1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of The readability of books for immersion schools
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Few books are available to support reading instruction in minority language immersion programs. Since North American teachers provide children with a choice of books scaffolded in difficulty and suited to their interests, they must resort to creating or adapting their own minority language materials, networking, or spending hours online or in bookstores. A more systematic approach would be based on an interdisciplinary understanding of the concept of readability. We focus on German as a minority language in North America and examined research published in both German and English to develop a conceptual framework of readability as comprising text complexity, context, and literary aspects. Using this framework, we conceptualize a research program for investigating readability of books in minority languages. This research program would be language-specific, but adaptable to other minority languages, thereby serving as a call to action for researchers interested in the readability of books.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24001.dre
2024-12-06
2025-01-20

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24001.dre
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Ajlan, A. A., Al-Khalifa, H. S., & Al-Salman, A. M. S.
    (2008) Towards the development of an automatic readability measurements for Arabic language. 3rd International Conference on Digital Information Management, ICDIM 2008, –. 10.1109/ICDIM.2008.4746711
     https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2008.4746711 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alberta Learning
    Alberta Learning (2001) Alberta version: The Common Curriculum Framework. wncp.ca/media/44395/framework.pdf
  3. Amendum, S. J., Conradi, K., & Hiebert, E.
    (2018) Does text complexity matter in the elementary grades? A research synthesis of text difficulty and elementary students’ reading fluency and comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, (), –. 10.1007/s10648‑017‑9398‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9398-2 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnost, W., Lull, E., Schueder, J., & Engler, J.
    (2021) Reading level identification using natural language processing techniques processing techniques. SMU Data Science Review, (), Article 7.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Benjamin, R. G.
    (2012) Reconstructing readability: Recent developments and recommendations in the analysis of text difficulty. Educational Psychology Review, (), –. 10.1007/s10648‑011‑9181‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9181-8 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bilash, O. S. E.
    (2002) The challenges and successes of developing a literacy community in a minority language in Western Canada: An action research study. Foreign Language Annals, (), –. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2002.tb01856.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb01856.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Bogaerds-Hazenberg, S., Evers-Vermeul, J., & Van den Bergh, H.
    (2019) Teachers and researchers as co-designers? A design-based research on reading comprehension instruction in primary education. Educational Design Research, (), –. 10.15460/eder.3.1.1399
     https://doi.org/10.15460/eder.3.1.1399 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brinkmann, E.
    (2021) Independent writing and reading right from the start: The language experience approach in German classrooms. Reading Primers International, , –. 10.13140/RG.2.2.35991.47521
     https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35991.47521 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brinkmann, E., & Brügelmann, H.
    (2023) Warum die sogenannten Erstlese“-Bücher eigentlich Zweitlesebücher sind: Bewertung der Leseschwierigkeit des Verlagsangebots mit dem BRELIX. InJ. Mikota & J. Nadine (Eds). Erstleseliteratur als vielfältiger Lern- und Erfahrungsort (pp.–). Kopaed.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brookshire, J., Scharff, L. F. V., & Moses, L. E.
    (2002) The influence of illustrations on children’s book preferences and comprehension, Reading Psychology, (), –, 10.1080/713775287
     https://doi.org/10.1080/713775287 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brügelmann, H., & Brinkmann, E.
    (2021a) Wie kann man erfassen, was Texte für echte Leseanfänger*innen leicht oder schwierig macht? Zur Begründung des Bremer Erstlese-Index“ (BRELIX).
     [Google Scholar]
  12. (2021b) The “Bremen Early Literacy Index (BRELIX)” of text difficulty. Reading Primers International, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cartledge, G., Keesey, S., Bennett, J. G., Ramnath, R., & Council III, M. R.
    (2016) Culturally relevant literature: What matters most to primary-age urban learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, (), –, 10.1080/10573569.2014.955225
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.955225 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, X., & Meurers, D.
    (2019) Linking text readability and learner proficiency using linguistic complexity feature vector distance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, (), –. 10.1080/09588221.2018.1527358
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527358 [Google Scholar]
  15. DeHart, J.
    (2020) Reading aloud, always. The Reading Teacher, (), –. 10.1002/trtr.1925
     https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1925 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dicks, J., & Genesee, F.
    (2017) Bilingual Education in Canada. InO. Garcia, A. Lin, & S. May (Eds.), Bilingual and Multilingual Education (pp.–). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02324‑3_32‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02324-3_32-1 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dressler, R.
    (2011) German-English bilingual programs: Transitioning to a dual immersion model?Forum Deutsch, (), –. www.forumdeutsch.ca/f/nf30catg
     [Google Scholar]
  18. (2018) Canadian Bilingual Program teachers’ understanding of immersion pedagogy. Canadian Modern Language Review, (), –, 10.3138/cmlr.3407
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.3407 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dressler, R. & Mueller, K.
    (2020) Strategies for purposeful oral language use in the second language classroom. Réflexions, (), –. hdl.handle.net/1880/113053
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (2022) Pedagogical strategies to foster target language use: A nexus analysis. Canadian Modern Language Review, (), –. 10.3138/cmlr‑2020‑0084
     https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr-2020-0084 [Google Scholar]
  21. Duke, N. K., & Purcell-Gates, V.
    (2003) Genres at home and at school: Bridging the known to the new. The Reading Teacher, (), –. 10.1598/RT.57.1.4
     https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.57.1.4 [Google Scholar]
  22. Erekson, J. A., & Benke, L. F.
    (2022) Making too much of estimates: Levels, readability formulas, and decodability in helping readers find the “right book.”New Review of Children’s Literature and Librarianship, (), –. 10.1080/13614541.2022.2151867
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13614541.2022.2151867 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ernst-Slavit, G., & Mulhern, M.
    (2003) Bilingual books: Promoting literacy and biliteracy in the second-language and mainstream classroom. International Reading Association. www.readingonline.org/articles/ernst-slavit/
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Fingerle, M.
    (2018) Resilienz, Migration und schulische Übergänge: Implikationen für den Übergang neu zugewanderter Kinder und Jugendliche in das deutsche Schulsystem. InN. von Dewitz, H. Terhart, & M. Massumi (Eds.), Neuzuwanderung und Bildung. Eine interdisziplinäre Perspektive auf Übergänge in das deutsche Bildungssystem. (pp.–). Beltz Juventa.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Freebody, P., & Luke, A.
    (1990) “Literacies” programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect: An Australian Journal, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Fry, E.
    (2002) Readability versus leveling. The Reading Teacher, (), –. www.jstor.org/stable/20205195
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Gebauer, S. K., Zaunbauer, A. C. M., Möller, J.
    (2013) Cross-language transfer in English immersion programs in Germany: Reading comprehension and reading fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, (), –. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.09.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.09.002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ghosn, I. K.
    (2002) Four good reasons to use literature in primary school ELT. ELT Journal, () (2002), –. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED449667.pdf. 10.1093/elt/56.2.172
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.2.172 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hancke, J., Vajjala, S., & Meurers, D.
    (2012) Readability classification for German using lexical, syntactic, and morphological features. Proceedings of COLING 2012: Technical Papers, December, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hargrave, A. C., & Senechal, M.
    (2000) A book reading intervention with preschool children who have limited vocabularies: The benefits of regular reading and dialogic reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, , –. 10.1016/S0885‑2006(99)00038‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)00038-1 [Google Scholar]
  31. Heger-Dorantes, D., & Dressler, R.
    (2024) A review of the literature from 2015–2024 on the readability of children’s books. University of Calgary. https://hdl.handle.net/1880/119514
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Heppt, B., Haag, N., Böhme, K., & Stanat, P.
    (2015) The role of academic language features for reading comprehension of language-minority students and students from low-SES families. Reading Research Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/rrq.83
     https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.83 [Google Scholar]
  33. Huang, B. H., Bedore, L. M., Ramírez, R., & Wicha, N.
    (2022) Contributions of oral narrative skills to English reading in Spanish–English latino/a dual language learners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, (), –. 10.1044/2021_JSLHR‑21‑00105
     https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00105 [Google Scholar]
  34. Imperial, J. M., & Ong, E.
    (2021) Application of lexical features towards improvement of Filipino readability identification of children’s literature. Philippine Computing Science Congress 2020, –. arxiv.org/abs/2101.10537
     [Google Scholar]
  35. James, E., Currie, N. K., Tong, S. X., & Cain, K.
    (2021) The relations between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in beginner readers to young adolescents. Journal of Research in Reading, , –. 10.1111/1467‑9817.12316
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12316 [Google Scholar]
  36. Jones, M. E., & Christensen, A. E.
    (2023) Constructing strong foundations of early literacy. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429284021
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429284021 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kauffman, S.
    (2005) Story elements: Which impact children’s reading interests? [Master’s thesis, Bowling Green State University]. OhioLINK Electronic Theses and Dissertations Center. rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1120575730
  38. Knott, C.
    (2017) Der Weg zum selbst gelesenen Buch. Erstlesetexte im Unterricht. Vom Bilderbuch bis Schmöker. Praxis Grundschule, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Labadie, M., Wetzel, M. M., & Rogers, R.
    (2012) Opening spaces for critical literacy: Introducing books to young readers. The Reading Teacher, (), –. 10.1002/TRTR.01097
     https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01097 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lam, K., Chen, X., & Cummins, J.
    (2015) To gain or to lose: Students’ English and Chinese literacy achievement in a Mandarin language bilingual program. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Lankes, E.-M.
    (2004) Leseunterricht in der Grundschule: Unterschiede zwischen Lehrkräften im internationalen Vergleich. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, (), –. 10.1007/s11618‑004‑0059‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-004-0059-0 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lenhard, W., Lenhard, A. & Schneider, W.
    (2017) ELFE II — Ein Leseverständnistest für Erst- bis Siebtklässler. Hogrefe.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Luke, A., Dooley, K., & Woods, A.
    (2011) Comprehension and content: Planning literacy in low socioeconomic and culturally diverse schools. Australian Educational Researcher, (), –. 10.1007/s13384‑011‑0021‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-011-0021-0 [Google Scholar]
  44. McNair, J. C.
    (2021) Surprise, surprise! exploring dust jackets, case covers, and endpapers in picture books to support comprehension. The Reading Teacher, (), –. 10.1002/trtr.1985
     https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1985 [Google Scholar]
  45. Maderazo, C., Martens, P., Croce, K., Martens, R., Doyle, M., Aghalarov, S., & Noble, R.
    (2010) Beyond picture walks: Revaluing picture books as written and pictorial texts. Language Arts, (), –. 10.58680/la201011539
     https://doi.org/10.58680/la201011539 [Google Scholar]
  46. Martin, L. E., & Kragler, S.
    (2012) Early signs of self-regulating print: Kindergartners at work reading to understand fiction and nonfiction Text. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, (), –. 10.1080/02568543.2012.659648
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2012.659648 [Google Scholar]
  47. Marx, A. E., & Stanat, P.
    (2012) Reading comprehension of immigrant students in Germany: Research evidence on determinants and target points for intervention. Reading and Writing, (), –. 10.1007/s11145‑011‑9307‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9307-x [Google Scholar]
  48. Mcquillan, K.
    (2009) Teachers reading aloud. Principal Leadership, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Meier, C.
    (2022) Kompetenzfacetten literarästhetischer Sprachreflexion. Peter Lang. 10.3726/b19114
     https://doi.org/10.3726/b19114 [Google Scholar]
  50. Mesmer, H. A. E.
    (2006) Beginning reading materials: A national survey of primary teachers’ reported uses and beliefs. Journal of Literacy Research, (), –. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ucalgary.ca/10.1207/s15548430jlr3804_2
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Mohr, K. A. J.
    (2006) Children’s choices for recreational reading: A three-part investigation of selection preferences, rationales, and processes. Journal of Literary Research, (), –. 10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_4
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_4 [Google Scholar]
  52. Nagler, T., Lonnemann, J., Linkersdörfer, J., Hasselhorn, M., & Lindberg, S.
    (2014) The impact of reading material’s lexical accessibility on text fading effects in children’s reading performance. Reading and Writing, (), –. 10.1007/s11145‑013‑9468‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9468-x [Google Scholar]
  53. Nuss, B.
    (2018) Base-1 method: A structural-functional approach to word, sentence and discourse readability. Waxmann.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Oeste, B.
    (2015) Mut zum Buch. Jugend Literatur, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Ovens, K., Eames, B. F., & McQuillan, I.
    (2021a) Comparative analyses of gene co-expression networks: Implementations and applications in the study of evolution. Frontiers in Genetics, (), –. 10.3389/fgene.2021.695399
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.695399 [Google Scholar]
  56. Parker, R. I., Hasbrouck, J. E., & Weaver, L.
    (2001) Spanish readability formulas for elementary-level texts: A validation study. Reading and Writing Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/105735601317095052
     https://doi.org/10.1080/105735601317095052 [Google Scholar]
  57. Racek, J.
    (2022) Weltkarte aller PASCH-Schulen. Initiative Schulen: Partner Der Zukunft“ (PASCH). https://www.pasch-net.de/de/pasch-schulen/weltkarte.html
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Risko, V. J., Walker-Dalhouse, D., Bridges, E. S., & Wilson, A.
    (2011) Drawing on text features for reading comprehension and composing. The Reading Teacher, (), –. 10.1598/RT.64.5.12
     https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.5.12 [Google Scholar]
  59. School Renaissance Inst., Inc.
    School Renaissance Inst., Inc. (2000) The ATOS[TM] readability formula for books and how it compares to other formulas. School Renaissance Inst., Inc. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED449468).
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Schilcher, A., Wild, J., Kraus, E. & Hilbert, S.
    (2022) FiLBY — Ein dreijähriges Lese-Trainingsprogramm im Praxis-Check. InN. McElvany, M. Becker, F. Lauermann, H. Gaspard & A. Ohle-Peters (Eds.), Optimierung schulischer Bildungsprozesse — What works? (pp.–). Waxmann.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Schroeder, S., Würzner, K., Heister, J., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R.
    (2015) ChildLex: A lexical database of German read by children. Behavior Research Methods, , –. 10.3758/s13428‑014‑0528‑1
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0528-1 [Google Scholar]
  62. Siewicke, N.
    (2015) Partial immersion in German — the English-German bilingual program in Edmonton Public Schools. InK. Haataja & R. E. Wicke (Eds.), Qualifiziert Unterrichten: Sprach- und fachintegrietes Lernen in der Zielsprache Deutsch (pp.–). Hueber.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Siggelkow, M., & Dressler, R.
    (2024) Lesbarkeit Deutscher Kinderbücher: Eine kommentierte Übersicht deutscher Literatur [The readability of German children’s books: An overview of the literature in German]. University of Calgary. https://hdl.handle.net/1880/118708
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Sipe, L. R.
    (2011) The construction of literary understanding by first and second graders in oral response to picture storybook read-alouds, Reading Research Quarterly, (), –. 10.1598/RRQ.35.2.4
     https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.4 [Google Scholar]
  65. Spangler, D., & Mazzante, J. A.
    (2015) Using reading to teach a world language: Strategies and activities. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315722757
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722757 [Google Scholar]
  66. Stoeger, H., Sontag, C., & Ziegler, A.
    (2014) Impact of a teacher-led intervention on preference for self-regulated learning, finding main ideas in expository texts, and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, (), –. 10.1037/a0036035
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036035 [Google Scholar]
  67. Tedick, D. J. & Lyster, R.
    (2020) Scaffolding language development in immersion and dual language classrooms. Taylor & Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Walker, S., & Reynolds, L.
    (2002) Serifs, sans serifs and infant characters in children’s reading books. Information Design Journal, (), –. 10.1075/idj.11.2.04wal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.11.2.04wal [Google Scholar]
  69. White-Clark, R., & Lappin, G.
    (2005) Building home-school partnerships: A way of enhancing reading literacy of diverse learners. Electronic Magazine of Multicultural Education, (), –. www.eastern.edu/publications/emme/2005spring/whiteclark_lappin.html
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Wild, J., & Pissarek, M.
    (2020) Regensburger Analysetool für Texte. https://www.uni-regensburg.de/assets/sprache-literatur-kultur/germanistik-did/ratte_dokumentation_2_.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Wilkins, A., Cleave, R., Grayson, N., & Wilson, L.
    (2009) Typography for children may be inappropriately designed. Journal of Research in Reading, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2009.01402.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01402.x [Google Scholar]
  72. Woods, A., & Exley, B.
    (Eds.) (2020) Literacies in early childhood: Foundations for equity and quality. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24001.dre
Loading
The readability of books for immersion schools
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.24001.dre
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24001.dre
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24001.dre
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: readability ; text complexity ; children’s books ; immersion ; bilingual education

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error