1887
image of Liquid racism in the Greek anti-racist campaign #StopMindBorders
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines the opaque reproduction of racism in an online, anti-racist campaign officially aiming to denounce hate speech and challenge widespread stereotypes concerning migrants. In particular, we investigate the video clips of the campaign launched by the Greek branch of the International Organization for Migration. We specifically concentrate on the attested in these video clips, namely a highly ambivalent form of racism encouraged in the mass media and usually hard to detect, as it involves multiple interpretations, some of which may not be assessed as racist ( ). The multimodal critical analysis of the representation of migrants reveals that these video clips tacitly promote migrants’ linguocultural assimilation as a prerequisite for their acceptance in the host country. In this sense, although the anti-racist campaign under scrutiny attempts to refute discourses of aggression and mainstream stereotypes against migrants, it ends up naturalizing hate speech and reproducing assimilative and monoculturalist ideologies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00036.tsa
2020-05-12
2020-09-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archakis, Argiris
    2018 “The Representations of Racism in Immigrant Students’ Essays in Greece: The ‘Hybrid Balance’ between Legitimizing and Resistance Identities.” Pragmatics28(1): 1–28. 10.1075/prag.16016.arc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.16016.arc [Google Scholar]
  2. Archakis, Argiris, Sofia Lampropoulou, and Villy Tsakona
    2018 “‘I’m Not Racist but I Expect Linguistic Assimilation’: The Concealing Power of Humor in an Anti-racist Campaign.” Discourse, Context and Media23: 53–61. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baider, Fabienne H.
    2017 “Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: Analyzing the Adaptation of Mainstream Supremacist Concepts to a Local Socio-historical Context (ELAM in Cyprus).” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict5(2): 178–204. 10.1075/jlac.5.2.02bai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.2.02bai [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michał Krzyżanowski, Tony Mc Enery, and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society19(3): 273–306. 10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bednarek, Monika
    2011 “The Stability of the Televisual Character: A Corpus Stylistic Case Study.” InTelecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series, edited byRoberta Piazza, Monika Bednarek, and Fabio Rossi, 185–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.211.13bed
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.211.13bed [Google Scholar]
  6. Billig, Michael
    1995Banal Nationalism. Los Angeles: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blackledge, Adrian
    2005Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.15 [Google Scholar]
  8. Blommaert, Jan
    2015 “Commentary: Superdiversity Old and New.” Language and Communication44: 82–88. 10.1016/j.langcom.2015.01.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blommaert, Jan, and Jef Verschueren
    1998Debating Diversity: Analyzing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Buonanno, Milly
    2008The Age of Television: Experiences and Theories. Bristol: Intellect.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cohen, Jonathan
    1999 “Favorite Characters of Teenage Viewers of Israeli Serials.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media43(3): 327–345. 10.1080/08838159909364495
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159909364495 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cooke, Melanie, and James Simpson
    2012 “Discourses about Linguistic Diversity.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Multilingualism, edited byMarilyn Martin-Jones, Adrian Blackledge, and Angela Creese, 116–130. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Esdras on the IOM Campaign against Racism in A. Bousdoukou (SKAI 13/7/2017)
    D. Esdras on the IOM Campaign against Racism in A. Bousdoukou (SKAI 13/7/2017) 2017https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K0M7Q7tteg
  14. Fairclough, Νorman
    1989Language and Power. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
    1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” InIntroduction to Discourse Studies, edited byTeun A. van Dijk, 258–284. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gogonas, Nikos, and Claudine Kirsch
    2018 “‘In this Country my Children are Learning two of the most Important Languages in Europe’: Ideologies of Language as a Commodity among Greek Migrant Families in Luxembourg.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism21(4): 426–438. 10.1080/13670050.2016.1181602
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1181602 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hart, Christopher
    2010Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230299009
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009 [Google Scholar]
  18. Irvine, Judith T., and Susan Gal
    2000 “Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation.” InRegimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, edited byPaul V. Kroskrity, 35–84. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KhosraviNik, Majid, Michał Krzyzanowski, and Ruth Wodak
    2012 “Dynamics of Discursive Representations of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the British Press 1996–2006.” InMigrations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited byMichi Messer, Renée Schroeder, and Ruth Wodak, 283–295. Vienna: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑7091‑0950‑2_26
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0950-2_26 [Google Scholar]
  20. Kirkwood, Steve
    2017 “The Humanization of Refugees: A Discourse Analysis of UK Parliamentary Debates on the European Refugee ‘Crisis’.” Journal of Community and Social Psychology27(2): 115–125. 10.1002/casp.2298
    https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2298 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kopytowska, Monika
    2017 “Introduction: Discourses of Hate and Radicalism in Action.” InContemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism across Spaces and Genres, edited byMonika Kopytowska, 1–12. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.93.001ed
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.93.001ed [Google Scholar]
  22. Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr
    2012How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2013 “Personalizing Crime and Crime-fighting in Factual Television: An Analysis of Social Actors and Transitivity in Language and Images.” Critical Discourse Studies10(4): 356–372. 10.1080/17405904.2013.813771
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813771 [Google Scholar]
  24. May, Stephen
    2017 “National and Ethnic Minorities: Language Rights and Recognition.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Migration and Language, edited bySuresh Canagarajah, 149–167. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315754512‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315754512-9 [Google Scholar]
  25. Moore, Kerry, Paul Mason, and Justin Lewis
    2008 “Images of Islam in the UK: The Representation of British Muslims in the National Print News Media 2000–2008.” Cardiff: Cardiff University. orca.cf.ac.uk/53005/1/08channel4-dispatches.pdf
  26. O’Brien, Gerald V.
    2003 “Indigestible Food, Conquering Hordes, and Waste Materials: Metaphors of Immigrants and the Early Immigration Restriction Debate in the United States.” Metaphor and Symbol18(1): 33–47. 10.1207/S15327868MS1801_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1801_3 [Google Scholar]
  27. Paulston, Christina Bratt
    1980Bilingual Education: Theories and Issues. Massachusetts: Newbury House.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Petrovic, Jelena
    2017 “Conditional Support for Territorial Migrations in Serbian National Discourse.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict5(2): 205–226. 10.1075/jlac.5.2.03pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.2.03pet [Google Scholar]
  29. Piazza, Roberta, Monika Bednarek, and Fabio Rossi
    (eds) 2011Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.211
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.211 [Google Scholar]
  30. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetoric of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak
    2009 “The Impact of Visual Racism: Visual Arguments in Political Leaflets of Austrian and British Far-right Parties.” Controversia6(2): 45–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Santa Ana, Otto
    1999 “‘Like an Animal I was Treated’: Anti-immigrant Metaphor in US Public Discourse.” Discourse and Society10(2): 191–224. 10.1177/0957926599010002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002004 [Google Scholar]
  33. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1991Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 1992 “Discourse and the Denial of Racism.” Discourse and Society3(1): 87–118. 10.1177/0957926592003001005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003001005 [Google Scholar]
  35. 1995 “Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Japanese Discourse1(1): 17–27.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 2008Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑07299‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07299-3 [Google Scholar]
  37. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Weaver, Simon
    2011 “Liquid Racism and the Ambiguity of Ali G.” European Journal of Cultural Studies14(3): 249–264. 10.1177/1367549410396004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410396004 [Google Scholar]
  39. 2016The Rhetoric of Racist Humor: US, UK and Global Race Joking. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315553504
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315553504 [Google Scholar]
  40. Wodak, Ruth
    2001 “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited byRuth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 63–94. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Wolfson, Nicholas
    1997Hate Speech, Sex Speech, Free Speech. London: Praeger.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00036.tsa
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00036.tsa
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error