Complaining in historical Chinese criminal trials

References

1. Archer, Dawn
   2006 “(Re)Initiating Strategies: Judges and Defendants in Early Modern English Courtrooms”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.7.2.03arc
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.7.2.03arc [Google Scholar]
2. Archer, Dawn
   2008 Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.135
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.135 [Google Scholar]
3. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, Juliane House and Gabriele Kasper
   (eds) 1989 Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bodde, Bodde
   1963 “Basic Concepts of Chinese Law: The Genesis and Evolution of Legal Thought in Traditional China”. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society (): –.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bouye, Thomas
   2007 “Filial Felons: Leniency and Legal Reasoning in Qing China”. InRobert E. Hegel and Katherine Carlitz (eds), Writing and Law in Late Imperial China: Crime, Conflict, and Judgment, –. Washington: University of Washington Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cang, He, Juliane House, Fengguang Liu and Dániel Z. Kádár
   2023 “Sympathising with Patients in Historical China: An Interaction Ritual Approach”. Language Sciences: . 10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101665
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101665 [Google Scholar]
7. Carlitz, Catherine
   2007 “Genre and Justice in Late Qing China Wu Woyao’s Strange Case of Nine Murders and Its Antecedents”. InRobert E. Hegel and Katherine Carlitz (eds), Writing and Law in Late Imperial China: Crime, Conflict, and Judgment, –. Washington: University of Washington Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Doty, Kathleen L.
   2010 “Courtroom Discourse”. InAndreas Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Historical Pragmatics, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1515/9783110214284.7.621
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284.7.621 [Google Scholar]
9. Edmondson, Willis J.
   1981 Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Edmondson, Willis and Juliane House
    1981 Let’s Talk and Talk About It: A Pedagogic Interactional Grammar of English. Munich: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Edmondson, Willis, Juliane House and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2023 Expressions, Speech Acts and Discourse: A Pedagogic Interactional Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108954662
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954662 [Google Scholar]
12. El-Daksh, Dina Abded and Mervat Ahmed
    2021 “A Variational Pragmatic Analysis of the Speech Act of Complaint Focusing on Alexandrian and Najdi Arabic”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.023 [Google Scholar]
13. Flanagan, Timothy
    1996 “Public Opinion on Crime and Justice: History, Development, and Trends”. InTimothy Flanagan and Dennis Longmire (eds), Public Opinion on Crime and Justice: History, Development, and Trends, –. Thousand Oak, California: Sage. 10.4135/9781483326900.n1
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326900.n1 [Google Scholar]
14. Fritz, Gerd
    2018 “Communication Principles for Controversies: A Historical Perspective”. InFrans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (eds), Controversy and Confrontation: Relating Controversy Analysis with Argumentation Theory, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cvs.6.07fri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cvs.6.07fri [Google Scholar]
15. Goffman, Erving
    1967 Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. New York: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Goffman, Erving
    1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Habermas, Jurgen
    1979 Communication and the Evolution of Society. (Translated byT. McCarthy.) New York: Beacon.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hao, Sabrina Y.
    2024 “Jiaohua in Ming Collections of Gong’an Short Stories: Law, Punishment, and Popular Conceptions of Justice”. InYingjie Guo (ed.), Jiaohua: Chinese Ideas and Practices of Moral Transformation. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑97‑9487‑4_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9487-4_6 [Google Scholar]
19. Hegel, Robert E.
    2007 “Introduction”. InRobert E. Hegel and Katherine Carlitz (eds), Writing and Law in Late Imperial China: Crime, Conflict, and Judgment, –. Washington: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. House, Juliane and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2023 “Speech Acts and Interaction in Second Language Pragmatics: A Position Paper”. Language Teaching: –. 10.1017/S0261444822000477
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000477 [Google Scholar]
21. Huang, Xu and Yongping Ran
    2024 “Complaint Formulation and Negotiation: The Use of zenme-interrogatives in E-commerce Service Encounters”. Lingua: . 10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103715
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2024.103715 [Google Scholar]
22. Isaacs, Ellen and Herbert Clark
    1990 “Ostensible Invitations”. Language in Society (), –. 10.1017/S0047404500014780
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500014780 [Google Scholar]
23. Johnson, Wallace and Dennis Twitchett
    1993 “Criminal Procedure in T’ang China”. Asia Major: Third Series (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2007 Terms of (Im)Politeness: On the Communicational Properties of Traditional Chinese Terms of Address. Budapest: Eotvos Lorand University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
26. Kádár, Dániel Z.
    2024 Ritual and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108624909
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108624909 [Google Scholar]
27. Katz, Paul
    2008 Divine Justice: Religion and the Development of Chinese Legal Culture. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203883686
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883686 [Google Scholar]
28. Kissine, Mikhail
    2013 From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511842191
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842191 [Google Scholar]
29. Kohnen, Thomas
    2022 “Speech Acts in the History of English: Gaps and Paths of Evolution”. InBettelou Los, Chris Cummins, Lisa Gotthard, Alpo Honkapohja and Benjamin Molineaux (eds), English Historical Linguistics: Historical English in Contact. Papers from the XXth ICEHL, –. 27–31 August 2018. Edinburgh, UK. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.359.09koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.359.09koh [Google Scholar]
30. Koutlaki, Sofia
    2020 “‘By the Elders’ Leave, I Do’: Rituals, Ostensivity and Perceptions of the Moral Order in Iranian Tehrani Marriage Ceremonies”. Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/prag.19021.kou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19021.kou [Google Scholar]
31. Kryk-Kastovsky, Barbara
    2009 “Speech Acts in Early Modern English Court Trials”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.009 [Google Scholar]
32. Kuiper, Koenrad
    1996 Smooth Talkers: The Linguistic Performance of Auctioneers and Sportscasters. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Leech, Geoffrey
    2007 “Politeness: Is there an East–West divide?” Journal of Politeness Research (): –. 10.1515/PR.2007.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.009 [Google Scholar]
34. Levinson, Stephen
    2017 “Speech Acts”. InHuang Yan (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.22
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.22 [Google Scholar]
35. Li, Kege
    2024 “In the Pursuit of the Constructed Truth: Courtroom Questioning as a Persuasive Genre of Talk”. Journal of Contemporary China (): –. 10.1080/10670564.2022.2153017
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2022.2153017 [Google Scholar]
36. Liang, Linxia
    2008 Delivering Justice in Qing China: Civil Trials in the Magistrate’s Court. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Link, Kristen and Roger Kreuz
    2005 “The Comprehension of Ostensible Speech Acts”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology (): –. 10.1177/0261927X05278384
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X05278384 [Google Scholar]
38. Lipson, Carol S. and Roberta A. Binkley
    2004 “Introduction”. InCarol S. Lipson and Roberta A. Binkley (eds), Rhetoric before and beyond the Greeks, –. Albany, New York: State University of New York Pres. 10.1353/book4813
    https://doi.org/10.1353/book4813 [Google Scholar]
39. Lochtman, Katja
    2022 “On the Intersection Between Variational and Contrastive Pragmatics: An Analysis of Requests for Repair in Complaints by German-speaking Belgians”. Contrastive Pragmatics (): –. 10.1163/26660393‑00001056
    https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-00001056 [Google Scholar]
40. Lutzky, Ursula
    2019 “‘But It is Not Prov’d’ A Sociopragmatic Study of the Discourse Marker But in the Early Modern English Courtroom”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.00026.lut
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00026.lut [Google Scholar]
41. Macauley, Melissa
    1998 Social Power and Legal Culture: Litigation Masters in Late Imperial China. Redwood City, California: Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9780804765206
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804765206 [Google Scholar]
42. Mühlhahn, Klaus
    2009 Criminal Justice in China: A History. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Neadelea, Marilena Oana
    2022 “Peculiarities of the Branches of Law in Ancient China”. Eastern European Journal of Regional Studies (): –. 10.53486/2537‑6179.8‑2.07
    https://doi.org/10.53486/2537-6179.8-2.07 [Google Scholar]
44. Olshtain, Elite and Liora Weinbach
    1987 “Complaints: A Study of Speech Act Behavior Among Native and Nonnative Speakers of Hebrew”. InJef Verschueren and Marcella Bertuccelli Papi (eds), The Pragmatic Perspective: Selected papers from the 1985 International Pragmatics Conference, –. 1–7 September 1985. Viareggio, Italy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbcs.5.15ols
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbcs.5.15ols [Google Scholar]
45. Olshtain, Elite and Liora Weinbach
    1993 “Interlanguage Features of the Speech Act of Complaining”. InGabriele Kasper and Shoshana Blum-Kulka (eds), Interlanguage Pragmatics, –. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195066029.003.0006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195066029.003.0006 [Google Scholar]
46. Park, Nancy
    2008 “Imperial Chinese Justice and the Law of Torture”. Late Imperial China (): –. 10.1353/late.0.0016
    https://doi.org/10.1353/late.0.0016 [Google Scholar]
47. Petykó, Márton
    2018 “Discursive (Re)Construction of ‘Witchcraft’ as a Community and ‘Witch’ as an Identity in the Eighteenth-Century Hungarian Witchcraft Trial Records”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.00003.pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.00003.pet [Google Scholar]
48. Shaw, William
    1980 “Traditional Korean Law and Its Relation to China”. InJerome Alan Cohen, Fu-mei Chang Chen and R. Randle Edwards (eds), Essays on China’s Legal Tradition, –. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Siemon, Katherine
    2017 Magistrates and the Law: Judicial Authority and Capital Cases in the Yongzheng Era, 1722–1735. (Unpublished PhD thesis.) Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Silbey, Jessica
    2017 “American Trial Films and the Popular Culture of Law”. Northeastern Public Law and Theory Faculty Research Papers SeriesNo.. Available online at: https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2382&context=faculty_scholarship
    [Google Scholar]
51. Steenstrup, Carl
    1996 A History of Law in Japan Until 1868. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Theiss, Janet
    2007 “Explaining the Shrew Narratives of Spousal Violence and the Critique of Masculinity in Eighteenth-Century Criminal Cases”. InRobert E. Hegel and Katherine Carlitz (eds), Writing and Law in Late Imperial China: Crime, Conflict, and Judgment, –. Washington: University of Washington Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Trosborg, Anna
    1995 Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110885286
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110885286 [Google Scholar]
54. Vanderveken, Daniel
    1990 Meaning and Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Vladimirou, Dimitra, Juliane House and Dániel Z. Kádár
    2022 “Aggressive Complaining on Social Media: The Case of #MuckyMerton”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.017 [Google Scholar]
56. Yi, Ran
    2022 “Justice Under Microscope: Analysing Mandarin Chinese Markers in Virtual Courtroom Discourse”. Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/14614456231197045
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231197045 [Google Scholar]
57. Zeng, Xianyi
    2009 “Mediation in China — Past and Present”. Asia Pacific Law Review (): –. 10.1080/10192557.2009.11788203
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2009.11788203 [Google Scholar]
58. Zhang, Dan 张丹
    2016 “《红楼梦》中的抱怨语研究” (‘A Study of Complaining Utterances in The Dream of Red Mansions’). Journal of Hubei Open Vocational College: –.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Zheng, Saifen 郑赛芬
    2012 “《红楼梦》英译本中王熙凤和林黛玉的抱怨策略—语用学分析” (‘Complaint Strategies of Wang Xifeng and Lin Daiyu in English Translations of A Dream of Red Mansions: A Pragmatic Analysis’). Shanghai: Shanghai International Studies University.
    [Google Scholar]