Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2212-8433
  • E-ISSN: 2212-8441
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


The study examines early multilingual formulaic speech with a focus on the English classroom. We have followed a discourse-pragmatic approach in the analysis of our data, which comprises transcripts from eight 45-minute sessions. Transcripts from these sessions involved 184 participants from two different age ranges. In this analysis, we have considered formulas produced in three languages: Catalan, Spanish, and English. Our goal is to provide further evidence for the inherent dynamism and complexity of early multilingual pragmatic development, and in so doing, to acknowledge the role of the educational level and the language program adopted in the school. Findings are partly in line with (a) previous studies dealing with the identification of pragmatic functions in the EFL classroom (Llinares & Pastrana, 2013), and (b) the peculiarities of early third language learners (Portolés, 2015). Finally, we tackle the importance of adopting multilingual perspectives in the analyses of multilingual students.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bannard, C. , & Lieven, E
    (2012) Formulaic language in L1 acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 3–16. doi: 10.1017/S0267190512000062
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000062 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bardovi-Harlig, K
    (2012) Formulas, routines, and conversational expressions in pragmatics research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 206–227. doi: 10.1017/S0267190512000086
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000086 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. , & Bastos, M.T
    (2011) Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction, and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Interculural Pragmatics, 8(3), 347–384.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnes, J
    (2011) The influence of child-direct speech in early trilingualism. International Journal of Multilingualism, 8, 42–62. doi: 10.1080/14790711003671861
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790711003671861 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barron, A
    (2003) Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.108
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.108 [Google Scholar]
  6. Blackledge, A. , & Creese, A
    (2014) Heteroglossia as practice and pedagogy. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑7856‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7856-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cenoz, J
    (2013) Discussion: Towards an educational perspective in CLIL language policy and pedagogical practice. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16, 389–394. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2013.777392
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777392 [Google Scholar]
  8. Cenoz, J. , & Gorter, D
    (2011) A holistic approach to multilingual education: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 339–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01204.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01204.x [Google Scholar]
  9. (2015) Multilingual education: Between language learning and translanguaging. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cekaite, A
    (2007) A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 45–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00509.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00509.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Creese, A. , & Blackledge, A
    (2010) Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 103–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00986.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00986.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Dalton-Puffer, C
    (2005) Negotiating interpersonal meanings in naturalistic classroom discourse. Directives in content-and-language integrated classrooms. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1275–1293. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.12.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Duff, P. , & Talmy, S
    (2011) Language socialization approaches to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp.95–115). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. García, O. , & Sylvan, C
    (2011) Pedagogies and practices in multilingual classrooms: Singularities in pluralities. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 385–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01208.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01208.x [Google Scholar]
  15. García, O. , & Flores, N
    (2012) Multilingual pedagogies. In M. Martin-Jones , A. Blackledge & A. Creese (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of multilingualism (pp.232–246). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Girard, M. , & Sionis, C
    (2003) Formulaic speech in the L2 class: An attempt at identification and classification. Pragmatics, 13, 231–251. doi: 10.1075/prag.13.2.02gir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.13.2.02gir [Google Scholar]
  17. (2004) The functions of formulaic speech in the L2 class. Pragmatics, 14, 31–51. doi: 10.1075/prag.14.1.01gir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.14.1.01gir [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang, J. , & Hatch, E
    (1978) A Chinese child’s acquisition of English. In E.M. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition (pp.118–131). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jessner, U
    (2008) Teaching third languages: Facts, trends and challenges. Language Teaching, 41(1), 15–56. doi: 10.1017/S0261444807004739
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004739 [Google Scholar]
  20. Klein, W
    (1986) Second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511815058
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815058 [Google Scholar]
  21. Llinares, A
    (2006) A pragmatic analysis of children’s interlanguage in EFL preschool contexts. Intercultural Pragmatics, 3(2), 171–193.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2007) Young learners’ functional use of the L2 in a low-immersion EFL context. ELT Journal, 61, 39–45. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccl043
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl043 [Google Scholar]
  23. Llinares, A. , & Pastrana, A
    (2013) CLIL students’ pragmatic development across classroom activities and educational levels. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.011 [Google Scholar]
  24. Montanari, S
    (2009) Pragmatic differentiation in early trilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 36, 597–627. doi: 10.1017/S0305000908009112
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908009112 [Google Scholar]
  25. Nikula, T
    (2005) English as an object and tool of study: Interactional effects and pragmatic implications. Linguistics and Education, 16(1), 27–58. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2005.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2005.10.001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Quay, S
    (2011) Trilingual toddlers at daycare centres: The role of caregivers and peers in language development. International Journal of Multilingualism, 8(1), 22–41. doi: 10.1080/14790711003671853
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790711003671853 [Google Scholar]
  27. Portolés, L
    (2015) Multilingualism and very young learners: An analysis of pragmatic awareness and language attitudes (Series Trends in Applied Linguistics: Vol. 12). Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9781501500022
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501500022 [Google Scholar]
  28. Roever, C
    (2012) What learners get for free: Learning of routine formulae in ESL and EFL environments. ELT Journal, 66(1), 10–22. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccq090
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq090 [Google Scholar]
  29. Safont, M.P
    (2011) Early requestive development in a consecutive third language learner. International Journal of Multilingualism, 8(3), 256–276. doi: 10.1080/14790718.2011.588332
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2011.588332 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2012) A longitudinal analysis of Catalan, Spanish and English request modifiers in early third language learning. In D. Gabrys-Barker (Ed.), Cross-linguistic influences in multilingual language acquisition (pp.99–114). Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑29557‑7_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29557-7_6 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2013) Early stages of trilingual pragmatic development. A longitudinal study of requests in Catalan, Spanish and English. International Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 68–80. Retrieved fromwww.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216613000180. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.007 [Google Scholar]
  32. Safont, P. & Portolés, L
    (2015) Pragmatic awareness in early consecutive third language learners. In P. Safont & L. Portolés (Eds.), Learning and using multiple languages: Current findings from research on multilingualism (pp.218–237). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Taguchi, N
    (2011) The effect of L2 proficiency and stay-abroad experience on pragmatic comprehension. Language Learning, 61, 904–939. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2011.00633.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00633.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Tomasello, M
    (2008) Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wray, A
    (2002) Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519772
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519772 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2008) Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2012) Formulaic language. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp.252–256). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2013) Formulaic language. Language Teaching, 43(3), 316–334. doi: 10.1017/S0261444813000013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000013 [Google Scholar]
  39. Wray, A. , & Perkins, M.R
    (2000) The functions of formulaic language. Language and Communication, 20, 1–28. doi: 10.1016/S0271‑5309(99)00015‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(99)00015-4 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error