Translating the same text twice

References

1. Belam, Judith
   2003 “Buying up to Falling Down: A Deductive Approach to Teaching Post-Editing.” InMT Summit IX, Workshop on Teaching Translation Technologies and Tools. New Orleans, USA.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bendana, Lola, and Alan Melby
   2012 Almost Everything You Ever Wanted to Know about Translation. Toronto: Multi-Languages Corporation. multi​-languages​.com​/materials​/everything​_you​_ever​_wanted​_to​_know​_about​_translation​_melby​_bendana.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
3. Castilho, Sheila, Joss Moorkens, Federico Gaspari, Iacer Calixto, John Tinsley, and Andy Way
   2017 “Is Neural Machine Translation the New State of the Art?” The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics108 (June 2017): 109–120. 10.1515/pralin‑2017‑0013
   https://doi.org/10.1515/pralin-2017-0013 [Google Scholar]
4. DePalma, Donald A., and Benjamin B. Sargent
   2013 Translation Services and Software in the Cloud: How LSPs Will Move to Cloud-Based Solutions. Lowell, MA: Common Sense Advisory.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Depraetere, Ilse
   2010 “What Counts as Useful Advice in a University Post-Editing Training Context? Report on a Case Study.” InEAMT 2010: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the European Association for Machine Translation. Saint-Raphaël, France.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dillinger, Mike
   2017 “Interview with Mike Dillinger, Machine Translation Pioneer, by Tony Beckwith.” The ATA ChronicleXLVI (2): 27–30.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Doherty, Stephen, and Dorothy Kenny
   2014 “The Design and Evaluation of a Statistical Machine Translation Syllabus for Translation Students.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer8.2: 295–315. 10.1080/1750399X.2014.937571
   https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2014.937571 [Google Scholar]
8. García, Ignacio
   2010 “Is Machine Translation Ready Yet?” Target, 22 (1): 7–21. 10.1075/target.22.1.02gar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/target.22.1.02gar [Google Scholar]
9. García, Ignacio
   2011 “Translating by Post-Editing: Is it the Way Forward?” Machine Translation25: 217–237. 10.1007/s10590‑011‑9115‑8
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-011-9115-8 [Google Scholar]
10. Gaspari, Federico, Hala Almaghout, and Stephen Doherty
    2015 “A Survey of Machine Translation Competences: Insights for Translation Technology Educators and Practitioners.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology23 (3): 333–358. 10.1080/0907676X.2014.979842
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2014.979842 [Google Scholar]
11. Gile, Daniel
    1999 “Testing the Effort Models’ Tightrope Hypothesis in Simultaneous Interpreting – A Contribution.” Hermes23: 153–172.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Guerberof Arenas, Ana
    2010 “Exploring Machine Translation on the Web.” Revista Tradumática8: 1–6. revistes.uab.cat/tradumatica/article/view/n8-guerberof.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Guzmán, Rafael
    2007 “Manual MT Post-editing: If it’s not Broken, don’t Fix it!” Translation Journal11 (4). translationjournal.net/journal/42mt.htm.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hutchins, John
    2003 “The Development and Use of Machine Translation Systems and Computer-Based Translation Tools.” International Journal of Translation15 (1): 5–26.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kelly, Nataly, Donald A. DePalma, and Robert G. Stewart
    2012 The Language Services Market: 2012 – An Annual Review of the Translation, Localization, and Interpreting Services Industry. Lowell, MA: Common Sense Advisory.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kenny, Dorothy, and Stephen Doherty
    2014 “Statistical Machine Translation in the Translation Curriculum: Overcoming Obstacles and Empowering Translators.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer8 (2): 276–294. 10.1080/1750399X.2014.936112
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2014.936112 [Google Scholar]
17. Killman, Jeffrey
    2014 “Vocabulary Accuracy of Statistical Machine Translation in the Legal Context.” InProceedings of the Third Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice (WPTP-3), The 11th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, 22–26 October 2014, Vancouver, BC Canada, bySharon O’Brien, Michel Simard, and Lucia Specia, 85–98. Vancouver: AMTA.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Killman, Jeffrey
    2016 “Introducing Machine Translation in Translator Training: Comparing ‘Information Mining’ with Post-Editing.” EntreCulturas7–8: 179–193.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Kliffer, Michael
    2005 “An experiment in MT post-editing by a class of intermediate/advanced French majors.” InEAMT 2005 Conference Proceedings, 160–165. Budapest, Hungary.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lee, Jason, and Posen Liao
    2011 “A Comparative Study of Human Translation and Machine Translation with Post-Editing.” Compilation and Translation Review4(2): 105–149.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mellinger, Christopher D.
    2017 “Translators and Machine Translation: Knowledge and Skills Gaps in Translator Pedagogy.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer11 (4): 280–293. 10.1080/1750399X.2017.1359760
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2017.1359760 [Google Scholar]
22. Mellinger, Christopher D., and Gregory M. Shreve
    2016 “Match Evaluation and Over-Editing in a Translation Memory Environment.” InReembedding Translation Process Research, byRicardo Muñoz Martín, 131–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.128.07mel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.128.07mel [Google Scholar]
23. Mossop, Brian
    1992 “Goals of a Revision Course.” InTeaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent, and Experience, byCay Dollerup and Anne Loddegaard. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.56.14mos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.56.14mos [Google Scholar]
24. Mossop, Brian
    2007 “Empirical Studies of Revision: What We Know and Need to Know.” The Journal of Specialized Translation8 (July 2007): 5–20
    [Google Scholar]
25. O’Brien, Sharon
    2002 “Teaching Post-Editing: A Proposal for Course Content.” In6th EAMT Workshop, Teaching Machine Translation, 99–106. Manchester, UK. Manchester, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Phelan, Mary
    2017 “Analytical Assessment of Legal Translation: A Case Study Using the American Translators Association Framework.” The Journal of Specialized Translation27 (January 2017): 189–210
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pym, Anthony
    2009 “Using Process Studies in Translator Training: Self-Discovery through Lousy Experiments.” InMethodology, Technology and Innovation in Translation Process Research, bySusanne Göpferich, Fabio Alves, and Inge Mees, 135–156. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pym, Anthony
    2011 “What Technology Does to Translating.” Translation & Interpreting3 (1): 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Pym, Anthony
    2013 “Translation Skill-Sets in a Machine-translation Age.” Meta58(3): 487–503. 10.7202/1025047ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1025047ar [Google Scholar]
30. Şahin, Mehmet, and Nilgün Dungan
    2014 “Translation Testing and Evaluation: a Study on Methods and Needs.” Translation & Interpreting, 6(2), 67–90.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sánchez Gijón, Pilar, and Olga Torres-Hostench
    2014 “MT Post-Editing into the Mother Tongue or into a Foreign Language? Spanish-to-English MT Translation Output Post-Edited by Translation Trainees.” InProceedings of the Third Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice (WPTP-3), The 11th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, 22–26 October 2014, Vancouver, BC Canada, bySharon O’Brien, Michel Simard, and Lucia Specia, 5–19. Vancouver: AMTA.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Singh, Nitish
    2012 Localization Strategies for Global E-Business. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. TAUS
    TAUS 2017 Machine Translation Market Report. https://www.taus.net/think-tank/reports/translate-reports/taus-machine-translation-market-report-2017
    [Google Scholar]
34. Yamada, Masaru
    2015 “Can College Students be Post-Editors? An Investigation into Employing Language Learners in Machine Translation plus Post-Editing Settings.” Machine Translation29 (1): 49–67. 10.1007/s10590‑014‑9167‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-014-9167-7 [Google Scholar]