1887
image of Investigating young Finnish CLIL pupils’ perceptions of foreign language use through visual narratives
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article explores how pupils in early CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) education perceive language skills and use. The participants were 25 French-medium and 16 English-medium CLIL pupils in Grade 2 (aged 8 years). They had received CLIL education since the 1st Grade. The data were visual narratives drawn by the pupils and some associated open-ended questions they answered in writing. The data were analyzed using visual and content analysis. The results show that the pupils’ perceptions of language were a combination of traditional and modern views of language. The pupils compartmentalized the different languages as separate entities. They mostly saw language being used with native speakers. Technological artefacts were absent even though they are an integral part of children’s life in Finland. Also, the pupils considered language being a vehicle for oral communication outside school. The results bear implications for CLIL education and early language teaching in general.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.21033.man
2022-06-20
2022-08-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alanen, R.
    (2003) A sociocultural approach to young language learners’ beliefs about language learning. InP. Kalaja & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches (pp.55–85). Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑4751‑0_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0_3 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alanen, R., Dufva, H., & Mäntylä, K.
    (Eds.) (2006) Kielen päällä: Näkökulmia kieleen ja kielenkäyttöön. The University of Jyväskylä.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Aro, M.
    (2009) Speakers and doers. Polyphony and agency in children’s beliefs about language learning. Doctoral dissertation. University of Jyväskylä.
  4. (2012) Effects of authority: Voicescapes in children’s beliefs about the learning of English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(3), 331–346. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2012.00314.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2012.00314.x [Google Scholar]
  5. (2013) Kielen oppijasta kielen osaajaksi. InT. Keisanen, E. Kärkkäinen, M. Rauniomaa, P. Siitonen & M. Siromaa (Eds.), Osallistumisen multimodaaliset diskurssit – Multimodal discourses of participation (pp.11–28). AFinLA Yearbook 2013. The Finnish Association for Applied Linguistics Publications71.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Atagi, N., & Sandhofer, C. M.
    (2020) Language environments predict aspects of explicit language awareness development. Language Learning, 70(2), 464–505. 10.1111/lang.12381
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12381 [Google Scholar]
  7. Benson, P., & Nunan, D.
    (Eds.) (2004) Learners’ stories: Difference and diversity in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blommaert, J.
    (2013) Language and the study of diversity. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies 74, pp.1–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Boeije, H.
    (2010) Analysis in qualitative research. Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Borg, S.
    (2003) Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research into what language teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching, 36, 81–109. 10.1017/S0261444803001903
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bovellan, E.
    (2014) Teachers’ beliefs about learning and language as reflected in their views of teaching materials for Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Doctoral dissertation. University of Jyväskylä.
  12. Busch, B.
    (2006) Language biographies – Approaches to multilingualism in education and linguistic research. InB. Busch, A. Jardine & A. Tjoutuku (Eds.), Language biographies for multilingual learning (pp.5–18). PRAESA.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2018) The language portrait in multilingualism research: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Working Papers in Urban Languages & Literacies 236, pp.1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Calderón Jurado, B., & Morilla García, C.
    (2018) Students’ attitude and motivation in bilingual education. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(3), 317–342. 10.17583/ijep.2018.3558
    https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2018.3558 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cenoz, J.
    (2015) Discussion: Some reflections on content-based education in Hong Kong as part of the paradigm shift. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(3), 345–351. 10.1080/13670050.2014.988117
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.988117 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chik, A., & Melo-Pfeifer, S.
    (2020) What does language awareness look like? Visual methodologies in language learning and teaching research (2000–2018). Language Awareness. Advance online publication. 10.1080/09658416.2020.1785481
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2020.1785481 [Google Scholar]
  17. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
    (2010) CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009024549
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2011) Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles?Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 182–204. 10.1017/S0267190511000092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092 [Google Scholar]
  19. DNA
    DNA (2020) Koululaistutkimus. Lasten puhelimien hankinta ja käyttö. https://www.sttinfo.fi/data/attachments/00085/1e7ffcfb-8dbd-40cf-8e3b-eca449a820a3.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dufva, H., Alanen, R., & Aro, M.
    (2003) Kieli objektina – miten lapset mieltävät kielen?InM. Koskela & N. Pilke (Eds.), Kieli ja asiantuntijuus. AFinLA Yearbook 2003. The Finnish Association for Applied Linguistics Publications61.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dufva, H., & Alanen, R.
    (2005) Metalinguistic awareness in dialogue: Bakhtinian considerations. InJ. Kelly Hall, G. Vitanova & L. Marchenkova (Eds.), Dialogue with Bakhtin on second and foreign language learning. New perspectives (pp.99–118). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dufva, H., Aro, M., Alanen, R., & Kalaja, P.
    (2011) Voices of literacy, images of books: Sociocognitive approach to multimodality in learner beliefs. ForumSprache, 6, 58–74.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dufva, H., & Lähteenmäki, M.
    (1996) What people know about language: A dialogical view. Zeitschrift fur Fremdsprachenforschung, 7(2), 121–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Enever, J., & Lindgren, E.
    (Eds.) (2017) Early language learning. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Eurydice
    Eurydice (2006) Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Eurydice: www.indire.it/lucabas/lkmw_file/eurydice/CLIL_EN.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Eurydice
    Eurydice (2017) Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe – 2017 edition. Eurydice Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Finnish National Agency of Education
    Finnish National Agency of Education (2014) National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. Finnish National Agency of Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. García Mayo, M. P.
    (Ed.) (2017) Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hansell, K., & Bergroth, M.
    (2020) Språkmedvetenhet inom småbarnspedagogik – Pedagogernas reflektioner över begreppet. InH. Hirsto, M. Enell-Nilsson, H. Kauppinen-Räisänen & N. Keng (Eds.), Työelämän viestintä III, Arbetslivskommunikation III, Workplace Communication III, Kommunikation im Berufsleben III. VAKKI SymposiumXL6.–7.2.2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Heller, M.
    (1999) Linguistic minorities and modernity: A sociolinguistic ethnography. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Holliday, A.
    (2009) English as a lingua franca: Non-native speakers’ and cosmopolitan realities. InF. Sharifian (Ed.), English as an international language (pp.21–33). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847691231‑005
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691231-005 [Google Scholar]
  32. Jaekel, N., Schurig, M., Florian, M., & Ritter, M.
    (2017) From early starters to late finishers? A longitudinal study of early foreign language learning in school. Language Learning, 67(3), 631–664. 10.1111/lang.12242
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12242 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kalaja, P., Alanen, R., & Dufva, H.
    (2008) Self-portraits of learners of EFL: Finnish students draw and tell. InP. Kalaja, V. Menezes & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Narratives of learning and teaching EFL (pp.186–198). Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kalaja, P., Alanen, R., Palviainen, Å., & Dufva, H.
    (2011) From milk cartons to English roommates: Context and agency in L2 learning beyond the classroom. InP. Benson & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp.47–58). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230306790_5
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306790_5 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kalaja, P., & Barcelos, A. M. F.
    (Eds.) (2003) Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑4751‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4751-0 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kalaja, P., Barcelos, A. M. F., & Aro, M.
    (2018) Revisiting research on L2 learner beliefs: Looking back and looking forward. InP. Garrett & J. M. Cots (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp.222–237). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kalaja, P., & Barcelos, A. M. F.
    (2019) Learner beliefs in second language learning. InC. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp.674–681). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0082.pub2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0082.pub2 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kalaja, P., & Melo-Pfeifer, S.
    (Eds.) (2019) Visualising multilingual lives: More than words. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kalaja, P., & Mäntylä, K.
    (2018) The English class of my dreams!: Envisioning teaching a foreign language. InS. Mercer & A. Kostoulas (Eds.), Language teacher psychology (pp.34–52). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783099467‑007
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783099467-007 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kalaja, P., & Pitkänen-Huhta, A.
    (2018) Visual methods in applied language studies. Applied Linguistics Review, 9(2–3), 157–176. 10.1515/applirev‑2017‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0005 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kuteeva, M., Kaufhold, K., & Hynninen, N.
    (Eds.) (2020) Language perceptions and practices in multilingual universities. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑38755‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38755-6 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kumpulainen, K., Sairanen, H., & Nordström, A.
    (2019) Young children’s agency in their digital media use in the sociocultural contexts of homes: A case study from Finland. InR. Brito & P. Dias (Eds.), Crianças, famílias e tecnologias. Que desafios? Que caminhos?CIED (Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudos Educacionais). Escola Superior de Educação do Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa. https://www.eselx.ipl.pt/sites/default/files/media/2019/e-bookalteracaofinal.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
    (2009) Language attitudes in CLIL and traditional EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(2), 4–17.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Lasagabaster, D.
    (2013) The use of the L1 in CLIL classes: The teachers’ perspective. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 6(2), 1–21. 10.5294/laclil.2013.6.2.1
    https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2013.6.2.1 [Google Scholar]
  45. Leppänen, S., Pitkänen-Huhta, A., Nikula, T., Kytölä, S., Törmäkangas, T., Nissinen, K., Kääntä, L., Räisänen, T., Laitinen, M., Pahta, P., Koskela, H., Lähdesmäki, S., & Jousmäki, H.
    (2011) National survey on the English language in Finland: Uses, meanings and attitudes. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English. https://varieng.helsinki.fi/series/volumes/05/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Llinares, A.
    (2017) Learning how to mean in primary school CLIL classrooms. InM. P. García Mayo (Ed.), Learning foreign languages in primary school: Research insights (pp.69–85). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783098118‑006
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098118-006 [Google Scholar]
  47. Loranc-Paszylk, B.
    (2019) Parental perceptions of bilingual primary schools in Poland: The (added) value of English. InJ. Rokita-Jaśkow & M. Ellis (Eds.), Early instructed second language learning (pp.175–190). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Marsh, D.
    (2000) Using languages to learn and learning to use languages. University of Jyväskylä. archive.ecml.at/mtp2/clilmatrix/pdf/1uk.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E.
    (2018) European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media and Society, 20, 1103–1122. 10.1177/1461444816685930
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930 [Google Scholar]
  50. Massler, U.
    (2012) Primary CLIL and its stakeholders: What children, parents and teachers think of the potential merits and pitfalls of CLIL modules in primary teaching. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(4), 36–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. May, S.
    (Ed.) (2014) The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL, and bilingual education. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Mearns, T., de Graaff, R., & Coyle, D.
    (2020) Motivation for or from bilingual education? A comparative study of learner views in the Netherlands. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(6), 724–737. 10.1080/13670050.2017.1405906
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1405906 [Google Scholar]
  53. Melo-Pfeifer, S.
    (2015) Multilingual awareness and heritage language education: Children’s multimodal representations of their multilingualism. Language Awareness, 24(3), 1–19. 10.1080/09658416.2015.1072208
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1072208 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2017) Drawing the multilingual self: How children portray their multilingual resources. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 55(1), 1–20. 10.1515/iral‑2017‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2017-0006 [Google Scholar]
  55. Méndez-García, M. C., & Pavón, V.
    (2012) Investigating the coexistence of the mother tongue and the foreign language through teacher collaboration in CLIL contexts: Perceptions and practice of the teachers involved in the plurilingual programme in Andalusia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(5), 573–592. 10.1080/13670050.2012.670195
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.670195 [Google Scholar]
  56. Menezes, V.
    (2008) Multimedia language learning histories. InP. Kalaja, V. Menezes & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Narratives of learning and teaching EFL (pp.199–213). Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Merikivi, J., Myllyniemi, S., & Salasuo, M.
    (2019) Smartphone kids. Digital media use among Finnish children. InA. Sparrman (Ed.), Making culture. Children’s and young people’s leisure cultures (pp.97–105). Kulturanalys Norden. https://kulturanalys.se/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/antologi_making_culture-1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Muñoz, C.
    (2015) Time and timing in CLIL: A comparative approach to language gains. InM. Juan-Garau & J. Salazar-Noguera (Eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments (pp.87–102). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑11496‑5_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11496-5_6 [Google Scholar]
  59. Mård-Miettinen, K., Kuusela, E., & Kangasvieri, T.
    (2014) Esikoululaisten käsityksiä kielten oppimisesta. Kasvatus – The Finnish Journal of Education, 44(4), 320–332.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Mäntylä, K., & Kalaja, P.
    (2019) ‘The class of my dreams’ as envisioned by student teachers of English: What is there to teach about the language?InP. Kalaja & S. Melo-Pfeifer (Eds.), Visualising multilingual lives: More than words (pp.254–274). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788922616‑018
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788922616-018 [Google Scholar]
  61. Mäntylä, K., Veivo, O., Pollari, P. & Toomar, J.
    (2021) English only? Kielten opettajien käsityksiä kielivalintojen monipuolistamisen esteistä ja keinoista. Kieli, koulutus ja yhteiskunta, 12(2). https://www.kieliverkosto.fi/fi/journals/kieli-koulutus-ja-yhteiskunta-maaliskuu-2021/english-only-kielten-opettajien-kasityksia-kielivalintojen-monipuolistamisen-esteista-ja-keinoista
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Nikula, T., & Moore, P.
    (2019) Exploring translanguaging in CLIL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 237–249. 10.1080/13670050.2016.1254151
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1254151 [Google Scholar]
  63. Nikula, T., & Pitkänen-Huhta, A.
    (2008) Using photographs to access stories of learning English. InP. Kalaja, V. Menezes & A. M. F. Barcelos (Eds.), Narratives of learning and teaching EFL (pp.171–185). Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Palviainen, Å., & Kędra, J.
    (2020) What’s in the family app?: Making sense of digitally mediated communication within multilingual families. Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices, 1(1), 89–111. 10.1558/jmtp.15363
    https://doi.org/10.1558/jmtp.15363 [Google Scholar]
  65. Peltoniemi, A., Skinnari, K., Mård-Miettinen, K., & Sjöberg, S.
    (2018) Monella kielellä Suomen kunnissa 2017. Selvitys muun laajamittaisen ja suppeamman kaksikielisen varhaiskasvatuksen, esiopetuksen ja perusopetuksen tilanteesta. University of Jyväskylä.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Pietikäinen, S., Alanen, R., Dufva, H., Kalaja, P., Leppänen, S., & Pitkänen-Huhta, A.
    (2008) Languaging in Ultima Thule: Multilingualism in the life of a Sami boy. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5(2), 79-99. 10.2167/ijmb083.0
    https://doi.org/10.2167/ijmb083.0 [Google Scholar]
  67. Piller, I.
    (2017) Intercultural communication: A critical introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Pitkänen-Huhta, A., & Mäntylä, K.
    (2020) Teachers negotiating multilingualism in the EFL classroom. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10.1515/eujal‑2018‑0020
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2018-0020 [Google Scholar]
  69. Pitkänen-Huhta, A., & Pietikäinen, S.
    (2012) Saamelaislapset kirjailijoina: Multimodaaliset tekstikäytänteet monikielisissä saamen luokissa. InL. Meriläinen, L. Kolehmainen & T. Nieminen (Eds.), Monikielinen arki (pp.67–89). AFinLA Yearbook 2012. The Finnish Association for Applied Linguistics Publications70.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Pižorn, K.
    (2017) Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): A panacea for young English language learners?InJ. Enever & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Early language learning (pp.145–163). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783098323‑011
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783098323-011 [Google Scholar]
  71. Pladevall-Ballester, E.
    (2015) Exploring primary school CLIL perceptions in Catalonia: Students’, teachers’ and parents’ opinions and expectations. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(1), 45–59. 10.1080/13670050.2013.874972
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.874972 [Google Scholar]
  72. Pyykkö, R.
    (2017) Monikielisyys vahvuudeksi. Selvitys Suomen kielivarannon tilasta ja tasosta. Publications of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland51.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Roiha, A.
    (2014) Teachers’ views on differentiation in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Perceptions, practices and challenges. Language and Education, 28(1), 1–18. 10.1080/09500782.2012.748061
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.748061 [Google Scholar]
  74. Roiha, A., & Mäntylä, K.
    (2022) ’It has given me this kind of courage…’: The significance of CLIL in forming a positive target language self-concept. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25:1, 100–116. 10.1080/13670050.2019.1636761
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1636761 [Google Scholar]
  75. Roiha, A., & Sommier, M.
    (2018) Viewing CLIL through the eyes of former pupils: Insights into foreign language and intercultural attitudes. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18(6), 631–647. 10.1080/14708477.2018.1465069
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2018.1465069 [Google Scholar]
  76. Rokita-Jaśkow, J., & Ellis, M.
    (Eds.) (2019) Early instructed second language learning. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Rubio, F.
    (Ed.) (2007) Self-esteem and foreign language learning. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Sjöholm, K.
    (2004) The complexity of the learning and teaching of EFL among Swedish-minority students in bilingual Finland. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(6), 685–696. 10.1080/0022027041000229387
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027041000229387 [Google Scholar]
  79. Skinnari, K., & Nikula, T.
    (2017) Teachers’ perceptions on the changing role of language in the curriculum. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 223–244. 10.1515/eujal‑2017‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2017-0005 [Google Scholar]
  80. Vogel, S., & García, O.
    (2017) Translanguaging. InG. Noblit & L. Moll (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_pubs/402/. 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.181
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.181 [Google Scholar]
  81. Wei, L., & Ho, W. Y.
    (2018) Language learning sans frontiers: A translanguaging view. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38, 33–59. 10.1017/S0267190518000053
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190518000053 [Google Scholar]
  82. Wolff, D.
    (2007) CLIL: Bridging the gap between school and working life. InD. Marsh & D. Wolff (Eds.), Diverse contexts: Converging goals. CLIL in Europe (pp.15–25). Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.21033.man
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.21033.man
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error