1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigates family conflict talk in a computer-mediated environment from a language-in-interaction focus. It is based on two different data sets of six WhatsApp groups that feature arguing British families, and of six WhatsApp groups that feature arguing Spanish families. It looks at the different linguistic strategies that participants deploy when taking up opposing stances on a given issue. Through a detailed discourse analysis of the conflict-based episodes in English and Spanish, the results not only show a differentiated linguistic process in the way(s) in which the study participants managed conflict, but also suggest that smartphone-mediated interpersonal conflict needs to be understood as an attempt to inhabit legitimate subject positions in and through discourse.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00015.gar
2018-11-26
2019-10-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Antaki, Charles
    1994Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organisation of Accounts. London: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arcidiacono, Francesco, and Antonio Bova
    (Eds.) 2017Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑59084‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59084-4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Becker, Jennifer, and Glen Stamp
    2005 “Impression Management in Chat Rooms: A Grounded Theory Model.” Communication Studies56: 243–6. 10.1080/10510970500181264
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970500181264 [Google Scholar]
  4. Billings, Andrew
    1979 “Conflict Resolution in Distressed and Non-distressed Married Couple.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology47: 368–376. 10.1037/0022‑006X.47.2.368
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.47.2.368 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bova, Antonio, and Francesco Arcidiacono
    2015 “Beyond Conflicts. Origin and Types of Issues Leading to Argumentative Discussions during Family Mealtimes.” Journal of Language and Aggression and Conflict3(2): 263–288. 10.1075/jlac.3.2.02bov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.2.02bov [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonito, Joshep, and Raymond Sanders
    2002 “Speakers’ Footing in a Collaborative Writing Task: A Resource for Addressing Disagreement While Avoiding Conflict.” Research on Language and Social Interaction35: 481–514. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3504_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3504_4 [Google Scholar]
  7. Boxer, Diana
    2011The Lost Art of the Good Schmooze: Building Rapport and Defusing Conflict in Everyday Talk. New York: Praeger Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brenneis, Donald
    1988 “Language and Disputing.” Annual Review of Anthropology17: 221–237. 10.1146/annurev.an.17.100188.001253
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.17.100188.001253 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brenneis, Donald, and Laura Lein
    1977 “‘You Fruithead’: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Children’s Dispute Settlement.” InChild Discourse, edited bySusan Ervin-Tripp and Claudia Mitchell-Kernan, 49–65. New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑241950‑8.50009‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-241950-8.50009-5 [Google Scholar]
  10. Burleson, Brant
    2003 “The Experience and Effects of Emotional Support: What the Study of Cultural and Gender Differences Can Tell Us about Close Relationships, Emotion, and Interpersonal Communication.” Personal Relationships10: 1–23. 10.1111/1475‑6811.00033
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00033 [Google Scholar]
  11. Butler, Judith
    1993Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Church, Amelia
    2016Preference Organisation and Peer Disputes: How Young Children Resolve Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.4324/9781315602035
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602035 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cox, Andrew
    2005 “What Are Communities of Practice? A Comparative Review of Four Seminal Works.” Journal of Information Science31(6): 527–540. 10.1177/0165551505057016
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551505057016 [Google Scholar]
  14. Diego Vallejo, Raúl de, and Carlos Guillén Gestoso
    2008Mediación: Proceso, Tácticas y Técnicas. Madrid: Pirámide.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eisenberg, Ann, and Catherine Garvey
    1981 “Children’s Use of Verbal Strategies in Resolving Conflicts.” Discourse Processes4(2): 149–170. 10.1080/01638538109544512
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538109544512 [Google Scholar]
  16. Eggins, Susanne, and Diana Slade
    1997Analysing Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. García-Gómez, Antonio
    2002 “A Cognitive Approach to Topic Management in Verbal Duels on American Talkshows.” Studies in English Language and Linguistics4: 145–170.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2007Habla Conflictiva como Acción Social. Discurso y Cognición. Oviedo: Septem Ediciones.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. 2012 “Perceptions of Assertiveness among Women: Triggering and Managing Conflict in Reality Television.” Discourse & Communication6(4): 379–399. 10.1177/1750481312457500
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481312457500 [Google Scholar]
  20. Giles, Howard, Justine Coupland, and Nikolas Coupland
    1991Contexts of Accommodation. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511663673
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663673 [Google Scholar]
  21. Goodwin, Marjorie H.
    1990He-said-she-said: Talk as Social Organization Among Black Children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Grimshaw, Allen D.
    1990Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations in Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hamelink, Cees
    2011Media and Conflict: Escalating Evil. London: Paradigm.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Holt, Jennifer, and Cynthia DeVore
    2005 “Culture, Gender, Organizational Role, and Styles of Conflict Resolution: A Meta-analysis.” International Journal of Intercultural Relations29(2): 165–196. 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hutchby, Ian
    1996Confrontation Talk: Arguments, Asymmetries, and Power on Talk Radio. Matwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2001 “‘Witnessing’: The Use of First-hand Knowledge in Legitimating Lay Opinions on Talk Radio.” Discourse Studies3(4): 481–497. 10.1177/1461445601003004009
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445601003004009 [Google Scholar]
  27. Janicki, Karol
    2015Language and Conflict. Selected Issues. London: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑38141‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-38141-5 [Google Scholar]
  28. Karney, Benjamin, and Bradbury, Thomas
    2000 “Attributions in Marriage: State or Trait? A Growth Curve Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology78: 295–309. 10.1037/0022‑3514.78.2.295
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.295 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kress, Gunther
    2010Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London & New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee, Daniel
    1997 “Frame Conflicts and Competing Construals in Family Argument.” Journal of Pragmatics27: 339–360. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00041‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00041-0 [Google Scholar]
  31. Leung, Alicia
    2008 “Interpersonal Conflict and Resolution Strategies: An Examination of Hong Kong Employees.” Team Performance Management: An International Journal14(3–4): 165–178. 10.1108/13527590810883433
    https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590810883433 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lorenzo-Duz, Nuria
    2008 “Real Disorder in the Court: An Investigation of Conflict Talk in US Television Courtroom Shows.” Media, Culture and Society30(1): 81–107. 10.1177/0163443708088613
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443708088613 [Google Scholar]
  33. Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen
    2018 “Emotional Self-presentation on WhatsApp: Analysis of the Profile Status.” Russian Journal of Linguistics22(1): 144–160. 10.22363/2312‑9182‑2018‑22‑1‑144‑160
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-144-160 [Google Scholar]
  34. Maynard, Douglas
    1985 “How Children Start Arguments.” Language in Society14: 1–29. 10.1017/S0047404500010915
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500010915 [Google Scholar]
  35. Merriam, Sharon
    2009Qualitative Case Study Research Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. Retrieved from: https://leseprobe.buch.de/images-adb/f2/46/f2465cf6-b1d1-4d13-829d-e5c985f6ee5c.pdf.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Mitchell-Kernan, Claudia
    1972 “Signifying and Marking: Two African-American Speech Acts.” InDirections in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, edited byJohn Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 161–179. New York: Holt.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Pérez-Sabater, Carmen
    2015 “Discovering Language Variation in WhatsApp Text Interactions.” Onomázein: Revista Semestral de Lingüística, Filología y Traducción31(1): 113–126. 10.7764/onomazein.31.8
    https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.31.8 [Google Scholar]
  38. Pomerantz, Anita
    1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes”. InStructures of Social Action, edited byMaxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pomerantz, Anita, and Jenny Mandelbaum
    2005 “A Conversation Analytic Approach to Relationships.” InHandbook of Language and Social Interaction, edited byKristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 149–171. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sánchez-Moya, Alfonso, and Olga Cruz-Moya
    2015 “WhatsApp, Textese, and Moral Panics: Discourse Features and Habits across Two Generations.” Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences173: 300–306. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.069
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.069 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sanderson, Catherine, and Kim Karetsky
    2002 “Intimacy Goals and Strategies of Conflict Resolution in Dating Relationships: A Mediational Analysis.” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships19(3): 317–337. 10.1177/0265407502193002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502193002 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schiffrin, Deborah
    1984 “Jewish Argument as Sociability.” Language in Society13: 311–335. 10.1017/S0047404500010526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500010526 [Google Scholar]
  43. Simmel, Georg
    1955 [1908]Conflict and The Web of Group Affiliations. New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Solomon, Denise, and Jennifer Theiss
    2013Interpersonal Communication. Putting Theory into Practice. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sulaiman, Ainin, and Muzamil Naqshbandi
    2014Social Media: Dynamism, Issues and Challenges. Singapore: Partridge Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Tsui, Amy
    1994English Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Vasilyeva, Alena
    2015 “Identity as a Resource to Shape Mediation in Dialogic Interaction.” Language and Dialogue5 (3): 355–380. 10.1075/ld.5.3.01vas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.3.01vas [Google Scholar]
  48. 2016 “Confrontation and Collaboration in the Course of the Election Debate.” Language and Dialogue6 (3): 370–395. 10.1075/ld.6.3.02vas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.3.02vas [Google Scholar]
  49. Vázquez-Cano, Esteban
    2012 “Mobile Learning with Twitter to Improve Linguistic Competence at Secondary Schools.” The New Educational Review29(3): 134–147.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Vuchinich, Samuel
    1990 “The Sequential Organization of Closing in Verbal Family Conflict”. InConflict talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations in Conversations, edited byAllen Grimshaw, 118–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Yus, Francisco
    2017 “Contextual Constraints and Non-propositional Effects in WhatsApp Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics114: 66–86. 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.04.003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00015.gar
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00015.gar
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error