Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2212-8433
  • E-ISSN: 2212-8441
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The aim of this article is to examine local enactment of new curriculum policy, paying special attention to combining the language of instruction in the school (Finnish) and the immersion language (Swedish) in an early total one-way Swedish immersion programme in Finland at a programmatic level. The study combines ethnography with educational language policy by focusing on coordinative and communicative discourses surrounding local immersion curriculum. The participatory observation data consist of 36 hours of audio-recorded curriculum working group meetings with immersion teachers and researchers. The findings showed that the curriculum task assigned to municipalities and cities providing immersion education was extensive. They also revealed how discursively oriented policy research on immersion education opens up new ways to develop immersion education. The actual curriculum decisions implied that the Swedish portion of the immersion programme is multilingual and rich in connections between multiple languages, contesting the common belief of monolingual practices in immersion instruction.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. K.
    (2017) Rethinking case study research: a comparative approach. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergroth, M.
    (2015) Kotimaisten kielten kielikylpy [Language immersion in the national languages]. Vaasan yliopisto. https://osuva.uwasa.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/7226/isbn_978-952-476-617-3.pdf?sequence=1
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2016) Reforming the national core curriculum for bilingual education in Finland. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 4 (1), 86–107.   10.1075/jicb.4.1.04ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.4.1.04ber [Google Scholar]
  4. Björklund, S., Mård-Miettinen, K., & Mäenpää, T.
    (2012) Functional multilingual competence. Exploring the pedagogical potential within immersion. InM. Bendtsen, M. Björklund, L. Forsman, & K. Sjöholm. (Eds.), Global trends meet local needs (pp.203–217). Åbo Akademi University.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonacina-Pugh, F.
    (2012) Researching ‘practiced language policies’: Insights from con- versation analysis. Language Policy, 11, 213–234.   10.1007/s10993‑012‑9243‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-012-9243-x [Google Scholar]
  6. Candelier, M.
    (2017) “Awakening to languages” and educational language policy. InJ. Cenoz, D. Gorter & S. May. (Eds.), Language awareness and multilingualism, encyclopedia of language and education (pp.161–172). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02240‑6_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02240-6_12 [Google Scholar]
  7. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Language. Learning, teaching and assessment. https://rm.coe.int/1680459f97
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cummins, J.
    (2007) Rethinking monolingual instructional strategies in multilingual classrooms. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 221–240. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/CJAL/article/view/19743
    [Google Scholar]
  9. European Commission
    European Commission (2019) Council recommendation on a comprehensive approach to the teaching and learning of languages. https://ec.europa.eu/education/education-in-the-eu/council-recommendation-improving-teaching-and-learning-languages_en. 10.3828/ejlp.2019.8
    https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2019.8 [Google Scholar]
  10. Eurydice
    (2019) Integrating students from migrant backgrounds into schools in Europe: National policies and measures. Eurydice Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/sites/default/files/integrating_students_from_migrant_backgrounds_into_schools_in_europe_national_policies_and_measures.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Finnish Government
    Finnish Government (2012) Decree on national objectives and distribution of teaching hours in basic education. www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2012/20120422
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Genesee, F., & Lindholm-Leary, K.
    (2013) Two case studies of content-based language education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 3–33.   10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen [Google Scholar]
  13. Gorter, D., & Cenoz, J.
    (2017) Language education policy and multilingual assessment, Language and Education, 31(3), 231–248.   10.1080/09500782.2016.1261892
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1261892 [Google Scholar]
  14. Halinen, I., Harmanen, M., & Mattila, P.
    (2015) Making sense of complexity of the world today: Why Finland is introducing multiliteracy in teaching and learning. InV. Bozsik. (Eds.), Improving literacy skills across learning. CIDREE Yearbook 2015 (pp.136–153). HIERD.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hardy, I., & Melville, W.
    (2018) The activation of epistemological resources in epistemic communities: District educators’ professional learning as policy enactment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 159–167.   10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.019 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hult, F. M.
    (2015) Making policy connections across scales using nexus analysis. InF. M. Hult & D. Cassels Johnson. (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning. A practical guide (pp.217–231). Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118340349.ch19
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118340349.ch19 [Google Scholar]
  17. Johnson, D. C., & Johnson, E. J.
    (2015) Power and agency in language policy appropriation. language policy, 14, 221–243.   10.1007/s10993‑014‑9333‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9333-z [Google Scholar]
  18. Johnson, D. C., & Pratt, K. L.
    (2014) Educational language policy and planning. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (2014, December3). Wiley Online Library.   10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1416
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1416 [Google Scholar]
  19. Johnson, D. C., & Ricento, T.
    (2013) Conceptual and theoretical perspectives in language planning and policy: Situating the ethnography of language policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2013(219). 7–21.   10.1515/ijsl‑2013‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2013-0002 [Google Scholar]
  20. Levinson, B. A. U., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T.
    (2009) Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795.   10.1177/0895904808320676
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808320676 [Google Scholar]
  21. McMillan, B., & Turnbull, M.
    (2009) Teachers’ use of the first language in French immersion: Revisiting a core principle. InM. Turnbull & J. Daily-O’Cain. (Eds.), First language use in second and foreign language learning (pp.15–34). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691972‑004
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691972-004 [Google Scholar]
  22. Morton, T.
    (2017) Reconceptualizing and describing teachers’ knowledge of language for content and language integrated learning (CLIL), International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 275–286,   10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1383352 [Google Scholar]
  23. Priestley, M., Minty, S., & Eager, M.
    (2014) School-based curriculum development in Scotland: Curriculum policy and enactment. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 22(2), 189–211,   10.1080/14681366.2013.812137
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2013.812137 [Google Scholar]
  24. Schmidt, V. A.
    (2015) Discursive institutionalism: Understanding Policy in Context. InF. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnová & M. Orsini. (Eds.), Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, (pp.171–189). Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781783472352.00016
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783472352.00016 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2010) Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘New Institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25.   10.1017/S175577390999021X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X [Google Scholar]
  26. Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K.
    (2017) Shared sense-making strategies in curriculum reform: District-level perspective. Improving Schools, 21(2), 111–126.   10.1177/1365480217744290
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480217744290 [Google Scholar]
  27. Spolsky, B.
    (2004) Language policy. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Uljens, M.
    (2018) Understanding educational leadership and curriculum reform – Beyond global economism and neo-conservative nationalism. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 2(2–3), 196–213.   10.7577/njcie.2811
    https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.2811 [Google Scholar]
  29. Uljens, M., & Rajakaltio, H.
    (2017) National curriculum development as educational leadershop: A discursive and non-affirmative approach. InM. Uljens & R. M. Ylimäki. (Eds.), Bridging educational leadership, curriculum theory and didaktik. Non-affirmative theory of education (pp.411–438). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑58650‑2_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58650-2_13 [Google Scholar]
  30. Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D.
    (2018) Discursive institutionalism: Towards a framework for analysing the relation between policy and curriculum, Journal of Education Policy, 33(1), 163–183.   10.1080/02680939.2017.1344879
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2017.1344879 [Google Scholar]
  31. Wei, L.
    (2018) Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30.   10.1093/applin/amx039
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error