1887
image of EMI as discursive positioning
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Set against a background of societal pressure and preference for English language education in Hong Kong, this paper explores the policy and practice of English medium instruction (EMI) from the perspective of one group of content subject teachers. Grounded in Bakhtin’s dialogism, the paper reports the results of a qualitative study that used in-depth interviews to explore the perspectives and experiences of these teachers as they implement EMI policy in Hong Kong schools. The results reveal the existence of several discourses of EMI in Hong Kong that position the teachers at community, institutional, and professional levels. The results also suggest that the interplay of EMI discourses can offer content subject teachers positions which they regard as undesirable. Suggestions for ensuring that the voices of these teachers are heard within the context of teacher professional development opportunities in EMI settings are considered and implications for future research are discussed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.21018.tre
2022-03-02
2022-05-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Kayi-Aydar, H.
    (2019) Positioning theory in applied linguistics. Research design and applications. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑97337‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97337-1 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakhtin, M.
    (1981) Discourse in the novel. InM. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (pp.259–422). University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Banks, M.
    (2018) Exploring EMI lecturers’ attitudes and needs. EPiC in Language and Linguistics, 3, 19–26. 10.29007/gjc1
    https://doi.org/10.29007/gjc1 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baxter, J.
    (2016) Positioning language and identity. Poststructuralist perspectives. InS. Preece (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and identity (pp.34–49). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Borg, S.
    (2017) Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. InP. Garrett & J. Cots (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp.75–91). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676494‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676494-5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V.
    (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  7. Chan, J.
    (2014) Fine-tuning language policy in Hong Kong education: stakeholders perceptions, practices and challenges. Language and Education, 28(5), 459–476. 10.1080/09500782.2014.904872
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.904872 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen, L., Manon, L., & Morrison, K.
    (2018) Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Davies, B., & Harre, R.
    (1990) Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. 10.1111/j.1468‑5914.1990.tb00174.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Dearden, J. & Macaro, E.
    (2016) Higher education teachers’ attitudes towards English medium instruction: A three-country comparison. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 455–486. 10.14746/sllt.2016.6.3.5
    https://doi.org/10.14746/sllt.2016.6.3.5 [Google Scholar]
  11. Emerson, C.
    (1983) The outer word and inner speech: Bakhtin, Vygotsky, and the internalization of language. Critical Inquiry, 10(2), 245–264. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1343349
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Evans, S.
    (2011) Historical and comparative perspectives on the medium of instruction in Hong Kong. Language Policy, 10, 19–36. 10.1007/s10993‑011‑9193‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-011-9193-8 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2013) The long march to biliteracy and trilingualism: language policy in Hong Kong education since the handover. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 33, 302–324. 10.1017/S0267190513000019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190513000019 [Google Scholar]
  14. Harre, R.
    (2012) Positioning theory: moral dimensions of social-cultural psychology. InJ. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp.191–206). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Holquist, M.
    (1983) Answering as authoring: Mikhail Bakhtin’s trans-linguistics. Critical Inquiry, 10(2), 307–319. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1343352
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (1990) Dialogism. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203330340
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203330340 [Google Scholar]
  17. Layder, D.
    (2006) Understanding social theory (2nd ed.). SAGE. 10.4135/9781446279052
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279052 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lau, C.
    (2020) English language education in Hong Kong: a review of policy and practice. Current issues in Language Planning, 21(5), 457–474. 10.1080/14664208.2020.1741239
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741239 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lo, Y. Y.
    (2014) Collaboration between L2 and content subject teachers in CBI: contrasting beliefs and attitudes. RELC Journal, 45(2), 181–196. 10.1177/0033688214535054
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214535054 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2019) Development of the beliefs and language awareness of content subject teachers in CLIL: does professional development help?International Journal of Bilingual education and Bilingualism, 22(7), 818–832. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1318821
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1318821 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2020) Professional development of CLIL teachers. Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑15‑2425‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2425-7 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lo, Y. Y., & Lin, A.
    (2019) Content and language integrated learning in Hong Kong. InX. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp.963–982). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑02899‑2_50
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_50 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lo, Y. Y., & Lo, E.
    (2014) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of English-medium education in Hong Kong. Review of Educational research, 84(1), 47–73. 10.3102/0034654313499615
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313499615 [Google Scholar]
  24. Macaro, E.
    (2020) Exploring the role of language in English medium instruction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(3), 263–276. 10.1080/13670050.2019.1620678
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1620678 [Google Scholar]
  25. Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E.
    (2016) Qualitative research. A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Poon, A.
    (2013) Will the new fine-tuning medium-of-instruction policy alleviate the threats of dominance of English-medium instruction?Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(1), 34–51. 10.1080/14664208.2013.791223
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.791223 [Google Scholar]
  27. Poon, A., Lau, C., & Chu, D.
    (2013) Impact of the fine-tuning medium-of-instruction policy on learning: some preliminary findings. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal4(1), 1037–1045. 10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2013.0138
    https://doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2013.0138 [Google Scholar]
  28. Tollefson, J.
    (2015) Language policy-making in multilingual education: mass media and the framing of medium of instruction. Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(1–2), 132–148. 10.1080/14664208.2014.947018
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2014.947018 [Google Scholar]
  29. Trent, J.
    (2010) Teacher identity construction across the curriculum: promoting cross-curriculum collaboration in English-medium schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(2), 167–183. 10.1080/02188791003721622
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791003721622 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2018) ‘Fitting in’ or ‘being different’? Integration, separation, and identity construction during a teaching practicum in Hong Kong. Teacher Development, 22(4), 571–586. 10.1080/13664530.2018.1466722
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2018.1466722 [Google Scholar]
  31. van Langenhove, L., & Harre, R.
    (1999) Introducing positioning theory. InR. Harre & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp.14–31). Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, L., & Kirkpatrick, A.
    (2015) Trilingual education in Hong Kong primary schools: an overview. Multilingual Education, 5(3). 10.1186/s13616‑015‑0023‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13616-015-0023-8 [Google Scholar]
  33. Wortham, S.
    (2001) Narratives in action. A strategy for research and analysis. Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zare-ee, A. & Hejazi, S.
    (2017) University teachers’ views on English as the medium of instruction in an Iranian higher education institution. Arab World English Journal, 8(4), 467–485. 10.24093/awej/vol8no4.32
    https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol8no4.32 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.21018.tre
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.21018.tre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: Hong Kong ; dialogism ; English medium of instruction ; positioning theory
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error