1887
image of Can Thai students thrive in CLIL classrooms?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study examines how 25 Thai lower secondary students with limited English proficiency engaged with their first experience of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in a logistics-focused lesson. Using video-recorded lessons and classroom observations, the study explores students’ comprehension, participation, and communication across eight sessions. The findings show that students successfully completed visually supported and procedural tasks but struggled with language-intensive activities requiring explanation, classification, or justification. Students frequently relied on Thai and translation tools to manage these challenges, indicating a clear gap between their understanding of the content and the academic English needed for disciplinary communication. The study highlights the importance of gradual task sequencing, explicit language scaffolding, and purposeful L1 integration to support early-stage CLIL implementation. Implications are offered for designing realistic, language-aware CLIL instruction that aligns with the needs of low-proficiency students in the Thai context.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24040.kew
2026-05-08
2026-06-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alimi, M. Y.
    (2018) The use of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) as conservation education methodology: An experience from State University of Semarang, . 10.1063/1.5061860
    https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5061860 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrios, E., & Acosta-Manzano, I.
    (2022) Primary students’ satisfaction with CLIL and perceived CLIL linguistic difficulty. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, (), –. 10.1080/01434632.2020.1759610
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1759610 [Google Scholar]
  3. Basterrechea, M., & Leeser, M. J.
    (2019) Language-related episodes and learner proficiency during collaborative dialogue in CLIL. Language Awareness, (), –. 10.1080/09658416.2019.1606229
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1606229 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beatty-Martínez, A. L., Parafita Couto, M. C., Ameka, F. K., & Aboh, E. O.
    (2025) Codeswitching. InReference Module in Social Sciences. Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑323‑95504‑1.00503‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95504-1.00503-2 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boonsuk, Y., & Ambele, E. A.
    (2020) Who ‘owns English’ in our changing world? Exploring the perception of Thai university students in Thailand. Asian Englishes, (), –. 10.1080/13488678.2019.1669302
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2019.1669302 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bulté, B., Surmont, J., & Martens, L.
    (2022) The impact of CLIL on the L2 French and L1 Dutch proficiency of Flemish secondary school pupils. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2021.2018400
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.2018400 [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlins Jr., C. M., & Siripol, P.
    (2024) CLIL or EMI? A Case Study of Non-English in-Service Teachers Teaching Reflection in an International School. Rajabhat Chiang Mai Research Journal, (), –. 10.57260/rcmrj.2024.265323
    https://doi.org/10.57260/rcmrj.2024.265323 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carloni, G.
    (2018) English-Taught Programs and Scaffolding in CLIL Settings: a Case Study. 10.30687/978‑88‑6969‑227‑7/029
    https://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-227-7/029 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cenoz, J.
    (2013) Discussion: Towards an educational perspective in CLIL language And, policy and pedagogical practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2013.777392
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777392 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chansri, C., & Wasanasomsithi, P.
    (2016) Implementing CLIL in Higher Education in Thailand: The Extent to Which CLIL Improves Agricultural Students’ Writing Ability, Agricultural Content, and Cultural Knowledge. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, (), –. https://www.culi.chula.ac.th/Images/asset/pasaa_journal/file-17-173-958hrs686886.pdf. 10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.51.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.51.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Charunsri, K.
    (2019) The Challenges of Implementing Content Language Integrated Learning in Tertiary Education in Thailand: A Review and Implication of Materials. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, (), . 10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.4p.125
    https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.4p.125 [Google Scholar]
  12. Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D.
    (2010) CLIL : Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009024549
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549 [Google Scholar]
  13. Coyle, D., & Meyer, O.
    (2021) Beyond CLIL: Pluriliteracies Teaching for Deeper Learning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108914505
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914505 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cummins, J.
    (1980) Psychological assessment of immigrant children: Logic or intuition?Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, (), –. 10.1080/01434632.1980.9994005
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1980.9994005 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2008) BICS and CALP: Empirical and Theoretical Status of the Distinction. InN. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp.–). Springer US. 10.1007/978‑0‑387‑30424‑3_36
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_36 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2008) Outcomes and processes in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): current research from Europe. InD. Werner & L. Volkmann (Eds.), Future Perspectives for English Language Teaching (pp.–). Carl Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dalton-Puffer, C., & Nikula, T.
    (2014) Content and language integrated learning. The Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2014.891370
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.891370 [Google Scholar]
  18. De Smet, A., Mettewie, L., Hiligsmann, P., Galand, B., & Van Mensel, L.
    (2023) Does CLIL shape language attitudes and motivation? Interactions with target languages and instruction levels. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2019.1671308
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1671308 [Google Scholar]
  19. Denman, J., Tanner, R., & de Graaff, R.
    (2013) CLIL in junior vocational secondary education: challenges and opportunities for teaching and learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2013.777386
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777386 [Google Scholar]
  20. Domalewska, D.
    (2017) Discourse Analysis of Teacher Talk: Code Switching in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms in Thailand. Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, (). 10.24203/ajeel.v5i2.3962
    https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v5i2.3962 [Google Scholar]
  21. Ducar, C., & Schocket, D. H.
    (2018) Machine translation and the L2 classroom: Pedagogical solutions for making peace with Google translate. Foreign Language Annals, (), –. 10.1111/flan.12366
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12366 [Google Scholar]
  22. Evans, S., & Morrison, B.
    (2011) Meeting the challenges of English-medium higher education: The first-year experience in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes, (), –. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Field, M., Kitajima, T., Chulikhit, Y., Jarukamjorn, K., & Porasupattana, S.
    (2020) Do Academic Content Gains from a CLIL Course Compare to Content Gains in a L1 Course?: A Preliminary Study of a Pharmaceutical Biotech Course. The International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, (), –. 10.18848/2327‑7955/CGP/v27i01/1‑14
    https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7955/CGP/v27i01/1-14 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gallagher, F., & Colohan, G.
    (2017) T(w)o and fro: using the L1 as a language teaching tool in the CLIL classroom. The Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2014.947382
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.947382 [Google Scholar]
  25. García, O., & Li, Wei
    (2014) Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137385765
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gerns, P., & Mortimore, L.
    (2025) Towards exploratory talk in secondary-school CLIL: An empirical study of the cognitive discourse function ‘explore.’Language Teaching Research. 10.1177/13621688241310740
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241310740 [Google Scholar]
  27. Goris, J., Denessen, E., & Verhoeven, L.
    (2019) The contribution of CLIL to learners’ international orientation and EFL confidence. The Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2016.1275034
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1275034 [Google Scholar]
  28. Guo, Z., & Feng, Q.
    (2024) An Ethnographic Case Study: Exploring an Adult ESL Learner’s BICS and CALP Proficiency Disparity. Forum for Linguistic Studies, (), –. 10.30564/fls.v6i4.6831
    https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i4.6831 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kaewngam, S., Chauvatcharin, N., & Kewara, P.
    (2020) CLIL in Genetics: Class Activity and English Language Usage in Classroom. Scholar: Human Sciences, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kanoksilapatham, B., & Khamkhien, A.
    (2019, July5). CLIL: Enhancing Engineering Research Article Reading Skills and Vocabulary Knowledge. Proceedings of The International Conference on Applied Research in Education. 10.33422/areconf.2019.07.351
    https://doi.org/10.33422/areconf.2019.07.351 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kewara, P.
    (2017) Phrasebook: A Way Out for CLIL Teachers in Thailand. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, (), –. 10.5294/laclil.2017.10.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2017.10.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kewara, P., & Prabjandee, D.
    (2018) CLIL Teacher Professional Development for Content Teachers in Thailand. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, (), –. 10.30466/ijltr.2018.20492
    https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2018.20492 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kovacikova, E.
    (2019) Development of speaking at primary schools through CLIL. XLinguae, (), –. 10.18355/XL.2019.12.02.02
    https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.02.02 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kubrická, J.
    (2021) CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) for Pre-service Teachers of Science: Scaffolding in Lesson Planning. Proceedings of the Conference on the Didactics of the Sciences DidSci+ 2021, –. 10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210‑9876‑2021‑7
    https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.P210-9876-2021-7 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lasagabaster, D.
    (2013) The use of the L1 in CLIL classes: The teachers’ perspective. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, (), –. 10.5294/laclil.2013.6.2.1
    https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2013.6.2.1 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M.
    (2010) Immersion and CLIL in English: more differences than similarities. ELT Journal, (), –. 10.1093/elt/ccp082
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082 [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, J.
    (2023) A sociocultural perspective understanding the role of L1 in the learning of L2 through TBLT and CLIL pedagogical approaches. Journal of Language Teaching, (), –. 10.54475/jlt.2023.008
    https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2023.008 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lialikhova, D.
    (2019) “We can do it together!” — But can they? How Norwegian ninth graders co-constructed content and language knowledge through peer interaction in CLIL. Linguistics and Education, , . 10.1016/j.linged.2019.100764
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100764 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lin, A. M. Y.
    (2015) Conceptualising the potential role of L1 in CLIL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, (), –. 10.1080/07908318.2014.1000926
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000926 [Google Scholar]
  40. Littlewood, W., & Yu, B.
    (2011) First language and target language in the foreign language classroom. Language Teacher, , –. 10.1017/S0261444809990310
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809990310 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lo, Y. Y.
    (2015) How much L1 is too much? Teachers’ language use in response to students’ abilities and classroom interaction in Content and Language Integrated Learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2014.988112
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.988112 [Google Scholar]
  42. Madrid, D., & Pérez Cañado, M. L.
    (2018) Innovations and Challenges in Attending to Diversity through CLIL. Theory Into Practice, (), –. 10.1080/00405841.2018.1492237
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2018.1492237 [Google Scholar]
  43. Mahan, K. R.
    (2022) The comprehending teacher: scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The Language Learning Journal, (), –. 10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1705879 [Google Scholar]
  44. Mahan, K. R., Brevik, L. M., & Ødegaard, M.
    (2021) Characterizing CLIL teaching: new insights from a lower secondary classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2018.1472206
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1472206 [Google Scholar]
  45. Marsh, D., & Wolff, D.
    (2007) Diverse Contexts — Converging Goals (D. Marsh & D. Wolff, Eds.). Peter Lang D. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑01429‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-01429-7 [Google Scholar]
  46. Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Jesùs Frigols, M.
    (2008) Uncovering CLIL. Macmillan Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Merino, J. A., & Lasagabaster, D.
    (2018) CLIL as a way to multilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2015.1128386
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1128386 [Google Scholar]
  48. Milán-Maillo, I., & Pladevall-Ballester, E.
    (2019) Explicit Plurilingualism in Co-taught CLIL Instruction: Rethinking L1 Use (pp.–). 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑22066‑2_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22066-2_10 [Google Scholar]
  49. Mozayan, M. R.
    (2015) BICS & CALP Revisited: A Critical Appraisal. International Journal of Educational Investigations, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Muniroh, S., Widiati, U., Karmina, S., Indah Silvia, D., & . N.
    (2023) Clil Models to Develop Students’ Communication Skills Based on Their Attitudes Toward Reading. KnE Social Sciences. 10.18502/kss.v8i7.13256
    https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i7.13256 [Google Scholar]
  51. Nashaat-Sobhy, N., Mestre-Mestre, E. M., & MacDonald, P.
    (2024) A review of a decade of scaffolding practices for learning in CLIL science classrooms. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education. 10.1075/jicb.23010.nas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.23010.nas [Google Scholar]
  52. Nikula, T.
    (2016) CLIL: A European Approach to Bilingual Education. InN. Van Deusen-Scholl & S. May (Eds.), Second and Foreign Language Education (3rd ed., pp.–). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑02323‑6_10‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02323-6_10-1 [Google Scholar]
  53. Olsson, E., & Sylvén, L. K.
    (2024) Cross-curricular CLIL projects in Swedish middle school. Nordic Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, (), –. 10.46364/njltl.v11i2.1181
    https://doi.org/10.46364/njltl.v11i2.1181 [Google Scholar]
  54. Pavón Vázquez, V., & Ramos Ordóñez, M. del C.
    (2019) Describing the use of the L1 in CLIL: an analysis of L1 communication strategies in classroom interaction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, (), –. 10.1080/13670050.2018.1511681
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1511681 [Google Scholar]
  55. Phantharakphong, P.
    (2012) English Learning Styles of High and Low Performance Students of the Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, , –. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.072
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.072 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sohn, B., dos Santos, P., & Lin, A. M. Y.
    (2022) Translanguaging and Trans-Semiotizing for Critical Integration of Content and Language in Plurilingual Educational Settings. RELC Journal, (), –. 10.1177/00336882221114480
    https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221114480 [Google Scholar]
  57. Suwannoppharat, K., & Chinokul, S.
    (2015) Applying CLIL to English language teaching in Thailand: Issues and challenges. LACLIL, (), –. 10.5294/laclil.2015.8.2.8
    https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2015.8.2.8 [Google Scholar]
  58. Tapia, L., & Vega, M.
    (2024) The Impact of Content Learning Integrated Language (CLIL) on the Speaking Skill in the EFL Classroom at the Secondary Level. Religación, (), . 10.46652/rgn.v9i40.1220
    https://doi.org/10.46652/rgn.v9i40.1220 [Google Scholar]
  59. Vega, M., & Moscoso, M.
    (2019) Challenges in the Implementation of CLIL in Higher Education: From ESP to CLIL in the Tourism Classroom. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning, (), –. 10.5294/laclil.2019.12.1.7
    https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2019.12.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  60. Villabona, N., & Cenoz, J.
    (2022) The integration of content and language in CLIL: a challenge for content-driven and language-driven teachers. Language, Culture and Curriculum, (), –. 10.1080/07908318.2021.1910703
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2021.1910703 [Google Scholar]
  61. Yuan, L., & Lo, Y. Y.
    (2023) CLIL and professional development. InThe Routledge Handbook of Content and Language Integrated Learning (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003173151‑14
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003173151-14 [Google Scholar]
  62. Zheng, J.
    (2024) Research on the Design of Junior High School English Reading Course Under CLIL Concept. The Educational Review, USA, (), –. 10.26855/er.2024.07.017
    https://doi.org/10.26855/er.2024.07.017 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24040.kew
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jicb.24040.kew
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error