Definiteness in written Swedish by Finnish-speaking immersion pupils at the end of immersion

References

1. Axelsson, M.
   (1994) Noun phrase development in Swedish as a second language: A study of adult learners’ acquiring definiteness and the semantics and morphology of adjectives. Stockholm: Stockholm University Centre for Research and Bilingualism.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bergroth, M.
   (2015) Kotimaisten kielten kielikylpy. Vaasan yliopiston julkaisuja. Selvityksiä ja raportteja 202 [Immersion of the National Languages]. Vaasa: University of Vaasa.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bergroth, M. , & Björklund, S.
   (2013) Kielikylpyohjelman tutkimustuloksia Suomessa. [Results from immersion studies in Finland] In L. Tainio & H. Harju-Luukkainen (Eds.), Kaksikielinen koulu – tulevaisuuden monikielinen Suomi/Tvåspråkig skola – ett flerspråkigt Finland i framtiden [Bilingual school – a multilingual Finland of the future]. (pp.91–114). Jyväskylä: Finnish Educational Research Association. Kasvatusalan tutkimuksia 62.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Brown, R.
   (1973) A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi: 10.4159/harvard.9780674732469
   https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674732469 [Google Scholar]
5. Bybee, J.
   (2008) Usage-based grammar. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.216–236). New York NY: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Collins, L. , Trofimovich, P. , White, J. , Cardoso, W. , & Horst, M.
   (2009) Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study. The Modern Language Journal 93 (3), 336–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00894.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00894.x [Google Scholar]
7. DeKeyser, R.
   (2005) What makes learning second language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55 (S1), 1–25. doi: 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00294.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00294.x [Google Scholar]
8. Ellis, N. C.
   (2016) Salience, cognition, language complexity, and complex adaptive systems. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38 (2), 341–351. doi: 10.1017/S027226311600005X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311600005X [Google Scholar]
9. Ellis, N. , & Robinson, P.
   (2008) An introduction to cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.3–24). New York NY: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ellis, R.
    (2008) The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ellis, R. , & Barkhuizen, G.
    (2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Filipović, L. , & Hawkins, J. A.
    (2013) Multiple factors in second language acquisition: The CASP model. Linguistics, 51 (1), 145–176. doi: 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0005 [Google Scholar]
13. Finnish National Agency for Education
    Finnish National Agency for Education (2014) Distribution of lesson hours in basic education. Retrieved fromwww.oph.fi/english/curricula_and_qualifications/basic_education
14. Finnish National Board of Education
    Finnish National Board of Education (2014) Koulutuksen tilastollinen vuosikirja 2014 [Statistical Annuals of Education]. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Fraurud, K.
    (1988) Hierarchical relations between discourse referents and the interpretation of antecedentless definite noun phrases. In V. Rosén (Ed.), Papers from the tenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics (pp.196–210). Bergen: University of Bergen.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Genesee, F.
    (1987) Learning through two languages. Studies of immersion and bilingual education. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Glahn, E. , Håkansson, G. , Hammarberg, B. , Holmen, A. , Hvenekilde, A. & Lund, K.
    (2001) Processability in Scandinavian second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23 (3), 389–416. doi: 10.1017/S0272263101003047
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101003047 [Google Scholar]
18. Goldschneider, J. , & DeKeyser, R.
    (2005) Explaining the “natural” order of L2 morpheme acquisition in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 55 (S1), 27–77. doi: 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00295.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00295.x [Google Scholar]
19. Hakulinen, A. , Vilkuna, M. , Korhonen, R. , Koivisto, V. , Heinonen, T. R. , & Alho, I.
    (2004) Iso suomen kielioppi [Big Finnish Grammar]. Helsinki: Society of Finnish Literature.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Harley, B.
    (1993) Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15 (2), 245–260. doi: 10.1017/S0272263100011980
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011980 [Google Scholar]
21. Harley, B.
    (1998) The role of focus-on-form tasks in promoting child L2 acquisition. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.156–174). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hatch, E. , & Lazaraton, A.
    (1991) The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Cambridge: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Housen, A. , & Simoens, H.
    (2016) Introduction: cognitive perspectives on difficulty and complexity in L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38 (2), 163–175. doi: 10.1017/S0272263116000176
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000176 [Google Scholar]
24. Hyltenstam, K.
    (1992) Non-native features of near-native speakers. On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In R. Harris (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp.351–368). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. doi: 10.1016/S0166‑4115(08)61505‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61505-8 [Google Scholar]
25. Jarvis, S.
    (2002) Topic continuity in L2 English article use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24 (3), 387–418. doi: 10.1017/S0272263102003029
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102003029 [Google Scholar]
26. Jarvis, S. , & Odlin, T.
    (2000) Morphological type, spatial reference, and language transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22 (4), 535–556. doi: 10.1017/s0272263100004034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100004034 [Google Scholar]
27. Järvinen, E-L.
    (2010) Val av species och bestämdhetsform i ett test för finska grundskoleelever [Choice of definiteness and form of a noun in a test for Finnish pupils in comprehensive school]. In C. Falk , A. Nord & R. Palm (eds): Svenskans beskrivning 30. [Describing Swedish 30]. Stockholm: Institutionen för nordiska språk, Stockholm University: 154–163.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Laury, R.
    (1996) Sen kategoriasta – onko suomessa jo artikkeli? [The category of se – Does Finnish already have an article?]. Virittäjä [Tuner], 100 (2), 162–180.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lieven, E. , & Tomasello
    (2008) Children’s first language acquisition. In: P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp.168–196). NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Long, M. H.
    (1990) The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain. TESOL Quarterly, 24 (4), 649–666. doi: 10.2307/3587113
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587113 [Google Scholar]
31. Lyons, C.
    (1999) Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511605789
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605789 [Google Scholar]
32. Lyster, R.
    (2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.18 [Google Scholar]
33. Lyster, R. , & Ranta, L.
    (1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19 , 37–66. doi: 10.1017/S0272263197001034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034 [Google Scholar]
34. Nyqvist, E-L.
    (2013) Species och artikelbruk i finskspråkiga grundskoleelevers inlärarsvenska. En longitudinell undersökning i årskurserna 7–9. [Definiteness and use of articles in Swedish of Finnish L2-learners. A longitudinal study from 7th to 9th grade in comprehensive school]. A doctoral dissertation published in electronic format. Turku: University of Turku. Retrieved fromwww.doria.fi/handle/10024/91519.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Nyqvist, E-L.
    (2014) Hurdana species- och artikelfel bör motarbetas? [What kind of definiteness and article errors ought to be avoided?] In J. Lindström , S. Henricson , A. Huhtala , P. Kukkonen , H. Lehti-Eklund , & C. Lindholm : Svenskans Beskrivning 33 [Describing Swedish 33]. Nordica Helsingiensia 37 , 353–362.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Nyqvist, E-L.
    (2015) Species och artikelbruk hos vuxna svenskinlärare [Definiteness and article use by adult L2-learners of Swedish]. NordAnd 10 (2), 73–101.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Nyqvist, E-L.
    (2016) Swedish as a L3 for Finnish learners: The role of complexity, cross-linguistic influence and study materials in the case of definiteness and the use of articles. Research in Language 14 (3), 297–327. doi: 10.1515/rela‑2016‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2016-0016 [Google Scholar]
38. Odlin, T.
    (2003) Cross-linguistic influence. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.436–486). Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9780470756492.ch15
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch15 [Google Scholar]
39. Pallotti, G.
    (2007) An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28 (3), 361–382. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm018
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm018 [Google Scholar]
40. Rahkonen, M. , & Håkansson, G.
    (2008) Production of written L2 Swedish – Processability or input frequencies?In J. -U. Kessler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp.135–161). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Ringbom, H.
    (1987) The role of the first language in foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Ringbom, H.
    (2007) Cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Sajavaara, K.
    (1983) The article errors of Finnish learners of English. Umeå Papers in English, 4 , 72–87.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Schmidt, R. W.
    (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 2 (2), 129–158. doi: 10.1093/applin/11.2.129
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129 [Google Scholar]
45. Sipola, S.
    (2008) Den språkliga korrektheten i uppsatser på svenska [Grammatical accuracy in narratives in Swedish]. In T. Swanström (Ed.), Språkbad: Två språk i utveckling. Kielikylpy: Kaksi kieltä kehityksessä [Immersion: Two languages in development] (pp.79–91). Turku: Skrifter från Svenska institutionen vid Åbo Akademi.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Teleman, U. , Hellberg, S. & Andersson, E.
    (1999a) Svenska Akademiens Grammatik. [Grammar of the Swedish Academy] Vol. 2 . Stockholm: Nordstedts Ordbok.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Teleman, U. , Hellberg, S. & Andersson, E.
    (1999b) Svenska Akademiens Grammatik. [Grammar of the Swedish Academy] Vol. 3 . Stockholm: Nordstedts Ordbok.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Trenkic, D.
    (2007) Variability in L2 article production: Beyond the representational deficit vs. processing constraints debate. Second Language Research, 23 (3): 289–327. doi: 10.1177/0267658307077643
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307077643 [Google Scholar]
49. Trenkic, D. , & Pongpairoj, N.
    (2013) Referent salience affects second language article use. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16 (1), 152–166. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000156.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000156 [Google Scholar]
50. World Atlas of Language Structures
    World Atlas of Language Structures (2017) Combination definite articles / indefinite articles. Retrieved fromwals.info/combinations/37A_38A#2/25.5/148.5.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Vilkuna, M.
    (1992) Referenssi ja määräisyys suomenkielisten tekstien tulkinnassa [Reference and definiteness in Finnish texts]. Helsinki: Society of Finnish Literature.
    [Google Scholar]