1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This essay offers insights into the problematic notions of irony, sarcasm and mock politeness, inspired by Charlotte Taylor’s recent monograph . Different understandings of the concept of mock politeness, as well as sarcasm and irony, are succinctly depicted. Some explanation is also provided for the contradictory findings reported in previous scholarship with regard to the im/politeness effects of irony. Additionally, this paper revisits Taylor’s select conclusions about the use of the first-order labels that she considers pertinent to mock politeness (i.e. labels used by lay language users).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00007.dyn
2018-07-02
2019-11-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bousfield, Derek
    2008Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.167
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167 [Google Scholar]
  2. 2010 “Researching Impoliteness and Rudeness: Issues and Definitions.” InInterpersonal Pragmatics, edited byMiriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 102–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Camp, Elisabeth
    2012 “Sarcasm, Pretense, and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.” Noûs46. 587–634.10.1111/j.1468‑0068.2010.00822.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00822.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Colston, Herbert
    1997 “Salting a Wound or Sugaring a Pill: The Pragmatic Functions of Ironic Criticism.” Discourse Processes23: 25–45.10.1080/01638539709544980
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709544980 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2002 “Contrast and Assimilation in Verbal Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics34: 111–142.10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)80008‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)80008-X [Google Scholar]
  7. Colston, Herbert, and Shauna Keller
    1998 “You’ll Never Believe This. Irony and Hyperbole in Expressing Surprise.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research27: 499–513.10.1023/A:1023229304509
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023229304509 [Google Scholar]
  8. Colston, Herbert, and Jennifer O’Brien
    2000 “Contrast and Pragmatics in Figurative Language: Anything Understatement Can Do, Irony Can Do Better.” Journal of Pragmatics32: 1557–1583.10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00110‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00110-1 [Google Scholar]
  9. Craig, Robert T., Karen Tracy, and Frances Spisak
    1986 “The Discourse of Requests: Assessments of a Politeness Approach.” Human Communication Research12 (4): 437–468.10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1986.tb00087.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00087.x [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics25: 349–367.10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research1: 35–72.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
  12. 2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  13. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
    2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics35: 1545–1579.10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00118‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dews, Shelly and Ellen Winner
    1997 “Attributing Meaning to Deliberately False Utterances: The Case of Irony.” InThe Problem of Meaning: Behavioral and Cognitive Perspectives, edited byCh. Mandell and A. McCabe, 377–414. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/S0166‑4115(97)80142‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80142-2 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dews, Shelly, Joan Kaplan, and Ellen Winner
    1995 “Why Not Say It Directly? The Social Functions of Irony.” Discourse Processes19: 347–367.10.1080/01638539509544922
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544922 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dynel, Marta
    2009Humorous Garden-Paths: A Pragmatic-Cognitive Study. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 2013a “Impoliteness as Disaffiliative Humour in Film Talk.” InDevelopments in Linguistic Humour Theory, edited byMarta Dynel, 105–144. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/thr.1.07dyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.07dyn [Google Scholar]
  18. 2013b “Irony from a Neo-Gricean Perspective: On Untruthfulness and Evaluative Implicature.” Intercultural Pragmatics10: 403–431.10.1515/ip‑2013‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0018 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2013c “When Does Irony Tickle the Hearer? Towards Capturing the Characteristics of Humorous Irony.” Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, edited byMarta Dynel, 298–320. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/thr.1.14dyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.14dyn [Google Scholar]
  20. 2014 “Isn’t It Ironic? Defining the Scope of Humorous Irony.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research27: 619–639.10.1515/humor‑2014‑0096
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0096 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2015 “Intention to Deceive, Bald-Faced Lies, and Deceptive Implicature: Insights into Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface.” Intercultural Pragmatics12: 309–332.10.1515/ip‑2015‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0016 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2016a “Conceptualising Conversational Humour as (Im)politeness: The Case of Film Talk.” Journal of Politeness Research12(1): 117–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2016b “‘Trolling Is Not Stupid’: Internet Trolling as the Art of Deception Serving Entertainment.” Intercultural Pragmatics13: 353–381
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 2017a “Academics vs. American Scriptwriters vs. Academics: A Battle over the Etic and Emic ‘Sarcasm’ and ‘Irony’ Labels.” Language & Communication55: 69–87.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 2017b “But Seriously: On Conversational Humour and (Un)truthfulness.” Lingua197: 83–102.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2018a “No Child’s Play: A Philosophical Pragmatic View of Overt Pretence as a Vehicle for Conversational Humour.” InCreating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Interactions, edited byVilly Tsakona and Jan Chovanec, 205–228. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. 2018bIrony, Deception and Humour: Seeking the Truth about Overt and Covert Untruthfulness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Eelen, Gino
    2001A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2010 “The Status Quo and Quo-Vadis of Impoliteness Research.” Intercultural Pragmatics7: 535–559.10.1515/iprg.2010.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.025 [Google Scholar]
  30. Garmendia, Joana
    2010 “Irony is Critical.” Pragmatics and Cognition18: 397–421.10.1075/pc.18.2.07gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18.2.07gar [Google Scholar]
  31. 2011 “She’s (Not) a Fine Friend: ‘Saying’ and Criticism in Irony.” Intercultural Pragmatics8: 41–65.10.1515/IPRG.2011.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2011.002 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2015 “A (Neo)Gricean Account of Irony: An Answer to Relevance Theory.” International Review of Pragmatics7: 40–79.10.1163/18773109‑00701003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00701003 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gibbs, Raymond, Jr., and Herbert Colston
    2002 “The Risks and Rewards of Ironic Communication.” InSay not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication, edited byLuigi Anolli, Rita Ciceri and Giuseppe Riva, 187–200. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Grice, Herbert Paul
    (1975) 1989 “Logic and Conversation.” InStudies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Haddington, Pentti
    2011 “Serious or Non-serious? Sequential Ambiguity and Disavowing a Prior Stance.” Functions of Language18: 149–182.10.1075/fol.18.2.01had
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.18.2.01had [Google Scholar]
  36. Haugh, Michael
    2012 “Epilogue: The First-Second Order Distinction in Face and Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research8 (1): 111–134.10.1515/pr‑2012‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2012-0007 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2016 “‘Just Kidding’: Teasing and Claims to Non-serious Intent.” Journal of Pragmatics95: 120–136.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Haugh, Michael, and Derek Bousfield
    2012 “Mock Impoliteness in Interactions amongst Australian and British Speakers of English.” Journal of Pragmatics44: 1099–1114.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna
    2009 “Cancelability and the Primary/Secondary Meaning Distinction.” Intercultural Pragmatics6: 259–289.10.1515/IPRG.2009.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2009.015 [Google Scholar]
  40. Jorgensen, Julia
    1996 “The Functions of Sarcastic Irony in Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics26: 613–634.10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00067‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00067-4 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kapogianni, Eleni
    2011 “Irony via ‘Surrealism’.” InThe Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, edited byMarta Dynel, 51–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.210.05kap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.210.05kap [Google Scholar]
  42. 2016 “The Ironist’s Intentions: Communicative Priority and Manifestness.” Pragmatics & Cognition23 (1): 150–173.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kreuz, Roger, Debra Long, and Mary Church
    1991 “On Being Ironic: Pragmatic and Mnemonic Implications.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity6: 149–162.10.1207/s15327868ms0603_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0603_1 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Sam Glucksberg, and Mary Brown
    1995 “How about Another Piece of Pie: The Allusional Pretense Theory of Discourse Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General124: 3–21.10.1037/0096‑3445.124.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  45. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2014The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mahon, James E.
    2015 “The Definition of Lying and Deception.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/lying-definition/.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Meibauer, Jörg
    2014Lying and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Boston/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Mills, Sara
    2003Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615238
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238 [Google Scholar]
  50. Partington, Alan
    2006The Linguistics of Laughter. A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. Oxon: Routledge Studies in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Roberts, Richard, and Roger Kreuz
    1994 “Why Do People Use Figurative Language?” Psychological Science5: 159–163.10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1994.tb00653.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.x [Google Scholar]
  52. Sinkeviciute, Valeria
    2013 “Decoding Encoded (Im)politeness: Cause on my Teasing You Can Depend.” InThe Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, edited byMarta Dynel, 263–288. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. 2017a “Funniness and ‘the Preferred Reaction’ to Jocularity in Australian and British English: An Analysis of Interviewees’ Metapragmatic Comments.” Language & Communication55: 41–54.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. 2017b “‘It’s Just a Bit of Cultural […] Lost in Translation’: Australian and British Intracultural and Intercultural Metapragmatic Evaluations of Jocularity.” Lingua197: 50–67.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Taylor, Charlotte
    2015 “Beyond Sarcasm: The Metalanguage and Structures of Mock Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics87: 127–141.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2016 “Mock Politeness and Culture: Perceptions and Practice in UK and Italian Data.” Intercultural Pragmatics13 (4): 463–498.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. 2017 “The Relationship between Irony and Sarcasm: Insights from a First-Order Metalanguage Investigation.” Journal of Politeness Research13 (2): 209–242.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Toplak, Mary, and Albert Katz
    2000 “On the Uses of Sarcastic Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics32: 1467–1488.10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00101‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00101-0 [Google Scholar]
  59. Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne
    2004Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich
    1992 “Introduction.” InPoliteness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, edited byRichard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich, 1–17. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Whalen, Juanita M., Penny M. Pexman, Alastair J. Gill, and Scott Nowson
    2013 “Verbal Irony Use in Personal Blogs.” Behaviour and IT32 (6): 560–569.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00007.dyn
Loading
  • Article Type: Discussion
Keyword(s): first-order label , im/politeness , irony , metapragmatics , mock politeness and sarcasm
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error