1887
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2212-8433
  • E-ISSN: 2212-8441
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between teacher questioning practices and pedagogical objectives in Spanish- and English-medium lectures. The results obtained from the analysis of 16 lectures delivered by the same two university teachers both in Spanish and English reveal that the use of questions could be exploited more effectively for pedagogical purposes. Consequently, this paper tries to raise teachers’ awareness of the role of questions upon their teaching and their students’ learning process.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.18016.san
2020-03-31
2020-09-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexander, R.
    (2008) Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ament, J. R., & Pérez Vidal, C.
    (2015) Linguistic outcomes of English medium instruction programmes in higher education: A study on Economics undergraduates at a Catalan university. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(1), 47–67. doi:  10.18870/hlrc.v5i1.239
    https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v5i1.239 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatia, V. K.
    (2013) Analysing genre language use in professional settings. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bengtsson, M.
    (2016) How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. doi:  10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, D.
    (1993) Representativeness in corpus design. Journal of Literacy and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. doi:  10.1093/llc/8.4.243
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/8.4.243 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cammarata, L., & Ó Ceallaigh, T. J.
    (2018) Teacher education and professional development for immersion and content-based instruction: Research on programs, practices, and teacher educators. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(2), 153–161. 10.1075/jicb.00004.cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.00004.cam [Google Scholar]
  7. Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D.
    (2012) Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01330.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01330.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang, Y.
    (2012) The use of questions by lecturers in lectures given in English: Influences of disciplinary cultures. English for Specific Purposes, 31, 103–116. doi:  10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cheng, S. W.
    (2012) ‘That’s it for today’: Academic lecture closings and the impact of class size. English for Specific Purposes, 31(4), 234–248. doi:  10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.004 [Google Scholar]
  10. Christie, F.
    (2005) Language education in the primary years. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Churchill, R.
    (2011) Teaching: Making a difference. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Crawford Camiciottoli, B.
    (2007) The language of business studies lectures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.157
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.157 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2004) Interactive discourse structuring in L2 guest lectures: Some insights from a comparative corpus-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 3, 183–199.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Creswell, J. W.
    (2014) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dafouz, E., & Sánchez-García, D.
    (2013) ‘Does everybody understand?’ Teacher questions across disciplines in English-medium university lectures: An exploratory study. Language Value, 5(1), 129–151. doi:  10.6035/LanguageV.2012.5.7
    https://doi.org/10.6035/LanguageV.2012.5.7 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2007) Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/lllt.20
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.20 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dafouz, E., & Smit, U.
    (2020) ROAD-MAPPING English medium education in the internationalised university. Palgrave-McMillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑23463‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23463-8 [Google Scholar]
  18. Delicado Puerto, G., & Pavón, V.
    (2015) La implantación de titulaciones bilingües en la educación superior: El caso de la formación didáctica del profesorado bilingüe de primaria en la universidad de Extremadura. Educación y Futuro, 32, 35–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
    (2013) English-Medium instruction at universities: Global challenges. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2007) Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Du Bois, J. W., S. Schuetze-Coburn, S. Cumming, & Paolino, D.
    (1993) Outline of discourse transcription. InJ. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp.45–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ellis, K.
    (1993) Teacher questioning behavior and student learning: What research says to teachers. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Albuquerque, NM.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fortanet, I., & Bellés, B.
    (2005) Spoken academic discourse: An approach to research on lectures. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, volumen monográfico, 161–178.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibbons, P.
    (2002) Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hall, J. K.
    (1995) (Re)creating our worlds with words: A sociohistorical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 206–232. doi:  10.1093/applin/16.2.206
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.2.206 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P.
    (2001) What is scaffolding?InJ. Hammond (Ed.), Scaffolding: Teaching and learning in language and literacy education (pp.1–14). Newtown, Australia: Primary English Teaching Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. He, A. W., & Young, R.
    (1998) Language proficiency interviews: A discourse approach. InR. Young & A. W. He (Eds.), Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency (pp.1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/sibil.14.02he
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.14.02he [Google Scholar]
  28. Howard, A.
    (2010) Is there such a thing as a typical language lesson?Classroom Discourse, 1, 82–100. doi:  10.1080/19463011003750699
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463011003750699 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hyland, K.
    (2012) Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kramsch, C.
    (1986) From language proficiency to competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), 366–372. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1986.tb05291.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05291.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Kunioshi, N., Noguchi, J., Tojo, K., & Hayashi, H.
    (2016) Supporting English-medium pedagogy through an online corpus of science and engineering lectures. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(3), 293–303. doi:  10.1080/03043797.2015.1056104
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1056104 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lantolf, J. P.
    (2011) The sociocultural approach to second language acquisition. Sociocultural theory, second language acquisition and L2 development. InD. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp.24–47). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E.
    (2014) Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9780203813850
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813850 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lee, J.
    (2009) Size matters: An exploratory comparison of small- and large-class university lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 42–57. doi:  10.1016/j.esp.2008.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lorenzo, F.
    (2007) An analytical framework of language integration in L2 content- based courses. Language and Education, 21, 502–513. doi:  10.2167/le708.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/le708.0 [Google Scholar]
  36. Markee, N.
    (2008) Toward a learning behaviour tracking methodology for CA-for- SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29, 404–427. doi:  10.1093/applin/amm052
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm052 [Google Scholar]
  37. McComas, W. F., & Abraham, L.
    (2004) Asking more effective questions. Rossier School of Education. cet.usc.edu/resources/teaching_learning/material_docs/Asking_Better_Questions.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Morell, T.
    (2007) What enhances EFL students’ participation in lecture discourse? Student, lecturer and discourse perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 222–237. doi:  10.1016/j.jeap.2007.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2007.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H.
    (2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Morton, T.
    (2012) Classroom talk, conceptual change and teacher reflection in bilingual science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 101–110. doi:  10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.006 [Google Scholar]
  41. Oksaar, E.
    (1990) Language contact and culture contact: Towards an integrative approach in second language acquisition research. InH. Dechert (Ed.), Current trends in European second language acquisition research (pp.230–243). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sánchez-García, D.
    (2010) Classroom interaction in university settings: The case of questions in three disciplines (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidad Complutense de Madrid. eprints.ucm.es/12793/1/Davinia_Sanchez.pdf
  43. (2016) A contrastive analysis of Spanish and English-medium instruction in tertiary education: Teacher discourse strategies in a spoken corpus (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad Complutense de Madrid. https://eprints.ucm.es/39800/1/T37905.pdf
  44. (2018) Teacher questioning: Exploring student interaction and cognitive engagement in Spanish and EMI university lectures. Porta Linguarum, Monográfico III, 103–120.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Seedhouse, P.
    (2004) The interactional architecture of the second language classroom: A conversational analysis perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Swales, J.
    (2004) Research genres: Explorations and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
  47. Taguchi, N.
    (2014) English-medium education in the global society: An introduction. Special issue of International Review of Applied Linguistics, 52(2), 89–98.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Thompson, S.
    (1994) Frameworks and contexts a genre-based approach to analyzing lecture introductions. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 171–187. doi:  10.1016/0889‑4906(94)90014‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90014-0 [Google Scholar]
  49. (1998) Why ask questions in monologue? Language choice at work in scientific and linguistic talk. InS. Hunston (Ed.), Language at work (pp.137–150). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Tsui, A.
    (1992) A functional description of questions. InM. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in spoken discourse analysis (pp.89–110). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Van Compernolle, R.
    (2015) Interaction and second language development: A Vygotskian perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/lllt.44
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.44 [Google Scholar]
  52. van Der Walt, C.
    (2013) Multilingual higher education: Beyond English medium orientations. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. doi:  10.21832/9781847699206
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847699206 [Google Scholar]
  53. Vygotsky, L.
    (1989) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Walsh, S.
    (2006a) Talking the talk of the TESOL classroom. ELT Journal, 60(2), 133–141. doi:  10.1093/elt/cci100
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci100 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2006b) Investigating classroom discourse. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9780203015711
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203015711 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2011) Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Abingdon: Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9780203827826
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826 [Google Scholar]
  57. (2013) Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Walsh, S., & Lowing, K.
    (2008) Talking to learn or learning to talk: PGCE students’ development of interactional competence. Paper presented at theBritish Educational Research Association Conference, Herriott Watt University, Edinburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Walsh, S., & Li, L.
    (2013) Conversations as space for learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 1–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Wegerif, R.
    (2010) Mind-expanding: Teaching for thinking and creativity. Buckingham: Open University Press/Mcgraw Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. (2011) Towards a dialogic theory of how children learn to think. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(3), 179–195. doi:  10.1016/j.tsc.2011.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  62. Wertsch, J. V.
    (2007) Mediation. InH. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp.178–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CCOL0521831040.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040.008 [Google Scholar]
  63. Wright, B. M.
    (2016) Display and referential questions: Effects on student responses. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 15(4), 160–189. 10.35360/njes.388
    https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.388 [Google Scholar]
  64. Young, L.
    (1994) University lectures-macro-structure and micro-features. InJ. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp.159–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Young, R. F.
    (2011) Interactional competence in learning, teaching and testing. InE. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.426–443). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.18016.san
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.18016.san
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): classroom discourse , EMI , pedagogical goals , questions and teacher education
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error