Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


This paper examines how the jihadist terrorist groups Al Qaeda and the so-called Islamic State discursively construct ‘the West’ as an alien, aberrant ‘other’ in their respective online propaganda magazines and over a 5 year period (2010–2015). The analysis integrates insights from the field of Terrorism Studies into a Corpus Assisted Discourse Studies approach, working centrally with the notions of othering and conventionalised impoliteness. Our findings reveal not only that othering is a key discursive process in the groups’ online propaganda machinery but that it is discursively realised via homogenisation, suppression (stereotyping) and pejoration strategies. The latter are further examined via the notion of conventional impoliteness. Pointed criticism emerges as the most frequent conventionalised impoliteness strategy in both magazines. Threats, condescension and exclusion strategies are also saliently used, albeit with different relative frequencies within each magazine. The findings show the value of Discourse Analysis to research into (jihadist) terrorism, including the possibility of drawing upon its findings to develop tailored counter-messages to those advanced by (jihadist) terrorist groups.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Baker, Paul
    2010 “Representations of Islam in British Broadsheet and Tabloid Newspapers 1999–2005.” Journal of Language and Politics9 (2): 310–338.10.1075/jlp.9.2.07bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.2.07bak [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, Paul, Ruth Wodak, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Kryzanowski, and Tony McEnery
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society19 (3): 273–306.10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, Paul
    Ed. 2015 “Special issue of Discourse and Communication on Corpus Based Approaches to the Study of Media Language.” Discourse and Communication9 (2).
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumann, Zigmund
    1991Intimations of Post-Modernity. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Becker, Annette
    2007 “Between ‘Us’ and ‘Them’: Two Interviews with German Chancellor Gerhard Schroder in the Run-up to the Iraq War.” InDiscourse, War and Terrorism, edited byAdam Hodges and Chad Nilep, 161–183. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.24.12bec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.24.12bec [Google Scholar]
  6. Berger, J. M., and Jonathon Morgan
    2015The ISIS Twitter Census. The Brookings Project on US Relations with the Islamic World (Analysis Paper no. 20), March 2015 (https://www.brookings.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2016/06/isis_twitter_census_berger_morgan.pdf – last accessed18th September 2017)
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blommaert, Jan, and Jeff Verschueren
    1998Debating Diversity: Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bowden, Zachary A.
    2008 “Poriadk & Bardak (Order and Chaos): The Neo-fascist Project of Articulating a Russian ‘People’.” Journal of Language and Politics7 (2): 231–247.10.1075/jlp.7.2.07bow
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.7.2.07bow [Google Scholar]
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre
    1991Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Braniff, Bill, and Assaf Moghadam
    2011 “Towards Global Jihadism: Al-Qaeda’s Strategic, Ideological and Structural Adaptations since 9/11.” Perspectives on Terrorism5 (2): 36–44.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Brindle, Andrew, and Corrie MacMillan
    2017 “Like & Share if You Agree: A Study of Discourses and Cyber-Activism of the Far-Right British Nationalist Party Britain First.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict5 (1):108–133.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Buruma, Ian, and Avishai Margalit
    2004Occidentalism: The West in the Eyes of its Enemies. New York: The Penguin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Clayman, Steven, and John Heritage
    2002The News Interview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613623
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613623 [Google Scholar]
  14. Colas, Brandon
    2017 “What Does Dabiq Do? ISIS Hermeneutics and Organizational Fractures within Dabiq Magazine.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism40: 173–190.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chertoff, Michael
    2008 “The Ideology of Terrorism: Radicalisation Revisited.” Brown Journal of World Affairs15(1): 11–20.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Coupland, Nikolas
    2010 “‘Other’ Representation”. InSociety and Language Use, edited byJürgen Jaspers, Jan-Ola Őstman and Jef Verschueren, 242–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hoph.7.16cou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.7.16cou [Google Scholar]
  17. Coupland, Nikolas, and Justine Coupland
    1999 “Ageing, Ageism and Anti-ageism: Moral Stance in Geriatric Medical Discourse.” InLanguage and Communication in Old Age: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, edited byHeidi Hamilton, 177–208. New York: Garland Publishing Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Culpeper, Jonathan, Paul Iganski, and Abe Sweiry
    2017 “Linguistic Impoliteness and Religiously Aggravated Hate Crime in England and Wales.” Journal of Language, Aggression and Conflict5 (1): 1–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  20. Droogan, Julian, and Shane Peattie
    2016 “Reading Jihad: Mapping the Shifting Themes of Inspire Magazine.” Terrorism and Political Violence. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2016.1211527
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2016.1211527 [Google Scholar]
  21. Duffy, Margaret E.
    2003 “Web of Hate: a Fantasy Theme Analysis of Rhetorical Vision of Hate Groups Online.” Journal of Communication Inquiry27 (3): 291–312.10.1177/0196859903252850
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859903252850 [Google Scholar]
  22. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2013 “Relational Work in Anonymous, Asynchronous Communication: A Study of (Dis)Affiliation on YouTube”. InLinguistic Aspects of Intercultural Pragmatics, edited byItsvan Kecskes and Jesus Romero Trillo, 343–356, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Goffman, Erving
    1967Interactional Rituals. Essays on Face to Face Behavior. Portland, USA: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Halverson, Jeffry, H. L. Goodall Jr., and Steven R. Corman
    2011Master Narratives of Islamist Extremism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978‑0‑230‑11723‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-11723-5 [Google Scholar]
  25. Habeck, Mary
    2006Knowing the Enemy: Jihadist Ideology and the War on Terror. Yale: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Holbrook, Donald
    2012 “Al-Qaeda’s Response to the Arab Spring.” Perspectives on Terrorism6 (6): 4–21.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hyland, Ken
    2000Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ingram, Haroro J.
    2014 “Three Traits of the Islamic State’s Information Warfare.” The RUSI Journal159 (6): 4–11.10.1080/03071847.2014.990810
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2014.990810 [Google Scholar]
  29. 2015a “The Strategic Logic of Islam State Information Operations.” Australian Journal of International Affairs69 (6): 729–752.10.1080/10357718.2015.1059799
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2015.1059799 [Google Scholar]
  30. 2015b “An Analysis of the Taliban in Khurasan’s Azan (issues 1–5).” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism38 (7): 560–579.10.1080/1057610X.2015.1022093
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2015.1022093 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2016 “An Analysis of Islamic State’s Dabiq Magazine.” Australian Journal of Political Science51: 458–477.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kaplan, Jeffrey, and Christopher P. Costa
    2015 “The Islamic State and the New Tribalism.” Terrorism and Political Violence27 (5): 926–969. doi: 10.1080/09546553.2015.1094306.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2015.1094306 [Google Scholar]
  33. Karim, Karim H.
    1997 “The Historical Resilience of Primary Stereotypes: Core Images of the Muslim Other.” InThe Language and Politics of Exclusion: Others in Discourse, edited byStephen Harold Riggins, 153–183. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Katz, Rita
    2014 “The State Department’s Twitter War with ISIS Is Embarrassing.” Time Magazine16September 2014 time.com/3387065/isis-twitter-war-state-department/ (last accessed18th September 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kirke, Xander
    2015 “Violence and Political Myth: Radicalizing Believers in the Pages of Inspire Magazine.” International Political Sociology9: 283–298.10.1111/ips.12098
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12098 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kleinke, Sonja, and Birte Bös
    2015 “Intergroup Rudeness and the Metapragmatics of its Negotiation in Online Discussion Fora.” Pragmatics25 (1): 47–71.10.1075/prag.25.1.03kle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.1.03kle [Google Scholar]
  37. Lazar, Annita, and Michelle M. Lazar
    2007 “Enforcing Justice, Justifying Force: America’s Justification of Violence in the New World Order.” InDiscourse, War and Terrorism, edited byAdam Hodges and Chad Nilep, 45–66, Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.24.06laz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.24.06laz [Google Scholar]
  38. Lemieux, Anthony F., Jarret M. Brachman, Jason Levitt, and Jay Wood
    2014 “ Inspire Magazine: A Critical Analysis of its Significance and Potential Impact through the Lens of the Information, Motivation, and Behaviour Skills Model.” Terrorism and Political Violence26: 354–371.10.1080/09546553.2013.828604
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2013.828604 [Google Scholar]
  39. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Anina Kinzel and Luke Walker
    2017 “The Role of Discourse Analysis in Terrorism Studies.” InTerrorists’ Use of the Internet: Assessment and Response, edited byMaura Conway, Lee Jarvis, Orla Lehane, Stuart Macdonald and Lella Nouri, 158–169. The Hague: iOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Macdonald, Stuart
    2016 “Terrorist Narratives & Communicative Devices: Findings from a Study of Online Terrorist Magazines.” InExpanding Research on Countering Violence Extremism, edited bySara Zeiger, 127–142, Abu Dhabi: Hedayah.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. 2017 “Radicalisers as Regulators: An Examination of Dabiq Magazine.” InTerrorists’ Use of the Internet: Assessment and Response, edited byMaura Conway, Lee Jarvis, Orla Lehane, Stuart Macdonald and Lella Nouri, 146–157, The Hague: iOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Macdonald, Stuart, Nyasha Maravanyika, David Nezri, Elliot Parry and Kate Thomas
    (forthcoming). “Online Jihadist Magazines and the ‘Religious Terrorism’ Thesis.” Critical Studies on Terrorism.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Macdonald, Stuart, and Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria
    (under review) Visual Jihad: Constructing the “Good Muslim” in Online Jihadist Magazines.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Mair, David
    2017 “#Westgate: A Case Study. How al-Shabaab Used Twitter during an Ongoing Attack.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism40: 24–43.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. March, James. G.
    1994A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Martínez-Cabeza, Miguel
    2009 “Dangerous Words: Threats, Perlocutions and Strategic Actions.” InCognitive Approaches to Language and Linguistic Data, edited byWieslaw Olesky and Piotr Stalmaszcyk, 269–284. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Matusitz, Jonathan, and James Olufowote
    2016 “Visual Motifs in Islamist Terrorism: Applying Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” Journal of Applied Security Research11: 18–32.10.1080/19361610.2016.1104276
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2016.1104276 [Google Scholar]
  48. Novenario, Celine Marie I.
    2016 “Differentiating Al Qaeda and the Islamic State through Strategies Publicized in Jihadist Magazines,” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism39 (11): 953–967.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Partington, Alan
    2009 “Evaluating Evaluation and some Concluding Reflections on CADS.” InCorpus-Assisted Discourse Studies on the Iraq Conflict, edited byJohn Morley and Paul Bayley, 261–304, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Prentice, Sheryl, Paul Rayson, and Paul Taylor
    2012 “The Language of Islamic Extremism: Towards an Automated Identification of Beliefs, Motivations and Justifications.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics17 (2): 259–286.10.1075/ijcl.17.2.05pre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.2.05pre [Google Scholar]
  51. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Anti-Semitism. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rickford, John R.
    1999 “The Ebonics Controversy in my Back Yard: A Sociolinguist’s Experiences and Reflections.” Journal of Sociolinguistics3(2): 267–275.10.1111/1467‑9481.00076
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00076 [Google Scholar]
  53. Said, Edward W.
    1997Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine how We See the Rest of the World. London: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 2003Orientalism. London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne Marie
    2008 “Those are only Slogans: A Linguistic Analysis of Argumentation in Debates with Extremist Political Speakers.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology27 (4): 345–358.10.1177/0261927X08322476
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322476 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sims, Christopher
    2012 “Occidentalism at War: Al-Qaida’s Resistance Rhetoric.” Altre Modernità: Saggi8 (11): 206–220.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Sivek, Susan C.
    2013 “Packaging Inspiration: Al Qaeda’s Digital Magazine Inspire in the Self-Radicalization Process.” International Journal of Communication7: 584–606.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Stern, Jessica, and J. M. Berger
    2015ISIS: The State of Terror. London: William Collins.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Stout, Mark E.
    2009 “In Search of Salafi Jihadist Strategic Thought: Mining the Words of the Terrorists.” Studies in Conflict Terrorism32 (10): 876–892.10.1080/10576100903185578
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10576100903185578 [Google Scholar]
  60. Talbot, Mary
    2000 “‘It’s Good to Talk’: The Undermining of Feminism in a British Telecom Advertisement.” Journal of Sociolinguistics2 (2): 233–258.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Tedeshi, James, and Richard Felson
    1994Violence, Aggression and Coercive Actions. Washington DC: America Psychological Association.10.1037/10160‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10160-000 [Google Scholar]
  62. Testa, Alberto, and Gary Armstrong
    2009 “Words and Actions: Italian Ultras and Neo-fascism.” Social Identities14 (4): 473–490.10.1080/13504630802211951
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630802211951 [Google Scholar]
  63. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. 1999 “Discourse and the Denial of Racism.” InThe Discourse Reader, edited byAdam Jaworski and Nikolas Coupland, 443–463. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Weimann, Gunnar J.
    2017 “In Search for those who Loose and Bind: Al-Qaeda between the Arab Revolutions and the Islamic State’s Caliphate.” InTerrorists’ Use of the Internet: Assessment and Response, edited byMaura Conway, Lee Jarvis, Orla Lehane, Stuart Macdonald and Lella Nouri, The Hague: iOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Winter, Charlie
    2015The Virtual ‘Caliphate’: Understanding Islamic State’s Propaganda Strategy. London: Quilliam Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. 2017Media Jihad: The Islamic State’s Doctrine for Information Warfare. London: International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Zeiger, Sara
    2016Undermining Violent Extremist Narrative in South East Asia: A How-To Guide, Abu Dhabi: Hedayah.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error