1887
image of Immersion teachers’ perspective on grammar instruction in language immersion in Finland
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that grammar is a central source of difficulty for immersion students and that their teachers often lack knowledge of how to integrate linguistic aims with content teaching. This descriptive, enquiry-based study reports on Finnish immersion teachers’ ( = 54) perspectives on grammar instruction in language immersion in Finland — a theme under-researched in Finland thus far. Our online questionnaire consists of 18 questions comprising three sections: the informants’ professional background, their views on the role of grammar in immersion and their views on correcting grammatical inaccuracies. We analyse our data using quantitative and statistical methods (Pearson’s χ² as a statistical test). Our findings show that most of our informants are experienced immersion teachers teaching languages to 13–15-year-old immersion students. They do not prioritise grammatical accuracy when planning their instruction, although they consider it an important aspect of second language proficiency. They also discuss grammatical accuracy to a greater extent with their students than with their colleagues and are more tolerant of inaccuracies in spoken output. Implications are discussed regarding the necessity of improving grammar instruction in immersion and immersion students’ grammatical accuracy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24003.nyq
2024-12-17
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, C., & Wright, W. E.
    (2017) Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (6th ed.). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R.
    (2004) Teachers’ stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/25.2.243
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.243 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergroth, M.
    (2021) Coordinating, communicating, and combining languages in local immersion education policy reform in Finland. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, –. 10.1075/jicb.19027.ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.19027.ber [Google Scholar]
  4. (2016) Reforming the national core curriculum for bilingual education in Finland. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, (), –. 10.1075/jicb.4.1.04ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.4.1.04ber [Google Scholar]
  5. (2007) Kielikylpyperheet valokeilassa. Taustat ja odotukset [Immersion families in the spotlight. Their backgrounds and expectations]. Publications of the University of Vaasa. www.uva.fi/materiaali/pdf/isbn_978-952-476-204-5.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2006) Immersion students in the matriculation examination. Three years after immersion. InS. Björklund, K. Mård-Miettinen, M. Bergström, & M. Södergård (Eds.), Exploring dual-focussed education. Integrating language and content for individual and societal needs (pp.–). Proceedings from the University of Vaasa. https://www.uwasa.fi/materiaali/pdf/isbn_952-476-149-1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergström, M.
    (2006) Writing in a second language — Case studies dealing with the challenges faced and the strategies used by immersion students at secondary school. InS. Björklund, K. Mård-Miettinen, M. Bergström, & M. Södergård (Eds.), Exploring dual-focussed education. Integrating language and content for individual and societal needs (pp.–). Proceedings from the University of Vaasa. https://www.uwasa.fi/materiaali/pdf/isbn_952-476-149-1.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Björklund, S.
    (2019) Research trends and future challenges in Swedish immersion. InM. Haneda & H. Nassaji (Eds.), Perspectives on language as action (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788922944‑006
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788922944-006 [Google Scholar]
  9. Björklund, S., & Mård-Miettinen, K.
    (2011) Integrating multiple languages in Immersion: Swedish immersion in Finland. InD. Tedick, D. Christian, & T. W. Fortune (Eds.), Immersion education. Practices, policies, possibilities (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847694041‑005
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847694041-005 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2014) Established and emerging perspectives on immersion education. InM. Bigelow & J. Ennser-Kananen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of educational linguistics (pp.–). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Björklund, S., Mård-Miettinen, K., & Savijärvi, M.
    (2014) Swedish immersion in the early years in Finland. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, , –. 10.1080/13670050.2013.866628
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.866628 [Google Scholar]
  12. Björklund, S., Mård-Miettinen, K., & Pakarinen, S.
    (2022) A language socialisation perspective on Swedish immersion in Finland: Students, teachers, and parents as key actors. Special 10th Anniversary Issue of the Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education. 10.1075/jicb.21019.bjo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21019.bjo [Google Scholar]
  13. Borg, S.
    (2003) Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research into what language teachers think, know, believe and do. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S0261444803001903
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cammarata, L., & Tedick, D.
    (2012) Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01330.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01330.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Eisenstein-Ebsworth, M., & Schweers, C. W.
    (1997) What researchers say and practitioners do perspectives on conscious grammar instruction in the ESL classroom. Applied Language Learning, (), –. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234665214_What_Researchers_Say_and_Practitioners_Do_Perspectives_on_Conscious_Grammar_Instruction_in_the_ESL_Classroom
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, N. C.
    (2005) At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S027226310505014X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310505014X [Google Scholar]
  17. Ellis, R.
    (2001) Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.2001.tb00013.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.2001.tb00013.x [Google Scholar]
  18. (2008) The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fortune, T. W., & Tedick, D. J.
    (Eds.) (2008) Pathways to multilingualism: Evolving perspectives on immersion education. Multilingual Matters, Ltd. 10.21832/9781847690371
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690371 [Google Scholar]
  20. Genesee, F.
    (2004) What do we know about bilingual education for majority language students?InK. Bhatia & W. Ritchie (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism and multiculturalism (pp.–). Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gimenez, T.
    (1994) Learners becoming teachers: An exploratory study of beliefs held by prospective and practising EFL teachers in Brazil [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Lancaster University.
  22. de Graaff, R., & Housen, A.
    (2009) Investigating the effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. InM. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp.–). Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444315783.ch38
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444315783.ch38 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Novella, M.
    (2015) Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning. InP. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.48.18goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.18goo [Google Scholar]
  24. Harley, B.
    (1993) Instructional strategies and SLA in early French immersion. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263100011980
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100011980 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hoare, P., & Kong, S.
    (2008) Late immersion in Hong Kong: Still stressed but making progress?. InT. W. Fortune & D. J. Tedick (Eds.), Pathways to multilingualism: Emerging perspectives on immersion education (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847690371‑015
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690371-015 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jean, G., & Simard, D.
    (2011) Grammar teaching and learning in L2: Necessary, but boring?Foreign Language Annals, (), –. https://faculty.weber.edu/tmathews/sli/Readings/Jean%20&%20Simard%202011.pdf. 10.1111/j.1944‑9720.2011.01143.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01143.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Krashen, S.
    (1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Laurén, C.
    (1998) The more, the easier — Immersion for multilingualism. InJ. Arnau & J. M. Artigal (Eds.), Immersion programmes: A European perspective (pp.–). Publicacions Universitat de Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Laurén, U.
    (2001) From oral to written story. On the development of immersion pupils’ structuring of a story. InS. Björklund (Ed.), Language as a tool. Immersion research and practices (pp.–). Proceedings from the University of Vaasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Liviero, S.
    (2017) Grammar teaching in secondary school foreign language learning in England: Teachers’ reported beliefs and observed practices. The Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2016.1263677
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1263677 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lyster, R.
    (2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.18 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L.
    (1997) Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (), –. 10.1017/S0272263197001034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034 [Google Scholar]
  33. Morton, T.
    (2016) Conceptualizing and investigating teachers’ knowledge for integrating content and language in content-based instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, (), –. 10.1075/jicb.4.2.01mor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.4.2.01mor [Google Scholar]
  34. Mård, K.
    (1995) Immersion pre-school as an environment for early second language acquisition. InM. Buss & C. Laurén (Eds.), Language immersion: Teaching and second language acquisition, from Canada to Finland (pp.–). University of Vaasa.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mård-Miettinen, K., & S. Björklund
    (2019) ”In one sentence there can easily be three different languages”. A glimpse into the use of languages among immersion students. InA. Huhta, G. Erickson, & N. Figueras (Eds.), Developments in language education: A memorial volume in honour of Sauli Takala (pp.–). EALTA and Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Jyväskylä. www.ealta.eu.org/documents/resources/Developments%20in%20Language%20Education%20A%20Memorial%20Volume%20in%20Honour%20of%20Sauli%20Takala.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ní Dhiorbháin, A., & Ó Duibhir, P.
    (2017) An explicit-inductive approach to grammar in Irish-medium immersion schools. Language Awareness, (), –. 10.1080/09658416.2016.1261870
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2016.1261870 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2022) Exploring student primary teachers’ linguistic knowledge of Irish. The Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2021.1879907
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2021.1879907 [Google Scholar]
  38. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  39. Nyqvist, E-L.
    (2018) Definiteness and use of articles in written Swedish by Finnish-speaking immersion pupils at the end of immersion: A comparison with non-immersion students. Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education, , –. 10.1075/jicb.17001.nyq
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.17001.nyq [Google Scholar]
  40. Nyqvist, E-L., & Lahtinen, S.
    (2021) Grammatical gender in L2 Swedish by Finnish-speaking immersion students. A comparison with non-immersion students. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0332586520000256
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586520000256 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ó Ceallaigh, T. J., Ní Mhurchú, S., & Ní Chróinín, D.
    (2016) Balancing content and language in CLIL: The experiences of teachers and learners. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, (), –. 10.1075/jicb.5.1.03oce
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.5.1.03oce [Google Scholar]
  42. Ó Duibhir, P.
    (2009) The spoken Irish of sixth-class pupils in Irish immersion schools. University of Dublin, Trinity College, Centre for Language and Communication Studies. https://www.cogg.ie/wp-content/uploads/The-spoken-Irish-of-sixth-class-pupils-in-Irish-immersion-schools.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Official Statistics of Finland
    Official Statistics of Finland (2020) Population structure. Annual review 2019, Appendix Figure 1. Swedish-speakers’ and foreign-language speakers’ proportion of the population in 1900–2019. Helsinki: Statistics Finland [referred: 21.3.2022]. www.stat.fi/til/vaerak/2019/01/vaerak_2019_01_2020-10-23_kuv_001_en.html
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Pakarinen, S., & Björklund, S.
    (2018) Multiple language signage in linguistic landscapes and students’ language practices: A case study from a language immersion setting. Linguistics and Education, , –. 10.1016/j.linged.2017.10.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.10.005 [Google Scholar]
  45. Peltoniemi, A.
    (2015) Kansainvälinen näkökulma kielikylpyopettajakoulutukseen [An international perspective to immersion teacher education]. Vaasan yliopiston julkaisuja ja raportteja 200. University of Vaasa. www.uva.fi/materiaali/pdf/isbn_978-952-476-601-2.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Peltoniemi, A., & Bergroth, M.
    (2020) Developing language-aware immersion teacher education: Identifying characteristics through a study of immersion teacher socialisation. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2020.1757613
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1757613 [Google Scholar]
  47. Roehr-Brackin, K.
    (2015) Explicit knowledge about language in L2 learning. InP. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp.–). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/sibil.48.06roe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.48.06roe [Google Scholar]
  48. Sato, K., & Kleinsasser, R. C.
    (2004) Beliefs, practices and interactions of teachers in a Japanese high school English department. Teaching and Teacher Education, (), –. 10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  49. Schmidt, R.
    (2001) Attention. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Schneider, C. G.
    (2021) CLIL teachers’ belief systems regarding grammar teaching and their teaching practices in en English full immersion private school in Chile: A qualitative study. Universidad Andrés Bello.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Sjöberg, S., Skinnari, K., Peltoniemi, A., & Mård-Miettinen, K.
    (2018) Språkbad i Finlands kommuner 2017. Utredning om språkbad i de inhemska språken i småbarnspedagogik, förskoleundervisning och grundläggande utbildning [Immersion in the Finnish municipalities in 2017. A report on immersion in domestic languages in early childhood education and care, pre-primary education and basic education]. Jyväskylä University. https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/57571/978-951-39-7413-8.pdf?sequence=2
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Spada, N.
    (2011) Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1017/S0261444810000224
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000224 [Google Scholar]
  53. Spada, N. & Tomita, Y.
    (2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00562.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x [Google Scholar]
  54. Swain, M.
    (1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. InG. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics (pp.–). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. (1998) Focus on form through conscious reflection. InC. Doughty & J. William (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Södergård, M.
    (2008) Teacher strategies for second language production in immersion kindergarten in Finland. InT. W. Fortune & D. J. Tedick (Eds.), Pathways to multilingualism: Emerging perspectives on immersion education (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847690371‑011
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690371-011 [Google Scholar]
  57. Tedick, D. J., & Lyster, R.
    (2020) Scaffolding language development in immersion and dual language classrooms. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Tedick, D., & Zilmer, C.
    (2018) Teacher perceptions of immersion professional development experiences emphasizing language-focused content instruction. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, (), –. 10.1075/jicb.17019.ted
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.17019.ted [Google Scholar]
  59. Vesterbacka, S.
    (1991) Ritualised routines and L2 acquisition: Acquisition strategies in an immersion programme. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, (), –. 10.1080/01434632.1991.9994443
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1991.9994443 [Google Scholar]
  60. Walker, C. L., & Tedick, D.
    (2000) The complexity of immersion education: Teachers address the issues. Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/0026‑7902.00049
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00049 [Google Scholar]
  61. Whyte, S., Wigham, C. R., & Younès, N.
    (2022) Insights into teacher beliefs and practice in primary-school EFL in France. Languages, (), –. 10.3390/languages7030185
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7030185 [Google Scholar]
  62. Williams, M., & Burden, R.
    (1997) Psychology for language teachers: A social constructive approach. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24003.nyq
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24003.nyq
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error