Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2212-8433
  • E-ISSN: 2212-8441
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Although it has long been touted as a key ingredient to successful immersion practice, no research to date has examined immersion teacher educators’ (ITEs) knowledge base as it relates to the work of content, language, and literacy integration in curriculum planning and teaching. Thus, it is difficult to know whether or not ITEs are ready and able to support the pedagogical transition toward better-integrated practice in the immersion classroom. This qualitative study set out to fill this gap in our knowledge by exploring ITEs’ understanding of the nature and role of language and literacy in the context of their discipline of expertise through the use of an analytic framework designed to examine ITEs’ knowledge base. Key findings point to the need for the elaboration of a professional development (PD) program specifically dedicated to supporting ITEs’ continuous knowledge growth, particularly when it comes to the issue of pedagogical integration.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alvermann, D. E., Phelps, S. F., & Gillis, V. R.
    (2010) Content area reading and literacy: Succeeding in today’s diverse classrooms (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. C.
    (2008) Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. B., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R.
    (1956) Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals – Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: McKay.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cammarata, L.
    (2016) Foreign Language education and the development of inquiry-driven language programs: Key challenges and curricular planning strategies. InL. Cammarata (Ed.), Content-based foreign language teaching: Curriculum and pedagogy for developing advanced thinking and literacy skills (pp.123–143). New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203850497
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850497 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cammarata, L., & Haley, C.
    (2017) Integrated content, language, and literacy instruction in a Canadian French immersion context: A professional development journey. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 332–348. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2017.1386617
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1386617 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D. J.
    (2012) Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01330.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01330.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Cammarata, L., Cavanagh, M., Blain, S., & Sabatier, C.
    (2018) Enseigner en immersion française au Canada: Synthèse des connaissances sur les défis et leurs implications pour la formation des enseignants. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 74(1), 101–127. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.3889
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.3889 [Google Scholar]
  8. Caelli, K., Ray, L., & Mill, J.
    (2003) ‘Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 1–13. doi: 10.1177/160940690300200201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200201 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cavanagh, M., & Blain, S.
    (2015) Planning strategies for writing: Their effect on the textual coherence of imaginative stories created by francophone pupils in New Brunswick and Alberta. The International Journal of Literacies, 21(2), 1–16. doi: 10.18848/2327‑0136/CGP/v21i02/48833
    https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0136/CGP/v21i02/48833 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2016) L’apprentissage des stratégies de mise en texte et de révision chez les élèves francophones en milieu minoritaire: Une étude de cas contrastés. Language and Literacy, 18(2), 44–61. doi: 10.20360/G2HW2V
    https://doi.org/10.20360/G2HW2V [Google Scholar]
  11. Cochran-Smith, M.
    (2003) Learning and unlearning: The education of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 5–28. doi: 10.1016/S0742‑051X(02)00091‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00091-4 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cormier, M., & Turnbull, M.
    (2007) Une approche littératiée pour apprendre la langue et les sciences en immersion française. InN. Spanghero-Gaillard & M. Billières (Eds.), Actes du deuxième colloque international de didactique cognitive des langues, 19 au 21 septembre 2007 (pp.55–59). Toulouse: Université de Toulouse – Le Mirail.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cormier, M., & Turnbull, M.
    (2009) Une approche littératiée : apprendre les sciences et la langue en immersion tardive. Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 65(5), 817–840.10.3138/cmlr.65.5.817
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.65.5.817 [Google Scholar]
  14. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L.
    (2000) Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cummins, J., & Man Yee-Fun, E.
    (2007) Academic language: What is it and how do we acquire it?InJ. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (Vol.15, pp.797–810). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑46301‑8_53
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_53 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cummins, J.
    (1984) Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2013) A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualizing. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 1–38. doi: 10.1515/eujal‑2013‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0011 [Google Scholar]
  18. Day, E. M., & Shapson, S. M.
    (1993) FI teacher education: A study of two programs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 49, 446–465. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.49.3.446
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.49.3.446 [Google Scholar]
  19. Day, E., & Shapson, S.
    (1996) A national survey: FI teachers’ preparation and their professional development needs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52(2), 248–270. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.52.2.248
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.52.2.248 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dillman, D. A.
    (2000) Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Erben, T.
    (2004) Emerging research and practices in immersion teacher education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 320–338. doi: 10.1017/S0267190504000157
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000157 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fortune, T. W.
    (2012) What the research says about immersion. InAsia Society (Ed.), Chinese language learning in the early grades: A handbook of resources and best practices for Mandarin immersion (pp.9–13). Retrieved from https://asiasociety.org/files/chinese-earlylanguage.pdf (10April 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E.
    (1998) Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397–417. doi: 10.2307/3588114
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588114 [Google Scholar]
  24. Genesee, F.
    (2004) What do we know about bilingual education for majority language students. InT. K. Bhatia & W. Ritchie (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (pp.547–576). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gibbons, P.
    (2009) English learners, academic literacy, and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone. Portsmouth NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Johnston, B., & Goettsch, K.
    (2000) In search of the knowledge base of language teaching: Explanations by experienced teachers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 437–468. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.56.3.437
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.56.3.437 [Google Scholar]
  27. Knapp, P., & Watkins, M.
    (2005) Genre, text, grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. Sydney: UNSW Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kong, K.
    (2009) Content-based instruction: What can we learn from content-trained teachers’ and language-trained teachers’ pedagogies?Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 233–267. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.66.2.233
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.2.233 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kong, S., & Hoare, P.
    (2011) Cognitive content engagement in content-based language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 15, 307–324. doi: 10.1177/1362168811401152
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401152 [Google Scholar]
  30. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P.
    (2009) What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 60–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Korthagen, F.
    (2000) Teacher educators, from neglected group to spearheads in the development of education. InG. Willems, J. Stakenborg, & W. Veugelers (Eds), Trends in Dutch teacher education (pp.36–49). Leuven: Garant.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Korthagen, F. A. J., Loughran, J., & Lunenberg, M.
    (2005) Teaching teachers: Studies into the expertise of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kucer, S. B.
    (2009) Dimensions of literacy: A conceptual base for teaching reading and writing in school settings (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lanier, J. E., & Little, J. W.
    (1986) Research on teacher education. InM. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp.527–569). New York, NY: MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Lyster, R.
    (2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.18 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2011) Content-based second language teaching. InE. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol.2, pp.611–630). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2016) Vers une approche intégrée en immersion. Montréal: Les Éditions CEC.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lyster, R., & Mori, H.
    (2006) Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300. doi: 10.1017/S0272263106060128
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060128 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lyster, R., & Tedick, D.
    (2014) Research perspectives on immersion pedagogy looking back and looking forward. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 2(2), 210–224. doi: 10.1075/jicb.2.2.04lys
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.2.2.04lys [Google Scholar]
  40. Merriam, S. B.
    (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T.
    (2015) A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning – mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2014.1000924
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000924 [Google Scholar]
  42. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J.
    (2006) Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9620.2006.00684.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x [Google Scholar]
  43. Morton, T.
    (2018) Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 275–286. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2016) Conceptualizing and investigating teachers’ knowledge for integrating content and language in content- based instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 4, 144–167. doi: 10.1075/jicb.4.2.01mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.4.2.01mor [Google Scholar]
  45. Obadia, A. A.
    (1985) La formation du professeur d’immersion française au Canada: Une conception philosophique et pédagogique en devenir ou à la recherche d’une troisième voie. Canadian Journal of Education, 10(4), 415–426. doi: 10.2307/1494841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1494841 [Google Scholar]
  46. Russell, T., & McPherson, S.
    (2001, May). Indicators of success in teacher education: A review and analysis of recent research. Pan-Canadian Education Research Agenda Symposium, Quebec City, Quebec.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Schleppegrell, M.
    (2004) The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Shulman, L. S.
    (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 [Google Scholar]
  49. (1986) Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004 [Google Scholar]
  50. Skehan, P.
    (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Smith, K.
    (2003) So, what about the professional development of teacher educators?European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 201–215. doi: 10.1080/0261976032000088738
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976032000088738 [Google Scholar]
  52. Steffen, G.
    (2013) Les disciplines dans l’enseignement bilingue. Apprentissage intégré des savoirs disciplinaires et linguistiques. Berne: Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑02663‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-02663-4 [Google Scholar]
  53. Tardif, C.
    (1984) La formation des enseignants en situation d’immersion. Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes/Canadian Modern Language Review, 41(2), 365–375. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.41.2.365
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.41.2.365 [Google Scholar]
  54. Tedick, D.
    (2000–2006) Content-Based Language Teaching with Technology (CoBaLTT). Web resource center. www.carla.umn.edu/cobaltt
  55. Tedick, D. J., & Cammarata, L.
    (2012) Content and language integration in K-12 contexts: Student outcomes, teacher practices and stakeholder perspectives. Foreign Language Annals, 45(S1), S28–S53. doi: 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2012.01178.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01178.x [Google Scholar]
  56. Tedick, D. J., & Fortune, T. W.
    (2013) Bilingual/immersion teacher education. InC. Chappelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Troyan, F., Cammarata, L., & Martel, J.
    (2017) Integration PCK: Modeling the knowledge underlying a world-language teacher’s implementation of CBI. Foreign Language Annals, 50(2), 458–476.10.1111/flan.12266
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12266 [Google Scholar]
  58. Watzke, J.
    (2007) Foreign language pedagogical knowledge: Toward a developmental theory of beginning teacher practices. Modern Language Journal, 91, 63–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00510.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00510.x [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhang, F., & Zhan, J.
    (2014) The knowledge base of non-native English-speaking teachers: Perspectives of teachers and administrators. Language and Education, 28, 58–582. doi: 10.1080/09500782.2014.921193
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.921193 [Google Scholar]
  60. Zeichner, K.
    (1999) The new scholarship in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(9), 4–15. doi: 10.3102/0013189X028009004
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028009004 [Google Scholar]
  61. Zwiers, J.
    (2008) Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): immersion; integrated approach; knowledge base; teacher educator
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error