1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of EFL lexical abilities in pre-primary education
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The increasing need for plurilingualism within the latest decades has led many schools to promote an early start to Foreign Language (FL) teaching, in some cases as early as in pre-primary education. Research on pre-primary students to understand FL development in instructed contexts is still scarce. This study examines (1) how English as a FL receptive vocabulary develops over two years in pre-primary education learners, and (2) which internal and external factors influence it. Data were collected from 71 Catalan-Spanish bilingual pre-primary students at three times: T1-September 2019 (  = 4;6), T2-September 2020 (  = 5;1), and T3-June 2021 (  = 5;9). EFL receptive vocabulary was measured with the PPVT-4 (Dunn & Dunn, 2007), and at T1 participants’ parents filled in a background questionnaire. Results showed growth in participants’ lexical abilities from T1-T3. The strongest predictors of lexical development were gender, maternal education level, school, and EFL out-of-school exposure.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24029.seg
2024-11-29
2024-12-05

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24029.seg
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agustín-Llach, M. P.
    (2015) Age and type of instruction (CLIL vs. traditional EFL) in lexical development. International Journal of English Studies, (), –. 10.6018/ijes/2016/1/220691
     https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2016/1/220691 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
    (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruton, A.
    (2011) Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, (), –. 10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  4. (2013) CLIL: Some of the reasons why … and why not. System, (), –. 10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Castellano-Risco, I., Alejo-González, R., & Piquer-Píriz, A. M.
    (2020) The development of receptive vocabulary in CLIL vs EFL: Is the learning context the main variable?System, . 10.1016/j.system.2020.102263
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102263 [Google Scholar]
  6. Catalan, R. M. J.
    (2003) Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1111/1473‑4192.00037
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00037 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cenoz, J., & Valencia, J. F.
    (1994) Additive trilingualism: Evidence from the Basque country. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716400005324
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400005324 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dale, L., & Tanner, R.
    (2012) CLIL activities. A resource for subject and language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2008) Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. InW. Delanoy, & L. Volkmann (Eds.), Future perspectives for English language teaching (pp.–). Carl Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Dalton-Puffer, C., Hüttner, J., & Llinares, A.
    (2022) CLIL in the 21st Century. Retrospective and prospective challenges and opportunities. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, (), –. 10.1075/jicb.21021.dal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.21021.dal [Google Scholar]
  11. David, A., & Wei, L.
    (2008) Individual Differences in the Lexical Development of French–English Bilingual Children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050802149200
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802149200 [Google Scholar]
  12. De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J.
    (2020) Learning English through out-of-school exposure. Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), . 10.1017/S1366728918001062
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001062 [Google Scholar]
  13. Delaney, J., & Devereux, P. J.
    (2021) Gender and Educational Achievement: Stylized Facts and Causal Evidence. Center for Economic Policy Research, Discussion paper No. DP15753. RetrievedOctober 4, 2024, fromhttps://ssrn.com/abstract=3783979. 10.2139/ssrn.3775979
     https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3775979 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2005) The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M.
    (2007) The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th Ed.). NCS Pearson.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Emilsson, K. H.
    (2021) The relationship between extramural English exposure and receptive vocabulary knowledge of young Swedish L2 learners of English. [Doctoral dissertation, Lund University] Lund University Publications. https://www.lu.se/lup/publication/9062496
  17. European Commission
    European Commission (1995) While paper on education and training. Teaching and learning — Towards the learning society. Office of Official Publications of the European Communities.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. European Commission
    European Commission (2003) Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: An action plan 2004–2006. Office of Official Publications of the European Communities.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. European Commission
    European Commission (2011) Commission staff working paper — Language learning at pre-primary level: making it efficient and sustainable — A policy handbook.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. European Commission
    European Commission (2002) CLIL/EMILE — The European dimension. Technical report.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Eurostat
    Eurostat (2024) Foreign language learning statistics. RetrievedSeptember 30, 2024, fromhttps://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Foreign_language_learning_statistics#Primary_education
  22. Eurydice European Unit
    Eurydice European Unit (2006) Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Directorate-General for Education and Culture of the European Commission.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Eurydice European Unit
    Eurydice European Unit (2023) Key data on teaching languages at school in Europe — 2023 edition. Publications Office of the European Union.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Farkas, G., & Beron, K.
    (2004) The detailed age trajectory of oral vocabulary knowledge: Differences by class and race. Social Science Research, (), –. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.08.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2003.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  25. García Esteban, S.
    (2015) Soft CLIL in infant education bilingual contexts in Spain. International Journal of Language and Applied Linguistics, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Gené-Gil, M., Juan-Garau, M., & Salazar-Noguera, J.
    (2016) A methodology for longitudinal research on EFL written production: Capturing writing multidimensionality by combining qualitative and quantitative procedures. Journal of Research Design and Linguistics and Communication Sciences, (), –. 10.1558/jrds.30221
     https://doi.org/10.1558/jrds.30221 [Google Scholar]
  27. Generalitat de Catalunya
    Generalitat de Catalunya (2023) Decret 21/2023, de 7 de febrer, d’ordenació dels ensenyaments de l’educació infant [Decree 21/2023, February 7, by which the ordinance of the teaching in pre-primary education in established]. Diari Oficial de la Generalitat de Catalunya, .
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Goris, J., Denessen, E., & Verhoeven, L.
    (2019) Effects of content and language integrated learning in Europe. A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies. European Educational Research Journal, (), –. 10.1177/1474904119872426
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119872426 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hoff, E.
    (2006) How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental review, (), –. 10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  30. Institut d’Estadística de Catalunya
    Institut d’Estadística de Catalunya (2018) Usos lingüístics de la població. Llengua inicial, d’identificació i habitual. RetrievedJuly 8, 2024, fromhttps://www.idescat.cat/indicadors/?id=basics&n=10364
  31. Institut d’Estadística de Catalunya
    Institut d’Estadística de Catalunya (2019) Enquesta d’usos lingüístics de la població. RetrievedJuly 8, 2024, fromhttps://www.idescat.cat/pub/?id=eulp
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Ikeda, M.
    (2013) Does CLIL work for Japanese secondary school students? Potential for the ‘weak’ version of CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Ikeda, M., Izumi, S., Watanabe, Y., Pinner, R., & Davis, M.
    (2021) Soft CLIL and English language teaching. Understanding Japanese policy, practice, and implications. Routledge Handbooks. 10.4324/9780429032332
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429032332 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jafarigohar, M., Fivsar, H., & Etemad, P.
    (2022) The effect of CLIL context on the primary education EFL receptive and productive lexical growth. Language Teaching Research, Online first. 10.1177/13621688221078997
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221078997 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jiménez-Catalán, R. M., & Agustín-Llach, M. P.
    (2017) CLIL or time? Lexical profiles of CLIL and non-CLIL EFL learners. System, , –. 10.1016/j.system.2017.03.016
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.016 [Google Scholar]
  36. Jiménez-Catalán, R. M., Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., & Cenoz, J.
    (2006) Vocabulary profiles of English foreign language learners in English as a subject and as a vehicular language. Views, (), –. 10.4067/S0718‑48832016000100003
     https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832016000100003 [Google Scholar]
  37. Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L.
    (1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive psychology, (), –. 10.1016/0010‑0285(89)90003‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kassambara, A.
    (2023) rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. R Package Version 0.7.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lindgren, E. & Muñoz, C.
    (2013) The influence of exposure, parents, and linguistic distance on young European learners’ foreign language comprehension. International Journal of Multilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/14790718.2012.679275
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2012.679275 [Google Scholar]
  40. Llach, M. P. A., & Gallego, M. T.
    (2012) Vocabulary knowledge development and gender differences in a second language. Elia, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
    (2009) Language attitudes in CLIL and international EFL classes. International CLIL Research Journal, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M.
    (2023) Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.9.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
  43. Leona, N. L., van Koert, M. J. H., van der Molen, M. W., Rispens, J. E., Tijms, J., & Snellings, P.
    (2021) Explaining individual differences in young English language learners’ vocabulary knowledge: The role of Extramural English Exposure and motivation. System, . 10.1016/j.system.2020.102402
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102402 [Google Scholar]
  44. Llinares, A., & Morton, T.
    (2010) Historical explanations as situated practice in content and language integrated learning. Classroom Discourse, (), –. 10.1080/19463011003750681
     https://doi.org/10.1080/19463011003750681 [Google Scholar]
  45. Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P.
    (2010) The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amp041
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp041 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., & Makowski, D.
    (2021) Performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models. Journal of Open Source Software, (), . 10.21105/joss.03139
     https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139 [Google Scholar]
  47. Muñoz, C.
    (2008) Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amm056
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm056 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2011) Input and long-term effects of starting age in foreign language learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral.2011.006
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2011.006 [Google Scholar]
  49. Navés, T.
    (2009) Effective Content and Language Integrated (CLIL) Programmes. InY. Ruiz de Zarobe and R. M. Jiménez Catalán, (Eds.), Content and Language Integrated Learning. Evidence from Research in Europe (pp.–). Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Navés, T., & Muñoz, C.
    (1999) CLIL experiences in Spain. InD. Marsh, and G. Langé, (Eds.), Implementing Content and Language Integrated Learning. TIE-CLIL.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Nieuwenhuis, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B.
    (2012) Influence.ME: Tools for Detecting Influential Data in Mixed Effects Models. R Journal, (), –. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=influence.ME. 10.32614/RJ‑2012‑011
     https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2012-011 [Google Scholar]
  52. Paradis, J.
    (2019) English second language acquisition from early childhood to adulthood: The role of age, first language, cognitive, and input factors. InProceedings of the BUCLD (Vol., pp.–).
     [Google Scholar]
  53. (2011) Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic approaches to bilingualism, (), –. 10.1075/lab.1.3.01par
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.3.01par [Google Scholar]
  54. Pérez Cañado, M. L.
    (2018) CLIL and educational levels: A longitudinal study on the impact of CLIL on language outcomes. Porta Linguarium, , –. 10.30827/Digibug.54022
     https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.54022 [Google Scholar]
  55. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2023) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Revelle, W.
    (2024) psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. R package version 2.4.3, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Rua, P. L.
    (2006) The sex variable in foreign language learning: an integrative approach. Porta Linguarum(), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Sagasta, M. P.
    (2003) Acquiring writing skills in a third language: The positive effects of bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1177/13670069030070010301
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069030070010301 [Google Scholar]
  59. San Isidro, X., & Lasagabaster, D.
    (2019) The impact of CLIL on pluriliteracy development and content learning in a rural multilingual setting: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.1177/1362168817754103
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817754103 [Google Scholar]
  60. Sanz, C.
    (2000) Bilingual education enhances third language acquisition: Evidence from Catalonia. Applied Psycholinguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0142716400001028
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400001028 [Google Scholar]
  61. (2008) Predicting enhanced L3 learning in bilingual contexts: The role of biliteracy. InC. Pérez-Vidal, M. Juan-Garau, & A. Bel (Eds.), A portrait of the young in the new multilingual Spain (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847690241‑014
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847690241-014 [Google Scholar]
  62. Segura, M., Barón, J., & Roquet, H.
    (2022) Productive vocabulary development in pre-primary through soft CLIL. Open Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/opli‑2022‑0194
     https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2022-0194 [Google Scholar]
  63. Soto-Corominas, A., Roquet, H., & Segura, M.
    (2024) The effects of CLIL and sources of individual differences on receptive and productive EFL skills at the onset of primary school. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amad031
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad031 [Google Scholar]
  64. Soto-Corominas, A., Segura, M., Roquet, H., Navarro, N., & Met, Y. E.
    (2024) Third language English performance at the onset of schooling: Effects of bilingualism and exposure in Catalan-Spanish bilingual children. International Journal of Multilingualism (online first). 10.1080/14790718.2024.2348714
     https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2024.2348714 [Google Scholar]
  65. Sun, H., Steinkrauss, R., Tendeiro, J., & De Bot, K.
    (2016) Individual differences in very young children’s English acquisition in China: Internal and external factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, (), –. 10.1017/S1366728915000243
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000243 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sun, H., Steinkrauss, R., Wieling, M., & De Bot, K.
    (2018) Individual differences in very young Chinese children’s English vocabulary breadth and semantic depth: Internal and external factors. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2016.1178706
     https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1178706 [Google Scholar]
  67. Sundqvist, P.
    (2024) Extramural English as an individual difference variable in L2 research: Methodology matters. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, online first. 10.1017/S0267190524000072
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190524000072 [Google Scholar]
  68. Sylvén, L. K.
    (2010) Teaching in English or English teaching? On the effects of content and language integrated learning on Swedish learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Gothenburg.
  69. Tedick, D. J., & Lyster, R.
    (2020) Scaffolding language development in immersion and dual language classrooms. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Thordardottir, E.
    (2011) The relationship between bilingual exposure and vocabulary development. International Journal of Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1177/1367006911403202
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911403202 [Google Scholar]
  71. Unsworth, S., Persson, L., Prins, T., & De Bot, K.
    (2015) An investigation of factors affecting early foreign language learning in the Netherlands. Applied linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amt052
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt052 [Google Scholar]
  72. Van Mensel, L., & Galand, B.
    (2022) Testing the predictive power of executive functions, motivation, and input on second language vocabulary acquisition: a prospective study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, (), –. 10.1007/s10212‑022‑00597‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-022-00597-x [Google Scholar]
  73. Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D.
    (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S (4th ed.) Springer. https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑21706‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 [Google Scholar]
  74. Vraciu, A., & Marsol, A.
    (2023) Content-specific vocabulary in CLIL: Exploring L2 learning outcomes in a primary education programme in Catalonia. Language Teaching Research, Online first. 10.1177/13621688231170073
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231170073 [Google Scholar]
  75. Wickham, H., Davis, V., Girlich, M., & Usher, K.
    (2024) tidyr: Tidy Messy Data. R package version 1.3.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyr
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24029.seg
Loading
EFL lexical abilities in pre-primary education
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.24029.seg
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24029.seg
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24029.seg
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: individual differences ; CLIL ; pre-primary education ; out-of-school exposure ; lexical abilities ; English as a Foreign Language

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error