Theoretically on Mock Politeness in English and Italian

References

1. Bousfield, Derek
   2008 Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.167
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167 [Google Scholar]
2. Bousfield, Derek
   2010 “Researching Impoliteness and Rudeness: Issues and Definitions.” InInterpersonal Pragmatics, edited byMiriam A. Locher and Sage L. Graham, 102–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Camp, Elisabeth
   2012 “Sarcasm, Pretense, and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.” Noûs46. 587–634.10.1111/j.1468‑0068.2010.00822.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00822.x [Google Scholar]
5. Colston, Herbert
   1997 “Salting a Wound or Sugaring a Pill: The Pragmatic Functions of Ironic Criticism.” Discourse Processes23: 25–45.10.1080/01638539709544980
   https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709544980 [Google Scholar]
6. Colston, Herbert
   2002 “Contrast and Assimilation in Verbal Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics34: 111–142.10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)80008‑X
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)80008-X [Google Scholar]
7. Colston, Herbert, and Shauna Keller
   1998 “You’ll Never Believe This. Irony and Hyperbole in Expressing Surprise.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research27: 499–513.10.1023/A:1023229304509
   https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023229304509 [Google Scholar]
8. Colston, Herbert, and Jennifer O’Brien
   2000 “Contrast and Pragmatics in Figurative Language: Anything Understatement Can Do, Irony Can Do Better.” Journal of Pragmatics32: 1557–1583.10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00110‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00110-1 [Google Scholar]
9. Craig, Robert T., Karen Tracy, and Frances Spisak
   1986 “The Discourse of Requests: Assessments of a Politeness Approach.” Human Communication Research12 (4): 437–468.10.1111/j.1468‑2958.1986.tb00087.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00087.x [Google Scholar]
10. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics25: 349–367.10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
11. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research1: 35–72.10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
12. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
13. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
    2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics35: 1545–1579.10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00118‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2 [Google Scholar]
14. Dews, Shelly and Ellen Winner
    1997 “Attributing Meaning to Deliberately False Utterances: The Case of Irony.” InThe Problem of Meaning: Behavioral and Cognitive Perspectives, edited byCh. Mandell and A. McCabe, 377–414. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/S0166‑4115(97)80142‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80142-2 [Google Scholar]
15. Dews, Shelly, Joan Kaplan, and Ellen Winner
    1995 “Why Not Say It Directly? The Social Functions of Irony.” Discourse Processes19: 347–367.10.1080/01638539509544922
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544922 [Google Scholar]
16. Dynel, Marta
    2009 Humorous Garden-Paths: A Pragmatic-Cognitive Study. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dynel, Marta
    2013a “Impoliteness as Disaffiliative Humour in Film Talk.” InDevelopments in Linguistic Humour Theory, edited byMarta Dynel, 105–144. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/thr.1.07dyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.07dyn [Google Scholar]
18. Dynel, Marta
    2013b “Irony from a Neo-Gricean Perspective: On Untruthfulness and Evaluative Implicature.” Intercultural Pragmatics10: 403–431.10.1515/ip‑2013‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0018 [Google Scholar]
19. Dynel, Marta
    2013c “When Does Irony Tickle the Hearer? Towards Capturing the Characteristics of Humorous Irony.” Developments in Linguistic Humour Theory, edited byMarta Dynel, 298–320. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/thr.1.14dyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.1.14dyn [Google Scholar]
20. Dynel, Marta
    2014 “Isn’t It Ironic? Defining the Scope of Humorous Irony.” HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research27: 619–639.10.1515/humor‑2014‑0096
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0096 [Google Scholar]
21. Dynel, Marta
    2015 “Intention to Deceive, Bald-Faced Lies, and Deceptive Implicature: Insights into Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface.” Intercultural Pragmatics12: 309–332.10.1515/ip‑2015‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2015-0016 [Google Scholar]
22. Dynel, Marta
    2016a “Conceptualising Conversational Humour as (Im)politeness: The Case of Film Talk.” Journal of Politeness Research12(1): 117–147.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Dynel, Marta
    2016b “‘Trolling Is Not Stupid’: Internet Trolling as the Art of Deception Serving Entertainment.” Intercultural Pragmatics13: 353–381
    [Google Scholar]
24. Dynel, Marta
    2017a “Academics vs. American Scriptwriters vs. Academics: A Battle over the Etic and Emic ‘Sarcasm’ and ‘Irony’ Labels.” Language & Communication55: 69–87.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Dynel, Marta
    2017b “But Seriously: On Conversational Humour and (Un)truthfulness.” Lingua197: 83–102.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dynel, Marta
    2018a “No Child’s Play: A Philosophical Pragmatic View of Overt Pretence as a Vehicle for Conversational Humour.” InCreating and Negotiating Humor in Everyday Interactions, edited byVilly Tsakona and Jan Chovanec, 205–228. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Dynel, Marta
    2018b Irony, Deception and Humour: Seeking the Truth about Overt and Covert Untruthfulness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Eelen, Gino
    2001 A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2010 “The Status Quo and Quo-Vadis of Impoliteness Research.” Intercultural Pragmatics7: 535–559.10.1515/iprg.2010.025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iprg.2010.025 [Google Scholar]
30. Garmendia, Joana
    2010 “Irony is Critical.” Pragmatics and Cognition18: 397–421.10.1075/pc.18.2.07gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18.2.07gar [Google Scholar]
31. Garmendia, Joana
    2011 “She’s (Not) a Fine Friend: ‘Saying’ and Criticism in Irony.” Intercultural Pragmatics8: 41–65.10.1515/IPRG.2011.002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2011.002 [Google Scholar]
32. Garmendia, Joana
    2015 “A (Neo)Gricean Account of Irony: An Answer to Relevance Theory.” International Review of Pragmatics7: 40–79.10.1163/18773109‑00701003
    https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00701003 [Google Scholar]
33. Gibbs, Raymond, Jr., and Herbert Colston
    2002 “The Risks and Rewards of Ironic Communication.” InSay not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication, edited byLuigi Anolli, Rita Ciceri and Giuseppe Riva, 187–200. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Grice, Herbert Paul
    (1975) 1989 “Logic and Conversation.” InStudies in the Way of Words, Herbert Paul Grice, 22–40. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Haddington, Pentti
    2011 “Serious or Non-serious? Sequential Ambiguity and Disavowing a Prior Stance.” Functions of Language18: 149–182.10.1075/fol.18.2.01had
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.18.2.01had [Google Scholar]
36. Haugh, Michael
    2012 “Epilogue: The First-Second Order Distinction in Face and Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research8 (1): 111–134.10.1515/pr‑2012‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2012-0007 [Google Scholar]
37. Haugh, Michael
    2016 “‘Just Kidding’: Teasing and Claims to Non-serious Intent.” Journal of Pragmatics95: 120–136.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Haugh, Michael, and Derek Bousfield
    2012 “Mock Impoliteness in Interactions amongst Australian and British Speakers of English.” Journal of Pragmatics44: 1099–1114.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.003 [Google Scholar]
39. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna
    2009 “Cancelability and the Primary/Secondary Meaning Distinction.” Intercultural Pragmatics6: 259–289.10.1515/IPRG.2009.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2009.015 [Google Scholar]
40. Jorgensen, Julia
    1996 “The Functions of Sarcastic Irony in Speech.” Journal of Pragmatics26: 613–634.10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00067‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00067-4 [Google Scholar]
41. Kapogianni, Eleni
    2011 “Irony via ‘Surrealism’.” InThe Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, edited byMarta Dynel, 51–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.210.05kap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.210.05kap [Google Scholar]
42. Kapogianni, Eleni
    2016 “The Ironist’s Intentions: Communicative Priority and Manifestness.” Pragmatics & Cognition23 (1): 150–173.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kreuz, Roger, Debra Long, and Mary Church
    1991 “On Being Ironic: Pragmatic and Mnemonic Implications.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity6: 149–162.10.1207/s15327868ms0603_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0603_1 [Google Scholar]
44. Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Sam Glucksberg, and Mary Brown
    1995 “How about Another Piece of Pie: The Allusional Pretense Theory of Discourse Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General124: 3–21.10.1037/0096‑3445.124.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.3 [Google Scholar]
45. Leech, Geoffrey
    1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Leech, Geoffrey
    2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
47. Mahon, James E.
    2015 “The Definition of Lying and Deception.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), E. N. Zalta (ed.), URL plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/lying-definition/.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Meibauer, Jörg
    2014 Lying and the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Boston/Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Mills, Sara
    2003 Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615238
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615238 [Google Scholar]
50. Partington, Alan
    2006 The Linguistics of Laughter. A Corpus-Assisted Study of Laughter-Talk. Oxon: Routledge Studies in Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Roberts, Richard, and Roger Kreuz
    1994 “Why Do People Use Figurative Language?” Psychological Science5: 159–163.10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1994.tb00653.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.x [Google Scholar]
52. Sinkeviciute, Valeria
    2013 “Decoding Encoded (Im)politeness: Cause on my Teasing You Can Depend.” InThe Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, edited byMarta Dynel, 263–288. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Sinkeviciute, Valeria
    2017a “Funniness and ‘the Preferred Reaction’ to Jocularity in Australian and British English: An Analysis of Interviewees’ Metapragmatic Comments.” Language & Communication55: 41–54.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Sinkeviciute, Valeria
    2017b “‘It’s Just a Bit of Cultural […] Lost in Translation’: Australian and British Intracultural and Intercultural Metapragmatic Evaluations of Jocularity.” Lingua197: 50–67.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Taylor, Charlotte
    2015 “Beyond Sarcasm: The Metalanguage and Structures of Mock Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics87: 127–141.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.005 [Google Scholar]
56. Taylor, Charlotte
    2016 “Mock Politeness and Culture: Perceptions and Practice in UK and Italian Data.” Intercultural Pragmatics13 (4): 463–498.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Taylor, Charlotte
    2017 “The Relationship between Irony and Sarcasm: Insights from a First-Order Metalanguage Investigation.” Journal of Politeness Research13 (2): 209–242.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Toplak, Mary, and Albert Katz
    2000 “On the Uses of Sarcastic Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics32: 1467–1488.10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00101‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00101-0 [Google Scholar]
59. Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne
    2004 Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, and Konrad Ehlich
    1992 “Introduction.” InPoliteness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, edited byRichard J. Watts, Sachiko Ide and Konrad Ehlich, 1–17. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Whalen, Juanita M., Penny M. Pexman, Alastair J. Gill, and Scott Nowson
    2013 “Verbal Irony Use in Personal Blogs.” Behaviour and IT32 (6): 560–569.
    [Google Scholar]