Review of Brinton (2023): Pragmatics in the History of English

References

1. Archer, Dawn and Jonathan Culpeper
   2009 “Identifying Key Sociophilological Usage in Plays and Trial Proceedings (1640–1760): An Empirical Approach via Corpus Annotation”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics10 (2): 286–309. 10.1075/jhp.10.2.07arc
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.10.2.07arc [Google Scholar]
2. Brinton, Laurel J.
   1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: De Gruyer Mouton. 10.1515/9783110907582
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110907582 [Google Scholar]
3. Brinton, Laurel J.
   2008 The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511551789
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551789 [Google Scholar]
4. Brinton, Laurel J.
   (ed.) 2017a English Historical Linguistics: Approaches and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316286562
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316286562 [Google Scholar]
5. Brinton, Laurel J.
   2017b The Evolution of Pragmatic Markers in English: Pathways of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316416013
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316416013 [Google Scholar]
6. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
7. Claridge, Claudia
   2012 “Linguistic Levels: Styles, Registers, Genres, Text Types”. InAlexander Bergs and Laurel J. Brinton (eds), Historical Linguistics of English, 237–253. (Volume11.) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110251593.237
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110251593.237 [Google Scholar]
8. Claridge, Claudia
   2017 “Discourse-based Approaches”. InLaurel J. Brinton (ed.), English Historical Linguistics: Approaches and Perspectives, 185–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316286562.008
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316286562.008 [Google Scholar]
9. Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker
   1995 “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics”. InAndreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.04jac
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.04jac [Google Scholar]
10. Jucker, Andreas H.
    (ed.) 1995 Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35 [Google Scholar]
11. Kohnen, Thomas
    2008 “Directives in Old English: Beyond Politeness?” InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, 27–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.04koh [Google Scholar]
12. Labov, William
    1972 “Some Principles of Linguistic Methodology”. Language in Society1 (1): 97–120. 10.1017/S0047404500006576
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006576 [Google Scholar]
13. Leech, Geoffrey
    2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Moore, Colette
    2011 Quoting Speech in Early English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Searle, John R.
    1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society5 (1): 1–23. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
16. Semino, Elena and Mick Short
    2004 Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Representation in a Corpus of English Writing. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203494073
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203494073 [Google Scholar]
17. Smith, Jeremy J.
    2024 “Book Review: Pragmatics in the History of English”. Journal of English Linguistics52 (2): 164–167. 10.1177/00754242241253618
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242241253618 [Google Scholar]
18. Zhou, Ling and Shaojie, Zhang
    2016 “汉语文化特性的’积极评价面子’与’消极评价面子’概念建构: 基于身份理论的视角” (‘Constructing Positively-evaluated Face and Negatively-evaluated Face in Chinese Culture: An Identity Theory-based Approach’). Foreign Languages and Their Teaching (5): 41–49+145. 10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.004292
    https://doi.org/10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.004292 [Google Scholar]