1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
  4. Volume 14, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 14, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2212-8433
  • E-ISSN: 2212-8441
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

The dual focused approach of Content and language Integrated Learning (CLIL) has been adopted across a range of linguistic and geographical regions adding to the complexity and variety of CLIL. The presence of CLIL across different educational communities provides an important opportunity to develop CLIL as a sustainable approach to education if the situated knowledge of CLIL can be harnessed. The comparative study reported here places three cases side-by-side to illustrate how informed discussion can be generated across different educational settings. The particular focus of this study is CLIL teacher education in Finland, England, and Australia. The contribution draws attention to the role of the wider environment in the implementation and development of CLIL, and the value of new insights afforded through a situated approach to theorising CLIL.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24017.moa
2025-04-18
2026-07-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24017.moa
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL)
    Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL) (2015) Accreditation of initial teacher education programs in Australia: Standards and procedures. AITSL. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/national-policy-framework/accreditation-of-initial-teacher-education-programs-in-australia.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Azparren-Legarre, M. P., & Bueno-Alastuey, M. C.
    (2022) Perceived Constraints of Contextual Factors on CLIL Teachers’ Effectiveness: Effect of a Training Course. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, 15(2), e1525–e1525.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, C.
    (2011) Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (5th ed.). England: Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ballinger, S., Fielding, R., & Tedick, D. J.
    (Eds.) (2024) Teacher Development for Content-Based Language Education: International Perspectives. Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Banegas, D. L., & Zappa-Hollman, S.
    (Eds.) (2024) The Routledge handbook of content and language integrated learning. Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781003173151
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003173151 [Google Scholar]
  6. Banegas, D. L., & del Pozo Beamud, M.
    (2022) Preparing future teachers for CLIL: An in-depth investigation of three cases. British Council. 10.57884/GB4B‑9573
     https://doi.org/10.57884/GB4B-9573 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F.
    (2017) Comparative case studies: An innovative approach. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 1(1), 5–17. 10.7577/njcie.1929
     https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.1929 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bergroth, M.
    (2016) Reforming the national core curriculum for bilingual education in Finland. Journal of Immersion and Content-based Language Education, 4(1), 86–107. 10.1075/jicb.4.1.04ber
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.4.1.04ber [Google Scholar]
  9. Bower, K.
    (2013) To what extent does content and language integrated learning (CLIL) as a language-based project approach promote pupil motivation in the teaching of MFL in three secondary schools in England?University of Hull.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. (2019a) School leaders’ perspectives on content and language integrated learning in England. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 1–17. 10.1080/07908318.2019.1667367
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2019.1667367 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2019b) ‘Speaking French alive’: learner perspectives on their motivation in Content and Language Integrated Learning in England. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(1), 45–60. 10.1080/17501229.2017.1314483
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1314483 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2021) Content and language integrated learning in England: Missed opportunities and ways forward. In, U. Lanvers, A. Thompson & M. East (eds), Language learning in Anglophone countries. Palgrave Macmillan. 267–287. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑56654‑8_14
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56654-8_14 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bower, K., Coyle, D., Cross, R. & Chambers, G.
    (Eds.) (2020) Curriculum Integrated Language Teaching: CLIL in Practice. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108687867
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108687867 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bower, K., Cross, R., & Coyle, D.
    (2020) CLIL in multilingual and English-background contexts: expanding the potential of content and language integrated pedagogies for mainstream learning. In, K. Bower, D. Coyle, R. Cross & G. Chambers (Eds), Curriculum Integrated Language Teaching: CLIL in Practice, Cambridge University Press, 3–21. 10.1017/9781108687867.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108687867.003 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bower, K.
    (2024) CLIL With Languages Other Than English. In, D. Banegas & S. Zappa-Hollman (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Content and Language Integrated Learning, London: Routledge, 210–224. 10.4324/9781003173151
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003173151 [Google Scholar]
  16. Broadfoot, P.
    (2000) Comparative education for the 21st century: Retrospect and prospect. Comparative Education, 36(3), 357–371. 10.1080/03050060050129036
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060050129036 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cammarata, L., Blain, S. & Cavanagn, M.
    (2024) Teacher preparation for the integration of language and literacy in the disciplines: Challenges and possibilities for Canadian French Immersion, inS. Ballinger, R. Fielding, & D. J. Tedick, (Eds.), Teacher Development for Content-Based Language Education: International Perspectives. Multilingual Matters, 64–82. 10.21832/BALLIN0596
     https://doi.org/10.21832/BALLIN0596 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cenoz, J.
    (2015) Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: The same or different?. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 8–24. 10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922
     https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922 [Google Scholar]
  19. Clyne, M. G.
    (2005) Australia’s language potential. University of New South Wales Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D.
    (2014) Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. 10.1093/applin/amt011
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011 [Google Scholar]
  21. Collen, I.
    (2021) Language Trends 2021. Language teaching in primary and secondary schools in England. Retrieved14.7.21, fromhttps://www.britishcouncil.org/research-policy-insight/research-reports/language-trends-2021
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Coyle, D.
    (2006) Content and language integrated learning: Motivating learners and teachers. Scottish Languages Review, 13(5), 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. (2007) Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. 10.2167/beb459.0
     https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2008) ‘CLIL: A Pedagogical Approach from the European Perspective’, inN. Van Deusen-Scholl and N. H. Hornberger (eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education. New York, NY: Springer, pp.97–111
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Coyle, D., Holmes, B., & King, L.
    (2009) Towards an integrated curriculum — CLIL National Statement and Guidelines. T. L. Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
    (2010) Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009024549
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549 [Google Scholar]
  27. Coyle, D.
    (2011) ITALIC Research Report Investigating Student Gains: Content and Language Integrated Learning. www.abdn.ac.uk/italic
     [Google Scholar]
  28. (2018) The place of CLIL in (bilingual) education. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 166–176. 10.1080/00405841.2018.1459096
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1459096 [Google Scholar]
  29. Coyle, D., Bower, K., Foley, Y. & Hancock, J.
    (2023) Teachers as Designers of Learning in Diverse Bilingual Classrooms in England: An ADIBE Case Study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26(9), 1031–1049. 10.1080/13670050.2021.1989373
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1989373 [Google Scholar]
  30. Cross, R.
    (2012) Creative in finding creativity in the curriculum: The CLIL second language classroom. Australian Educational Researcher, 391, 431–445. 10.1007/s13384‑012‑0074‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0074-8 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2016) Language and content ‘integration’: The affordances of additional languages as a tool within a single curriculum space. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(3), 388–408. 10.1080/00220272.2015.1125528
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1125528 [Google Scholar]
  32. Cross, R., & Gearon, M.
    (2013) Research and evaluation of the content and language integrated learning (CLIL) approach to teaching and learning languages in Victorian schools. Melbourne Graduate School of Education. Retrieved online fromwww.education.vic.gov.au/school/principals/curriculum/Pages/clilvictoria.aspx
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Cross, R., D’Warte, J., & Slaughter, Y.
    (2022) Plurilingualism and language and literacy education. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy. 10.1007/s44020‑022‑00023‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00023-1 [Google Scholar]
  34. Dalton-Puffer, C., Hüttner, J., & Llinares, A.
    (2022) CLIL in the 21st Century: Retrospective and prospective challenges and opportunities. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 10(2), 182–206. 10.1075/jicb.21021.dal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21021.dal [Google Scholar]
  35. Dalton-Puffer, C., Llinares, A., Lorenzo, F., & Nikula, T.
    (2014) “You can stand under my umbrella”: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 213–218. 10.1093/applin/amu010
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu010 [Google Scholar]
  36. Department for Education
    Department for Education (2010) The importance of teaching: The schools white paper 2010. The Stationery Office Norwich.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Díaz Pérez, W., Fields, D. L., & Marsh, D.
    (2018) Innovations and challenges: Conceptualizing CLIL practice. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 177–184. 10.1080/00405841.2018.1484037
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1484037 [Google Scholar]
  38. Education Services Australia
    Education Services Australia (2021) CLIL: A toe in the water. https://www.lls.edu.au/teacherspace/professionallearning/2186?sectionid=124
  39. EDUFI
    EDUFI (2014a) National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014 Finnish National Agency for Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. EDUFI
    EDUFI (2022) Opetushallitus päivitti määräystään: hakijalle useampia tapoja osoittaa riittävä kielen hallinta kaksikielisessä opetuksessa, https://www.oph.fi/fi/uutiset/2022/opetushallitus-paivitti-maaraystaan-hakijalle-useampia-tapoja-osoittaa-riittava-kielen
  41. Fernández, R., & Halbach, A.
    (2011) Analysing the situation of teachers in the CAM bilingual project after four years of implementation. Content and Foreign Language Integrated Learning. Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts. Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Fielding, R. & Harbon, L.
    (2024) Teacher perception of the link between professional learning and professional identities and confidence in integrating content and language, inS. Ballinger, R. Fielding, & D. J. Tedick, (Eds.), Teacher development for content-based language education: International perspectives. Multilingual Matters, 170–189.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture
    Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture (2016) Teacher Education in Finland, (11/2016) https://okm.fi/documents/1410845/4150027/Teacher+education+in+Finland/57c88304-216b-41a7-ab36-7ddd4597b925
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Finnish National Board of Education
    Finnish National Board of Education (2004) National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. Helsinki: National Board of Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Florian, L.
    (2015) Inclusive Pedagogy: A transformative approach to individual differences but can it help reduce educational inequalities?. Scottish Educational Review, 47(1), 5–14. 10.1163/27730840‑04701003
     https://doi.org/10.1163/27730840-04701003 [Google Scholar]
  46. Gabillon, Z.
    (2020) Revisiting CLIL: Background, pedagogy, and theoretical underpinnings. Contextes et didactiques. Revue semestrielle en sciences de l’éducation, (15). 10.4000/ced.1836
     https://doi.org/10.4000/ced.1836 [Google Scholar]
  47. García, O.
    (2009) Emergent Bilinguals and TESOL: What’s in a Name?Tesol Quarterly, 43(2), 322–326. 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2009.tb00172.x
     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00172.x [Google Scholar]
  48. Gruber, M. T., & Mercer, S.
    (2022) The agency of CLIL primary school teachers in Austria. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 10(1), 90–112. 10.1075/jicb.20032.gru
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.20032.gru [Google Scholar]
  49. Helsinki City
    Helsinki City (2024) Oppilaan koulupaikan määräytyminen ja oppilaaksiottamisen perusteet 1.1.2025 alkaen, kasvatuksen ja koulutuksen toimiala, suomenkielinen perusopetus, DiaarinumeroHEL 2024–007684 Oppilaan koulupaikan määräytyminen ja oppilaaksiottamisen perusteet 1.1.2025 alkaen, kasvatuksen ja koulutuksen toimiala, suomenkielinen perusopetus | Päätökset | Helsingin kaupunki
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Hu, H., & Mi, A.
    (2024) Localisation of content and language integrated learning in China: Tensions in teacher professional development. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–17. 10.1080/01434632.2024.2380099
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2380099 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kewara, P., & Prabjandee, D.
    (2018) CLIL teacher professional development for content teachers in Thailand. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 93–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Kirss, L., Säälik, Ü., Pedaste, M., & Leijen, Ä.
    (2020) A synthesis of theoretical frameworks on multilingual education for school leaders. Trames, 24(74/69), 1–27. 10.3176/tr.2020.1.02
     https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2020.1.02 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kohl, J., Marjanen, A., Rautio, H._K., Rusama, J., Räisänen, R. & Salomaa, R._L.
    (2019) Handbook for English-enriched Teaching and Learning. Grades 1–6. Helsinki Education Division.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Kohl, J., Lämsä, J., Nuutinen, A. & Rytkönen, J.
    (2024) Handbook for Bilingual Education Mathematics in grades 1–9 in Large-Scale Bilingual Education, Helsinki Education Division.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Kääntä, L.
    (2021) Multimodal perspective into teachers’ definitional practices: Comparing subject-specific language in physics and history lessons. Classroom-based conversation analytic research: Theoretical and applied perspectives on pedagogy, 197–223. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑52193‑6_10
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52193-6_10 [Google Scholar]
  56. Lehti, L., Järvinen, H.-M. & Suomela-Salmi, E.
    (2006) Kartoitus vieraskielisen opetuksen tarjonnasta peruskouluissa ja lukioissa [Mapping FL-learning in comprehesive and high schools]. In, P. Pietilä, P. Lintunen & H.-M. Järvinen (Eds.), Kielenoppija tänään [Language Learners of Today]. Jyväskylä: AFinLA, 293–313.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Llinares, A., & Cross, R.
    (2022) New challenges for CLIL research: Identifying (in) equity issues. AILA Review, 35(2), 169–179. 10.1075/aila.00054.edi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.00054.edi [Google Scholar]
  58. McNess, E., Arthur, L., & Crossley, M.
    (2015) ‘Ethnographic dazzle’and the construction of the ‘Other’: revisiting dimensions of insider and outsider research for international and comparative education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(2), 295–316. 10.1080/03057925.2013.854616
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2013.854616 [Google Scholar]
  59. Mehisto, P., & Asser, H.
    (2007) Stakeholder perspectives: CLIL programme management in Estonia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 683–701. 10.2167/beb466.0
     https://doi.org/10.2167/beb466.0 [Google Scholar]
  60. Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J.
    (2008) Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Macmillan Education 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Mills, B., & Tinsley, T.
    (2020) Boys studying modern foreign languages at GCSE in schools in England. https://epi.org.uk/publications-and-research/boys-studying-foreign-languages/www.britishcouncil.org
  62. Moate, J. M.
    (2011) The impact of foreign language mediated teaching on teachers’ sense of professional integrity in the CLIL classroom. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 333–346. 10.1080/02619768.2011.585023
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.585023 [Google Scholar]
  63. Moate, J.
    (2014) Dialogic struggles and pedagogic innovation. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 22(2), 295–314. 10.1080/14681366.2014.891641
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2014.891641 [Google Scholar]
  64. Moate, J., Lempel, L., Palojärvi, A., & Kangasvieri, T.
    (2021) Teacher development through language-related innovation in a decentralised educational system. Professional Development in Education, 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Moate, J.
    (2021) Seeking understanding of the textbook-based character of Finnish education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(3), 353–365. 10.1080/02607476.2021.1896341
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1896341 [Google Scholar]
  66. Moate, J., Cross, R., Bower, K., & Thomas, E.
    (2023) Teacher Education for CLIL. CELT Matters Special Issue 2023, 19–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Moate, J.
    (2023) Supporting teacher collaboration in bilingual education: Sharing the CLIL pie. Kieli, koulutus ja yhteiskunta, 14(4).
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Modern Languages Teachers’ Association of Victoria
    Modern Languages Teachers’ Association of Victoria. (n.d.). MLTAV CLIL Teachers’ Network. https://clillanguageteachers.weebly.com/
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Morton, T. & Llinares, A.
    (2024) Building Teachers’ Knowledge of Cognitive Discourse Functions to Integrate Content and Language, inS. Ballinger, R. Fielding, & D. J. Tedick, (Eds.), Teacher development for content-based language education: International perspectives. Multilingual Matters, 21–41. 10.2307/jj.21995545.7
     https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.21995545.7 [Google Scholar]
  70. Nikula, T. & Marsh, D.
    (1996) Kartoitus vieraskielisen opetuksen tarjonnasta peruskouluissa ja lukioissa. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Nikula, T., Dalton-Puffer, C., & García, A. L.
    (2013) CLIL classroom discourse: Research from Europe. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 1(1), 70–100. 10.1075/jicb.1.1.04nik
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.1.1.04nik [Google Scholar]
  72. Nikula, T.
    (2010) Effects of CLIL on a teacher’s classroom language use. Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms, 105–124. 10.1075/aals.7.06nik
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.7.06nik [Google Scholar]
  73. (2007) Speaking English in Finnish content-based classrooms. World Englishes, 26(2), 206–223. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.2007.00502.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2007.00502.x [Google Scholar]
  74. Nikula, T., Dafouz, E., Moore, P., & Smit, U.
    (Eds.) (2016) Conceptualising Integration in CLIL and Multilingual Education. England: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781783096145
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096145 [Google Scholar]
  75. Nikula, T., Skinnari, K., & Mård-Miettinen, K.
    (2023) Diversity in CLIL as experienced by Finnish CLIL teachers and students: Matters of equality and equity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26(9), 1066–1079. 10.1080/13670050.2022.2028125
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2028125 [Google Scholar]
  76. Nuffield Foundation
    Nuffield Foundation (2000) Languages: the next generation: the final report and recommendations of the Nuffield Languages Inquiry.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Pappa, S.
    (2021) Identity and emotions in teaching CLIL: The case of primary school teachers in Finland. The psychological experience of integrating content and language. Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788924306‑007
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788924306-007 [Google Scholar]
  78. Pappa, S., Moate, J., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Eteläpelto, A.
    (2017) Teachers’ pedagogical and relational identity negotiation in the Finnish CLIL context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 651, 61–70. 10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  79. Peltoniemi, A., Skinnari, K., Mård-Miettinen, K. & Sjöberg, S.
    (2018) Monella kielellä Suomen kunnissa 2017: selvitys muun laajamittaisen ja suppeamman kaksikielisen varhaiskasvatuksen, esiopetuksen ja perusopetuksen tilanteesta. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto. Available: urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-7391-9
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Pérez Cañado, M. L.
    (2020) CLIL and elitism: Myth or reality?. The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 4–17. 10.1080/09571736.2019.1645872
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1645872 [Google Scholar]
  81. (2018) Innovations and challenges in CLIL teacher training. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 212–221. 10.1080/00405841.2018.1492238
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1492238 [Google Scholar]
  82. Rogers, E. M.
    (2003) Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. San Isidro, X.
    (2018) Innovations and challenges in CLIL implementation in Europe. Theory Into Practice, 57(3), 185–195. 10.1080/00405841.2018.1484038
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1484038 [Google Scholar]
  84. Serragiotto, G.
    (2017) The problems of implementing CLIL in Italy. International Journal of Linguistics, 91, 82–96. 10.5296/ijl.v9i5.11829
     https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v9i5.11829 [Google Scholar]
  85. Simola, H.
    (2005) The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative education, 41(4), 455–470. 10.1080/03050060500317810
     https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500317810 [Google Scholar]
  86. Turner, M., & Cross, R.
    (2016) Making space for multilingualism in Australian schooling. Language and Education, 30(4), 289–297. 10.1080/09500782.2015.1114627
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1114627 [Google Scholar]
  87. Turner, M., & Tour, E.
    (2023) Literacies in the English classroom: leveraging and extending the linguistic repertoire of all students. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 1–14. 10.1007/s44020‑023‑00045‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-023-00045-3 [Google Scholar]
  88. Victorian Department of Education
    Victorian Department of Education (2023) CLIL — FUSE. https://fuse.education.vic.gov.au/pages/clil
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Wiesemes, R.
    (2005) The Final Report for the Content and Language Integrated Project, London: CILT, 11.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Wright, W. E., & Baker, C.
    (2017) Key Concepts in Bilingual Education. In, O. García, A. Lin, S. May, (eds), Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Encyclopaedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02258‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02258-1 [Google Scholar]
  91. Yin, R.
    (2006) Case Study Methods, In, J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.)., Handbook of complementary methods in education research. Routledge, 111–122.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Yuan, L., & Lo, Y. Y.
    (2023) CLIL and professional development. InThe Routledge handbook of content and language integrated learning. Routledge, 160–176. 10.4324/9781003173151
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003173151 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24017.moa
Loading
Harnessing the situated nature of CLIL for teacher education through a comparative study
Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 14, 54 (2026); https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.24017.moa
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24017.moa
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24017.moa
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): CLIL; comparative case study; macro-; meso- and micro-levels; situated knowledge; teacher education

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error