Conceptualizing and investigating teachers’ knowledge for integrating content and language in content-based instruction

References

1. Baecher, L. , Farnsworth, T. , & Ediger, A
   (2014) The challenges of planning language objectives in content-based ESL instruction. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 118–136. doi: 10.1177/1362168813505381
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505381 [Google Scholar]
2. Ball, D.L. , Thames, M.H. , & Phelps, G.C
   (2008) Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554 [Google Scholar]
3. Berry, A. , Loughran, J. , & van Driel, J.H
   (2008) Revisiting the roots of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1271–1279. doi: 10.1080/09500690801998885
   https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801998885 [Google Scholar]
4. Cammarata, L. , & Tedick, D.J
   (2012) Balancing content and language in instruction: The experience of immersion teachers, The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 251–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01330.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01330.x [Google Scholar]
5. Cenoz, J
   (2015) Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: The same or different?Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 8–24. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922
   https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922 [Google Scholar]
6. Cenoz, J. , Genesee, F. , & Gorter, D
   (2014) Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. doi: 10.1093/applin/amt011
   https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011 [Google Scholar]
7. Hodgen, J
   (2011) Knowing and identity: A situated theory of mathematics knowledge in teaching. In T. Rowland & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp.27–42). Dordrecht: Springer/Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9766‑8_3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9766-8_3 [Google Scholar]
8. Hüttner, J. , Dalton-Puffer, C. , & Smit, U
   (2013) The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 267–284. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2013.777385
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777385 [Google Scholar]
9. Kelle, U
   (2005) “Emergence” vs. “forcing” of empirical data: A crucial problem of “grounded theory” reconsidered. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6. Retrieved fromwww.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/467
   [Google Scholar]
10. Korthagen, F.A.J
    (2010) Situated learning theory and the pedagogy of teacher education: Towards an integrative view of teacher behaviour and teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.05.001 [Google Scholar]
11. Lemke, J.L
    (1990) Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Lin, A.M.Y
    (2015) Conceptualising the potential role of L1 in CLIL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 74–89. doi: 10.1080/07908318.2014.1000926
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000926 [Google Scholar]
13. Loughran, J. , Mulhall, P. , & Berry, A
    (2004) In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391. doi: 10.1002/tea.20007
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20007 [Google Scholar]
14. Love, K
    (2009) Literacy pedagogical content knowledge in secondary teacher education: Reflecting on oral language and learning across the disciplines. Language and Education, 23(6), 541–560. doi: 10.1080/09500780902822942
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902822942 [Google Scholar]
15. Lyster, R
    (2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.18 [Google Scholar]
16. Moore, P. , & Lorenzo, F
    (2007) Adapting authentic materials for CLIL classrooms: An empirical study. VIEWZ: Vienna English Working Papers, 16, 28–35. Retrieved fromhttps://anglistik.univie.ac.at/research/views/archive/
    [Google Scholar]
17. Mortimer, E.F. , & Scott, P.H
    (2003) Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Pérez Cañado, M.L
    (2014) Teacher training needs for bilingual education: In-service teacher perceptions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 19(3), 266–295. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2014.980778
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.980778 [Google Scholar]
19. Richards, K
    (2006) ‘Being the teacher’: Identity and classroom conversation. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 51–77. doi: 10.1093/applin/ami041
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami041 [Google Scholar]
20. Shulman, L
    (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 [Google Scholar]
21. Speer, N.M
    (2005) Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(3), 361–391. doi: 10.1007/s10649‑005‑2745‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-2745-0 [Google Scholar]
22. Tan, M
    (2011) Mathematics and science teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 325–342. doi: 10.1177/1362168811401153
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401153 [Google Scholar]
23. Tedick, D.J. , Christian, D. , & Fortune, T.W
    (2011) The future of immersion education: An invitation to ‘dwell in possibility’. In D.J. Tedick , D. Christian , & T.W. Fortune (Eds.), Immersion education: Practices, policies, possibilities (pp.1–10). Bristol, England: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]