Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) and the linguistic difficulties of Saudi students learning algebra

References

1. Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y.
   (2012) University teacher educators’ research engagement: Perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 347–356.   10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.011
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.10.011 [Google Scholar]
2. Brady, H. E., Collier, D., & Seawright, J.
   (2004) Refocusing the Discussion of Methodology. InH. E. Brady, & D. Collier. (Eds.), Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (pp.3–20). Rowman and Littlefield.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barwell, R.
   (2009) Multilingualism in mathematics classrooms: Global perspectives. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692061
   https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692061 [Google Scholar]
4. Cazden, C. B.
   (1986) Language in the classroom. Annual review of applied linguistics, 71, 18–33.   10.1017/S0267190500001628
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500001628 [Google Scholar]
5. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
   (2010) Content and language integrated learning. Ernst Klett Sprachen. 10.1017/9781009024549
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549 [Google Scholar]
6. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P.
   (2007) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dalton-Puffer, C.
   (2008) Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. InDelanoy, W., Volkmann, L. (Eds.), Future Perspectives in English Language Teaching (pp.7–23). Carl Winter.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dalton-Puffer, C.
   (2011) The French influence on Middle English morphology: A corpus-based study on derivation. Walter de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S.
   (Eds.) (2011) The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Durkin, K., & Shire, B.
    (1991) Primary school children’s interpretations of lexical ambiguity in mathematical descriptions. Journal of Research in Reading, 14(1), 46–55.   10.1111/j.1467‑9817.1991.tb00005.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1991.tb00005.x [Google Scholar]
11. Goldhaber, A. S.
    (2006) Math as a language in its own right. American Scientist, 94(2), 185–187. 10.1511/2006.58.185
    https://doi.org/10.1511/2006.58.185 [Google Scholar]
12. Kersaint, G., Thompson, D. R., & Petkova, M.
    (2014) Teaching mathematics to English language learners. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203098561
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203098561 [Google Scholar]
13. Krieger, Z.
    (2007) Saudi Arabia puts its billions behind Western-style higher education. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(3). pp.1–6.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kunitzsch, P.
    (2003) The transmission of Hindu-Arabic numerals reconsidered. The Enterprise of Science in Islam: New Perspectives, 3–21.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lasagabaster, D., & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y.
    (Eds.) (2010) CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Marsh, D., & Mehisto, P.
    (2011) Approaching the economic, cognitive and health benefits of bilingualism: Fuel for CLIL. InY. Ruiz de Zarobe, J. M. Sierra- F. Gallardo del Puerto. (Eds), Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning, 361. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J.
    (2008) Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T.
    (2015) A plurtliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning-mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57.   10.1080/07908318.2014.1000924
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000924 [Google Scholar]
19. Mohan, B. & Leung, C. & Slater, T.
    (2010) Assessing Language and Content: A Functional Perspective. InA. Paran & S. Lies. (Eds.) Testing the Untestable in Language Education (pp.217–240). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692672‑013
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692672-013 [Google Scholar]
20. Moores-Abdool, W., Yahya, N., & Unzueta, C. H.
    (2009, May). Learning preferences of Saudi university students with native English-speaking teachers. The 2nd. Annual Conference of Saudi Arabia Association of Language Teachers (KSAALT), Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Moschkovich, J. N.
    (2007) Examining mathematical discourse practices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(1), 24–30.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Nikula, T.
    (2006, August). CLIL as student empowerment? Observations on language use in Finnish CLIL Classrooms [paper presentation]. ESSE8 Conference, London.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Nikula, T.
    (2007) The IFR pattern and space for interaction: Observations on EFL and CLIL classrooms. InC. Dalton-Puffer & U. Smit. (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse (pp.179–204). Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
24. O’Halloran, K.
    (1999) Towards a systemic functional analysis of multisemiotic mathematics texts. Semiotica, 124(1–2), 1–30.   10.1515/semi.1999.124.1‑2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1999.124.1-2.1 [Google Scholar]
25. Seethaler, P. M., Fuchs, L. S., Star, J. R., & Bryant, J.
    (2011) The cognitive predictors of computational skill with whole versus rational numbers: An exploratory study. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 536–542.   10.1016/j.lindif.2011.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.05.002 [Google Scholar]
26. Veel, R.
    (1999) Language, knowledge and authority in school mathematics. InF. Christie. (Ed.), Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness: Linguistic and social processes (pp.185–216). Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Zydatiß, W.
    (2012) Linguistic thresholds in the CLIL classroom? The threshold hypothesis revisited. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 16–18.
    [Google Scholar]