1887
image of Managing conflict originated by feminism
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN 2213-1280
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze how conflict begins, unfolds and ends in a WhatsApp interaction within a Spanish family on 2018’s International Women’s Day. The analytical framework proposed by is applied to a conversation that began at 10:37 am on March 8 and ended at 1:47 am on March 9. Multimodal analysis is used to consider not only participants’ linguistic strategies for expressing their opinions about feminism, but also the function of multimedia elements and emojis. The results show that conflict is constructed across multiple turns when some participants’ pro-feminist views are seen negatively by others. Thus, feminism emerges as a source of conflict among the family members. Another important issue drawn from the findings is the key role played by multimodal elements which have different functions related to how conflict is created and unfolds, such as being the origin of conflict itself, showing disapproval with others’ opinions, intensifying opinions to show emotion or trying to reduce face-threat.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00032.fer
2019-12-17
2020-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahad, Annie Dayani, and Syamimi Md Ariff Lim
    2014 “Convenience or Nuisance?: The ‘WhatsApp’ Dilemma.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences155: 189–196. doi:  10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.278
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.278 [Google Scholar]
  2. Androutsopoulos, Jannis
    2006 “Introduction: Sociolinguistics and Computer-Mediated Communication.” Journal of Sociolinguistics10(4): 419–438. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑9841.2006.00286.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2006.00286.x [Google Scholar]
  3. 2011 “From Variation to Heteroglossia in the Study of Computer-Mediated Discourse.” InDigital Discourse: Language in the Media, edited byCrispin Thurlow and Kristine Mroczek, 277–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0013
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0013 [Google Scholar]
  4. Andújar-Vaca, Alberto, and María Soledad. Cruz-Martínez
    2017 “Mobile Instant Messaging: Whatsapp and Its Potential to Develop Oral Skills.” Comunicar25(50): 43–52. doi:  10.3916/C50‑2017‑04
    https://doi.org/10.3916/C50-2017-04 [Google Scholar]
  5. Angouri, Jo, and Theodora Tseliga
    2010 “‘You Have No Idea What You are Talking About!’ From E-disagreement to E-impoliteness in Two Online Fora.” Journal of Politeness Research6: 57–82. 10.1515/jplr.2010.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.004 [Google Scholar]
  6. Aull, Bethany
    2019 “A Study of Phatic Emoji Use in WhatsApp Communication.” Internet Pragmatics. doi:  10.1075/ip.00029.aul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00029.aul [Google Scholar]
  7. Barhoumi, Chokri
    2015 “The Effectiveness of WhatsApp Mobile Learning Activities Guided by Activity Theory on Students’ Knowledge Management.” Contemporary Educational Technology6(3): 221–238.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baron, Naomi S.
    2008Always on: Language in an Online and Mobile World. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313055.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195313055.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bonito, Joshep, and Raymond Sanders
    2002 “Speakers’ Footing in a Collaborative Writing Task: A Resource for Addressing Disagreement While Avoiding Conflict.” Research on Language and Social Interaction35: 481–514. doi:  10.1207/S15327973RLSI3504_4
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3504_4 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2014 “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics73: 19–36. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  11. (eds) 2019Analyzing Digital Discourse: New Insights and Future Directions. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑92663‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2012 “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-Based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(4): 501–521. doi:  10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2012.01579.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01579.x [Google Scholar]
  13. Bouhnik, Dan, and Mor Deshen
    2014 “WhatsApp Goes to School: Mobile Instant Messaging between Teachers and Students.” Journal of Information Technology Education: Research13: 217–231. doi:  10.28945/2051
    https://doi.org/10.28945/2051 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bourlai, Elli, and Susan C. Herring
    2014 “Multimodal Communication on Tumblr: ‘I Have So Many Feels!’” InProceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Web Science: 171–175.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bousfield, Derek
    2007 “Beginnings, Middles and Ends: A Biopsy of the Dynamics of Impolite Exchanges.” Journal of Pragmatics39(12): 2185–2216. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2008Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.167
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167 [Google Scholar]
  17. Boxer, Diana, and Florencia Cortés-Conde
    1997 “From Bonding to Biting: Conversational Joking and Identity Display.” Journal of Pragmatics27 (3): 275–294. doi:  10.1016/S0378‑2166(96)00031‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00031-8 [Google Scholar]
  18. Boxer, Diana, and María Elena Placencia
    2018 “Introduction: Closeness and Conflict.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict6(2): 167–176. doi:  10.1075/jlac.00008.int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00008.int [Google Scholar]
  19. Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
    2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Socio-Cultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies7(4/5): 585–614. doi:  10.1177/1461445605054407
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
  20. Calero Vaquera, María Luisa
    2014 “El discurso del WhatsApp: Entre el Messenger y el SMS.” Oralia17: 85–114.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chairunnisa, Sabrina, and A. S. Benedictus
    2017 “Analysis of Emoji and Emoticon Usage in Interpersonal Communication of Blackberry Messenger and Whatsapp Application User.” International Journal of Social Sciences and Management4(2): 120–126. 10.3126/ijssm.v4i2.17173
    https://doi.org/10.3126/ijssm.v4i2.17173 [Google Scholar]
  22. Church, Karen, and Rodrigo de Oliveira
    2013 “What’s up with Whatsapp?: Comparing Mobile Instant Messaging Behaviors with Traditional SMS.” Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services: 352–361.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Crystal, David
    2006Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511487002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.” Journal of Politeness Research1: 35–72. doi:  10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2011Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  26. Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann
    2003 “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics35(10/11): 1545–1579. doi:  10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00118‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2 [Google Scholar]
  27. De Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin, and Michael Bamberg
    (eds) 2006Discourse and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511584459
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511584459 [Google Scholar]
  28. Derks, Daantje, Arjan Er Bos, and Jasper Von Grumbkow
    2008 “Emoticons and Online Message Interpretation.” Social Science Computer Review26(3): 379–388. doi:  10.1177/0894439307311611
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307311611 [Google Scholar]
  29. Dobs, Abby, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2013 “Impoliteness in Interaction: Accounting for Face-threat Witness’s Responses.” Journal of Pragmatics53: 112–130. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  30. Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring
    2010 “Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force.” Communication Theory20(3): 249–268. doi:  10.1111/j.1468‑2885.2010.01362.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01362.x [Google Scholar]
  31. 2014 “Emoticons and Illocutionary Force”. InPerspectives on Theory of Controversies and the Ethics of Communication, edited byDana Riesenfeld and Giovanni Scarafile, 81–90. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑007‑7131‑4_8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7131-4_8 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ersöz, Selva
    2019 “Understanding Whatsapp Parent Groups’ Dynamics: Group Communication and Information Sharing.” Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi8(1): 1167–1183. 10.33206/mjss.464275
    https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.464275 [Google Scholar]
  33. Flores-Salgado, Elizabeth, and Teresa A. Castineira-Benitez
    2018 “The Use of Politeness in WhatsApp Discourse and Move ‘Requests’.” Journal of Pragmatics133: 79–92. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.009 [Google Scholar]
  34. Fundación Telefónica
  35. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2009 “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: the ‘Culture Wars’”. Journal of Politeness Research5(2): 273–304. doi:  10.1515/JPLR.2009.014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2009.014 [Google Scholar]
  36. 2018 “Globalization, Transnational Identities, and Conflict Talk: The Superdiversity and Complexity of the Latino Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics134: 120–133. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  37. García-Gómez, Antonio
    2007Habla conflictiva como acción social. Oviedo: Septem Ediciones.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. 2009La conversacionalización del discurso mediático en la televisión británica. Ideología, poder y cambio social. Oviedo: Septem Ediciones.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. 2011 “Regulating Girlhood: Evaluative Language, Discourses of Gender Socialization and Relational Aggression.” European Journal of Women’s Studies18(3): 243–264. doi:  10.1177/1350506811405817
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506811405817 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2018 “Managing Conflict on WhatsApp: A Contrastive Study of British and Spanish Family Disputes.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict6(2): 318–340. doi:  10.1075/jlac.00015.gar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00015.gar [Google Scholar]
  41. Graham, Sage
    2003 “Cooperation, Conflict and Community in Computer-Mediated Communication.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Washington, DC, Georgetown University. UMI number 3114024.
  42. 2005 “A Cyber-Parish: Gendered Identity Construction in an On-Line Episcopal Community.” InGender and the Language of Religion, edited byAllyson Jule, 133–150. New York: Palgrave. 10.1057/9780230523494_8
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523494_8 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2007 “Disagreeing to Agree: Conflict, (Im)politeness and Identity in a Computer-mediated Community.” Journal of Pragmatics39: 742–759. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.017 [Google Scholar]
  44. Grimshaw, Allen D.
    (ed) 1990Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Herring, Susan C.
    2015 “New Frontiers in Interactive Multimodal Communication.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, edited byAlexandra Georgakopoulou and Tereza Spilioti, 398–402. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Hobman, Elizabeth V., Prashant Bordia, Bernd Irmer, and Artemis Chang
    2002 “The Expression of Conflict in Computer-Mediated and Face-To-Face Groups.” Small Group Research33(4): 439–465. doi:  10.1177/104649640203300403
    https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640203300403 [Google Scholar]
  47. Hutchby, Ian
    2001 “‘Oh’, Irony and Sequential Ambiguity in Arguments.” Discourse & Society12: 123–141. doi:  10.1177/0957926501012002001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012002001 [Google Scholar]
  48. Jewitt, Carey
    2013 “Multimodal Methods for Researching Digital Technologies.” InThe Sage Handbook of Digital Technology Research, edited bySara Price, Carey Jewitt and Barry Brown, 250–265. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446282229.n18
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282229.n18 [Google Scholar]
  49. Johnston, Maximilian, Dominic King, Sonal Arora, Nebil Behar, Thanos Athanasiou, Nick Sevdalis, and Ara Darzi
    2015 “Smartphones Let Surgeons Know Whatsapp: An Analysis of Communication in Emergency Surgical Teams.” The American Journal of Surgery209(1): 45–51. doi:  10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.030
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.08.030 [Google Scholar]
  50. Jones, Rodney H., and Christoph A. Hafner
    2012Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203095317
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095317 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kamel Boulos, Maged, Dean Giustini, and Steve Wheeler
    2016 “Instagram and WhatsApp in Health and Healthcare: An Overview.” Future Internet8(3): 37. doi:  10.3390/fi8030037
    https://doi.org/10.3390/fi8030037 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lange, Patricia
    2007 “Commenting on Comments: Investigating Responses to Antagonism on YouTube.” Paper presented at theSociety for Applied Anthropology Conference, Tampa, Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Leung, Alicia
    2008 “Interpersonal Conflict and Resolution Strategies: An Examination of Hong Kong Employees.” Team Performance Management: An International Journal14(3–4): 165–178. doi:  10.1108/13527590810883433
    https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590810883433 [Google Scholar]
  54. Maíz Arévalo, Carmen
    2018 “Emotional Self-Presentation on Whatsapp: Analysis of the Profile Status.” Russian Journal of Linguistics22(1): 144–160. doi:  10.22363/2312‑9182‑2018‑22‑1‑144‑160
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-1-144-160 [Google Scholar]
  55. O’Hara, Kenton, Michael Massimi, Richard Harper, Simon Rubens, and Jessica Morris
    2014 “Everyday Dwelling with WhatsApp.” Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 1131–1143.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Pagliai, Valentina
    2010 “Introduction: Performing Disputes.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology20(1): 63–71. doi:  10.1111/j.1548‑1395.2010.01048.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01048.x [Google Scholar]
  57. Pérez-Sabater, Carmen
    2013 “The Linguistics of Social Networking: A Study of Writing Conventions on Facebook.” Linguistik online56(6): 81–93. doi:  10.13092/lo.56.257
    https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.56.257 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2015 “Discovering Language Variation in Whatsapp Text Interactions.” Onomázein: Revista semestral de lingüística, filología y traducción31(1): 113–126. doi:  10.7764/onomazein.31.8
    https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.31.8 [Google Scholar]
  59. Petitjean, Cécile, and Etienne Morel
    2017 “‘Hahaha’: Laughter as a Resource to Manage WhatsApp Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics110: 1–19. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  60. Provine, Robert R., Robert J. Spencer, and Darcy L. Mandel
    2007 “Emotional Expression Online: Emoticons Punctuate Website Text Messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology26(3): 299–307. doi:  10.1177/0261927X06303481
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X06303481 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sampietro, Agnese
    2016a “Emoticonos y multimodalidad. El uso del pulgar hacia arriba en WhatsApp.” Aposta. Revista de ciencias sociales69: 271–295.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. 2016b “Exploring the Punctuating Effect of Emoji in Spanish Whatsapp Chats.” Lenguas modernas47: 91–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Sánchez-Moya, Alfonso, and Olga Cruz-Moya
    2015a “Whatsapp, Textese, and Moral Panics: Discourse Features and Habits across Two Generations.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences173: 300–306. doi:  10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.069
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.069 [Google Scholar]
  64. 2015b “‘Hey There! I Am Using Whatsapp’: A Preliminary Study of Recurrent Discursive Realisations in A Corpus of Whatsapp Statuses.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences212: 52–60. doi:  10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.298
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.298 [Google Scholar]
  65. Vuchinich, Samuel
    1990 “The Sequential Organization of Closing in Verbal Family Conflict.” InConflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversation, edited byAllen D. Grimshaw, 118–138. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Yus, Francisco
    2005 “Attitudes and Emotions through Written Text: The Case of Textual Deformation in Internet Chat Rooms.” Pragmalingüística13: 147–174.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. 2011Cyberpragmatics. Internet-mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/pbns.213
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213 [Google Scholar]
  68. 2014 “Not all Emoticons are Created Equal”. Linguagem em (Dis)curso14(3): 511–529. doi:  10.1590/1982‑4017‑140304‑0414
    https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4017-140304-0414 [Google Scholar]
  69. 2017 “Contextual Constraints and Non-Propositional Effects in Whatsapp Communication.” Journal of Pragmatics114: 66–86. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2017.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.04.003 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00032.fer
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00032.fer
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: feminism; family interaction; conflict talk; digital discourse; WhatsApp
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error