Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2212-8433
  • E-ISSN: 2212-8441
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This study analyzes a professional development intervention for preservice teachers that integrates language-acquisition strategies and academic content. The intervention is based on the Guided Language Acquisition Design (Project GLAD) and an elementary school’s science curriculum (FOSS), which included elements of effective professional development: active learning, models of effective practice, a focus on content, job-embeddedness, and reflection.

The Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) and Bilingual Education-certified preservice teachers found that scaffolding context-reduced and cognitively-demanding lessons were foundational for content and language learning. Helping to plan lessons, creating lesson materials, and implementing them with third-grade dual-language students were key to the preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of integrating language and content. This study illustrates how situated learning experiences are beneficial for preservice teachers to orchestrate effective integration of language and content instruction for students in dual-language classrooms.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S.
    (1997) The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. C.
    (2008) Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi:  10.1177/0022487108324554
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bogden, R., & Biklin, S. K.
    (2011) Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Borko, H.
    (2004) Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:  10.3102/0013189X033008003
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cummins, J.
    (1981) The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. InCalifornia State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp.3–49). Los Angeles, CA: California State University, National Evaluation, Dissemination and Assessment Center.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Darling-Hammond, L.
    (1999) Educating teachers for the next century: Rethinking practice and policy. InG. A. Griffith (Ed.), The education of teachers: The ninety-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp.221–256). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M., Gardner, M., & Espinoza, D.
    (2017) Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Deussen, T., Autio, E., Roccograndi, A., Hanita, M.
    (2014) The impact of Project GLAD on students’ literacy and science learning: Year 1 results from a cluster-randomized trial of sheltered instruction. SREE Spring 2014 Conference Abstract. Retrieved from https://ia800403.us.archive.org/1/items/ERIC_ED562842/ERIC_ED562842.pdf/.
  9. Fortune, T. W., Tedick, D. J., & Walker, C.
    (2008) Integrated language and content teaching: Insights from the immersion classroom. InT. W. Fortune & D. J. Tedick (Eds.), Pathways to multilingualism: Evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp.71–96). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847690371‑007
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690371-007 [Google Scholar]
  10. Full Option Science System (FOSS)
    Full Option Science System (FOSS) (2015) Water and climate. Retrieved from https://www.fossweb.com/delegate/ssi-wdf-ucm-webContent?dDocName=D3023747/.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gibbons, P.
    (2003) Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247–273. doi:  10.2307/3588504
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588504 [Google Scholar]
  12. Krashen, S.
    (1988) Second language acquisition and second language learning. New York, NY: Alemany Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lave, J., & Wenger, E.
    (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee, O., & Luykx, A.
    (2006) Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511617508
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617508 [Google Scholar]
  15. Meyer-Jacks, L., & Thaddeus, E.
    (2006) Water: Third-grade curriculum. Albuquerque, NM: Project GLAD, Dual Language of New Mexico.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Migration Policy Institute
    Migration Policy Institute (2017) Children in U.S. immigrant families. Retrieved from www.migrationpolicy.org/programs/data-hub/charts/children-immigrant-families/.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D. & Gonzalez, N.
    (1992) Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. doi:  10.1080/00405849209543534
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849209543534 [Google Scholar]
  18. Morton, T.
    (2016) Conceptualizing and investigating teachers’ knowledge for integrating content and language in content-based instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content Based Language Education, 4(2), 144–167. doi:  10.1075/jicb.4.2.01mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.4.2.01mor [Google Scholar]
  19. National Center for Education Statistics
    National Center for Education Statistics (1997) America’s teachers: Profile of a profession. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. National Research Council
    National Research Council (2012) A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA)
    National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) (2004) National Science Teachers Association position statement. Retrieved from www.nsta.org/docs/PositionStatement_ScientificInquiry.pdf/.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Oliveira, A. & Weinburg, M. H.
    (2017) Science teacher preparation in content-based second language acquisition. New York, NY: Springer. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑43516‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43516-9 [Google Scholar]
  23. Orange County Department of Education (OCDE)
    Orange County Department of Education (OCDE) (2015) OCDE Project GLAD learning guide (2nd ed.). Costa Mesa, CA: Orange County Department of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Quinn, H., Lee, O., & Valdés, G.
    (2012) Language demands and opportunities in relation to next generation science standards for English Language Learners: What teachers need to know. (Understanding Language Initiative) Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Scarcella, R.
    (2003) Academic English: A conceptual framework. Irvine, CA: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Shulman, L.
    (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1–22. doi:  10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 [Google Scholar]
  27. Snow, M., Met, & Genesse, F.
    (1989) A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23(2), 201–217. doi:  10.2307/3587333
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587333 [Google Scholar]
  28. Swain, M.
    (1996) Integrating language and content in immersion classrooms: Research perspectives. Canadian Modern Language Review, 4, 529–548. doi:  10.3138/cmlr.52.4.529
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.52.4.529 [Google Scholar]
  29. Tong, F., Luo, W., Irby, B., Lara-Alecio, R., & Rivera, H.
    (2015) Investigating the impact of professional development on teachers’ instructional time and English learners’ language development: a multilevel cross-classified approach. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(3), 292–313. doi:  10.1080/13670050.2015.1051509
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1051509 [Google Scholar]
  30. Walker, C., Ranney, S., & Fortune, T.
    (2005) Preparing preservice teachers for English language learners: A content-based approach. InD. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher education: International perspectives (pp.313–333). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Walqui, A., & van Lier, L.
    (2010) Scaffolding the academic success of adolescent English language learners: A pedagogy of promise. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilson, D. M.
    (2011) Dual language programs on the rise. Harvard Graduate School of Education, 27(2), 1–4.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error