Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:
Zoom in

Introduction, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/fulltext/jlac.00008.int-1.gif


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Anderson, Kristin L., and Jill Cermele
    2014 “Public/Private Language Aggression against Women. Tweeting Rage and Intimate Partner Violence.” In Language Aggression against Women, Special Issue, edited byPatricia Bou-Franch, Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict2: 274–93. 10.1075/jlac.2.2.05and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.2.05and [Google Scholar]
  2. Arcidiacono, Francesco, and Antonio Bova
    2017Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts. Springer: New York. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑59084‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59084-4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Attardo, Salvatore
    2000 “Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness.” Journal of Pragmatics32: 793–826. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00070‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00070-3 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bou-Franch, Patricia, Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2014 “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics73: 19–36. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Boxer, Diana
    1993 “Social Distance and Speech Behavior: The Case of Indirect Complaints.” Journal of Pragmatics19: 103–25. 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90084‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90084-3 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bravo, Diana
    1999 “¿Imagen ‘positiva’ vs imagen ‘negativa’?: Pragmática sociocultural y componentes de face.” Oralia2: 155–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brenes Peña, Ester
    2011Tertulia televisiva y descortesía verbal. Análisis pragmalingüístico. Berne: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0159‑1
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0159-1 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown, David
    2000 “Educational Beliefs: An Overview.” InInteractive Learning: Vignettes from America’s Most Wired Campuses, edited byDavid Brown, 3–7. Boston: Anker.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cloke, Kenneth and Joan Goldsmith
    2011Resolving Conflicts at Work: Ten Strategies for Everyone on the Job. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fant, Lars
    1989 “Cultural Mismatch in Conversation: Spanish and Scandinavian Communicative Behaviour in Negotiation Settings.” Hermes Journal of Linguistics3: 247–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina, and Esperanza Alcaide Lara
    2008(Des)cortesía, agresividad y violencia verbal en la sociedad actual. Sevilla: Universidad Internacional de Andalucía.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina, and Esperanza Alcaide Lara
    2009Manifestaciones textuales de la descortesía y agresividad verbal en diversos ámbitos comunicativos. Sevilla: Universidad Internacional de Andalucía.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina, and María Elena Placencia
    2013 “Polémica y/o descortesía en programas televisivos de crónica social en Ecuador y España: El caso de Vamos con todo y Sálvame diario.” In(Des)cortesía para el espectáculo: estudios de pragmática variacionista, edited byCatalina Fuentes Rodríguez, 127–65. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. García-Gómez, Antonio
    2012 “Perceptions of Assertiveness among Women: Triggering and Managing Conflict in Reality Television.” Discourse & Communication6 (4): 379–399. 10.1177/1750481312457500
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312457500 [Google Scholar]
  15. González, Marina
    2010 “Las funciones del insulto en debates políticos televisados.” Discurso & Sociedad4: 828–52.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goodwin, Marjorie H.
    1982 “Processes of Dispute Management among Urban Black Children.” American Ethnologist9: 76–96. 10.1525/ae.1982.9.1.02a00050
    https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1982.9.1.02a00050 [Google Scholar]
  17. Grimshaw, Allen
    1990Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Häggkvist, Cilla, and Lars Fant
    2000 “El intercambio de opiniones en conversaciones intra e interculturales.” Oralia3: 95–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hernández Flores, Nieves
    2002La cortesía en la conversación española de familiares y amigos: la búsqueda del equilibrio entre la imagen del hablante y la imagen del destinatario. Aalborg: Institut for Sprog og Internationale Kurturstudier, Aalborg Universitet, Vol37.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2004 “Politeness as ‘Face’ Enhancement: An Analysis of Spanish Conversations between Family and Friends.” InCurrent Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, edited byRosina Márquez Reiter and María Elena Placencia, 265–84. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.123.21her
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.123.21her [Google Scholar]
  21. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria
    2007 “(Im)Politeness and the Spanish Media: The Case of Audience Participation Debates.” InResearch on Politeness in the Spanish-speaking World, edited byMaría Elena Placencia and Carmen García, 145–66. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2008 “Real Disorder in the Court: An Investigation of Conflict Talk in US Television Courtroom Shows.” Media, Culture & Society30 (1): 81–107. 10.1177/0163443708088613
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708088613 [Google Scholar]
  23. 2009Television Discourse: Analysing Language in the Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑11717‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-11717-5 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2011 “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics43: 2578–93. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mancera Rueda, Ana, and Ana Pano Alamán
    2013El discurso político en Twitter. Anthropos: Barcelona.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Maynard, Douglas W.
    1985How children start arguments Language in Society, 14 (1): 1–29.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Norrick, Neal R., and Alice Spitz
    2008 Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (10): 1661–1686.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Padilla García, Xose A., and María Belén Alvarado Ortega
    2010 “Being Polite through Irony.” InDialogue in Spanish: Studies in Functions and Contexts, edited byKoike, Dale and Lidia Rodríguez-Alfano, 69–87. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ds.7.04pad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.7.04pad [Google Scholar]
  29. Papke, Edgar
    2016The Elephant in the Boardroom: How Leaders Use and Manage Conflict to Reach Greater Levels of Success. Wayne, N. J.: The Career Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pexman, Penny M., and Kara M. Olineck
    2002 “Does Sarcasm Always Sting? Investigating the Impact of Ironic Insults and Ironic Compliments.” Discourse Processes33 (3): 199–217. 10.1207/S15326950DP3303_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3303_1 [Google Scholar]
  31. Placencia, María Elena
    2008 “(Non)Compliance with Directives among Family and Friends: Responding to Social Pressure and Individual Wants.” Intercultural Pragmatics5 (3): 315–44. 10.1515/IPRG.2008.015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2008.015 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2011 La insistencia entre familiares y amigos en el español quiteño: ¿de la interconexión hacia la autonomía?InEstudios de variación pragmática en español, edited byCarmen García and María Elena Placencia, 185–214. Buenos Aires: Dunken.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Placencia, María Elena, and Ana Mancera Rueda
    2011 “Vaya, ¡qué chungo! Rapport-building Talk in Service Encounters: The Case of Bars in Seville at Breakfast Time.” InSpanish at Work: Analysing Institutional Discourse across the Spanish-speaking World, edited byNuria Lorenzo-Dus, 192–207. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230299214_14
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299214_14 [Google Scholar]
  34. Placencia, María Elena, and Catalina Fuentes Rodríguez
    2013 “In Between Spectacle and Political Correctness: Vamos con todo – An Ambivalent News/Talk Show.” Pragmatics23: 117–45. 10.1075/prag.23.1.06pla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.1.06pla [Google Scholar]
  35. Rühlemann, Christoph
    2010 “What Can a Corpus Tell us about Pragmatics?” InThe Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, edited byAnne O’Keeffe, and Michael McCarthy, 288–301. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203856949.ch21
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949.ch21 [Google Scholar]
  36. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1984 “Jewish Argument as Sociability.” Language in Society13 (3): 311–335. 10.1017/S0047404500010526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500010526 [Google Scholar]
  37. 1985 “Everyday Argument: The Organization of Diversity in Talk.” InHandbook of Discourse Analysis, edited byTeun A. van Dijk, 35–46. London: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Scott, Vivian
    2015Workplace Conflict Resolution Essentials. Queensland: Wiley Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sheldon, Amy
    1990 “Pickle Fights: Gendered Talk in Pre-school Disputes.” Discourse Processes13 (1): 5–31. 10.1080/01638539009544745
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539009544745 [Google Scholar]
  40. Stewart, Katherine A., and Madeline M. Maxwell
    2010Storied Conflict Talk: Narrative Construction in Mediation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.12 [Google Scholar]
  41. Tannen, Deborah
    1998The Argument Culture. Stopping America’s War of Words. New York: The Random House Publishing Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Thurén, Britt-Marie
    1988Left Hand Left Behind: The Changing Gender System of a Barrio in Valencia, Spain. Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology, 22. Stockholm: University of Stockholm.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wolfson, Nessa
    1981 “Compliments in Cross-cultural Perspective.” TESOL Quarterly15: 117–24. 10.2307/3586403
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586403 [Google Scholar]
  44. 1983 “An Empirically Based Analysis of Complimenting in American English.” InSociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, edited byNessa Wolfson and Elliot Judd, 82–95. Rowley, MASS: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 1988 “The Bulge: A Theory of Speech Behavior and Social Distance.” InSecond Language Discourse: A Textbook of Current Research, edited byJonathan Fine, 21–38. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error