A scoping review of the literature on content and language integrated learning assessment

References

1. Aguilar, M., & Rodríguez, R.
   (2012) Lecturer and student perceptions on CLIL at a Spanish university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(2), 183–197. 10.1080/13670050.2011.615906
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.615906 [Google Scholar]
2. Barbero, T.
   (2009) Assessment in CLIL. InH. Järvinen (Ed.), Language in content instruction (pp.108–118). University of Turku.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Barbero, T.
   (2012) Assessment tools and practices in CLIL. InF. Quartapelle (Ed.), Assessment and evaluation in CLIL (pp.38–56). Ibis. https://aeclil.altervista.org/Sito/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/AECLIL-Assessment-and-evaluation-in-CLIL.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
4. Kandlbinder, P.
   (2014) Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA News, 36(3), 5–6. 10.3316/informit.150744867894569
   https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.150744867894569 [Google Scholar]
5. Coonan, C. M.
   (2011) CLIL in (language) teacher training. Studi di glottodidattica, 5(2), 1–14. 10.15162/1970‑1861/130
   https://doi.org/10.15162/1970-1861/130 [Google Scholar]
6. Coonan, C. M.
   (2012) The foreign language curriculum and CLIL. Synergies Italie, 81, 117–128. https://gerflint.fr/Base/Italie8/carmel_mary%202.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
7. Coyle, D.
   (2007) Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. 10.2167/beb459.0
   https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0 [Google Scholar]
8. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
   (2010) CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009024549
   https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549 [Google Scholar]
9. Creswell, J. W.
   (2014) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage publications.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cummins, J.
    (2000) Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853596773
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853596773 [Google Scholar]
11. Czura, A., & Papaja, K.
    (2010) Classroom-based and external assessment in CLIL. Anglica Wratislaviensia, 481, 163–170. https://wuwr.pl/awr/article/view/113
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2013) A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 1–38. 10.1515/eujal‑2013‑0011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0011 [Google Scholar]
13. De la Barra, E., Veloso, S., & Maluenda, L.
    (2018) Integrating assessment in a CLIL-based approach for second-year university students. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 20(2), 111–126. 10.15446/profile.v20n2.66515
    https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v20n2.66515 [Google Scholar]
14. Fuentes, M. À.
    (2013) Which score is adequate: Approximation to the assessment rationale used in a Science through English CLIL written test. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 6(4), 54–73. 10.5565/rev/jtl3.541
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.541 [Google Scholar]
15. Gablasova, D.
    (2014) Issues in the assessment of bilingually educated students: Expressing subject knowledge through L1 and L2. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 151–164. 10.1080/09571736.2014.891396
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.891396 [Google Scholar]
16. Graves, K., & Garton, S.
    (2017) An analysis of three curriculum approaches to teaching English in public-sector schools. Language Teaching, 50(4), 441–482. 10.1017/S0261444817000155
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000155 [Google Scholar]
17. Hofmannová, M., Novotná, J., & Pípalová, R.
    (2004) Assessment instruments for classes integrating mathematics and foreign language teaching. ICME, 101, 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hönig, I.
    (2009) Assessment in CLIL [Doctoral dissertation, Universität Wien]. othes.univie.ac.at/7976/1/2009-11-21_0107764.pdf
19. Hönig, I.
    (2010) Assessment in CLIL: Theoretical and empirical research. VDM Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Julián-de-Vega, C., & Fonseca-Mora, M. C.
    (2017) Language policy and teacher team coordination practices in secondary CLIL schools. European Journal of Language Policy, 9(2), 183–202. 10.3828/ejlp.2017.12
    https://doi.org/10.3828/ejlp.2017.12 [Google Scholar]
21. Kiely, R.
    (2009) CLIL – The question of assessment. RetrievedAugust 22, 2023, fromsurl.li/kiazg
22. Lasagabaster, D.
    (2008) Foreign language competence in content and language integrated courses. The Open Applied Linguistics Journal, 11, 30–41. 10.2174/1874913500801010030
    https://doi.org/10.2174/1874913500801010030 [Google Scholar]
23. Leal, J. P.
    (2016) Assessment in CLIL: Test development for content and language for teaching natural science in English as a foreign language. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 293–317. 10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.3
    https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.3 [Google Scholar]
24. Lo, Y. Y.
    (2014) Collaboration between L2 and content subject teachers in CBI: Contrasting beliefs and attitudes. RELC Journal, 45(2), 181–196. 10.1177/0033688214535054
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214535054 [Google Scholar]
25. Lo, Y. Y., & Fung, D.
    (2020) Assessments in CLIL: The interplay between cognitive and linguistic demands and their progression in secondary education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(10), 1192–1210. 10.1080/13670050.2018.1436519
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1436519 [Google Scholar]
26. Lo, Y. Y., & Lin, A. M. Y.
    (2014) Designing assessment tasks with language awareness: Balancing cognitive and linguistic demands. Assessment and Learning, 3(3), 97–119. https://wlts.edb.hkedcity.net/filemanager/file/A&L3(11)_Lo&Lin.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lo, Y. Y., Lui, W. M., & Wong, M.
    (2019) Scaffolding for cognitive and linguistic challenges in CLIL science assessments. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 7(2), 289–314. 10.1075/jicb.18028.lo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18028.lo [Google Scholar]
28. Londo, M.
    (2012) Optimising EMI in higher education through CLIL: Case study at Vienna University of Technology. AV Akademikerverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Marsh, D., Maljers, A., & Hartiala, A. K.
    (2001) Profiling European CLIL classrooms. Languages Open Doors.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Martín-Macho Harrison, A., & Faya Cerqueiro, F.
    (2020) L1 in CLIL: The case of Castilla-La Mancha. TEJUELO. Didactics of Language and Literature. Education, 311, 143–174. 10.17398/1988‑8430.31.143
    https://doi.org/10.17398/1988-8430.31.143 [Google Scholar]
31. Massler, U.
    (2011) Assessment in CLIL learning. InS. Ioannou-Georgiou & P. Pavlou (Eds.), Guidelines for CLIL implementation in primary and pre-primary education (pp.114–136). Socrates Comenius.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Massler, U., Stotz, D., & Queisser, C.
    (2014) Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. The Language Learning Journal, 42(2), 137–150. 10.1080/09571736.2014.891371
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.891371 [Google Scholar]
33. Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J.
    (2014) Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mohan, B.
    (1986) Language and content. Addison-Wesley Pusblishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Mohan, B., Leung, C., & Slater, T.
    (2010) Assessing language and content: A functional perspective. InA. Paran & L. Sercu (Eds.), Testing the untestable in language education (pp.217–240). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692672‑013
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692672-013 [Google Scholar]
36. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group
    (2009) Reprint-preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Physical Therapy, 89(9), 873–880. 10.1093/ptj/89.9.873
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/89.9.873 [Google Scholar]
37. Morton, T.
    (2020) Cognitive discourse functions: A bridge between content, literacy and language for teaching and assessment in CLIL. CLIL. Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 3(1), 7–17. 10.5565/rev/clil.33
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.33 [Google Scholar]
38. Morton, T., & Llinares, A.
    (2017) Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Type of programme or pedagogical model?InA. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.), Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL (pp.1–16). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.47.01mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47.01mor [Google Scholar]
39. Otto, A.
    (2020) Performance-based assessment in CLIL: Competences at the core of learning. InM. E. Gómez-Parra, & C. A. H. Abril (Eds.), Handbook of research on bilingual and intercultural education (pp.447–468). IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑7998‑2588‑3.ch019
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2588-3.ch019 [Google Scholar]
40. Otto, A., & Estrada, J. L.
    (2019) Towards an understanding of CLIL assessment practices in a European context: Main assessment tools and the role of language in content subjects. CLIL. Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 2(1), 31–42. https://raco.cat/index.php/clil/article/view/359606. 10.5565/rev/clil.11
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.11 [Google Scholar]
41. Pérez-Vidal, C.
    (2002) Modern languages across the curriculum: Practical case examples, Spain. InM. Grenfell (Ed.), Modern languages across the curriculum (pp.114–130). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Reierstam, H.
    (2015) Assessing language or content? A comparative study of the assessment practices in three Swedish upper secondary CLIL schools [Doctoral dissertation, University of Gothenburg]. hdl.handle.net/2077/40701
43. Reljić, G., Ferring, D., & Martin, R.
    (2015) A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of bilingual programs in Europe. Review of Educational Research, 85(1), 92–128. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24434333. 10.3102/0034654314548514
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314548514 [Google Scholar]
44. Hurtado, N., Guerrero, E., Romero, E., & Rubio, F.
    (2016, July). Towards bilingual teaching in higher education. Paper presented at the8th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, Barcelona, Spain. https://library.iated.org/view/HURTADO2016TOW. 10.21125/edulearn.2016.2214
    https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.2214 [Google Scholar]
45. Rohmah, I. I. T., Saleh, M., Faridi, A., & Fitriati, S. W.
    (2019) Language assessment pattern for primary education in the content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classroom context. Asian EFL Journal, 21(2.2), 101–123. repository.ikippgribojonegoro.ac.id/id/eprint/22
    [Google Scholar]
46. Short, D.
    (1993) Assessing integrated language and content instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4). 1–24. 10.2307/3587399
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587399 [Google Scholar]
47. Šteflíčková, A.
    (2015) Testing and diagnostics of students’ difficulties in CLIL teaching. InK. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth congress of the European society for research in mathematics education (pp.1529–1530). Charles University in Prague.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Tavella, G., & Banegas, D. L.
    (2016) The CLIL road from planning to assessment: Case studies in Patagonia. InD. L. Banegas, M. Lopez-Barrios, M. Porto, & M. A. Soto (Eds.), ELT as a multidisciplinary endeavor: Growing through collaboration. Selected papers from the 41st FAAPI Conference (pp.150–160). ASJPI.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Tedick, D. J., & Cammarata, L.
    (2012) Content and language integration in K–12 contexts: Student outcomes, teacher practices, and stakeholder perspectives. Foreign Language Annals, 45(s1), s28–s53. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2012.01178.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2012.01178.x [Google Scholar]
50. Tsagari, D., & Michaeloudes, G.
    (2013) Formative assessment patterns in CLIL primary schools in Cyprus. InD. Tsagari, S. Papadima-Sophocleous, & S. Ioannou-Georgiou (Eds.), International experiences in language testing and assessment (pp.75–93). Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑02511‑8
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-02511-8 [Google Scholar]
51. Wewer, T.
    (2014) Assessment of young learners’ English proficiency in bilingual content instruction CLIL [Doctoral dissertation, University of Turku]. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-29-5754-5
52. Xavier, A. C. D. C. M.
    (2015) Assessment for Learning in EBE/CLIL: A learning-oriented approach to assessing English language skills and curriculum content at early primary level [Master’s thesis, NOVA University Lisbon]. https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/17973/1/ProjectWork_ELT_AX_OE_FINAL_28_10_2015.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
53. Yang, W.
    (2016) ESP vs. CLIL: A coin of two sides or a continuum of two extremes. ESP today, 4(1), 43–68. https://www.esptodayjournal.org/pdf/current_issue/3.6.2016/WENHSIEN-YANG-full%20text.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
54. Zhetpisbayeva, B. A., Kitibayeva, A. K., Kazimova, D. A., Akbayeva, G. N., & Zatyneiko, M. A.
    (2018) Assessment issues in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 8(4), 32–38. https://japer.in/article/assessment-issues-in-content-and-language-integrated-learning-clil
    [Google Scholar]