Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2212-8433
  • E-ISSN: 2212-8441
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) programmes have recently gained momentum in many European countries in the belief that students will significantly improve their foreign language proficiency while content learning is not negatively affected. Based on a longitudinal qualitative approach, this article focuses on students’ reflections on their experience with CLIL. Previous studies have shown that students are able to reflect on organizational conditions and their learning process, while their reflections allow researchers to identify some of the key elements in students’ beliefs. Through focus groups carried out over a three-year period, this study gathers secondary education students’ reflections on their motivational stance, the CLIL experience, and the use of their linguistic repertoire in the CLIL classroom. By tapping into students’ language beliefs, reflections, and motivation, a clearer picture of CLIL settings will be available by bringing to light both the strengths and weaknesses of these programmes.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Alcón, E. , & Michavila, F
    (Eds.) (2012) La universidad multilingüe. Madrid: Tecnos.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baralt, M
    (2012) Coding qualitative data. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp.222–244). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444347340.ch12
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340.ch12 [Google Scholar]
  3. Cenoz, J
    (2009) Towards multilingual education: Basque educational research from an international perspective. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Charmaz, K
    (2006) Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Coyle, D
    (2013) Listening to learners: An investigation into ‘successful learning’ across CLIL contexts. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16, 244–266. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2013.777384
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777384 [Google Scholar]
  6. Coyle, D. , Hood, P. , & Marsh, D
    (2011) CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Csizér, K. , & Lukács, G
    (2010) The comparative analysis of motivation, attitudes and selves: The case of English and German in Hungary. System, 38, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2009.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Dafouz, E. , & Hibler, A
    (2013) ‘Zip your lips’ or ‘Keep quiet’: Main teachers’ and language assistants’ classroom discourse in CLIL settings. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 655–669. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.12026.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12026.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Dalton-Puffer C
    (2007) Outcomes and processes in content and language integrated learning (CLIL): Current research from Europe. In W. Delanoy & L. Volkmann (Eds.), Future perspectives for English language teaching (pp.139–157). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dalton-Puffer, C
    (2011) Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles?Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204. doi: 10.1017/S0267190511000092
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dalton-Puffer, C. , Hüttner, J. , Schindelegger, V. , & Smit, U
    (2009) Technology-geeks speak out: What students think about vocational CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal, 1, 18–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dalton-Puffer, C. , & Smit, U
    (2013) Thinking allowed. Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 46, 545–449. doi: 10.1017/S0261444813000256
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444813000256 [Google Scholar]
  13. Doiz, A. , Lasagabaster, D. , & Sierra, J. M
    (Eds.) (2013) English-medium instruction at universities: Global challenges. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (2014) Language friction and multilingual policies at higher education: The stakeholders’ view. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 35, 345–360. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2013.874433
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2013.874433 [Google Scholar]
  15. Doiz, A. , & Lasagabaster, D
    (2017) Teachers’ beliefs about translanguaging practices. In C. M. Mazak & K. S. Carroll (Eds.), Translanguaging in higher education: Beyond monolingual ideologies (pp.157–176). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dörnyei, Z
    (2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2009) The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp.9–42). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. (2010) Researching motivation: From integrativeness to the ideal L2 self. In S. Hunston & D. Oakey (Eds.), Introducing applied linguistics: Concepts and skills (pp.74–83). London, England: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dörnyei, Z. , & Ushioda, E
    (2011) Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dörnyei, Z. , MacIntyre, P. D. , & Henry, A
    (2015) Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. European Commission
    (2004) Promoting language learning and linguistic diversity: An action plan 2004–06. Luxembourg: European Commission.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fortanet, I. , & Räisänen, C
    (Eds.) (2008) ESP in European higher education. Integrating language and content. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/aals.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.4 [Google Scholar]
  23. Friedman, D. A
    (2012) How to collect and analyze qualitative data. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp.180–200). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781444347340.ch10
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444347340.ch10 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibson, B. , & Hartman, J
    (2014) Rediscovering grounded theory. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Halbach, A. , & Lázaro, A
    (2015) La acreditación del nivel de lengua inglesa en las universidades españolas: Actualización 2015. [Accreditation of English language level in Spanish universities: 2015 Update.] Madrid: British Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hüttner, J. , Dalton-Puffer, C. , & Smit, U
    (2013) The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16, 267–284. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2013.777385
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777385 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kachru, B
    (1986) The alchemy of English: The spread, functions and models of non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (Ed.) (1992) The other tongue: English across cultures (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lamb, M
    (2007) The impact of school on EFL learning motivation: An Indonesian case study. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 757–780. doi: 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2007.tb00102.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00102.x [Google Scholar]
  30. (2012) A self-system perspective on young adolescents’ motivation to learn English in urban and rural settings. Language Learning, 62, 997–1023. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00719.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00719.x [Google Scholar]
  31. Lamb, M. , & Buyidanto
    (2013) Cultural challenges, identity and motivation in state school EFL. In E. Ushioda (Ed.), International perspectives on motivation: Language learning and professional challenges (pp.18–34). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9781137000873_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137000873_2 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lasagabaster, D
    (2016) The relationship between motivation, gender, L1 and possible selves in English-medium instruction. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13, 315–332. doi: 10.1080/14790718.2015.1105806
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2015.1105806 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2017). “I always speak English in my classes”: Reflections on the use of the L1/L2 in English-medium instruction. In A. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.), Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL (pp.259–275). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.47
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.47 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lasagabaster, D. , & Doiz, A
    (2015) A longitudinal study on the impact of CLIL on affective factors. Applied Linguistics. doi: 10.1093/applin/amv059
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv059 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2016a) CLIL students’ perceptions of their language learning process: Delving into self perceived improvement and instructional preferences. Language Awareness, 25, 110–126. doi: 10.1080/09658416.2015.1122019
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2015.1122019 [Google Scholar]
  36. (Eds.) (2016b) CLIL experiences in secondary and tertiary education: In search of good practices. Bern: Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0929‑0
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0929-0 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lasagabaster, D. , & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y
    (Eds.) (2010) CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Lasagabaster, D. , & Sierra, J. M
    (2010) Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64, 376–395. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccp082
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lorenzo, F. , Casal, S. , & Moore, P
    (2010) The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics, 31, 418–442. doi: 10.1093/applin/amp041
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp041 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lyster, R
    (2007) Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.18 [Google Scholar]
  41. Masgoret, A.-M. , & Gardner, R. C
    (2003) Attitudes, motivation, and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates. Language Learning, 53, 167–210. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9922.00227
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00227 [Google Scholar]
  42. Massler, U
    (2012) Primary CLIL and its stakeholders: What children, parents and teachers think of the potential merits and pitfalls of CLIL modules in primary teaching. International CLIL Research Journal, 1, 36–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Muñoz, C
    (2014) Exploring young learners’ foreign language learning awareness. Language Awareness, 23, 24–40. doi: 10.1080/09658416.2013.863900
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863900 [Google Scholar]
  44. Paulsrud, B. Y
    (2016) English-medium instruction in Sweden: Perspectives and practices in two upper secondary schools. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 4, 108–128. doi: 10.1075/jicb.4.1.05pau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.4.1.05pau [Google Scholar]
  45. Pérez Cañado, M. L
    (2012) CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15, 315–341. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064 [Google Scholar]
  46. Pladevall-Ballester, E
    (2015) Exploring primary school CLIL perceptions in Catalonia: Students’ and parents’ opinions and expectations. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18, 45–59. doi: 10.1080/13670050.2013.874972
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.874972 [Google Scholar]
  47. Rumlich, D
    (2016) Evaluating bilingual education in Germany: CLIL students’ general English proficiency, EFL self-concept and interest. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sierra, J. M
    (2011) CLIL and project work: Contributions from the classroom. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe , J. M. Sierra & F. Gallardo (Eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts (pp.211–239). Bern: Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0171‑3
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0171-3 [Google Scholar]
  49. Taguchi, T. , Magid, M. , & Papi, M
    (2009) The L2 motivational self system among Japanese, Chinese and Iranian learners of English: A comparative study. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp.66–97). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wächter, B. , & Maiworm, F
    (2014) English-taught programmes in European higher education: The state of play in 2014. Bonn: Lemmens.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wilkinson, R. , & Walsh, M. L
    (Eds.) (2015) Integrating content and language in higher education: From theory to practice. Selected papers from the 2013 ICLHE Conference. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑05109‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-05109-4 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error