1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict
  4. Volume 7, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present study aims to help better understand the cognitive and affective processes at work in ‘moral struggles’ concerning discussions about hosting immigrants. In particular, it will focus on the prosocial aspect of the debate on hosting of immigrants since previous studies have stressed mainly its racist nature. To this end, a total of 12,583 comments were extracted from the Facebook page of an Italian singer, divided into prosocial and proself stances, and analysed by developing a specific coding based on the theory of helping behaviour in emergency (Darley and Latané 1968) and the theory of moral agency (Bandura 1991). Prosocial processes were defined on the basis of the following ‘loci’: recipients, behaviour, consequences and agency. In parallel the comments were analysed by emotional coding to identify the levels of expressed anger. The results showed a wide variety of prosocial stances associated with these loci in online arguments within real sentences. Prosocial commenters can use words as weapons toward proself commenters to win their ‘crusade’ when they are flamed, and they are ‘cold’ when they focus on recipient and consequences. Finally, results suggested that a dialogue between prosocial and proself positions can occur in the presence of a moderate level of anger.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00024.der
2019-07-15
2024-10-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00024.der
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aiken, Sharryn, David Lyon, and Malcolm Thorburn
    2014 “Introduction: ‘Crimmigration, Surveillance and Security Threats’: A Multidisciplinary Dialogue”. Queen’s Law Journal40: 1–11.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aquino, Karl, and I. Americus Reed
    2002 “The Self-importance of Moral Identity”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83(6): 1423–1440. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.83.6.1423
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandura, Albert
    1991 “Social Cognitive Theory of Moral Thought and Action”. InHandbook of Moral Behavior and DevelopmentVol.1, edited byWilliam M. Kurtines and Jacob L. Gewirtz, 45–103. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 2015 Moral Disengagement: How People Do Harm and Live with Themselves. New York: Macmillan Higher Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Batson, Daniel
    1987 “Prosocial Motivation: Is It Ever Truly Altruistic?”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology20: 65–122. doi:  10.1016/S0065‑2601(08)60412‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60412-8 [Google Scholar]
  6. 2011 Altruism in Humans. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Batson, C. Daniel, Christopher L. Kennedy, Lesley-Anne Nord, E. L. Stocks, D’Yani A. Fleming, Christian M. Marzette, David A. Lishner, Robin E. Hayes, Leah M. Kolchinsky and Tricia Zerger
    2007 “Anger at Unfairness: Is It Moral Outrage?”. European Journal of Social Psychology37(6): 1272–1285. doi:  10.1002/ejsp.434
     https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.434 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bekkers, René, and Mark Ottoni-Wilhelm
    2016 “Principle of Care and Giving to Help People in Need”. European Journal of Personality30(3): 240–257. doi:  10.1002/per.2057
     https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2057 [Google Scholar]
  9. Böhm, Robert, Maik M. Theelen, Hannes Rusch, and Paul A. van Lange
    2018 “Costs, Needs, and Integration Efforts Shape Helping Behavior Toward Refugees”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America115 (28): 7284–7289. doi:  10.1073/pnas.1805601115
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805601115 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bode, Nikolai W. F., Jordan Miller, Rick O’Gorman, and Edward A. Codling
    2015 “Increased Costs Reduce Reciprocal Helping Behaviour of Humans in a Virtual Evacuation Experiment”. Scientific Reports5. doi:  10.1038/srep15896
     https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15896 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, Jonathon D., and S. April Smart
    1991 “The Self and Social Conduct: Linking Self-Representations to Prosocial Behavior”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology60(3): 368–375. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.60.3.368
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.368 [Google Scholar]
  12. Caffi, Claudia, and Richard W. Janney
    1994 “Toward a Pragmatics of Emotive Communication”. Journal of Pragmatics22(3–4): 325–373. doi:  10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90115‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90115-5 [Google Scholar]
  13. Castano, Emanuele, and Roger Giner-Sorolla
    2006 “Not Quite Human: Infrahumanization in Response to Collective Responsibility for Intergroup Killing”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology90(5): 804–818. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.90.5.804
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.804 [Google Scholar]
  14. Daniels, Jessie
    2009 Cyber Racism: White Supremacy Online and the New Attack on Civil Rights. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Darley, John M., and Bibb Latané
    1968 “Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology8(4): 377–383. doi:  10.1037/h0025589
     https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025589 [Google Scholar]
  16. D’Errico, Francesca, and Marinella Paciello
    2018 “Online Moral Disengagement and Hostile Emotions in Discussions on Hosting Immigrants”. Internet Research28(5): 1313–1335. doi:  10.1108/IntR‑03‑2017‑0119
     https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2017-0119 [Google Scholar]
  17. D’Errico, Francesca, Marinella Paciello, and Matteo Amadei
    2018 “‘Behind Our Words’: Psychological Paths Underlying the Un/Supportive Stance Toward Immigrants in Social Media”. InIEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics, 649–656. doi:  10.1109/DSAA.2018.00084
     https://doi.org/10.1109/DSAA.2018.00084 [Google Scholar]
  18. D’Errico, Francesca, and Isabella Poggi
    2012 “Blame the Opponent! Effects of Multimodal Discrediting Moves in Public Debates”. Cognitive Computation4(4): 460–476. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑642‑41545‑6_14
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41545-6_14 [Google Scholar]
  19. D’Errico, Francesca, Giovanna Leone, and Tiziana Mastrovito
    2011 “The Paradox of Over-help. When Teacher’s Intervention Makes an Immigrant Child More Dependent”. InCultural Diversity and Multicultural Classes, edited byW. Berg, 129–144. Wiesbaden: Verlag GmbH. 10.1007/978‑3‑531‑93494‑5_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93494-5_8 [Google Scholar]
  20. Detert, James R., Linda Klebe Treviño, and Vicki L. Sweitzer
    2008 “Moral Disengagement in Ethical Decision Making: A Study of Antecedents and Outcomes”. Journal of Applied Psychology93(2): 374–391. doi:  10.1037/0021‑9010.93.2.374
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dovidio, John F., Jane A. Piliavin, Samuel L. Gaertner, David A. Schroeder, and Russell D. Clark III
    1991 “The Arousal: Cost-Reward Model and the Process of Intervention: A Review of the Evidence”. InReview of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.12Prosocial Behavior, edited byM. S. Clark, 86–118. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Esses, Victoria M., Leah K. Hamilton, and Danielle Gaucher
    2017 “The Global Refugee Crisis: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications for Improving Public Attitudes and Facilitating Refugee Resettlement”. Social Issues and Policy Review11(1): 78–123. doi:  10.1111/sipr.12028
     https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12028 [Google Scholar]
  23. Esses, Victoria M., Stelian Medianu, and Andrea S. Lawson
    2013 “Uncertainty, Threat, and the Role of the Media in Promoting the Dehumanization of Immigrants and Refugees”. Journal of Social Issues69(3): 518–536. doi:  10.1111/josi.12027
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12027 [Google Scholar]
  24. Eisenberg, Nancy, Richard Fabes, Paul Miller, Jim Fultz, Rita Shell, Robin Mathy and Ray Reno
    1989 “Relation of Sympathy and Personal Distress to Prosocial Behavior: A Multimethod Study”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(1): 55–66. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.57.1.55
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.1.55 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fan, Rui, Onur Varol, Ali Varamesh, Alexander Barron, Ingrid A. van de Leemput, Marten Scheffer, and Johan Bollen
    2019 “The Minute-Scale Dynamics of Online Emotions Reveal the Effects of Affect Labeling”. Nature Human Behaviour3(1): 92–100. doi:  10.1038/s41562‑018‑0487‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0487-0 [Google Scholar]
  26. Faulkner, Nicholas, and Ana-Maria Bliuc
    2016 “‘It’s Okay to Be Racist’: Moral Disengagement in Online Discussions of Racist Incidents in Australia”. Ethnic and Racial Studies39(14): 2545–2563. doi:  10.1080/01419870.2016.1171370
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1171370 [Google Scholar]
  27. Graham, Jesse, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Sena Koleva, and Peter H. Ditto
    2011 “Mapping the Moral Domain”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology101(2): 366–385. doi:  10.1037/a0021847
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847 [Google Scholar]
  28. Greenacre, Michael J.
    1984 Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis. London: Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Haidt, Jonathan
    2008 “Morality”. Perspectives on Psychological Science3(1): 65–72. doi:  10.1111/j.1745‑6916.2008.00063.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Hoffman, Martin L.
    2001 Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2008 “Empathy and Prosocial Behavior”. InHandbook of Emotions, edited byMichael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones and Lisa Feldman Barrett: 440–455New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hyndman, Jennifer, and Wenona Giles
    2016 Refugees in Extended Exile: Living on the Edge. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315618029
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315618029 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hynie, Michaela
    2018 “Refugee Integration: Research and Policy”. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology24(3): 265–276. doi:  10.1037/pac0000326
     https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000326 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jackson, Lynne M., and Victoria M. Esses
    2000 “Effects of Perceived Economic Competition on People’s Willingness to Help Empower Immigrants”. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations3(4): 419–435. 10.1177/1368430200003004006
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200003004006 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kingsley, Patrick, Alessandra Bonomolo, and Stephanie Kirchgaessner
    2015 “700 migrants feared dead in Mediterranean shipwreck”. The Guardian19April 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Koenigs, Michael, and Daniel Tranel
    2007 “Irrational Economic Decision-Making after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage: Evidence from the Ultimatum Game”. Journal of Neuroscience27(4): 951–956. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4606‑06.2007
     https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4606-06.2007 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kristofferson, Kirk, Katherine White, and John Peloza
    2013 “The Nature of Slacktivism: How the Social Observability of an Initial Act of Token Support Affects Subsequent Prosocial Action”. Journal of Consumer Research40(6): 1149–1166. doi:  10.1086/674137
     https://doi.org/10.1086/674137 [Google Scholar]
  38. Latané, Bibb, and John M. Darley
    1969 “Bystander ‘Apathy’”. American Scientist57(2): 244–268. www.jstor.org/stable/27828530
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 1970 The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn’t He Help?. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Leone, Giovanna
    2012 “Observing Social Signals in Scaffolding Interactions: How to Detect When a Helping Intention Risks Falling Short”. Cognitive Processing13(2): 477–485. doi:  10.1007/s10339‑011‑0422‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-011-0422-z [Google Scholar]
  41. Lin, Stephanie C., Rebecca L. Schaumberg, and Taly Reich
    2016 “Sidestepping the Rock and the Hard Place: The Private Avoidance of Prosocial Requests”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology64: 35–40. doi:  10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.011
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.011 [Google Scholar]
  42. López-Rodríguez, Lucía, Isabel Cuadrado, and Marisol Navas
    2017 “I Will Help you because We are Similar: Quality of Contact Mediates the Effect of Perceived Similarity on Facilitative Behaviour Towards Immigrants”. International Journal of Psychology52(4): 273–282. doi:  10.1002/ijop.12212
     https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12212 [Google Scholar]
  43. Manesi, Zoi, Niels J. van Doesum, and P. van Lange
    2017 “Prosocial Behavior”. InEncyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, edited byVirgil Zeigler-Hill and Todd K. Shackelford, 1–4. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑28099‑8_1894‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1894-1 [Google Scholar]
  44. Musolff, Andreas
    2015 “Dehumanizing Metaphors in UK Immigrant Debates in Press and Online Media”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict3(1): 41–56. doi:  10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.3.1.02mus [Google Scholar]
  45. Nadler, Arie
    2002 “Inter-Group Helping Relations as Power Relations: Maintaining or Challenging Social Dominance Between Groups Through Helping”. Journal of Social Issues58(3): 487–502. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.91.1.97
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.97 [Google Scholar]
  46. Nadler, Arie, and Lily Chernyak-Hai
    2014 “Helping them Stay Where they are: Status Effects on Dependency/Autonomy-Oriented Helping”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology106(1): 58–72. doi:  10.1037/a0034152
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034152 [Google Scholar]
  47. Ortony, Andrew, and Gerald L. Clore
    1981 “Disentangling the Affective Lexicon”. Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Vol.3. California. doi:  10.1007/978‑94‑009‑2792‑6_15
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2792-6_15 [Google Scholar]
  48. Paciello, Marinella, Roberta Fida, Luca Cerniglia, Carlo Tramontano, and Ellie Cole
    2013 “High Cost Helping Scenario: The Role of Empathy, Prosocial Reasoning and Moral Disengagement on Helping Behavior”. Personality and Individual Differences55(1): 3–7. doi:  10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  49. Pennebaker, James W., Matthias R. Mehl, and Kate G. Niederhoffer
    2003 “Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves”. Annual Review of Psychology54(1): 547–577. doi:  10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041 [Google Scholar]
  50. Pew Research Center (PRC)
    Pew Research Center (PRC)www.pewinternet.org/2017/07/11/online-harassment-2017/
  51. Pillutla, Madan M., and J. Keith Murnighan
    1996 “Unfairness, Anger, and Spite: Emotional Rejections of Ultimatum Offers”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes68(3): 208–224. doi:  10.1006/obhd.1996.0100
     https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0100 [Google Scholar]
  52. Poggi, Isabella
    2003 “Mind Markers”. InGestures. Meaning and Use, edited byMonica Rector, Isabella Poggi and Nadine Trigo, 119–132. Porto: Edicoes Universidade Fernando Pessoa.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 2008 “Types of Emotions and Types of Goals”. InProceedings of the Workshop AFFINE: Affective Interaction in Natural Environment, Proc. ICMI.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Poggi, Isabella, and Francesca D’Errico
    2010 “The Mental Ingredients of Bitterness”. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces3(1–2): 79–86. doi:  10.1007/s12193‑009‑0021‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-009-0021-9 [Google Scholar]
  55. Poggi, Isabella, Francesca D’Errico, and Laura Vincze
    2013 “Comments by Words, Face and Body”. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces7(1–2): 67–78. doi:  10.1007/s12193‑012‑0102‑z
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-012-0102-z [Google Scholar]
  56. Rudolph, Udo, Scott Roesch, Tobias Greitemeyer, and Bernard Weiner
    2004 “A Meta-Analytic Review of Help Giving and Aggression from an Attributional Perspective: Contributions to a General Theory of Motivation”. Cognition and Emotion18(6): 815–848. doi:  10.1080/02699930341000248
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000248 [Google Scholar]
  57. Runions, Kevin C., and Michal Bak
    2015 “Online Moral Disengagement, Cyberbullying, and Cyber-aggression”. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking18(7): 400–405. doi:  10.1089/cyber.2014.0670
     https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0670 [Google Scholar]
  58. Schreuders, Elisabeth, Eduard Klapwijk, T., Will, Greet-Jan J., and Berna Güroğlu
    2018 “Friend versus Foe: Neural Correlates of Prosocial Decisions for Liked and Disliked Peers”. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience18(1): 127–142. doi:  10.3758/s13415‑017‑0557‑1
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-017-0557-1 [Google Scholar]
  59. Shaikh, Samira, Laurie Feldman, Eliza Barach, and Yousri Marzouki
    2017 “Tweet Sentiment Analysis with Pronoun Choice Reveals Online Community Dynamics in Response to Crisis Events”. InAdvances in Cross-Cultural Decision Making, edited byMark Hoffman, 345–356. Springer, Cham. doi:  10.1007/978‑3‑319‑41636‑6_28
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41636-6_28 [Google Scholar]
  60. Sproull, Lee, and Sara Kiesler
    1986 “Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication”. Management Science32(11): 1492–1512. doi:  10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
     https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492 [Google Scholar]
  61. Stürmer, Stephan, Mark Snyder, Alexandra Kropp, and Birte Siem
    2006 “Empathy-Motivated Helping: The Moderating Role of Group Membership”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin32(7): 943–956. doi:  10.1177/0146167206287363
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206287363 [Google Scholar]
  62. van Doorn, Janne, Marcel Zeelenberg, and Seger M. Breugelmans
    2014 “Anger and Prosocial Behavior”. Emotion Review6(3): 261–268. doi:  10.1177/1754073914523794
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914523794 [Google Scholar]
  63. Van Lange, Paul A. M.
    1999 “The Pursuit of Joint Outcomes and Equality in Outcomes: An Integrative Model of Social Value Orientation”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77(2): 337–349. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.77.2.337
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.337 [Google Scholar]
  64. van’t Wout Mascha, Renè S. Kahn, Alan G. Sanfey, and Andrè Aleman
    2006 “Affective State and Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game”. Experimental Brain Research169(4): 564–568. doi:  10.1007/s00221‑006‑0346‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0346-5 [Google Scholar]
  65. Verkuyten, Maykel
    2004 “Emotional Reactions to and Support for Immigrant Policies: Attributed Responsibilities to Categories of Asylum Seekers”. Social Justice Research17(3): 293–314. doi:  10.1023/B:SORE.0000041295.83611.dc
     https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000041295.83611.dc [Google Scholar]
  66. Vitaglione, Guy D., and Mark A. Barnett
    2003 “Assessing a New Dimension of Empathy: Empathic Anger as a Predictor of Helping and Punishing Desires”. Motivation and Emotion27(4): 301–325. doi:  10.1023/A:1026231622102
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026231622102 [Google Scholar]
  67. Weiner, Bernard
    2006 Social Motivation, Justice, and the Moral Emotions: An Attributional Approach. London: Psychology Press. 10.4324/9781410615749
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615749 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00024.der
Loading
Online moral struggles in hosting immigrant’s discourses
Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7, 182 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00024.der
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00024.der
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00024.der
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): anger intensity; hosting immigrants; moral processes; online emotions; prosocial stances; social media discussions

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error