The impact of adjunct instruction on EFL academic writing at university

References

1. Ai, H., & Lu, X.
   (2013) A corpus-based comparison of syntactic complexity in NNS and NS university students’ writing. InDíaz-Negrillo, P. Ballier, & P. Thomson (Eds), Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data, 249–264. John Benjamins. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027270955-15ai. 10.1075/scl.59.15ai
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.59.15ai [Google Scholar]
2. Ament, J., & Pérez-Vidal, C.
   (2015) Linguistic outcomes of English medium instruction programmes in higher education: A study on Economics undergraduates at a Catalan university. Higher Learning Research Communications, 5(1), 47–68. 10.18870/hlrc.v5i1.239
   https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v5i1.239 [Google Scholar]
3. Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B.
   (2003) Content-based second language instruction (Classics ed.). University of Michigan Press. 10.3998/mpub.8754
   https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8754 [Google Scholar]
4. Bulté, B., & Housen, A.
   (2015) Evaluating short-term changes in L2 complexity development. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 63(4), 42–76. 10.5209/rev_CLAC.2015.v63.50169
   https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CLAC.2015.v63.50169 [Google Scholar]
5. Council of Europe
   Council of Europe (2020) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, available atwww.coe.int/lang-cefr
   [Google Scholar]
6. Coyle, Y., & Roca de Larios, J.
   (2014) Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children’s reported noticing and output production in a L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(3), 451–485. 10.1017/S0272263113000612
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000612 [Google Scholar]
7. Coyle, Y., & de Larios, J. R.
   (2020) Exploring young learners’ engagement with models as a written corrective technique in EFL and CLIL settings. System, 951, 102374. 10.1016/j.system.2020.102374
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102374 [Google Scholar]
8. Dueñas, M.
   (2003) A description of prototype models for content-based language instruction in higher education. Bells: Barcelona English Language & Literature Studies, 121. www.publicacions.ub.edu/revistes/bells12/PDF/art04.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
9. Friedl, G., & Auer, M.
   (2007) Erläuterungenzur novellierung der reifeprufungsverordnung fur AHS, lebende fremdsprachen (Rating scale used for assessment of the writing task). BIFIE. www.bifie.at/publikationen
   [Google Scholar]
10. Genesee, F., & Lindholm-Leary, K.
    (2013) Two case studies of content-based language education. Journal of Immersion and Content-based language Education, 1(1), 3–33. 10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.02gen [Google Scholar]
11. Grim, F.
    (2008) Integrating focus on form in L2 content-enriched instruction lessons. Foreign Language Annals, 41(2), 321–346. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2008.tb03295.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2008.tb03295.x [Google Scholar]
12. Hanaoka, O.
    (2007) Noticing from models and reformulations: A case study of two Japanese EFL Learners. Sophia Linguistica, 541, 167–192.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Jexenflicker, S., & Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2010) The CLIL differential: Comparing the writing of CLIL and non-CLIL students in higher colleges of technology. InC. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms (pp.169–189). John Benjamins. 10.1075/aals.7.09jex
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.09jex [Google Scholar]
14. Lasagabaster, D., Doiz, A., & Pavón, V.
    (2018) Undergraduates’ beliefs about the role of language and team teaching in EMI courses at University. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 50(2–3), 111–127. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7104955
    [Google Scholar]
15. Long, M. H. & Robinson, P.
    (1998) Focus on form theory, research, and practice. InC. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (pp.5–41). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lu, X.
    (2010) Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496. 10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu [Google Scholar]
17. Lu, X.
    (2012) The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01232_1.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01232_1.x [Google Scholar]
18. Lyster, R.
    (2017) Content-based language teaching. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315103037
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315103037 [Google Scholar]
19. Navarro Gil, N.
    (2018) Reflexive metadiscourse in a corpus of Spanish bachelor dissertations in EFL. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 61, 29–49. 10.32714/ricl.06.04
    https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.06.04 [Google Scholar]
20. Navarro-Gil, N.
    (2019) The effects of a content-based language course on students’ academic vocabulary production. CLIL Journal of Innovation and Research in Plurilingual and Pluricultural Education, 2(2), 25–42. 10.5565/rev/clil.30
    https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/clil.30 [Google Scholar]
21. Paquot, M., & Plonsky, L.
    (2017) Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3(1), 61–94. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.03paq
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.03paq [Google Scholar]
22. Pérez-Cañado, M. L.
    (2012) CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341. 10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064 [Google Scholar]
23. Polio, C., & Yoon, H. J.
    (2018) The reliability and validity of automated tools for examining variation in syntactic complexity across genres. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 165–188. 10.1111/ijal.12200
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12200 [Google Scholar]
24. Räisänen, C., & Fortanet-Gómez, I.
    (2008) The state of ESP teaching and learning in Western European higher education after Bologna. ESP in European Higher Education: Integrating Language and Content, 41, 11–51. 10.1075/aals.4.03rai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.4.03rai [Google Scholar]
25. Ready, D., & Wesche, M.
    (1992) An evaluation of the University of Ottawa’s sheltered program: Language teaching strategies that work. InR. J. Courchêne, J. I. Glidden, S. T. John, & C. Therien (Eds.), Comprehension-based second language teaching (pp.389–404). University of Ottawa Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Rodgers, D. M.
    (2006) Developing content and form: Encouraging evidence from Italian content-based instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 373–386. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2006.00430.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00430.x [Google Scholar]
27. Rogier, D.
    (2012) The effects of English-medium instruction on language proficiency of students enrolled in higher education in the UAE. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Exeter. https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10036/4482/RogierD.pdf?sequence=2
28. Römer, U.
    (2011) Corpus research applications in second language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 311, 205225. 10.1017/S0267190511000055
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000055 [Google Scholar]
29. Roquet, H., & Pérez-Vidal, C.
    (2017) Do productive skills improve in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) contexts? The case of writing. Applied Linguistics, 38 (4), 489–511. 10.1093/applin/amv050
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv050 [Google Scholar]
30. Roquet, H., Vraciu, A., & Nicolás, F.
    (2019) The effect of amount of exposure to English medium instruction programmes in higher education: The case of morphosyntax. InL. Marqués-Pascual & A. Cortijo-Ocaña (Eds.), Second and Third Language Acquisition in Bilingual Contexts. (pp.69–106). Delaware: Juan de la Cuesta, ISBN: 978-1-58871-338-4.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Roquet, H., Vraciu, A., Nicolás, F., & Pérez-Vidal, C.
    (2022) Adjunct instruction in higher education: Examining the effects on English foreign language proficiency. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25 (4): 1377–1398. 10.1080/13670050.2020.1765967
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1765967 [Google Scholar]
32. Ruiz de Zarobe, Y.
    (2010) Written production and CLIL: An empirical study. InC. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Language Use and Language Learning in CLIL Classrooms (pp.191–209). John Benjamins. 10.1075/aals.7.10rui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.10rui [Google Scholar]
33. Skehan, P., & Foster, P.
    (1997) Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185–211. 10.1177/136216889700100302
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216889700100302 [Google Scholar]
34. Smith, U., & Dafouz, E.
    (2012) Integrating content and language in higher education. Gaining insights into English-medium instruction at European universities. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/aila.25
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.25 [Google Scholar]
35. Snow, M. A., & Brinton, D. M.
    (1988) Content-based language instruction: Investigating the effectiveness of the adjunct model. TESOL Quarterly, 22(4), 553–574. 10.2307/3587256
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587256 [Google Scholar]
36. Wolfe-Quintero, K., S. Inagaki, & Kim, H.
    (1998) Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. University of Hawai’i at Manoa. 10.2307/3587656
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587656 [Google Scholar]
37. Zhang, M., & Pladevall-Ballester, E.
    (2021) Discipline-specific language learning outcomes in EMI programs in the People’s Republic of China. Language and Education, 35(4), 357–374. 10.1080/09500782.2021.1895827
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1895827 [Google Scholar]