2023. Accessed25 September 2023at: https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/uk-world-news/stay-safe-warning-rare-disease-26751648
  41. Landry, Rodrigue and Richard Y. Bourhis
    1997 “Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality: An Empirical Study”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology16 (1): 23–49. 10.1177/0261927X970161002
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X970161002 [Google Scholar]
  42. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983 Principles of Pragmatics. New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Leeman, Jennifer and Gabriella Modan
    2009 “Commodified Language in Chinatown: A Contextualized Approach to Linguistic Landscape”. Journal of Sociolinguistics13 (3): 332–362. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2009.00409.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00409.x [Google Scholar]
  44. Lou, Jia
    2007 “Revitalizing Chinatown into a Heterotopia: A Geosemiotic Analysis of Shop Signs in Washington, D.C.’s Chinatown”. Space and Culture10 (2): 170–194. 10.1177/1206331206298547
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206298547 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2017 “Linguistic Landscape and Ethnographic Fieldwork”. InChristine Mallinson, Becky Childs and Gerard Van Herk (eds), Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications, 94–98. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315535258‑20
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315535258-20 [Google Scholar]
  46. Ogiermann, Eva and Spyridoula Bella
    2021 “On the Dual Role of Expressive Speech Acts: Relational Work on Signs Announcing Closures During the Covid-19 Pandemic”. Journal of Pragmatics1841: 1–17. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.020
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.07.020 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2023 “Disseminating Risk Communication: Advice Offered on Non-official Public Signage during the Covid-19 Pandemic”. Pragmatics and Society14 (2): 329–352. 10.1075/ps.22016.ogi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22016.ogi [Google Scholar]
  48. Papen, Uta
    2012 “Commercial Discourses, Gentrification and Citizen’s Protest: The Linguistic Landscape of Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin”. Journal of Sociolinguistics16 (1): 56–80. 10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2011.00518.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00518.x [Google Scholar]
  49. Pavlenko, Aneta
    2010 “Linguistic Landscape of Kyiv, Ukraine: A Diachronic Study”. InElana Shohamy, Eliezer Ben-Rafael and Monica Barni (eds), Linguistic Landscape in the City, 133–150. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692993‑010
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692993-010 [Google Scholar]
  50. Prokop, Izabela
    2010 Aspekty Analizy Pragmalingwistycznej (‘Aspects of Pragmalinguistic Analysis’). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Ronan, Patricia
    2015 “Categorizing Expressive Speech Acts in the Pragmatically Annotated SPICE Ireland Corpus”. ICAME Journal391: 25–45. 10.1515/icame‑2015‑0002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/icame-2015-0002 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sankoff, Gillian
    2005 “Age: Apparent Time and Real Time”. InKeith Brown (ed.), Elsevier Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 110–116. (Volume91.) Oxford: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Searle, John
    1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
  54. 1976 “Classification of Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society5 (1): 1–24. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  55. Scollon, Ron and Suzie Wong Scollon
    2003 Discourses in Place: Language in the Material World. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203422724
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203422724 [Google Scholar]
  56. Shohamy, Elana
    2019 “Linguistic Landscape After a Decade: An Overview of Themes, Debates and Future Directions”. InMartin Pütz and Neele-Frederike Mundt (eds), Expanding the Linguistic Landscape: Linguistic Diversity, Multimodality and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource, 25–37. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Spolsky, Bernard and Robert Cooper
    1991 The Languages of Jerusalem. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198239086.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198239086.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Starks, Donna and Nhan Phan
    2021 “An Exploration of Stasis and Change: A Park in the Old Quarter Hanoi as a Palimpsest”. Social Semiotics31 (4): 550–569. 10.1080/10350330.2019.1647818
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1647818 [Google Scholar]
  59. Svennevig, Jan
    2021 “How to do Things with Signs: The Formulation of Directives on Signs in Public Spaces”. Journal of Pragmatics1751: 165–183. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.016 [Google Scholar]
  60. Tantucci, Vittorio, Jonathan Culpeper and Matteo Di Cristofaro
    2018 “Dynamic Resonance and Social Reciprocity in Language Change: The Case of Good Morrow”. Language Sciences681: 6–21. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.09.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  61. Taavitsainen, Irma
    2018 “Historical Corpus Pragmatics” InAndreas Jucker, Klaus Schneider and Wolfram Bublitz (eds), Methods in Pragmatics, 527–553. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110424928‑021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-021 [Google Scholar]
  62. Taavitsainen, Irma and Susam Fitzmaurice
    2007 “Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It”. InSusan Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 11–36. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197822.11
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197822.11 [Google Scholar]
  63. Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas Jucker
    2010 “Trends and Developments in Historical Pragmatics”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, 3–30. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214284.1.3
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  64. Tragel, Ilona and Aimi Pikksaar
    2023 “Authority and Solidarity on the Estonian COVID-19 Signs: In Line with the Government’s Guidelines, We Ask You to Wear a Mask”. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence51: online. 10.3389/frai.2022.1000188
     https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.1000188 [Google Scholar]
  65. Vallentin, Rita
    2023 “Pragmatic Functions of Humor in Berlin’s Directive Covid-19 Signs”. Pragmatics and Society14 (2): 236–256. 10.1075/ps.22010.val
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.22010.val [Google Scholar]
  66. Vandenbroucke, Mieke
    2018 “Multilingualism, Urban Change and Gentrification in the Landscape of a Brussels Neighbourhood”. Multilingua37 (1): 25–52. 10.1515/multi‑2015‑0103
     https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2015-0103 [Google Scholar]
  67. Walker, Peter
    2021 “Keep Life Moving: The Latest in a Long Line of UK Covid Mantras”. Published21 July 2021. Accessed5 May 2024at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/21/keep-life-moving-the-latest-in-a-long-line-of-uk-covid-mantras#:~:text=Stay%20home%2C%20protect%20the%20NHS%2C%20save%20lives%20(again)
  68. Wei, Jilan
    2023 “Please Wear a Face Mask: The Role of British Business in Regulating Mask-Wearing through Signage”. Journal of Pragmatics2161: 6–20. 10.1016/j.pragma.2023.07.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.07.009 [Google Scholar]
  69. Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov and Marvin Herzog
    1968 “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change”. InWinfred Lehmann and Yakov Malkiel (eds), Directions for Historical Linguistics, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Woods, Rebecca
    2016 “Modelling the Syntax–Discourse Interface. A Syntactic Analysis of Please”. InProceedings of ConSOLE XXIII, 360–382. Leiden. 7–9 January 2015. Leiden: Leiden University.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. World Health Organization
    World Health Organization 2022 “A Healthy Return: Investment Case for a Sustainably Financed WHO”. Geneva: World Health Organization.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Yochim, Ashley
    2020 “The Changing Landscape of Unofficial Signage in a US Refugee Relocation City”. Linguistic Landscape6 (3): 237–264. 10.1075/ll.19021.yoc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.19021.yoc [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.23029.ogi
Loading
“Stay safe!” — A wish, advice, or an order?
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 26, 321 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.23029.ogi
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.23029.ogi
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.23029.ogi
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Covid-19 pandemic; language variability and change; linguistic landscapes; public signs

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error