1887
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2212-8433
  • E-ISSN: 2212-8441
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Teacher language awareness (TLA) constitutes the teacher’s self-reflective knowledge about the operation of language systems in pedagogical practices. This study focuses on teachers’ understanding of learning of language and learning through language in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) contexts, exploring how teachers proceduralise their knowledge of language to facilitate science learning in Hong Kong. By analysing the reflective relationship between TLA and scaffolding strategies of two teachers (students  = 31; 32) during a set of lessons in a secondary school, this paper suggests that it is critical to re-orient the TLA focus from teachers to the act of learning and learners’ needs. This expanded conceptual framework of TLA sheds light on how to transform teachers’ implicit knowledge of language into explicit awareness of scaffolding in class. The TLA-filtered, scaffolded interactions can therefore promote the use of language not merely for pedagogical purposes but also as a cognitive learning tool.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.18023.xu
2019-09-25
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andrews, S.
    (2007) Teacher language awareness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511497643
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497643 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, S., & Lin, A. M. Y.
    (2018) Language awareness and teacher development. InP. Garrett & J. M. Cots (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp.57–74). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andrews, S., & Svalberg, A. M.-L.
    (2017) Teacher language awareness. InJ. Cenoz, D. Gorter, & S. May (Eds.), Language awareness and multilingualism. (pp.219–231). New York, NY: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Chan, J. Y. H.
    (2016) The fine-tuning medium-of-instruction policy in Hong Kong: A case study of the changing school-based test papers in science subjects. Education Journal, 44(1), 159–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Choi, P. K.
    (2003) “The best students will learn English”: Ultra-utilitarianism and linguistic imperialism in education in post-1997 Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy, 18(6), 673–694. 10.1080/0268093032000145917
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093032000145917 [Google Scholar]
  6. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
    (2010) CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Edge, J.
    (1988) Applying linguistics in English language teacher training for speakers of other languages. ELT Journal, 42(1), 9–13. 10.1093/elt/42.1.9
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.1.9 [Google Scholar]
  8. Education Bureau
    Education Bureau (2009) Fine-tuning the medium of instruction for secondary schools. Hong Kong SAR: Education Bureau.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans, S.
    (2013) The long march to biliteracy and trilingualism: Language policy in Hong Kong education since the handover. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 302–324. 10.1017/S0267190513000019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190513000019 [Google Scholar]
  10. Fung, D., & Yip, V.
    (2014) The effects of the medium of instruction in certificate-level physics on achievement and motivation to learn. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1219–1245. 10.1002/tea.21174
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21174 [Google Scholar]
  11. García, O.
    (2009) Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gibbons, P.
    (2003) Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247–273. 10.2307/3588504
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588504 [Google Scholar]
  13. Graham, K. M., Choi, Y., Davoodi, A., Razmeh, S., & Dixon, L. Q.
    (2018) Language and content outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A systematic review. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 19–37. 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.2
    https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1993) Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116. 10.1016/0898‑5898(93)90026‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hoare, P.
    (2003) Effective teaching of science through English in Hong Kong secondary schools. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 10.5353/th_b2976829
    https://doi.org/10.5353/th_b2976829
  16. Holton, D., & Clarke, D.
    (2006) Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127–143. 10.1080/00207390500285818
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390500285818 [Google Scholar]
  17. Koopman, G. J., Skeet, J., & de Graaff, R.
    (2014) Exploring content teachers’ knowledge of language pedagogy: A report on a small-scale research project in a Dutch CLIL context. The Language Learning Journal, 42 (2), 123–136. 10.1080/09571736.2014.889974
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889974 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
    (2016) Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64(4), 367–375. 10.1093/elt/ccp082
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lindahl, K. M.
    (2013) Exploring an invisible medium: Teacher language awareness among preservice educators of English language learners (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
  20. (2016) Teacher language awareness among pre-service K-12 educators of English language learners. InJ. Crandall & M. Christison (Eds.), Teacher education and professional development in TESOL: Global perspectives (pp.127–140). New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315641263‑8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315641263-8 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lindahl, K. M., Baecher, L., & Tomas, Z.
    (2013) Teacher language awareness in content-based activity design. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language, 1(2), 198–225. 10.1075/jicb.1.2.03lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.2.03lin [Google Scholar]
  22. Lindahl, K. M., & Watkins, N.
    (2015) Creating a culture of language awareness in content-based contexts. TESOL Journal, 6(4), 777–789. 10.1002/tesj.223
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.223 [Google Scholar]
  23. Liyanage, I., & Bartlett, B. J.
    (2010) From autopsy to biopsy: A metacognitive view of lesson planning and teacher trainees in ELT. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1362–1371. 10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lo, Y. Y.
    (2017) Development of the beliefs and language awareness of content subject teachers in CLIL: Does professional development help?International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 1–15. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1318821
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1318821 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lyster, R.
    (2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. London: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/lllt.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.18 [Google Scholar]
  26. Merino, J. A., & Lasagabaster, D.
    (2018) The effect of content and language integrated learning programmes’ intensity on English proficiency: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 18–30. 10.1111/ijal.12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12177 [Google Scholar]
  27. Morton, T.
    (2018) Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 275–286. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352 [Google Scholar]
  28. Regalla, M.
    (2012) Language objectives: More than just vocabulary. TESOL Journal, 3(2), 210–230. 10.1002/tesj.15
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.15 [Google Scholar]
  29. Seah, L. H., Clarke, D., & Hart, C.
    (2015) Understanding middle school students’ difficulties in explaining density differences from a language perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 37(14), 2386–2409. 10.1080/09500693.2015.1080879
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1080879 [Google Scholar]
  30. Shulman, L. S.
    (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 [Google Scholar]
  31. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M.
    (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tan, M.
    (2011) Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning. Language Teaching Research, 15(3): 325–342. 10.1177/1362168811401153
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401153 [Google Scholar]
  33. Thornbury, S.
    (1997) About language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Vygotsky, L. S.
    (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological functions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wright, T., & Bolitho, R.
    (1993) Language awareness: A missing link in language teacher education?ELT Journal, 47(4), 292–304. 10.1093/elt/47.4.292
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/47.4.292 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.18023.xu
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.18023.xu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error