1887
image of CLIL as a balance for female–male differences?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines female–male differences in English writing outcomes for Taiwanese primary school learners enrolled in a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) program. Narrative and expository writing samples of 212 primary school students (Male = 103, Female = 109) in Taiwan were collected and scored using several measures including spelling accuracy, correct word sequences, lexical diversity, total t-units, and a holistic rubric for ideas. Students’ topic interest was also measured through a Likert-scale survey. The findings revealed differences between females and males and the two genres of writing. While there were statistical differences attributed to gender and topic interest variables for some writing measures, further analysis revealed that these effects were minimal in terms of practical significance. The paper raises questions about the relationship between female–male writing differences and CLIL and provides suggestions for future research to broaden our understanding and support diversity in the CLIL classroom.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.20007.gra
2021-01-14
2021-05-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acar, T.
    (2016) Measurement of attitudes regarding foreign language skills and its relation with success. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(4), 310–322. doi:  10.11591/ijere.v5i4.5959
    https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v5i4.5959 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ainley, M. , Hillman, K. , & Hidi, S.
    (2002, 2002/08/01/). Gender and interest processes in response to literary texts: situational and individual interest. Learning and Instruction, 12(4), 411–428. doi:  10.1016/S0959‑4752(01)00008‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00008-1 [Google Scholar]
  3. Babayiğit, S.
    (2015) The dimensions of written expression: Language group and gender differences. Learning and Instruction, 35, 33–41. doi:  10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.08.006 [Google Scholar]
  4. Berninger, V. W. , & Graham, S.
    (1998) Language by hand: A synthesis of a decade of research on handwriting. Handwriting Review, 12, 11–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Berninger, V. W. , & Swanson, H. L.
    (1994) Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. Advances in cognition and educational practice, 2, 57–81.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bijami, M. , Kashef, S. H. , & Khaksari, M.
    (2013) Gender differences and writing performance: A brief review. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 1(2), 8–11. doi:  10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.1n.2p.8
    https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.1n.2p.8 [Google Scholar]
  7. Camacho, A. , & Alves, R. A.
    (2017) Fostering parental involvement in writing: Development and testing of the program Cultivating Writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(2), 253–277. doi:  10.1007/s11145‑016‑9672‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9672-6 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carroll, J. B.
    (1964) Language and thought. Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen, J. , Cohen, P. , West, S. G. , & Aiken, L. S.
    (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cortes, V.
    (2019) Considering the importance of L2 learners’ writing needs. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 100679. doi:  10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100679
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100679 [Google Scholar]
  11. Coyle, D.
    (2007) Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. doi:  10.2167/beb459.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cumming, A.
    (2016) Theoretical orientations to L2 writing. In R. M. Machón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp.65–88). De Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9781614511335‑006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511335-006 [Google Scholar]
  13. Education Northwest
    Education Northwest (2013) Grades K–2 Traits Rubric for Ideas. https://educationnorthwest.org/sites/default/files/gradesK-2-6pt-rubric.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fontecha, A. F. , & Alonso, A. C.
    (2014) A preliminary study on motivation and gender in CLIL and non-CLIL types of instruction. International Journal of English Studies, 14(1), 21–36. doi:  10.6018/ijes/14/1/156681
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/14/1/156681 [Google Scholar]
  15. Genesee, F. , & Lindholm-Leary, K.
    (2013) Two case studies of content-based language education. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 3–33. doi:  10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen [Google Scholar]
  16. Graham, K. M. , Choi, Y. , Davoodi, A. , Razmeh, S. , & Dixon, L. Q.
    (2018) Language and content outcomes of CLIL and EMI: A systematic review. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 19–37. doi:  10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.2
    https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2018.11.1.2 [Google Scholar]
  17. Graham, S.
    (2008) Effective writing instruction for all students. doc.renlearn.com/KMNet/R004250923GJCF33.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Graham, S. , Gillespie, A. , & McKeown, D.
    (2013) Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(1), 1–15. doi:  10.1007/s11145‑012‑9395‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2 [Google Scholar]
  19. Heras, A. , & Lasagabaster, D.
    (2015) The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 70–88. doi:  10.1177/1362168814541736
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541736 [Google Scholar]
  20. Juel, C. , Griffith, P. L. , & Gough, P. B.
    (1986) Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(4), 243–255. doi:  10.1037/0022‑0663.78.4.243
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.243 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kalali, N. N. , & Pishkar, K.
    (2015) Genre analysis and writing skill: Improving Iranian EFL learners writing performance through the tenets of genre analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(6), 119–130. doi:  10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.6p.119
    https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.6p.119 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kamari, E. , Gorjian, B. , & Pazhakh, A.
    (2012) Examining the effects of gender on second language writing proficiency of Iranian EFL students: Descriptive vs. opinion one-paragraph essay. Advances in Asian Social Science (AASS), 3(4), 759–763.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim, T. Y.
    (2010) Socio-political influences on EFL motivation and attitudes: Comparative surveys of Korean high school students. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2), 211–222. doi:  10.1007/s12564‑010‑9071‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9071-7 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kobayashi, Y.
    (2002) The role of gender in foreign language learning attitudes: Japanese female students’ attitudes towards English learning. Gender and Education, 14(2), 181–197. doi:  10.1080/09540250220133021
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250220133021 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lahuerta, A.
    (2017) Analysis of accuracy in the writing of EFL students enrolled on CLIL and non-CLIL programmes: The impact of grade and gender. The Language Learning Journal, 48(2), 121–132. doi:  10.1080/09571736.2017.1303745
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2017.1303745 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lasagabaster, D.
    (2008) Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 1, 30–41. doi:  10.2174/1874913500801010030
    https://doi.org/10.2174/1874913500801010030 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lips, H. M.
    (2019) Gender: The basics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mady, C. , & Seiling, A.
    (2017) The coupling of second language learning motivation and achievement according to gender [Article]. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(12), 1149–1159. doi:  10.17507/tpls.0712.01
    https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0712.01 [Google Scholar]
  29. McMaster, K. L. , Shin, J. , Espin, C. A. , Jung, P. , Wayman, M. M. , & Deno, S. L.
    (2017) Monitoring elementary students’ writing progress using curriculum-based measures: Grade and gender differences. Reading and Writing, 30(9), 2069–2091. doi:  10.1007/s11145‑017‑9766‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9766-9 [Google Scholar]
  30. Merisuo-Storm, T.
    (2007) Pupils’ attitudes towards foreign-language learning and the development of literacy skills in bilingual education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(2), 226–235. doi:  10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.024
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.024 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mori, S. , & Gobel, P.
    (2006) Motivation and gender in the Japanese EFL classroom. System, 34(2), 194–210. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2005.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  32. Nair, S. M. , & Hui, L. L.
    (2018) An analysis of common errors in ESL descriptive writing among chinese private school students in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1), 28–42. doi:  10.18488/journal.61.2017.61.28.42
    https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2017.61.28.42 [Google Scholar]
  33. Nation, I. S. P.
    (2009) Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ningrum, A. S. B. , Latief, M. A. , & Sulistyo, G. H.
    (2016) The effect of mind mapping on EFL students’ idea development in argumentative writing across gender differences and learning styles. Dinamika Ilmu, 16(1), 149–166. doi:  10.21093/di.v16i1.296
    https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v16i1.296 [Google Scholar]
  35. Pae, H. K.
    (2014) Forced choice or free choice?: the role of question formats in predicting speaking and writing skills of nonnative speakers of English. Educational Assessment, 19(2), 97–115. doi:  10.1080/10627197.2014.903651
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2014.903651 [Google Scholar]
  36. Plonsky, L. , & Oswald, F. L.
    (2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878–912. doi:  10.1111/lang.12079
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079 [Google Scholar]
  37. Polio, C.
    (2019) Keeping the language in second language writing classes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46, 100675. doi:  10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100675
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100675 [Google Scholar]
  38. Roquet, H. , Llopis, J. , & Pérez-Vidal, C.
    (2016) Does gender have an impact on the potential benefits learners may achieve in two contexts compared: Formal instruction and formal instruction + content and language integrated learning?International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(4), 370–386. doi:  10.1080/13670050.2014.992389
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.992389 [Google Scholar]
  39. Royston, P.
    (2004) Multiple imputation of missing values. The Stata Journal, 4(3), 227–241. doi:  10.1177/1536867X0400400301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0400400301 [Google Scholar]
  40. Slattery, P.
    (2012) Curriculum development in the postmodern era: Teaching and learning in an age of accountability (3rd ed.). Routledge. doi:  10.4324/9780203139554
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203139554 [Google Scholar]
  41. StataCorp
    StataCorp (2019) Stata statistical software (Release 16) [Computer software]. StataCorp LLC. https://www.stata.com
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Steinlen, A. K.
    (2018) The development of German and English writing skills in a bilingual primary school in Germany. Journal of Second Language Writing, 39, 42–52. doi:  10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Sunderland, J.
    (2000) Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education. Language Teaching, 33(4), 203–223. doi:  10.1017/S0261444800015688
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800015688 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tedick, D. J. , & Cammarata, L.
    (2012) Content and language integration in K–12 contexts: Student outcomes, teacher practices, and stakeholder perspectives. Foreign Language Annals, 45(s1), s28–s53. doi:  10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2012.01178.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01178.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Whittaker, R. , & Llinares, A.
    (2009) CLIL in social science classrooms: Analysis of spoken and written productions. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & R. M. Jiménez Catalán (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe (pp.215–234). Multilingual Matters. doi:  10.21832/9781847691675‑015
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691675-015 [Google Scholar]
  46. Xu, W. , & Case, R. E.
    (2015) Age-related differences in motivation in learning English among Mainland Chinese students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25(1), 67–82. doi:  10.1111/ijal.12050
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12050 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.20007.gra
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.20007.gra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error