“Let me now answer, very directly, Marie’s question”

References

1. Allen, Beccy, Ruth Fox, Isla Geis-King, Virginia Gibbons, Matt Korris, Petya Pavlova, and Michael Raftery
   2014 Tuned in or Turned Off? Public Attitudes to Prime Minister’s Questions. London: Hansard Society.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bates, Stephen R., Peter Kerr, Christopher Byrne, and Liam Stanley
   2014 “Questions to the Prime Minister: A Comparative Study of PMQs from Thatcher to Cameron.” Parliamentary Affairs67(2):253–280. 10.1093/pa/gss044
   https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss044 [Google Scholar]
3. Bercow, John
   2010 [Online]. Speech to the Centre for Parliamentary Studies. Available at: www.parliament.uk/business/commons/the-speaker/speeches/speeches/speech-to-the-centre-for-parliamentary-studies/. [Accessed07 May 2018].
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blair, Tony
   2010 A Journey. London: Hutchinson.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
   1978 “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena.” InQuestions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, edited byEsther N. Goody, 56–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
   1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
7. Bull, Peter
   1994 “On Identifying Questions, Replies, and Non-replies in Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology13(2):115–131. 10.1177/0261927X94132002
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94132002 [Google Scholar]
8. Bull, Peter
   2003 The Microanalysis of Political Communication: Claptrap and Ambiguity. London: Psychology Press. 10.4324/9780203417843
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203417843 [Google Scholar]
9. Bull, Peter
   2008 “‘Slipperiness, Evasion, and Ambiguity’: Equivocation and Facework in Noncommittal Political Discourse.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology27(4):333–344. 10.1177/0261927X08322475
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322475 [Google Scholar]
10. Bull, Peter
    2009 “Techniques of Political Interview Analysis.” InDiscourse and Politics, edited byGloria Álvarez-Benito, Gabriela Fernández-Díaz, and Isabel Íñigo-Mora, 215–228. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bull, Peter
    2016 [Online]. “Theresa May Has a Very Special Technique for Avoiding Questions.” The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/theresa-may-has-a-very-special-technique-for-avoiding-questions-67424. [Accessed07 May 2018].
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bull, Peter
    2017 [Online]. “Who Dodges More Questions, Theresa May or Jeremy Corbyn? The Verdict is In.” The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/who-dodges-more-questions-theresa-may-or-jeremy-corbyn-the-verdict-is-in-78955. [Accessed07 May 2018].
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bull, Peter, Judy Elliott, Derrol Palmer, and Libby Walker
    1996 “Why Politicians are Three-faced: The Face Model of Political Interviews.” British Journal of Social Psychology35(2):267–284. 10.1111/j.2044‑8309.1996.tb01097.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01097.x [Google Scholar]
14. Bull, Peter, and Kate Mayer
    1993 “How Not to Answer Questions in Political Interviews.” Political Psychology14(4):651–666. 10.2307/3791379
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3791379 [Google Scholar]
15. Bull, Peter, and Pam Wells
    2012 “Adversarial Discourse in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology31(1):30–48. 10.1177/0261927X11425034
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X11425034 [Google Scholar]
16. Cohen, Jacob
    1960 “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement20(1):37–46. 10.1177/001316446002000104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104 [Google Scholar]
17. Corbyn, Jeremy
    2016 [Online]. “Today is my 100th PMQs Question as Labour Leader – But I Still Won’t Get a Straight Answer from David Cameron.” The Independent. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/today-is-my-100th-pmqs-question-as-labour-leader-but-i-still-wont-get-a-straight-answer-from-david-a6920681.html. [Accessed07 May 2018].
    [Google Scholar]
18. Culpeper, Jonathan
    1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics25(3):349–367. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
19. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
20. Domenici, Kathy, and Stephen W. Littlejohn
    2006 Facework: Bridging Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Dunleavy, Patrick, G. W. Jones, Jane Burnham, Robert Elgie, and Peter Fysh
    1993 “Leaders, Politics and Institutional Change: The Decline of Prime Ministerial Accountability to the House of Commons, 1868–1990.” British Journal of Political Science23(3):267–298. 10.1017/S0007123400006621
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400006621 [Google Scholar]
22. Dunleavy, Patrick, G. W. Jones, and Brendan O’Leary
    1990 “Prime Ministers and the Commons: Patterns of Behaviour, 1868 to 1987.” Public Administration68(1):123–140. 10.1111/j.1467‑9299.1990.tb00750.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1990.tb00750.x [Google Scholar]
23. Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull
    . (in preparation). “Quoting Ordinary People in Prime Minister’s Questions.” To be submitted toConstructing Ordinariness across Media Genres: Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series edited by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Giddings, Philip, and Helen Irwin
    2005 “Objects and Questions.” InThe Future of Parliament, edited byPhilip Giddings, 67–77. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230523142_6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523142_6 [Google Scholar]
25. Gimson, Andrew
    2012 “PMQs: That’s the Way to Do It!” British Journalism Review23(3):11–13. 10.1177/0956474812460465b
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956474812460465b [Google Scholar]
26. Goffman, Erving
    1967 “Where the Action Is.” InInteraction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face BehaviorbyErving Goffman, 149–270. Chicago: Aldine.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Harris, Sandra
    1991 “Evasive Action: How Politicians Respond to Questions in Political Interviews.” InBroadcast Talkedited byPaddy Scannell, 76–99. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Harris, Sandra
    2001 “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society12(4):451–472. 10.1177/0957926501012004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012004003 [Google Scholar]
29. Heffer, Greg
    2016 [Online]. “Corbyn Claims Cameron is Jealous of His Style as ‘Do Up Your Tie’ Row Rumbles On.” Sunday Express. Available at: https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/647453/Jeremy-Corbyn-David-Cameron-jealous-style-PMQs-video. [Accessed30 December 2018].
    [Google Scholar]
30. House of Commons Information Office
    House of Commons Information Office 2010a [Online]. Parliamentary Questions (Factsheet P1, Procedure Series). Available at: https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/p01.pdf. [Accessed08 May 2018].
    [Google Scholar]
31. House of Commons Information Office
    House of Commons Information Office 2010b [Online]. Some Traditions and Customs of the House (Factsheet G7, General Series). Available at: www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/g07.pdf. [Accessed09 May 2018].
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hughes, Laura
    2016 [Online]. “One Year into Jeremy Corbyn’s Leadership, Labour Suffers Worst Opinion Poll Ratings the Party Has Ever Experienced in Opposition.” The Telegraph. Available at: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/12/jeremy-corbyns-labour-suffers-worst-opinion-poll-ratings-the-par/. [Accessed07 May 2018].
    [Google Scholar]
33. Irwin, Helen
    1988 “Opportunities for Backbenchers.” InThe Commons under Scrutinyedited byMichael Ryle and Peter G. Richards, 76–98. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Irwin, Helen, Andrew Kennon, David Natzler, and Robert Rogers
    1993 “Evolving Rules.” InParliamentary Questionsedited byMark N. Franklin and Philip Norton, 23–72. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. ITV
    ITV 2015 [Online]. “Jeremy Corbyn Promises ‘New Kind of Politics’ as he Unveils 10-point Policy Plan.” ITV report. Available at: www.itv.com/news/2015-08-14/jeremy-corbyn-promises-new-kind-of-politics-as-he-unveils-10-point-policy-plan/. [Accessed07 May 2018].
    [Google Scholar]
36. Jucker, Andreas H.
    1986 News Interviews: A Pragmalinguistic Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.vii.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.vii.4 [Google Scholar]
37. Kádár, Dániel
    2017 Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107280465
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280465 [Google Scholar]
38. Lees, Charles
    2015 [Online]. “The Saint in the Bear Pit: Reviewing Jeremy Corbyn’s First PMQs.” The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/the-saint-in-the-bear-pit-reviewing-jeremy-corbyns-first-pmqs-47510. [Accessed07 May 2018].
    [Google Scholar]
39. Martin, Iain
    2013 [Online]. “After a Dire PMQs, MPs Should Get a Pay Cut.” Available at: journalisted.com/article/5u3hx. [Accessed07 May 2018].
40. Pearce, W. Barnett, and Stephen W. Littlejohn
    1997 Moral Conflict: When Social Worlds Collide. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Pérez de Ayala, Soledad
    2001 “FTAs and Erskine May: Conflicting needs? Politeness in Question Time.” Journal of Pragmatics33(2):143–169. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(00)00002‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00002-3 [Google Scholar]
42. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Rasiah, Parameswary
    2010 “A Framework for the Systematic Analysis of Evasion in Parliamentary Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics42(3):664–680. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.07.010 [Google Scholar]
44. Sripada, Chandra S., and Stephen Stich
    2006 “A Framework for the Psychology of Norms.” InThe Innate Mind: Volume 2, Culture and Cognition, edited byPeter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence, and Stephen Stich, 285–310. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Thomas, Graham P.
    2006 “United Kingdom: The Prime Minister and Parliament.” InExecutive Leadership and Legislative Assembliesedited byNicholas D. J. Baldwin, 4–37. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Tracy, K.
    2008 “‘Reasonable Hostility’: Situation-appropriate Face-attack.” Journal of Politeness Research4(2):169–191. 10.1515/JPLR.2008.009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2008.009 [Google Scholar]
47. Waddle, Maurice, and Peter Bull
    2016 “Playing the Man, Not the Ball: Personalisation in Political Interviews.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology35(4):412–434. 10.1177/0261927X15592443
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15592443 [Google Scholar]
48. Waddle, Maurice, Peter Bull, and Jan R. Böhnke
    2019 “‘He is Just the Nowhere Man of British Politics’: Personal Attacks in Prime Minister’s Questions.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology38(1):61–84. 10.1177/0261927X18767472
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X18767472 [Google Scholar]
49. Wintour, Patrick
    2015 [Online]. “Jeremy Corbyn: It’s Time for a New Kind of Politics.” The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/11/jeremy-corbyn-aims-to-throw-out-theatrical-abuse-in-parliament. [Accessed22 October 2018].
    [Google Scholar]