Thematic patterns, Cognitive Discourse Functions, and genres

References

1. Airey, J.
   (2016) EAP, EMI or CLIL?InK. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp.95–107). Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ball, P.
   (2009) Does CLIL work?InD. Hill & P. Alan (Eds.), The Best of Both Worlds?: International Perspectives on CLIL (pp.32–43). Norwich Institute for Language Education, Norwich.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D.
   (2003) Assessment for Learning: Putting it into practice. OUP.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dalton-Puffer, C.
   (2013) A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 216–253. 10.1515/eujal‑2013‑0011
   https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0011 [Google Scholar]
5. Dalton-Puffer, C.
   (2018) Postscriptum: Research pathways in CLIL/Immersion instructional practices and teacher development. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(3), 384–387. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1384448
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1384448 [Google Scholar]
6. García, O., & Li, W.
   (2014) Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137385765
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765 [Google Scholar]
7. He, P., & Lin, A. M. Y.
   (2019) Co-developing science literacy and foreign language literacy through “Concept+ Language Mapping”. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 7(2), 261–288. 10.1075/jicb.18033.he
   https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18033.he [Google Scholar]
8. Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority [HKEAA]
   Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority [HKEAA] (2014) Hong Kong Diploma of Secondary Education (DSE) Biology Examination Report. Hong Kong Government Printer.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lemke, J. L.
   (1990) Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Lin, A. M. Y.
    (2016) Language across the curriculum & CLIL in English as an additional language (EAL) contexts: Theory and practice. Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑1802‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1802-2 [Google Scholar]
11. Lin, A. M. Y.
    (2019) Theories of trans/languaging and trans-semiotizing: implications for content-based education classrooms. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(1), 5–16. 10.1080/13670050.2018.1515175
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1515175 [Google Scholar]
12. Lin, A. M. Y., & Lo, Y. Y.
    (2017) Trans/Languaging and the Triadic Dialogue in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Language and Education, 31(1), 26–45. 10.1080/09500782.2016.1230125
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230125 [Google Scholar]
13. Lin, A. M., & Wu, Y.
    (2015) ‘May I speak Cantonese?’–Co-constructing a scientific proof in an EFL junior secondary science classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(3), 289–305. 10.1080/13670050.2014.988113
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.988113 [Google Scholar]
14. Lin, A. M. Y., & Wu, Y.
    (2021) Leveraging on L1 content knowledge in CLIL assessment: Thematic patterns, cognitive discourse functions & genres. Keynote paper presented in theCLIL and Multilingual Research Forum, 11 December 2021, Beijing Normal University, China.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
    (2008) Genre relations: Mapping culture. Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Morton, T.
    (2020) Cognitive discourse functions: A bridge between content, literacy and language for teaching and assessment in CLIL. Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 3(1), 7–17. 10.5565/rev/clil.33
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.33 [Google Scholar]
17. Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U.
    (Eds.) (2016) Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783096145
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096145 [Google Scholar]
18. Rose, D., & Martin, J. R.
    (2012) Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Tang, K. S.
    (2020) Discourse strategies for science teaching and learning: Research and practice. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429352171
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429352171 [Google Scholar]
20. Tang, K. S., Tan, S. C., & Yeo, J.
    (2011) Students’ multimodal construction of Work Energy Concept. International Journal of Science Education, 331, 1775–1804. 10.1080/09500693.2010.508899
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.508899 [Google Scholar]
21. Wu, Y.
    (2021) Translanguaging/Trans-semiotizing in the flow of dialogic knowledge co-making in a CLIL biology class: A classroom discourse analytic study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
22. Wu, Y.
    (2022) Towards an Integrative Model for CLIL: Implications of an analysis of a CLIL biology assessment task. Research notes presented at thePokfulam Circle Study Group, University of Hong Kong, 9 April 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Wu, Y., & Lin, A. M. Y.
    (2019) Translanguaging and trans-semiotizing in a CLIL biology class in Hong Kong: Whole-body sense-making in the flows of knowledge co-making. Classroom Discourse, 10(3–4): 252–273. 10.1080/19463014.2019.1629322
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1629322 [Google Scholar]
24. Yip, D. Y., Tsang, W. K., & Cheung, S. P.
    (2003) Evaluation of the effects of the medium of instruction on science learning of Hong Kong secondary students: Performance on the science achievement test. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(2), 295–331. 10.1080/15235882.2003.10162808
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2003.10162808 [Google Scholar]