1887
image of Feminist activism on Twitter
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The emergence of digital platforms has allowed feminists to employ new methods to fight gender inequality and break the silence which surrounds gender-based aggression. This paper aims to examine evaluative discourses employed by Twitter users to construct and denounce sexual violence in a corpus of tweets containing the hashtag #WhyIDidntReport. This hashtag was created in 2018 as a response to Donald Trump’s tweets in which he questioned Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s decision not to report her case of sexual assault when it occurred. As a result, victim-survivors adopted the hashtag to explain why they did not report their own cases. The present study adopts a corpus-assisted discourse analysis approach and draws on Appraisal Theory to examine ideological discourses of (sexually) violent acts and victim-survivors. Results show the presence of discourses of violence and emotional suffering employed to bond around shared experiences and publicly denounce oppressive patriarchal practices and a lack of support from institutions and authorities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00049.pal
2020-12-03
2021-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aloy Mayo, María, and Maire Taboada
    2017 “Evaluation in Political Discourse Addressed to Women: Appraisal Analysis of Cosmopolitan’s Online Coverage of the 2014 Us Midterm Elections.” Discourse, Context & Media18: 40–48. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Kristin L., and Jill Cermele
    2014 “Public/Private Language Aggression against Women: Tweeting Rage and Intimate Partner Violence.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict2 (2): 274–293. 10.1075/jlac.2.2.05and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.2.05and [Google Scholar]
  3. Anthony, Laurence
    . AntConc (Version 3.5.7). Tokyo: Waseda University 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul
    2010Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid Khosravinik, Michal Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society19 (3): 273–306. 10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery
    2015 “Who Benefits When Discourse Gets Democratised? Analysing a Twitter Corpus around the British Benefits Street Debate.” InCorpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora, ed. byPaul Baker, and Tony McEnery, 244–265. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/9781137431738_12
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738_12 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barker-Plummer, Bernadette, and David Barker-Plummer
    2017 “Twitter as a Feminist Resource: #YesAllWomen, Digital Platforms, and Discursive Social Change.” InSocial Movements and Media, ed. byJennifer Earl, and Deana A. Rholinger, 91–118. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. 10.1108/S2050‑206020170000014010
    https://doi.org/10.1108/S2050-206020170000014010 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bednarek, Monica, and Helen Caple
    2014 “Why do News Values Matter? Towards a New Methodological Framework for Analysing News Discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and Beyond.” Discourse & Society25 (2): 135–158. 10.1177/0957926513516041
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513516041 [Google Scholar]
  9. Blevins, Katie
    2018 “bell hooks and Consciousness-Raising: Argument for a Fourth Wave of Feminism.” InMediating Misogyny: Gender, Technology, and Harassment, ed. byJacqueline Ryan Vickery, and Tracy Everbach, 91–108. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillian. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑72917‑6_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72917-6_5 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bou-Franch, Patricia
    2013 “Domestic Violence and Public Participation in the Media: The Case of Citizen Journalism.” Gender and Language7 (3): 275–302. 10.1558/genl.v7i3.275
    https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v7i3.275 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2014 “Gender Ideology and Social Identity Processes in Online Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict2 (2): 226–248. 10.1075/jlac.2.2.03bou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.2.03bou [Google Scholar]
  12. Boyle, Karen
    2019#MeToo, Weinstein and Feminism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑28243‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28243-1 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chiluwa, Innocent, and Presley Ifukor
    2015 “‘War against our Children’: Stance and Evaluation in #Bringbackourgirls Campaign Discourse on Twitter and Facebook.” Discourse & Society26 (3), 267–296. 10.1177/0957926514564735
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564735 [Google Scholar]
  14. Clark-Parsons, Rosemary
    2019 “‘I SEE YOU, I BELIEVE YOU, I STAND WITH YOU’: #Metoo and the Performance of Networked Feminist Visibility.” Feminist Media Studies. doi:  10.1080/14680777.2019.1628797
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1628797 [Google Scholar]
  15. Darics, Erika, and Veronika Koller
    2019 “Social Actors ‘to Go’: An Analytical Toolkit to Explore Agency in Business Discourse and Communication.” Business and Professional Communication Quarterly82 (2): 214–238. 10.1177/2329490619828367
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490619828367 [Google Scholar]
  16. De Cock, Barbara, and Andrea Pizarro Pedraza
    2018 “From Expressing Solidarity to Mocking on Twitter: Pragmatic Functions of Hashtags Starting with #Jesuis across Languages.” Language in Society47: 197–217. 10.1017/S0047404518000052
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518000052 [Google Scholar]
  17. Dibbell, Julian
    1993 “A Rape in Cyberspace, or How an Evil Clown, a Haitian Trickster Spirit, Two Wizards, and a Cast of Dozens Turned a Database into a Society.” Village Voice23: 36–42.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Dunn, Jennifer L.
    2005 “‘Victims’ and ‘Survivors’: Emerging Vocabularies of Motive for ‘Battered Women Who Stay’.” Sociological Inquiry75: 1–30. 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.2005.00110.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2005.00110.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Formato, Federica
    2014 “Language Use and Gender in the Italian Parliament.” Ph.D. Diss., Lancaster University. www.research.lancs.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/language-use-and-gender-in-the-italian-parliament(12ab6d96-d35e-4062-9628-35036d8fadad).html
  20. Hall, Kira
    1996 “Cyberfeminism.” InComputer-mediated Communication, ed. bySusan C. Herring, 147–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.39.12hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.39.12hal [Google Scholar]
  21. Hardaker, Claire, and Mark McGlashan
    2016 “‘Real Men don’t Hate Women’: Twitter Rape Threats and Group Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics91: 80–93. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  22. Herring, Susan C.
    1999 “The Rhetorical Dynamics of Gender Harassment On-Line.” The Information Society15: 151–167. 10.1080/019722499128466
    https://doi.org/10.1080/019722499128466 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoffman, Christian R.
    2018 “Crooked Hillary and Dumb Trump: The Strategic Use and Effect of Negative Evaluations in US Election Campaign Tweets.” Internet Pragmatics1 (1): 55–87. 10.1075/ip.00004.hof
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00004.hof [Google Scholar]
  24. Hunt, Sally
    2015 “Representations of Gender and Agency in the Harry Potter Series.” InCorpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora, ed. byPaul Baker, and Tony McEnery, 266–284. London: Palgrave. 10.1057/9781137431738_13
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738_13 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ison, Jessica
    2019 “‘It’s not Just Men and Women’: LGBTQIA People and #MeToo.” In#MeToo and the Politics of Social Change, ed. byBianca Flieborn, and Rachel Loney-Howes, 151–167. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑15213‑0_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15213-0_10 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jackson, Sarah J., and Sonia Banaszczyk
    2016 “Digital Standpoints: Debating Gendered Violence and Racial Exclusions in the Feminist Counterpublic.” Journal of Communication Inquiry40 (4): 391–407. 10.1177/0196859916667731
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859916667731 [Google Scholar]
  27. Jaki, Sylvia, Tom De Smedt, Maja Gwóźdź, Rudresh Panchal, Alexander Rossa, and Guy De Pauw
    2019 “Online Hatred of Women in the Incels.me Forum: Linguistic Analysis and Automatic Detection.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict7 (2): 240–268. 10.1075/jlac.00026.jak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00026.jak [Google Scholar]
  28. Jane, Emma A.
    2017 “Feminist Digilante Responses to a Slut-shaming on Facebook.” Social Media + Society. doi:  10.1177/2056305117705996
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117705996 [Google Scholar]
  29. Keller, Jessalynn, Kaitlynn Mendes, and Jessica Ringrose
    2018 “Speaking ‘unspeakable things:’ Documenting Digital Feminist Responses to Rape Culture.” Journal of Gender Studies27 (1): 22–36. 10.1080/09589236.2016.1211511
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2016.1211511 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kirkup, Gill, and Laurie Smith Keller
    1992Inventing Women: Science, Technology and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kreis, Ramona
    2017 “#refugeesnotwelcome: Anti-Refugee Discourse on Twitter.” Discourse & Communication11 (5): 498–514. 10.1177/1750481317714121
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317714121 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kumar, Ritesh
    2020 “#shutdownjnu vs #standwithjnu: A Study of Aggression and Conflict in Political Debates on Social Media in India.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict8 (1): 29–56. 10.1075/jlac.00028.kum
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00028.kum [Google Scholar]
  33. Lazar, Michelle
    (ed.) 2005Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230599901
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lazar, Michelle M.
    2018 “Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. byJohn Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 372–387. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Loney-Howes, Rachel
    2018 “Shifting the Rape Script: “Coming Out” Online as a Rape Victim.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies39 (2): 26–57. 10.5250/fronjwomestud.39.2.0026
    https://doi.org/10.5250/fronjwomestud.39.2.0026 [Google Scholar]
  36. Martin, Jim R., and Peter R. R. White
    2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mendes, Kaitlynn, Jessica Ringrose, and Jessalynn Keller
    2018 “#MeToo and the Promise and Pitfalls of Challenging Rape Culture through Digital Feminist Activism.” European Journal of Women’s Studies25 (2): 236–246. 10.1177/1350506818765318
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506818765318 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mendes, Kaitlynn, Jessalynn Keller and Jessica Ringrose
    2019 “Digitized Narratives of Sexual Violence: Making Sexual Violence Felt and Known through Digital Disclosures.” New Media & Society21 (6): 1290–1310. 10.1177/1461444818820069
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818820069 [Google Scholar]
  39. Morikawa, Nora
    2019 “#Yesallwomen’s Language: Women’s Style Shifting in Feminist Discourse on Twitter.” Discourse, Context & Media28: 112–120. 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  40. Palomino-Manjón, Patricia
    2018 “‘Great to See Ur Staff Are Doing Their Job properly’: Customer (Dis)Affiliation on Corporate Facebook Pages.” International Journal of English Studies18 (2): 77–96. 10.6018/ijes/2018/2/314401
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2018/2/314401 [Google Scholar]
  41. Plant, Sadie
    2000 “On the Matrix: Cyberfeminist Simulations.” InThe Cybercultures Reader, ed. byBarbara M. Kennedy, and David Bell, 325–336. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sánchez-Moya, Alfonso
    2017 “Corpus-Driven Insights into the Discourse of Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence.” Quaderns de Filologia: Estudis Lingüístics22: 215–243. 10.7203/qf.22.11309
    https://doi.org/10.7203/qf.22.11309 [Google Scholar]
  43. Santaemilia, José, and Sergio Maruenda
    2014 “The Linguistic Representation of Gender Violence in (Written) Media Discourse: The Term ‘Woman’ in Spanish Contemporary Newspapers.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict2 (2): 250–273. 10.1075/jlac.2.2.04san
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.2.04san [Google Scholar]
  44. Schwark, Sandra, and Gerd Bohner
    2019 “Sexual Violence – ‘Victim’ or ‘Survivor: News Images Affect Explicit and Implicit Judgments of Blame.” Violence Against Women25 (12): 1491–1509. 10.1177/1077801218820202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218820202 [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith, Merril D.
    (ed.) 2018Encyclopedia of Rape and Sexual Violence. California: ABC-CLIO.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Spry, Tami
    1995 “In the Absence of Word and Body: Hegemonic Implications of ‘Victim’ and ‘Survivor’ in Women’s Narratives of Sexual Violence.” Women and Language. WL: Urbana. 13 (2): 27–40.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Stubbs-Richardson, Megan, Nicole E. Rader, and Arthur G. Cosby
    2018 “Tweeting Rape Culture: Examining Portrayals of Victim Blaming in Discussions of Sexual Assault Cases on Twitter.” Feminism & Psychology28 (1): 90–108. 10.1177/0959353517715874
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517715874 [Google Scholar]
  48. Tagg, Caroline
    2015Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315727165
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727165 [Google Scholar]
  49. Thompson, Geoff, and Susan Hunston
    2000Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Trinch, Shona L.
    2014 “De-Authorizing Rape Narrators: Stance, Taboo and Privatizing the Public Secret.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict2 (2): 204–225. 10.1075/jlac.2.2.02tri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.2.02tri [Google Scholar]
  51. White, Peter R. R.
    2011 “Appraisal.” InDiscursive Pragmatics, ed. byJan Zienkowski, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jeff Verschueren, 14–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hoph.8.02whi
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.8.02whi [Google Scholar]
  52. Wilding, Faith
    1998 “Where Is Feminism in Cyberfeminism?” N. Paradoxa2: 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Williamson, Jessica, and Kelly Serna
    2018 “Reconsidering Forced Labels: Outcomes of Sexual Assault Survivors Versus Victims (and Those Who Choose Neither).” Violence Against Women24 (6): 668–683. 10.1177/1077801217711268
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217711268 [Google Scholar]
  54. Zappavigna, Michele
    2012Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 2014 “Enacting Identity in Microblogging through Ambient Affiliation.” Discourse & Communication8 (8): 209–228. 10.1177/1750481313510816
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313510816 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2017 “Evaluation.” InPragmatics of Social Media, ed. byChristian R. Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 435–458. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110431070‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-016 [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhu, Hongqiang
    2016 “Searchable Talk as Discourse Practice on the Internet: The Case of “#bindersfullofwomen”. Discourse, Context & Media12: 87–98. 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.10.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2015.10.001 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00049.pal
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00049.pal
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error