Alternative truths and delegitimization pragmatic strategies around the 2018 Italian elections

References

1. Austin, John L
   1962 How to Do Things with Words.Oxford-London: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baldi, Benedetta, and Ludovico Franco
   2015 “(De)legitimization strategies in the austere prose of Palmiro Togliatti.” QULSO1: 139–158. doi:  10.13128/QULSO‑2421‑7220‑16520
   https://doi.org/10.13128/QULSO-2421-7220-16520 [Google Scholar]
3. Baldi, Benedetta, and Leonardo M. Savoia
   2009 “Metafora e ideologia nel linguaggio politico.” Lingua italiana d’oggi6: 119–165.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann
   1966 The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Blass, Regina
   2005 “Manipulation in the Speech and Writings of Hitler and the NSDAP from a Relevance-Theoretic Viewpoint.” InManipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, edited byLouis de Saussure and Peter Schulz, 169–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.17.09bla
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17.09bla [Google Scholar]
6. Block, David
   2019 Post-truth and Political Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑00497‑2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00497-2 [Google Scholar]
7. Bourdieu, Pierre
   2001 Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Caiani, Manuela
   2011 “L’estrema destra in Italia fra passato e presente: il discorso sulla globalizzazione in Societa.” Mutamento e Politica2:133–151. doi: 10.13128/SMP‑10323
   https://doi.org/10.13128/SMP-10323 [Google Scholar]
9. Caiani, Manuela, and Donatella della Porta
   2011 “The Elitist Populism of the Extreme Right: A Frame Analysis of extreme Right Wing Discourses in Italy and Germany”. Acta Politica, 46/2: 180–202. doi:  10.1057/ap.2010.28
   https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2010.28 [Google Scholar]
10. Cap, Piotr
    2008 “Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics40:17–41. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.002 [Google Scholar]
11. Cap, Piotr
    2013 Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.232
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.232 [Google Scholar]
12. Capone, Alessandro
    2010 “Barack Obama’s South Carolina Speech”. Journal of Pragmatics42:2964–2977. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.011 [Google Scholar]
13. Chadwick, Andrew
    2013 The Hybrid Media System. Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Chilton, Paul A.
    2004 Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203561218
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218 [Google Scholar]
15. Chilton, Paul A.
    2005 “Manipulation, Memes and Metaphors”. InManipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century, edited byLouis de Saussure and Peter Schulz, 15–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.17.03chi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.17.03chi [Google Scholar]
16. Chilton, Paul A., and Mikhail Ilyin
    1993 “Metaphor in Political Discourse”. Discourse & Society4: 7–31. doi:  10.1177/0957926593004001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004001002 [Google Scholar]
17. Chomsky, Noam
    1988 Language and Problems of Knowledge: The Managua Lectures. Cambridge: Mass., MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011 Impoliteness. Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
19. Enzi, Aldo
    2012 Il lessico della violenza nella Germania nazista. Milano: Pgreco.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fairclough, Norman
    2003 Analyzing Discourse. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203697078
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078 [Google Scholar]
21. Fernbach, Philip M., Todd Rogers, Craig R. Fox, and Steven Sloman
    2013 “Political Extremism is Supported by an Illusion of Understanding.” Psychological Science24:939–946. doi:  10.1177/0956797612464058
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612464058 [Google Scholar]
22. Gainous, Jason, and Kevin M. Wagner
    2013 Tweeting to Power. The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199965076.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199965076.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Goffman, Erving
    1974 Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Habermas, Jurgen
    1984 [1981] Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA.: Beacon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hardin, Russell
    2002 “The Crippled Epistemology of Extremism.” InPolitical Extremism and Rationality, edited byAlbert Breton, Gianluigi Galeotti, Pierre Salmon, and Ronald Wintrobe, 3–22. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511550478.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550478.002 [Google Scholar]
26. Hellin Garcia, María José
    2013 “Legitimization and Delegitimization Strategies on Terrorism”. Pragmatics23:301–330. doi:  10.1075/prag.23.2.05hel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23.2.05hel [Google Scholar]
27. Inglehart, Ronald
    1977 The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Inglehart, Ronald
    2018 Cultural Evolution. People’s Motivations Are Changing and Reshaping the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108613880
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108613880 [Google Scholar]
29. Joseph, John E.
    2006 Language and Politics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 10.3366/edinburgh/9780748624522.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748624522.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
30. Kampf, Zohar
    2015 “The Politics of Being Insulted. The Uses of Hurt Feelings in Israeli Public Discourse.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict3(1):107–127. doi:  10.1075/bct.93.05kam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.93.05kam [Google Scholar]
31. Kienpointner, Manfred
    1997 “Varieties of Rudeness: Types and Functions of Impolite Utterances.” Functions of Language4(2):251–287. doi:  10.1075/fol.4.2.05kie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.4.2.05kie [Google Scholar]
32. Krifka, Manfred
    2007 “Basic Notions of Information Structure.” InInterdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure, vol.6, ISIS, Working Papers of the SFB632, edited byCaroline Féry and Manfred Krifka, University of Potsdam.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Kruglanski, Arie W., Antonio Pierro, Lucia Mannetti, and Eraldo De Grada
    2006 “Groups as Epistemic Providers: Need for Closure and the Unfolding of Group-centrism.” Psychological Review113: 84–100. doi:  10.1037/0033‑295X.113.1.84
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.1.84 [Google Scholar]
34. Labov, William
    1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lakoff, George
    1996 Moral Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Lakoff, George
    2006 Simple Framing. An Introduction to Framing and its Use in Politics. Berkeley, CA: Rockridge Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors we Live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1999 Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Lakoff, Robin Tolmach
    1990 Talking Power. The Politics of Language. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Lass, Roger
    1990 “How to Do Things with Junk: Exaptation in Language Evolution”. Journal of Linguistics26:79–102. doi:  10.1017/S0022226700014432
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700014432 [Google Scholar]
41. Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ullrich Ecker, and John Cook
    2017 “Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition6(4):353–369. doi:  10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008 [Google Scholar]
42. Lucisano, Pietro, and Maria Emanuela Piemontese
    1988 Gulpease: una formula per la predizione della difficoltà dei testi in lingua italiana. Scuola e CittàXXXIX(3):110–124.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Maillat, Didier
    2013 “Constraining Context Selection: On the Pragmatic Inevitability of Manipulation”. Journal of Pragmatics59:190–199. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.009 [Google Scholar]
44. Martín Rojo, Luisa, and Teun van Dijk
    1997 “There was a Problem, and it was Solved! Legitimating the Expulsion of ‘Illegal’ Migrants in Spanish Parliamentary Discourse.” Discourse & Society8:523–566. doi:  10.1177/0957926597008004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008004005 [Google Scholar]
45. Oddo, John
    2011 “War Legitimation Discourse: Representing ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ in Four US Presidential Addresses”. Discourse & Society22:287–314. doi:  10.1177/0957926510395442
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510395442 [Google Scholar]
46. Ondelli, Stefan
    2018 “L’identificazione del nemico: un’analisi dei tweet di Matteo Salvini dal 2011 al 2018”. Ms, Trieste.
47. Quattrociocchi, Walter, and Antonella Vicini
    2016 Misinformation. Guida alla società dell’informazione e della credulità, Milano: Franco Angeli.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Reyes, Antonio
    2009 “Discursive Strategies in Chávez’s Political Discourse”. Critical Discourse Studies5:133–152. doi:  10.1080/17405900801990074
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900801990074 [Google Scholar]
49. Reyes, Antonio
    2011 “Strategies of Legitimization in Political Discourse: From Words to Actions.” Discourse & Society22:781–807. doi:  10.1177/0957926511419927
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927 [Google Scholar]
50. Rolfe, Mark
    2016 The Reinvention of Populist Rhetoric in the Digital Age: Insiders & Outsiders in Democratic Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑2161‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2161-9 [Google Scholar]
51. Ross, Andrew, and Damian Rivers
    2017 “Digital Cultures of Political Participation: Internet Memes and the Discursive Delegitimization of the 2016 US Presidential Candidates.” Discourse, Context and Media16:1–11. doi:  10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.01.001 [Google Scholar]
52. Ruzza, Carlo, and Laura Balbo
    2013 “Italian Populism and the Trajectories of Two Leaders: Silvio Berlusconi and Umberto Bossi.” InRight-Wing Populism in Europe: Politics and Discourse, edited byRuth Wodak, Majid Khosravinik, and Brigitte Mral, 163–176. UK: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Rydgren, Jens
    2008 “Immigration Sceptics, Xenophobes or Racists? Radical Right-wing Voting in Six West European Countries”. European Journal of Political Research47:737–765. doi:  10.1111/j.1475‑6765.2008.00784.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00784.x [Google Scholar]
54. Saussure Louis, de
    2008 “Procedural Pragmatics and the Study of Discourse.” Pragmatics and Cognition15:139–160. doi:  10.1075/pc.15.1.10sau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.10sau [Google Scholar]
55. Searle, John R.
    1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
56. Silverstein, Michael
    2003 Talking Politics: The Substance of Style from Abe to “W.”. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Snow, David A., R. Burke Rochford, Jr., Steven K. Worden, and Robert D. Benford
    1986 “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review51: 464–481. doi:  10.2307/2095581
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2095581 [Google Scholar]
58. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    1986 Relevance, Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Swami, Viren
    2012 “Social Psychological Origins of Conspiracy Theories: The Case of the Jewish Conspiracy Theory in Malaysia.” Frontiers in Psychology3: 1–9. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280 [Google Scholar]
60. Tandoc, Edson C. Jr., Zheng Wei Lim, and Richard Ling
    2018 “Defining ‘Fake News’.” Digital Journalism6(2):137–153. doi:  10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 [Google Scholar]
61. Vaara, Eero
    2014 “Struggles over Legitimacy in the Eurozone Crisis: Discursive Legitimation Strategies and their Ideological Underpinnings.” Discourse & Society25:500–518. doi:  10.1177/0957926514536962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536962 [Google Scholar]
62. van Dijk, Teun
    1998 Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Study. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
63. van Dijk, Teun
    2005 “War Rhetoric of a Little Ally: Political Implicatures and Aznar’s Legitimatization of the War in Iraq.” Journal of Language and Politics4: 65–92. doi:  10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.1.04dij [Google Scholar]
64. van Leeuwen, Theo, and Ruth Wodak
    1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies1:83–118. doi:  10.1177/1461445699001001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001001005 [Google Scholar]
65. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2007 “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse and Communication1:91–112. doi:  10.1177/1750481307071986
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
66. van Prooijen, Jan Willem, Andre Krouwel, and Thomas Pollett
    2015 “Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories.” Social Psychological and Personality Science6(5):570–578. doi:  10.1177/1948550614567356
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614567356 [Google Scholar]
67. Wright, Thomas L., and Jack Arbuthnot
    1974 “Interpersonal Trust, Political Preference, and Perceptions of the Watergate Affair.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin1:168–170. doi:  10.1177/014616727400100158
    https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727400100158 [Google Scholar]
68. Wodak, Ruth
    2011 The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Wodak, Ruth
    2015 The Politics of Fear. What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446270073
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446270073 [Google Scholar]