1887
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2212-8433
  • E-ISSN: 2212-8441
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article explores the effects of the type of instruction (Content and language integrated learning, CLIL, vs. non-CLIL) and gender upon foreign language motivation in Primary Education learners in northern Spain. A total of 252 students with ages ranging from 9–12 completed a questionnaire measuring different motivation components. Results showed that CLIL students seem to manifest greater and be more critical with their image as foreign language learners. Additionally, gender turned out to be a more influential factor in non-CLIL learning settings, since non-CLIL males obtained worse results than their female counterparts in and . This gender effect was not observed in CLIL classrooms, which potentially makes this learning approach a more egalitarian educational setting for both genders in terms of foreign language motivation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.19023.gal
2021-04-08
2021-10-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agustín-Llach, M. P.
    (2014) Exploring the lexical profile of young CLIL learners: Towards an improvement in lexical use. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 2(1), 53–73. doi:  10.1075/jicb.2.1.03agu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.2.1.03agu [Google Scholar]
  2. Amengual-Pizarro, M., & Prieto-Arranz, J. I.
    (2015) Exploring affective factors in L3 learning: CLIL vs. non-CLIL. InM. J. Garau & J. Salazar (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp.197–220). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑11496‑5_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11496-5_12 [Google Scholar]
  3. Boyle, J. P.
    (1987) Sex differences in listening vocabulary. Language Learning, 37(2), 273–284. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1987.tb00568.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00568.x [Google Scholar]
  4. Burstall, C.
    (1975) French in the primary school: The British experiment. Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(5), 388–402.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Celaya, M. L., & Ruiz-de-Zarobe, Y.
    (2010) First languages and age in CLIL and non-CLIL contexts. International CLIL Journal, 1(3), 60–66.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cid, E., Grañena, G., & Tragant, E.
    (2009) Constructing and validating the foreign language attitudes and goals survey (FLAGS). System, 37(3), 496–513. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2009.02.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.02.014 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chambers, G. N.
    (1999) Motivating language learners. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Clement, R., & Kruidenier, B.
    (1983) Orientations in second language acquisition: I. The effects of ethnicity, milieu, and target language on their emergence. Language Learning, 33, 273–291. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1983.tb00542.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00542.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Collins, L., & Muñoz, C.
    (2016) The foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 133–147. 10.1111/modl.12305
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12305 [Google Scholar]
  10. Coonan, C. M.
    (2007) Insider views in the CLIL class through teacher self-observation-introspection. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 625–646. doi:  10.2167/beb463.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/beb463.0 [Google Scholar]
  11. Coyle, D.
    (2006) Content and language integrated learning: Motivating learners and teachers. Scottish Languages Review, 13, 1–18. https://blocs.xtec.cat/clilpractiques1/files/2008/11/slrcoyle.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2011) ITALIC research report. Investigating student gains: Content and language integrated learning. University of Aberdeen.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
    (2010) CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cronbach, L. J.
    (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. doi:  10.1007/BF02310555
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555 [Google Scholar]
  15. Czura, A., Papja, K., & Urbaniak, M.
    (2009) Bilingual education and the emergence of CLIL in Poland. InD. Marsh, P. Mehisto, D. Wolff, R. Aliaga, T. Asikainen, M. J. Frigols-Martín, S. Hughes, & G. Langé (Eds.), CLIL practice: Perspectives from the field (pp.172–178). University of Jyväskylä.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2011) Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles?Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. doi:  10.1017/S0267190511000092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092 [Google Scholar]
  17. Davies, J., & Brember, I.
    (2001) The closing gap in attitudes between boys and girls: A five-year longitudinal study. Educational Psychology, 21(1), 103–114. doi:  10.1080/01443410124899
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410124899 [Google Scholar]
  18. Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
    (2014) CLIL and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 209–224. doi:  10.1080/09571736.2014.889508
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889508 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. (2009) The L2 motivational self system. InZ. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp.9–42). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691293‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-003 [Google Scholar]
  21. European Commision
    European Commision (1995) White paper on education and training: Towards the learning society. DG XX, Brussels.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fernández-Fontecha, A.
    (2014) Motivation and gender effect in receptive vocabulary learning: An exploratory analysis in CLIL Primary Education. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 7(2), 27–49. doi:  10.5294/laclil.2014.7.2.2
    https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2014.7.2.2 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2015) Motivation and vocabulary breadth in CLIL and EFL contexts: Different age, same time of exposure. Complutense Journal of English Studies, 23, 79–96. doi:  10.5209/rev_CJES.2015.v23.51214
    https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CJES.2015.v23.51214 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fernández-Fontecha, A., & Canga-Alonso, A.
    (2014) A preliminary study on motivation and gender in CLIL and non-CLIL types of instruction. International Journal of English Studies (IJES), 14(1), 21–36. doi:  10.6018/ijes/14/1/156681
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/14/1/156681 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fernández-Fontecha, A., & Terrazas-Gallego, M.
    (2012) The role of motivation and age in vocabulary knowledge. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics (VIAL), 9, 39–62. vialjournal.webs.uvigo.es/pdf/Vial-2012-Article2.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Forey, G., Besser, S., & Sampson, N.
    (2016) Parental involvement in foreign language learning: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 16(3), 383–413.   10.1177/1468798415597469
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798415597469 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., & Gómez-Lacabex, E.
    (2017) Oral production outcomes in CLIL: An attempt to manage amount of exposure. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 31–54. doi:  10.1515/eujal‑2015‑0035
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2015-0035 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gallardo-del-Puerto, F., Gómez-Lacabex, E., & García-Lecumberri, M. L.
    (2009) Testing the effectiveness of content and language integrated learning in foreign language contexts: The assessment of English pronunciation. InY. Ruiz-de-Zarobe, & R. M. Jiménez-Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp.63–80). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691675‑007
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691675-007 [Google Scholar]
  29. García-Mayo, M. P.
    (2017) Introduction. InM. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp.xiii–xxiii). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783098118‑002
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098118-002 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gardner, R. C.
    (1985) Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E.
    (1959) Motivational variables in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology13, 266–272. doi:  10.1037/h0083787
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083787 [Google Scholar]
  32. George, D., & Mallery, P.
    (2003) SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (11.0 update, 4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Heras, A., & Lasagabaster, D.
    (2015) The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 70–88. doi:  10.1177/1362168814541736
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541736 [Google Scholar]
  34. Holm, S.
    (1979) A simple sequential rejective method procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Jiménez-Catalán, R., & Ojeda-Alba, J.
    (2009) Girls’ and boys’ lexical availability in EFL. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 158, 57–76. doi:  10.2143/ITL.158.0.2046920
    https://doi.org/10.2143/ITL.158.0.2046920 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kiss, C. & Nikolov, M.
    (2005) Developing, piloting and validating an instrument to measure young learners’ aptitude. Language Learning, 55(1), 99–150. doi:  10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00291.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00291.x [Google Scholar]
  37. Kissau, S.
    (2006) Gender differences in motivation to learn French. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(3), 401–422. doi:  10.3138/cmlr.62.3.401
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.62.3.401 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lasagabaster, D.
    (2011) English achievement and student motivation in CLIL and EFL settings. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 3–18. doi:  10.1080/17501229.2010.519030
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2010.519030 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A.
    (2017) A longitudinal study on the impact of CLIL on affective factors. Applied Linguistics, 38(5), 688–712. doi:  10.1093/applin/amv059
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv059 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lasagabaster, D., & López-Beloqui, R.
    (2015) The impact of type of approach (CLIL versus EFL) and methodology (book-based versus project work) on motivation. Porta Linguarum, 23, 41–57. https://www.ugr.es/~portalin/articulos/PL_numero23/3%20%20David%20Lasagabaster.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
    (2009) Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 4–17. www.laslab.org/wp-content/uploads/language_attitudes_in_clil_and_traditional_efl_classes.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Lázaro, A., & García-Mayo, M. P.
    (2012) L1 use and morphosyntactic development in the oral production of EFL learners in a CLIL context. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 50(2), 135–160. doi:  10.1515/iral‑2012‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2012-0006 [Google Scholar]
  43. López-Rúa, P.
    (2006) The sex variable in foreign language learning: An integrative approach. Porta Linguarum, 6, 99–114. digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/handle/10481/30663/Lopez_Sex.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., Moore, P., & Afonso, T.
    (2009) Bilingüismo y educación: Situación de la Red de centros bilingües en Andalucía. Centro de Estudios Andaluces. Consejería de la Presidencia.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Lozano-Martínez, L.
    (2017) Los docentes en los programas de educación bilingüe en Cantabria. Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada (ELIA), 17, 93–123. doi:  10.12795/elia.2017.i17.05
    https://doi.org/10.12795/elia.2017.i17.05 [Google Scholar]
  46. Madrid, D.
    2002 The power of the FL teacher’s motivational strategies. Cauce: Revista de Filología y su Didáctica, 25, 369–422. https://cvc.cervantes.es/literatura/cauce/pdf/cauce25/cauce25_19.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Martínez-Adrián, M., & Gutiérrez-Mangado, J.
    (2009) The acquisition of English syntax by CLIL learners in the Basque country. InY. Ruiz-de-Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez-Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp.176–196). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691675‑013
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691675-013 [Google Scholar]
  48. Matsuzaki-Carreira, J.
    (2006) Motivation for learning English as a foreign language in Japanese elementary schools. JALT Journal, 28(2), 135–158. https://jalt-publications.org/files/pdf-article/jj-28.2-art2.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Merino, J. A., & Lasagabaster, D.
    (2018) The effect of content and language integrated learning programmes’ intensity on English proficiency: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28, 18–30. doi:  10.1111/ijal.12177
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12177 [Google Scholar]
  50. Merisuo-Storm, T.
    (2007) Pupils’ attitudes towards foreign-language learning and the development of literacy skills in bilingual education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 226–235. doi:  10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.024 [Google Scholar]
  51. Muñoz, C.
    (2017) The development of language awareness at the transition from primary to secondary school. InM. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp.49–68). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783098118‑005
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098118-005 [Google Scholar]
  52. Navarro-Pablo, M., & García-Jiménez, E.
    (2018) Are CLIL students more motivated? An analysis of affective factors and their relation to language attainment. Porta Linguarum, 29, 71–90. https://www.ugr.es/~portalin/articulos/PL_numero29/4_MACARENA%20NAVARRO.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Nunnally, J. O.
    (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Nyikos, M.
    (1990) Gender-related differences in adult language learning: Socialization and memory factors. Modern Language Journal, 74(3), 273–287. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1990.tb01063.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1990.tb01063.x [Google Scholar]
  55. Pallant, J.
    (2011) SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Pavlenko, A., & Piller, I.
    (2008) Language education and gender. InS. May, & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (pp.57–69). Springer Science + Business Media LLC. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑30424‑3_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_5 [Google Scholar]
  57. Pérez-Cañado, M. L.
    (2018) CLIL and educational level: A longitudinal study on the impact of CLIL on language outcomes. Porta Linguarum, 29, 51–70. https://www.ugr.es/~portalin/articulos/PL_numero29/3_MARIA%20LUISA%20PEREZ.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Pladevall-Ballester, E.
    (2019) A longitudinal study of primary school EFL learning motivation in CLIL and non-CLIL settings. Language Teaching Research23(6), 765–786. doi:  10.1177/1362168818765877
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818765877 [Google Scholar]
  59. Roehr-Brackin, K.
    (2018) Metalinguistic awareness and second language acquisition. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315661001
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315661001 [Google Scholar]
  60. San Isidro, X.
    (2010) An insight into Galician CLIL: Provision and results. InD. Lasagabaster & Y. Ruiz-de-Zarobe (Eds.), CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training (pp.55–78). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. (2019) The multi-faceted effects of CLIL: A literature review. AEDEAN Nexus, 1, 33–49. https://aedean.org/wp-content/uploads/nexus-2019-01.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Seikkula-Leino, J.
    (2007) CLIL learning: Achievement levels and affective factors. Language and Education, 21(4), 328–341. doi:  10.2167/le635.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/le635.0 [Google Scholar]
  63. Snow, M. A.
    (1990) Language immersion: An overview and comparison. InA. M. Padilla, H. H. Fairchild, & C. M. Valadez (Eds.), Foreign language education: Issues and strategies (pp.109–126). Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Södergard, M.
    (2006) From kindergarten to grade 6: The immersion experience from the pupils’ point of view. InS. Björklund, K. Mård-Mietttinen, & M. Södergård (Eds.), Exploring dual-focused education: Integrating language and content for individual and societal needs (pp.85–109). Centre for Immersion and Multiculturalism.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Somers, T., & Llinares, A.
    (2018) Students’ motivation for Content and Language Integrated Learning and the role of programme intensity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi:  10.1080/13670050.2018.1517722
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1517722 [Google Scholar]
  66. Spolsky, B.
    (1989) Conditions for second language learning. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Sunderland, J.
    (2000) Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching, 33, 203–223. doi:  10.1017/S0261444800015688
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800015688 [Google Scholar]
  68. Sung, H., & Padilla, A. M.
    (1998) Student motivation, parental attitudes, and involvement in the learning of Asian languages in elementary and secondary schools. The Modern Language Journal, 82(2), 205–216. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1998.tb01193.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01193.x [Google Scholar]
  69. Sylvén, L. K.
    (2010) Teaching in English or teaching English? On the effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning on Swedish learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition. Gothenburg Studies in English97. University of Gothenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Sylvén, L. K., & Thompson, A. S.
    (2015) Language learning motivation and CLIL: Is there a connection?Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 3(1), 28–50. doi:  10.1075/jicb.3.1.02syl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.3.1.02syl [Google Scholar]
  71. Thompson, A. S., & Sylvén, L. K.
    (2019) CLIL and motivation revisited: A longitudinal perspective. InL. K. Sylvén (Ed.), Investigating Content and Language Integrated Learning: Insights from Swedish high schools (pp.76–95). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Wiesemes, R.
    (2009) Developing theories of practices in CLIL: CLIL as post-method pedagogies?InY. Ruiz-de-Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez-Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp.41–59). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Zeman, J., Cassano, M., Perry-Parrish, C., & Stegall, S.
    (2006) Emotion regulation in children and adolescents. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 27(2), 155–168. doi:  10.1097/00004703‑200604000‑00014
    https://doi.org/10.1097/00004703-200604000-00014 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.19023.gal
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.19023.gal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error