The pen is mightier than the sword

References

1. 1.   Malala Yousafzai: Speech at the United Nations Youth Assembly (12.72013) [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jul/12/malala-yousafzai-united-nations-education-speech-text; last seen onJanuary 8, 2020; my own text is based on the transcription of the British newspaper The Guardian, which has been modified and corrected according to the video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRh_30C8l6Y; length of the video (within the ABC News Special Report): 19:35; length of Malala Yousafzai’s speech: 00:40 – 17:36, that is, 17 minutes; last seen onJanuary 8, 2020)]
2. Yousafzai, Malala and Lamb, Christina
   2.   Yousafzai, Malala and Lamb, Christina (2013): Ich bin Malala. München: Droemer (Engl. Original: M. Yousafzai and Chr. Lamb (2013): I am Malala. New York: Little, Brown and Company).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Yousafzai, Malala and McCormick, Patricia
   3.   Yousafzai, Malala and McCormick, Patricia (2014): I am Malala. Teen Edition Retold by Malala for Her Own Generation. London: Indigo.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Yousafzai, Malala
   4.   Yousafzai, Malala (2017): Malala’s Magic Pencil. London: Puffin Books, Penguin/Random House.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Aristotle
   Aristotle 2006 On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Das, Runa
   2017 “He Named Me Malala: Connecting the Historical, the Local, and the Global.” Social Identities. Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture. 23(2): 195–211. 10.1080/13504630.2016.1186534
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2016.1186534 [Google Scholar]
7. Eemeren, Frans H. van
   2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.2
   https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.2 [Google Scholar]
8. Eemeren, Frans H. van
   2018 Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑95381‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6 [Google Scholar]
9. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels
   2009 Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑2614‑9
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9 [Google Scholar]
10. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij, and Jean H. M. Wagemans
    2014 Handbook of Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst
    1984 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht: Foris. 10.1515/9783110846089
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110846089 [Google Scholar]
12. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst
    1992 Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst
    2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: SicSat.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Peter Houtlosser
    2002 “Strategic Manoeuvring with the Burden of Proof.” InAdvances in Pragma-Dialectics, edited byFrans H. van Eemeren, 13–28. Amsterdam: SicSat.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Peter Houtlosser
    2006 “Strategic Manoeuvring with the Burden of Proof.” Argumentation20(4): 381–392.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Peter Houtlosser, and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
    2007 Argumentative Indicators in Discourse. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑6244‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5 [Google Scholar]
17. Fahnestock, Jean
    2009 “Quid pro nobis. Rhetorical Stylistics for Argument Analysis.” InExamining Argumentation in Context, edited byFrans H. van Eemeren, 191-220. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.1.12fah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.1.12fah [Google Scholar]
18. Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough
    2012 Political Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Garssen, Bart
    1997 Argumentatieschema’s in pragma-dialectisch perspectief. Amsterdam: IFOTT.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gilligan, Carol
    1985 Die andere Stimme. München: Piper.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Habermas, Jürgen
    1981 Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Vol.1. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
    1997 “A Multilevel Approach in the Study of Talk in Interaction.” Pragmatics7(1): 1–20. 10.1075/prag.7.1.01ker
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.7.1.01ker [Google Scholar]
23. Kienpointner, Manfred
    1986 “Topische Sequenzen in argumentativen Dialogen.” Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik14(3): 321–355. 10.1515/zfgl.1986.14.3.321
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zfgl.1986.14.3.321 [Google Scholar]
24. Kienpointner, Manfred
    1992 Alltagslogik. Stuttgart: Frommann/Holzboog.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kienpointner, Manfred
    2013 “Strategic Maneuveringg in the Political Rhetoric of Barack Obama.” Journal of Language and Politics12(3): 357–377. 10.1075/jlp.12.3.03kie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.3.03kie [Google Scholar]
26. Kienpointner, Manfred
    2017 “Reason and Passion in Political Rhetoric: The Case of Louise Michel’s (1830–1905) Revolutionary Discourse.” InArgumentation across Communities of Practice: Multi-disciplinary Perspectives, edited byCornelia Ilie and Giuliana Garzone, 99–125. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/aic.10.06kie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.10.06kie [Google Scholar]
27. Kienpointner, Manfred, and Anna Orlandini
    2005 “La doxa de la justice à travers les langues et les époques.” Revue Internationale des droits de l’antiquité52: 181–206.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kienpointner, Manfred, and Maria Stopfner
    2017 “Ideologies and (Im)politeness.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited byCulpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 61–87. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_4 [Google Scholar]
29. Kohlberg, Lawrence
    1974 Zur kognitiven Entwicklung des Kindes. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Khoja-Moolji, Shenila
    2018 “Why is Malala such a Polarising Figure in Pakistan.” April1 2018 https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/malala-polarising-figure-pakistan-180401054631496.html
31. Lakoff, George
    2006 Whose Freedom? The Battle over America’s Most Important Idea. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Larivée, Serge, Carole Sénéchal and Geneviève Chénard
    2013 “Les côtés ténébreux de Mère Teresa.” Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses42(3): 319–345. 10.1177/0008429812469894
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0008429812469894 [Google Scholar]
33. Mazza, Viviana
    2013 Die Geschichte von Malala. München: dtv.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Montefiore, Simon Sebag
    2015 Speeches that Changed the World. London: Quercus.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Olesen, Thomas
    2016 “Malala and the Politics of Global Iconicity.” The British Journal of Sociology67(2): 307–327. 10.1111/1468‑4446.12195
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12195 [Google Scholar]
36. Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
    1983 Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Piaget, Jean, and Bärbel Inhelder
    1980 Die Psychologie des Kindes. Stuttgart: Klett.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Walton, Douglas N., Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
    2008 Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511802034
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034 [Google Scholar]