Teaching, learning and scaffolding in CLIL science classrooms

References

1. Ankrum, J. W., Genest, M. T., & Belcastro, E. G.
   (2014) The power of verbal scaffolding: “Showing” beginning readers how to use reading strategies. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(1), 39–47. 10.1007/s10643‑013‑0586‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0586-5 [Google Scholar]
2. Bolton, K., & Graddol, D.
   (2012) English in China today. English Today, 28(3), 4–9. 10.1017/S0266078412000223
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078412000223 [Google Scholar]
3. Cameron, L.
   (2001) Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511733109
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733109 [Google Scholar]
4. Cammarata, L.
   (2016) Foreign language education and the development of inquiry-driven language programs: Key challenges and curricular planning strategies. InL. Cammarata (Ed.), Content-based foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills (pp.123–143). New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203850497
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850497 [Google Scholar]
5. Cammarata, L., & Haley, C.
   (2018) Integrated content, language, and literacy instruction in a Canadian French immersion context: A professional development journey. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 332–348. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1386617
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1386617 [Google Scholar]
6. Cammarata, L., & Ó Ceallaigh, T. J.
   (Eds.) (2018) Teacher education and professional development for immersion and content-based instruction: Research on programs, practices, and teacher educators [Special issue]. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(2). 10.1075/jicb.00004.cam
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.00004.cam [Google Scholar]
7. Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D.
   (2014) Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. 10.1093/applin/amt011
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011 [Google Scholar]
8. Chapin, S., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N.
   (2013) Classroom discussions in Math: A teacher’s guide for using talk moves to support the common core and more, Grades K-6: A Multimedia Professional Learning Resource (3rd ed.). Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
   (2010) CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cummins, J.
    (2000) Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853596773
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596773 [Google Scholar]
11. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2007) Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.20
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.20 [Google Scholar]
12. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2013) A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 216–253. 10.1515/eujal‑2013‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0011 [Google Scholar]
13. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2018) Postscriptum: Research pathways in CLIL/Immersion instructional practices and teacher development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 384–387. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1384448
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1384448 [Google Scholar]
14. Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T.
    (2014) “You can Stand Under my Umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and Bilingual Education. A Response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 213–218. 10.1093/applin/amu010
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu010 [Google Scholar]
15. de Oliveira, L. C.
    (2010) Enhancing content instruction for ELLs: Learning about language in science. InD. Sunal, C. Sunal, M. Mantero, & E. Wright (Eds.), Teaching science with Hispanic ELLs in K-16 classrooms (pp.135–150). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Echevarria, J., Vogt, M. E., & Short, D. J.
    (2013) Making content comprehensible for English language learners: The SIOP Model (4th ed.). New York: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Fang, F.
    (2017) World Englishes or English as a Lingua Franca: Where does English in China stand?English Today, 33(1), 19–24. 10.1017/S0266078415000668
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078415000668 [Google Scholar]
18. Genesee, F., & Lindholm-Leary, K.
    (2013) Two case studies of content-based language education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 3–33. 10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen [Google Scholar]
19. Gibbons, P.
    (2015) Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gottlieb, M.
    (2006) Assessing English language learners: Bridges for language proficiency to academic achievement. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kong, S., Hoare, P., & Chi, Y. P.
    (2011) Immersion education in China: Teachers’ perspectives. Frontiers of Education in China, 6(1), 68–91. 10.1007/s11516‑011‑0122‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-011-0122-6 [Google Scholar]
22. Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
    (2010) Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64(4), 367–75. 10.1093/elt/ccp082
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082 [Google Scholar]
23. Lemke, J. L.
    (1990) Talking science: Language, learning and values. Westport, CT: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Li, D. C. S.
    (2017) Multilingual Hong Kong: Communities, Languages, Identities. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑44195‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44195-5 [Google Scholar]
25. Lin, A. M. Y.
    (2016) Language across the curriculum and CLIL in English-as-an-additional-language contexts: Theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑1802‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1802-2 [Google Scholar]
26. Lin, A. M. Y., & Lo, Y. Y.
    (2017) Trans/languaging and the triadic dialogue in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Language and Education, 31(1), 26–45. 10.1080/09500782.2016.1230125
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230125 [Google Scholar]
27. Lin, A. M. Y., & Wu, Y.
    (2015) ‘May I speak Cantonese?’ – Co-constructing a scientific proof in an EFL junior secondary science classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(3), 289–305. 10.1080/13670050.2014.988113
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.988113 [Google Scholar]
28. Llinares, A., & Morton, T.
    (Eds.) (2017) Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.47
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47 [Google Scholar]
29. Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R.
    (2012) The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lo, Y. Y.
    (2014) Collaboration between L2 and content subject teachers in CBI: Contrasting beliefs and attitudes. RELC Journal, 45(2), 181–196. 10.1177/0033688214535054
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214535054 [Google Scholar]
31. Lo, Y. Y., & Lin, A. M. Y.
    (2015) Special Issue: Designing Multilingual and Multimodal CLIL Frameworks for EFL students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(3), 261–269. 10.1080/13670050.2014.988111
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.988111 [Google Scholar]
32. Lyster, R.
    (2016) Vers une approche intégrée en immersion. Montréal: Les Éditions CEC.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lyster, R., & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y.
    (Eds.) (2018) Instructional practices and teacher development in CLIL and immersion school settings [Special issue]. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(3). 10.1080/13670050.2017.1383353
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383353 [Google Scholar]
34. Marsh, D.
    (2002) CLIL/EMILE – the European dimension: actions, trends and foresight potential. Finland: University of Jyvӓskylӓ. Retrieved from https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/47616/david_marsh-report.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    [Google Scholar]
35. Massler, U., Stotz, D., & Queisser, C.
    (2014) Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 137–150. 10.1080/09571736.2014.891371
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.891371 [Google Scholar]
36. Mihai, F. M.
    (2010) Assessing English language learners in the content areas: A research-into-practice guide for educators. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.2825611
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2825611 [Google Scholar]
37. Morton, T.
    (2016) Conceptualizing and investigating teachers’ knowledge for integrating content and language in content-based instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 4(2), 144–167. 10.1075/jicb.4.2.01mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.4.2.01mor [Google Scholar]
38. Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., & Lorenzo, F.
    (2016) More than content and language: The complexity of integration in CLIL and multilingual education. InT. Nikula, E. Dafouz, P. Moore, & U. Smit (eds.), Conceptualising integration in CLIL and multilingual education (pp.1–25). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783096145‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096145-004 [Google Scholar]
39. Nikula, T., & Moore, P.
    (2019) Exploring translanguaging in CLIL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 237–249. 10.1080/13670050.2016.1254151
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1254151 [Google Scholar]
40. Pawan, F.
    (2008) Content-area teachers and scaffolded instruction for English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(6), 1450–1462. 10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.003 [Google Scholar]
41. Rojas-Drummond, S., & Mercer, N.
    (2003) Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1), 99–111. 10.1016/S0883‑0355(03)00075‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00075-2 [Google Scholar]
42. Schleppegrell, M. J.
    (2004) The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781410610317
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610317 [Google Scholar]
43. Schleppegrell, M. J.
    (2009) Language in academic subject areas and classroom instruction: What is academic language and how can we teach it?Paper presented atworkshop on The role of language in school learning sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, Menlo, CA. Retrieved from https://www.rcoe.us/educational-services/files/2012/08/What_is_Academic_Language_Schleppegrell.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
44. Seah, L. H., Clarke, D. J., & Hart, C.
    (2015) Understanding middle school students’ difficulties in explaining density from a language perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2386–2409. 10.1080/09500693.2015.1080879
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1080879 [Google Scholar]
45. Silver, D.
    (2011) Using the ‘Zone’ help reach every learner. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 47(sup1), 28–31. 10.1080/00228958.2011.10516721
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2011.10516721 [Google Scholar]
46. Somers, T., & Surmont, J.
    (2012) CLIL and immersion: How clear-cut are they?ELT Journal, 66(1), 113–116. 10.1093/elt/ccr079
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr079 [Google Scholar]
47. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
    (2000) Task-based second language learning: the uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 251–274. 10.1177/136216880000400304
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400304 [Google Scholar]
48. Tan, M.
    (2011) Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 325–342. 10.1177/1362168811401153
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401153 [Google Scholar]
49. Tan, Y.
    (2014) English as a ‘mother tongue’ in Singapore. World Englishes, 33(3), 319–339. 10.1111/weng.12093
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12093 [Google Scholar]
50. Van Kampen, E., Admiraal, W., & Berry, A.
    (2018) Content and language integrated learning in the Netherlands: teachers’ self-reported pedagogical practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(2), 222–236. 10.1080/13670050.2016.1154004
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1154004 [Google Scholar]
51. Vygotsky, L. S.
    (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Weinburgh, M., Silva, C., Smith, K. H., Groulx, J., & Nettles, J.
    (2014) The intersection of inquiry-based science and language: Preparing teachers for ELL classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(5), 519–541. 10.1007/s10972‑014‑9389‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9389-9 [Google Scholar]
53. Wolff, D.
    (2012) The European framework for CLIL teacher education. Synergies, 8, 105–116.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G.
    (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17(2), 89–100. 10.1111/j.1469‑7610.1976.tb00381.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x [Google Scholar]
55. Zwiers, J.
    (2008) Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms, Grades 5–12. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]