Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2212-8433
  • E-ISSN: 2212-8441
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



Grounded in research on explicit and implicit knowledge and on the role of conscious awareness in language learning, this interpretive case study examined the efforts of one Portuguese teacher to implement a focus on language within a language arts curriculum based on literary genres with a class of fourth grade (9-year-old) students over the course of an academic year. The study found that lessons on authentic literary texts provided a meaningful context for calling students’ attention to nominal and verbal agreement patterns in Portuguese. By the end of the year, students’ nominal and verbal agreement had improved dramatically on a written test, but only their nominal agreement had improved significantly in an unstructured interview, although they had begun to use a greater variety of verb forms. Students were also able to correct many of their own errors and to use metalinguistic terminology to explain the language patterns involved.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages
    American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (2012) ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012. Author. https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, J. R.
    (1982) Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406. 10.1037/0033‑295X.89.4.369
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.369 [Google Scholar]
  3. (1983) The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, D. , Maechler, M. , Bolker, B. , & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:  10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bialystok, E.
    (2001) Bilingualism in development, language, literacy, & cognition. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511605963
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605963 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bouffard, L. A. , & Sarkar, M.
    (2008) Training 8-year-old French Immersion students in metalinguistic analysis: An innovation in form-focused pedagogy. Language Awareness, 17, 3–24. doi:  10.2167/la424.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/la424.0 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, R.
    (1973) A first language: The early stages. Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674732469
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674732469 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cummins, J.
    (1998) Immersion education for the millennium: What have we learned from 30 years of research on second language immersion?In M. R. Childs & R. M. Bostwick (Eds.), Learning through two languages: Research and practice. Second Katoh Gakuen International Symposium on Immersion and Bilingual Education (pp.34–47). Katoh Gakuen. carla.umn.edu/cobaltt/modules/strategies/immersion2000.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Day, E. M. , & Shapson, S. M.
    (1991) Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning, 21, 45–58. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑1770.2001.tb00014.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00014.x [Google Scholar]
  10. DeKeyser, R.
    (1998) Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.42–63). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2003) Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp.313–348). Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470756492.ch11
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  12. DeKeyser, R. & Juffs, A.
    (2005) Cognitive considerations in L2 learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.437–454). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Doughty, C. & Williams, J.
    (1998) Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroomsecond language acquisition (pp.197–261). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ellis, R.
    (1993) The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91–113. doi:  10.2307/3586953
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586953 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2005) Instructed language learning and task-based teaching. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.713–728). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2008) Explicit form-focused instruction and second language acquisition. In B. Spolsky & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp.437–455). Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470694138.ch31
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694138.ch31 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2009) Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis , S. Loewen , C. Elder , R. Erlam , J. Philip , & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp.3–25). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691767‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691767-003 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ellis, R. , & Barkhuizen, G.
    (2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fortune, T. W. , Tedick, D. J. , & Walker, C. L.
    (2008) Integrated language and content teaching: Insights from the immersion classroom. In T. W. Fortune & D. J. Tedick (Eds.), Pathways to multilingualism: Evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp.71–96). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847690371‑007
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690371-007 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gass, S. M.
    (2013) Second language acquisition: An introductory course (4th ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9780203137093
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137093 [Google Scholar]
  21. Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L.
    (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gombert, J. E.
    (1990) Le développement Métalinguistique. Presses universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Goo, J. , Granena, G. , Yilmaz, Y. , & Novella, M.
    (2015) Implicit and implicit instruction in L2 learning: Norris & Ortega (2000) revisited and updated. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp.443–482). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.48.18goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.18goo [Google Scholar]
  24. Han, Z.
    (2009) Interlanguage and fossilization: Towards an analytic model. In V. Cook & L. Wei (Eds.), Contemporary applied linguistics (pp.136–162). Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Harley, B.
    (1989) Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10, 331–359. doi:  10.1093/applin/10.3.331
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.3.331 [Google Scholar]
  26. (1992) Patterns of second language development in French immersion. Journal of French Language Studies, 2(2), 159–183. doi:  10.1017/S0959269500001289
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269500001289 [Google Scholar]
  27. (1993) Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 245–260. doi:  10.1017/S0272263100011980
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011980 [Google Scholar]
  28. (1998) The role of focus-on-form tasks in promoting child L2 acquisition. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.156–174). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Harley, B. , Howard, J. , & Hart, D.
    (1998) Grammar in Grade 2: An instructional experiment in primary French immersion. In S. Lapkin (Ed.) French second language education in Canada: Empirical studies (pp.177–193). University of Toronto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Harley, B. , & Swain, M.
    (1978) An analysis of the verb system used by young learners of French. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 3(1), 35–79. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43135190
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hulstijn, J. H.
    (1995) Not all grammar rules are equal: Giving grammar instruction its proper place in foreign language teaching. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention & awareness in foreign language learning (pp.359–386). Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ioup, G.
    (2005) Age in second language development. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp.419–435). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Jaeger, F. L.
    (2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi:  10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kowal, M. , & Swain, M.
    (1997) From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote it in the immersion classroom?In R. K. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion education: International perspectives (pp.284–309). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524667.022
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524667.022 [Google Scholar]
  35. Krashen, S.
    (1977) The monitor model for adult second language performance. In M. Burt , H. Dulay , & M. Finocchiaro (Eds.), Viewpoints on English as a second language (pp.152–161). Regents.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lambert, W. E. , & Tucker, G. R.
    (1972) Bilingual education of children: The St. Lambert experiment. Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Leow, R. P.
    (1997) Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior. Language Learning, 47, 467–505. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑1770.2001.tb00016.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00016.x [Google Scholar]
  38. (2000) A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 557–584. doi:  10.1017/S0272263100004046
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004046 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lichtman, K. M.
    (2012) Child-adult differences in implicit and explicit second language learning (Doctoral dissertation). University of IllinoisatUrbana-Champaign. hdl.handle.net/2142/34241
  40. Lichtman, K.
    (2013) Developmental comparisons of implicit and explicit language learning. Language Acquisition, 20(2), 93–108. doi:  10.1080/10489223.2013.766740
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2013.766740 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G.
    (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. 10.1016/0147‑1767(85)90062‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 [Google Scholar]
  42. Long, M. H.
    (1988) Instructed interlanguage development. In L. Beebe (Ed.), Issues in second language acquisition (pp.113–141). Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Long, M. , & Robinson, P.
    (1998) Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.15–41). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lyster, R.
    (1987) Speaking immersion. Canadian Modern Language Review, 43, 701–717. doi:  10.3138/cmlr.43.4.697
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.43.4.697 [Google Scholar]
  45. (1994) The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 15, 263–287. doi:  10.1093/applin/15.3.263
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/15.3.263 [Google Scholar]
  46. (1998) Immersion pedagogy and implications for language teaching. In J. Cenoz & F. Genesee (Eds.), Beyond bilingualism: Multilingualism and multilingual education (pp.64–95). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/lllt.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.18 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lyster, R. , Collins, L. , & Ballinger, S.
    (2009) Linking languages through a bilingual read-aloud project. Language Awareness18, 366–383. doi:  10.1080/09658410903197322
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903197322 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lyster, R. & Mori, H.
    (2006) Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300. doi:  10.1017/S0272263106060128
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060128 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lyster, R. , & Mori, H.
    (2008) Instructional counterbalance in immersion pedagogy. In T. W. Fortune & D. J. Tedick (Eds.), Pathways to multilingualism: Evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp.133–151). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847690371‑010
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690371-010 [Google Scholar]
  51. Lyster, R. , Quiroga, J. , & Ballinger, S.
    (2013) The effects of biliteracy instruction on morphological awareness. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1, 169–197. doi:  10.1075/jicb.1.2.02lys
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.2.02lys [Google Scholar]
  52. Lyster, R. , & Ranta, L.
    (1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66. doi:  10.1017/S0272263197001034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lyster, R. , & Tedick, D. J.
    (2014) Research perspectives on immersion pedagogy: Looking back and looking forward. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Instruction, 2, 210–224. doi:  10.1075/jicb.2.2.04lys
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.2.2.04lys [Google Scholar]
  54. Mackey, A.
    (2006) Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405–430. doi:  10.1093/applin/ami051
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami051 [Google Scholar]
  55. Maykut, P. , & Morehouse, R.
    (1994) Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. Falmer Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. McLaughlin, B.
    (1990) “Conscious” vs. “unconscious” learning. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 617–634. doi:  10.2307/3587111
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587111 [Google Scholar]
  57. Merriam, S. B.
    (2001) Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Merriam, S. B. , & Tisdell, E. J.
    (2015) Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers
    National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (2010) Common Core State Standards. Authors. www.corestandards.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Niu, R. , & Li, L.
    (2017) A review of studies on languaging and language learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7, 1222–1228. doi:  10.17507/tpls.0712.08
    https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0712.08 [Google Scholar]
  61. Norris, J. M. , & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. doi:  10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  62. Pawlak, M.
    (2006) The place of form-focused instruction in the foreign language classroom. College of Pedagogy and Fine Arts, Adam Mickiewicz University.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Radwan, A. A.
    (2005) The effect of explicit attention to form in language learning. System, 33, 69–87. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2004.06.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.06.007 [Google Scholar]
  65. Robinson, P.
    (1995) Aptitude, awareness, and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit second language learning. In R. W. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (pp.303–357). Mānoa, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. (1997) Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 45–99. doi:  10.1111/0023‑8333.21997002
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.21997002 [Google Scholar]
  67. Robinson, P. , Mackey, A. , Gass, S. M. , & Schmidt, R.
    (2012) Attention and awareness in second language acquisition. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp.247–267). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Rosa, E. , & O’Neill, M.
    (1999) Explicitness, intake and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511–566. 10.1017/S0272263199004015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004015 [Google Scholar]
  69. Rubinstein-Ávila, E.
    (2002) Problematizing the “dual” in a dual-immersion program: A portrait. Linguistics and Education, 13, 65–87. doi:  10.1016/S0898‑5898(01)00064‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(01)00064-X [Google Scholar]
  70. (2003) Negotiating power and redefining literacy expertise: Buddy Reading in a dual-immersion programme. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 83–97. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9817.261007
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.261007 [Google Scholar]
  71. San Diego County Office of Education
    San Diego County Office of Education (2012) Common Core en Español. Author. https://commoncore-espanol.sdcoe.net/Home
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Schmidt, R. W.
    (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158. doi:  10.1017/S0272263199004015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004015 [Google Scholar]
  73. Schmidt, R.
    (1995) Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention & awareness in foreign language learning (pp.1–63). Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai’i.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. (2010) Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chan , S. Chi , K. N. Cin , J. Instanto , M. Nagami , J. W. Sew , T. Suthiwan , & I. Walker (Eds.). Proceedings of CLaSIC 2010, Singapore, December2–4 (pp.721–737). National University of Singapore, Centre for Language Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Sharwood Smith, M.
    (1981) Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics, 2, 159–168. doi:  10.1093/applin/2.2.159
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/2.2.159 [Google Scholar]
  76. Södergård, M.
    (2008) Teacher strategies for second language production in immersion kindergarten in Finland. In T. W. Fortune & D. J. Tedick (Eds.), Pathways to multilingualism: Evolving perspectives on immersion education (pp.152–173). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847690371‑011
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690371-011 [Google Scholar]
  77. Spilka, I.
    (1976) Assessment of second language performance in immersion programs. Canadian Modern Language Review, 32, 543–561. doi:  10.3138/cmlr.32.5.543
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.32.5.543 [Google Scholar]
  78. Swain, M.
    (1974) French immersion programs across Canada: Research findings. Canadian Modern Language Review, 31, 117–129. doi:  10.3138/cmlr.31.2.117
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.31.2.117 [Google Scholar]
  79. (1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.235–253). Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. (1988) Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESOL Canada Journal, 6, 68–83. doi:  10.18806/tesl.v6i1.542
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v6i1.542 [Google Scholar]
  81. (1996) Integrating language and content in immersion classrooms: Research perspectives. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 52, 529–548. doi:  10.3138/cmlr.52.4.529
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.52.4.529 [Google Scholar]
  82. (2006) Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp.95–108). Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Swain, M. , Lapkin, S. , Knouzi, I. , Suzuki, W. , & Brooks, L.
    (2009) Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 5–29. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00825.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00825.x [Google Scholar]
  84. Swain, M. , & Carroll, S.
    (1987) The immersion observation study. In B. Harley , P. Allen , J. Cummins , & M. Swain (Eds.), The development of bilingual proficiency. Final Report, Vol. II (pp.190–263). Modern Language Centre, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED291248.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Tedick, D. J. , & Lyster, R.
    (2020) Scaffolding language development in immersion and dual language classrooms. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Tedick, D. J. , & Young, A. I.
    (2016) Fifth grade two-way immersion students’ responses to form-focused instruction. Applied Linguistics, 37, 784–807. doi:  10.1093/applin/amu066
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu066 [Google Scholar]
  87. Tiepolo, E. V. , & Juhas, S. R.
    (2015) Língua Portuguesa: 4o ano. Aymará Educação.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Tomlin, R. , & Villa, V.
    (1994) Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 183–203. doi:  10.1017/S0272263100012870
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012870 [Google Scholar]
  89. Utah Education Policy Center
    Utah Education Policy Center. (n.d.). Dual language immersion program participation. Salt Lake City, UT: Author. https://l2trec.utah.edu/research/DLI%20partipation_2015_final.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Welleck, R. , & Warren, A.
    (1970) Theory of literature (3rd ed.). Harcourt Brace.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Wright, R.
    (1996) A study of the acquisition of verbs of motion by Grade 4/5 early French immersion students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 257–280. doi:  10.3138/cmlr.53.1.257
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.53.1.257 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error