1887
image of Offers in the Old Saxon Hêliand
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study examines offers in the , an Old Saxon gospel harmony, using a combined form-to-function and function-to-form approach. Offers are also classified according to speech representation mode and role configuration to assess how recipient agency and illocutionary force are shaped in discourse. A key finding is that offers appear both in Direct Speech () and in Narrative Representation of Speech Acts (), showing how the poem exploits different representational strategies to frame this speech act. In , offers generally retain their performative force and remain negotiable, even without real-time interaction, though some hybrid cases reduce this immediacy. In , by contrast, negotiability is reduced, with some instances highlighting deliberate refusal whilst others present acceptance or rejection as fixed outcomes. Within the itself, this attenuates their interactive quality, yet in comparison with the the same framing often sharpens volitional elements and foregrounds recipient responsibility more explicitly than its source. By representing religious devotion as an exchange requiring active acceptance, the adapts not only the lexicon but also pragmatic framing, making offers an additional tool for aligning Christian teaching with Saxon cultural models of lordship-based exchange of service and reward.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.25013.con
2026-05-11
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackermann, Tanja
    2022 “Bauernkomödien, Fremdsprachenlehrwerke und die Authentizitätsfrage — ein Vergleich anhand von Aufforderungen im 17. Jahrhundert” (‘Peasant Comedies, Foreign Language Textbooks, and the Question of Authenticity: A Comparison Based on Directives in the Seventeenth Century’). InMarkus Denkler and Michael Elmentaler (eds), Bauernkomödien des 17. Jahrhunderts als sprachhistorische Quellen (‘Peasant Comedies of the Seventeenth Century as Sources for Historical Linguistics’). Vienna, Cologne and Weimar: Böhnlau.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 2023 “Direktive Sprechakte in frühneuzeitlichen Fremdsprachenlehrwerken: Eine datenbasierte Evaluation von Lehrwerksdialogen als Quelle für die Historische Pragmatik” (‘Directive Speech Acts in Early Modern Foreign Language Textbooks: A Data-Based Evaluation of Textbook Dialogues as a Source for Historical Pragmatics’). Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (): –. 10.1515/bgsl‑2023‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/bgsl-2023-0002 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barron, Anne
    2003Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics: Learning How to Do Things with Words in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.108
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.108 [Google Scholar]
  4. 2005 “Offering in Ireland and England”. InAnne Barron and Klaus P. Schneider (eds), The Pragmatics of Irish English, –. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110898934.141
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110898934.141 [Google Scholar]
  5. 2017 “Offers in English”. InRachel Giora and Michael Haugh (eds), Doing Pragmatics Interculturally: Cognitive, Philosophical, and Sociopragmatic Perspectives, –. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110546095‑018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110546095-018 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2025 “I’ll Get It: Payment Offers, Payment Offer Sequences and Gender on First Dates”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2024.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brinton, Laurel J.
    2023Pragmatics in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009322904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009322904 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. (Second edition.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Roger and Albert Gilman
    1989 “Politeness Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies”. Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500013464
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013464 [Google Scholar]
  10. Busse, Ulrich
    2008 “An Inventory of Directives in Shakespeare’s King Lear”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.06bus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.06bus [Google Scholar]
  11. Cathey, James
    (ed.) 2002Hêliand: Text and Commentary. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Concu, Valentina
    2023a “‘Ih gebiude dir, wurm!’ Directives in Old Saxon and Old High German”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.20012.con
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.20012.con [Google Scholar]
  13. 2023b “Thanking in Old Saxon and Old High German”. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics (): –. 10.1515/lpp‑2023‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2023-0009 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2025 “Explicit Performatives in Old Saxon and Old High German: A Comparative Study”. International Review of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1163/18773109‑01701003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01701003 [Google Scholar]
  15. Culpeper, Jonathan and Dawn Archer
    2008 “Requests and Directness in Early Modern English Trial Proceedings and Play-Texts, 1640–1760”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.05cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.05cul [Google Scholar]
  16. Del Lungo Camiciotti, Gabriella
    2008 “Two Polite Speech Acts from a Diachronic Perspective: Aspects of the Realisation of Requesting and Undertaking Commitments in the Nineteenth-Century Commercial Community”. InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.07del
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.07del [Google Scholar]
  17. Doane, Alger Nicolaus
    1991The Saxon Genesis: An Edition of the West Saxon Genesis B and the Old Saxon Vatican Genesis. Madison and London: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hancher, Michael
    1979 “The Classification of Cooperative Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500005911
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005911 [Google Scholar]
  19. Harrison, Perry Neil
    2025 “Healing Power and the Disabled Body in the Old Saxon Heliand”. JEGP, Journal of English and Germanic Philology (): –. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/962205. 10.5406/1945662X.124.3.01
    https://doi.org/10.5406/1945662X.124.3.01 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hauser, Albert
    1999Grüezi und adieu: Gruss-und Umgangsformen vom 17. Jahrhundert bis zur Gegenwart (‘Greetings and Farewells: Greetings and Etiquette from the 17th Century to the Present’). Zürich: Verlag Neue Zürcher Zeitung.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Jacobs, Andreas and Andreas H. Jucker
    1995 “The Historical Perspective in Pragmatics”. InJucker Andrea (ed.), Pragmatics and Beyond Series, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.35.04jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.35.04jac [Google Scholar]
  22. Jacobsson, Mattias
    2002 “Thank You and Thanks in Early Modern English”. ICAME Journal: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jucker, Andreas
    2018 “Apologies in the History of English: Evidence from the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA)”. Corpus Pragmatics: –. 10.1007/s41701‑018‑0038‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-018-0038-y [Google Scholar]
  24. 2020Politeness in the History of English: From the Middle Ages to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108589147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589147 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jucker, Andreas H.
    2024Speech Acts: Discursive, Multimodal, Diachronic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Jucker, Andreas H. and Joanna Kopaczyk
    2017 “Historical (Im)politeness”. InJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, –. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_17
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_17 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jucker, Andreas H. and Irma Taavitsainen
    (eds) 2008Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176 [Google Scholar]
  28. (eds) 2020Manners, Norms and Transgressions in the History of English: Literary and Linguistic Approaches. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.312
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.312 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kalmanovitch, Yshai
    2021 “A Pragmatic Analysis of Descriptive, Depictive and Simulative Reporting Speech Acts: Empirical Evidence from a Prosodic Study on Conversational Modern Israeli Hebrew”. Journal of Pragmatics: –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.11.009 [Google Scholar]
  30. Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher
    1985 “Sprache der Nähe — Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte” (‘Language of Immediacy — Language of Distance: Orality and Literacy in the Tension between Linguistic Theory and Language History’). Romanistisches Jahrbuch (): –. 10.1515/9783110244922.15
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110244922.15 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kohnen, Thomas
    2000 “Explicit Performatives in Old English: A Corpus-based Study of Directives”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.2.07koh [Google Scholar]
  32. 2008 “Directives in Old English: Beyond Politeness?” InAndreas H. Jucker and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Speech Acts in the History of English, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.176.04koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.176.04koh [Google Scholar]
  33. 2011 “Understanding Anglo-Saxon ‘Politeness’: Directive Constructions with ic wille / ic wolde”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.12.1‑2.10koh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.12.1-2.10koh [Google Scholar]
  34. 2015 “Historical Corpus Pragmatics: Focus On Speech Acts and Texts”. InAndreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier and Marianne Hundt (eds), Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse, –. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lebsanft, Franz
    1999 “A Late Medieval French Bargain Dialogue (Pathelin II), or Further Remarks on the History of Dialogue Forms”. InAndreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical Dialogue Analysis, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.66.11leb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.66.11leb [Google Scholar]
  36. Leech, Geoffrey
    2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lehmann, Winfred
    1956The Development of Germanic Verse Form. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lötscher, Andreas
    1981 “Zur Sprachgeschichte des Fluchens und Beschimpfens im Schweizer-Deutschen” (‘On the Linguistic History of Swearing and Insulting in Swiss German’). Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Louviot, Élise
    2016Direct Speech in Beowulf and Other Old English Narrative Poems. Martlesham, UK: Boydell & Brewer. 10.1515/9781782046547
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781782046547 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2021 “Direct Speech in Heliand and Otfrid von Weissenburg’s Evangelienbuch: A Shared Vernacular Tradition?” Journal of Medieval History (): –. 10.1080/03044181.2021.1976976
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03044181.2021.1976976 [Google Scholar]
  41. Moessner, Lilo
    2010 “Directive Speech Acts: A Cross-Generic Diachronic Study”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics (): –. 10.1075/jhp.11.2.03moe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.11.2.03moe [Google Scholar]
  42. O’Keeffe, Anne
    2018 “Corpus-based Function-to-Form Approaches”. InAndreas H. Jucker, Klaus P. Schneider and Wolfram Bublitz (eds), Methods in Pragmatics, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110424928‑023
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-023 [Google Scholar]
  43. Osborn, Jamie Jacqueline
    2020 Politeness Theory: Compliance and Paralinguistic Politeness Strategies. (PhD thesis.) Tennessee: University of Tennessee.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pérez Hernández, Lorena
    2001 “The Directive-Commissive Continuum”. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies: –. 10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.200110536
    https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_misc/mj.200110536 [Google Scholar]
  45. Ranke, Ernst
    (ed.) 1868Testamentum novum (‘New Testament’). Marburgi: Elwert.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rapp, Rebecca and Sandra Reimann
    2016 “Gruoz enbieten und grüszen. Ein Beitrag zum Desiderat eines syntaktisch-semantischen mittelhochdeutschen Verbwörterbuchs” (‘Greetings and Salutations: A Contribution to the Need for a Syntactic-Semantic Middle High German Verb Dictionary’). InPeter Ernst and Martina Werner (eds), Linguistische Pragmatik in historischen Bezügen (‘Linguistic Pragmatics in Historical Contexts’), –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110353327‑017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110353327-017 [Google Scholar]
  47. Richman, Gerald
    1986 “Artful Slipping in Old English”. Neophilologus: –. 10.1007/BF00553322
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00553322 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rühlemann, Christoph and Karin Aijmer
    2015 “Introduction Corpus Pragmatics: Laying the Foundations”. InKarin Aijmer and Christopher Rühlemann (eds), Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. (Volume.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  50. Schneider, Klaus P.
    2003Diminutives in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Schuelke, Gertrude L.
    1958 “‘Slipping’ in Indirect Discourse“. American Speech (): –. 10.2307/453177
    https://doi.org/10.2307/453177 [Google Scholar]
  52. Searle, John R.
    1976 “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society (): –. 10.1017/S0047404500006837
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837 [Google Scholar]
  53. Semino, Elena and Mick Short
    2004Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Representation in a Corpus of English Writing. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203494073
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203494073 [Google Scholar]
  54. Sievers, Eduard and Burkhard Taeger
    (eds) 1984Heliand. (9. Auflage.) Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Simpson, Paul
    1989 “Politeness Phenomena in Ionesco’s The Lesson”. InRonald Carter, Paul Simpson and Milton Park (eds), Language, Discourse and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Discourse Stylistics, –. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Somers, Katharina and Shannon Dubenion-Schmidt
    2014 “The Intersection between Syntax and Meter in the Old Saxon Hêliand”. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik (): –. 10.1163/9789401211017_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401211017_005 [Google Scholar]
  57. Stroebe, Klara
    1911Altgermanische Grussformen (‘Old Germanic Forms of Greeting’). Heidelberg: Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Taavitsainen, Irma and Susan Fitzmaurice
    2007 “Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It”. InSusan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, –. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Taavitsainen, Irma and Andreas H. Jucker
    2007 “Speech Act Verbs and Speech Acts in the History of English”. InSusan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, –. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110197822.107
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197822.107 [Google Scholar]
  60. Wunderlich, Dieter
    1977 “Assertions, Conditional Speech Acts, and Practical Inferences”. Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(77)90020‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(77)90020-0 [Google Scholar]
  61. Youngs, Samuel J.
    2021 “A Transcript of Submission: Jesus as Fated Victim of Divine Violence in the Old Saxon Heliand”. Religions (): . 10.3390/rel12050306
    https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12050306 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.25013.con
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jhp.25013.con
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: speech acts ; speech representation ; historical pragmatics ; Old Saxon ; offers
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error