Co-developing science literacy and foreign language literacy through “Concept + Language Mapping”

References

1. Ausubel, D. P.
   (1968) Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N.
   (2005) Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events. A micro ethnographic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cammarata, L., & Ó Ceallaigh, T. J.
   (2018) Teacher education and professional development for immersion and content-based instruction: Research on programs, practices, and teacher educators. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(2), 153–161. 10.1075/jicb.00004.cam
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.00004.cam [Google Scholar]
4. Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D.
   (2012) Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. Modern Language Journal, 96(2):153–289. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01330.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01330.x [Google Scholar]
5. Cenoz, J.
   (2016) Discussion: Towards an education perspective in CLIL language policy and pedagogical practice. InY. Ruiz de Zarobe (Ed.), Content and language integrated learning: Language policy and pedagogical practice. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D.
   (2014) Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. 10.1093/applin/amt011
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011 [Google Scholar]
7. Cheng, M. M. W., & Gilbert, J. K.
   (2015) Students’ visualization of diagrams representing the human circulatory system: The use of spatial isomorphism and representational conventions. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 136–161. 10.1080/09500693.2014.969359
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.969359 [Google Scholar]
8. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
   (2010) CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Creswell, J. W.
   (2003) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Dale, L., Ron, O., & Verspoor, M.
    (2018) Searching for identity and focus: Towards an analytical framework for language teachers in bilingual education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 366–383. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1383351
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383351 [Google Scholar]
11. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2013) A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualizing content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 216–253. 10.1515/eujal‑2013‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0011 [Google Scholar]
12. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2018) Postscriptum: Research pathways in CLIL/Immersion instructional practices and teacher development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 384–387. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1384448
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1384448 [Google Scholar]
13. Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T.
    (2014) Content and language integrated learning. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 117–122. 10.1080/09571736.2014.891370
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.891370 [Google Scholar]
14. Gibbons, P.
    (2009) English learners, academic literacy, and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Halliday, M. A. K.
    (1993) Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and education, 5(2), 93–116. 10.1016/0898‑5898(93)90026‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7 [Google Scholar]
16. He, P. C., & Lin, A. M. Y.
    (2018) Becoming a “language-aware” content teacher: Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) teacher professional development as a collaborative, dynamic, dialogic process. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(2), 163–189. 10.1075/jicb.17009.he
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.17009.he [Google Scholar]
17. Lemke, J. L.
    (1990) Talking science: Language, learning and values. Westport, CT: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lemke, J. L.
    (1998) Teaching all the languages of science: Words, symbols, images, and actions. Conference on Science Education in Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lin, A. M. Y.
    (2007) What’s the use of ‘triadic dialogue’? Activity theory, conversation analysis and analysis of pedagogical practices. Pedagogies, 2(2), 77–94. 10.1080/15544800701343943
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800701343943 [Google Scholar]
20. Lin, A. M. Y.
    (2016) Language across the curriculum & CLIL in English as an Additional Language (EAL) Contexts: Theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑1802‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1802-2 [Google Scholar]
21. Lin, A. M. Y., & Man, E. Y. F.
    (2009) Bilingual education: Southeast Asian perspectives. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. 10.5790/hongkong/9789622099586.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789622099586.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
22. Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R.
    (2012) The roles of language in CLIL. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lorenzo, F.
    (2016) Genre-based curricula: multilingual academic literacy in content and language integrated learning. InY. Ruiz de Zarobe (Ed.), Content and language integrated learning: Language policy and pedagogical practice. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lyster, R.
    (2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.18 [Google Scholar]
25. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P.
    (2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Morton, T.
    (2018) Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 275–286. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352 [Google Scholar]
27. Morton, T., & Llinares, A.
    (2017) Content and Language Learning (CLIL): Type of programme or pedagogical model?InA. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.), Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL (pp.105–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.47.01mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47.01mor [Google Scholar]
28. Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O.
    (2011) Learning from animated concept maps with concurrent audio narration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79, 209–230. 10.1080/00220970903292918
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903292918 [Google Scholar]
29. Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U.
    (2016) Conceptualizing integration in CLIL and multilingual education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783096145
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096145 [Google Scholar]
30. Novak, J. D.
    (2010) Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203862001
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203862001 [Google Scholar]
31. Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Johansen, G. T.
    (1983) The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students. Science Education, 67(5), 625–645. 10.1002/sce.3730670511
    https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670511 [Google Scholar]
32. Osborne, J.
    (2014) Scientific practices and inquiry in the science classroom. InLederman, N. G. & Abell, S. K. (Ed.), Handbook of research on science education (VolumeII). New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Reeves, T. C.
    (2000) Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research through “design experiments” and other development research strategies. International perspectives on instructional technology research for the 21st century, New Orleans, LA.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Rose, D., & Martin, J. R.
    (2012) Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Ruiz de Zarobe, Y.
    (2016) Introduction – CLIL implementation: From policy-makers to individual initiatives. InY. Ruiz de Zarobe (Ed.), Content and language integrated learning: Language policy and pedagogical practice. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Wellington, J. J., & Osborne, J.
    (2001) Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]