1887
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

On the occasion of the 2017 UK election campaign, Amnesty International conducted a large-scale, sentiment-based analysis of online hate speech against women MPs on Twitter (Dhrodia 2018), identifying the “Top 5” most attacked women MPs as Diane Abbott, Joanna Cherry, Emily Thornberry, Jess Phillips and Anna Soubry.

Taking Amnesty International’s results as a starting point, this paper investigates online misogyny against the “Top 5” women MPs, with a specific focus on the video-sharing platform YouΤube, whose loosely censored cyberspace is known as a breeding ground for antagonism, impunity and disinhibition (Pihlaja 2014), and, therefore, merits investigation.

By collecting and analysing a corpus of YouTube multimodal data we explore, critique and contextualize online misogyny as a techno-social phenomenon applying a Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS) approach (KhosraviNik and Esposito 2018). Mapping a vast array of discursive strategies, this study offers an in-depth analysis on how technology-facilitated gender-based violence contributes to discursively constructing the political arena as a fundamentally male-oriented space, and reinforces stereotypical and sexist representation of women in politics and beyond.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00053.esp
2021-02-22
2021-06-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Androutsopoulos, Jannis , and Jana Tereick
    2015 “YouTube: Language and Discourse Practices in Participatory Culture.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication, edited by Alexandra Georgakopoulou and Tereza Spilioti , 354–370. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson, Diane
    1992Suffragettes in the Purple, White and Green: London 1906–1914. Museum of London.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey, Jane , Valerie Steeves , Jacquelyn Burkell , and Priscilla Regan
    2013 “Negotiating with Gender Stereotypes on Social Networking Sites: From ‘Bicycle Face’ to Facebook.” Journal of Communication Inquiry37(2): 91–112. 10.1177/0196859912473777
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859912473777 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baynes, Chris
    2019 “Carl Benjamin: Police Investigating Ukip Candidate’s Rape Comments about Labour MP Jess Phillips.” The Independent, May7.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benavides-Vanegas, Farid Samir
    2020 “Emoticons, Memes and Cyberbullying: Gender Equality in Colombia.” Social Semiotics30(3): 328–343. 10.1080/10350330.2020.1731169
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1731169 [Google Scholar]
  6. Benson, Phil
    2017The Discourse of YouTube Multimodal Text in a Global Context. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Burgess, Jean , and Joshua Green
    2009YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. London: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Campus, Donatella
    2013Women Political Leaders and the Media. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137295545
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295545 [Google Scholar]
  9. Citron, Danielle K.
    2014Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/harvard.9780674735613
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674735613 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cope, Bill , and Mary Kalantzis
    2020Making Sense. Reference, Agency, and Structure in a Grammar of Multimodal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316459645
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459645 [Google Scholar]
  11. Culpeper, Jonathan , Michael Haugh , and Dániel Z. Kádár
    (eds) 2017 “Introduction.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited by Jonathan Culpeper , Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár , 1–8. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7 [Google Scholar]
  12. Davey, Jennifer
    2018 “Women and Politics”. The Oxford Handbook of Modern British Political History, 1800–2000, edited by David Brown , Robert Crowcroft and Gordon Pentland Brown , 417–433. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dhrodia, Azmina
    2018 “Unsocial Media: A Toxic Place for Women.” IPPR Progressive Review24(4): 380–387.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Döring, Nicola , and M. Rohangis Mohseni
    2019 “Fail Videos and Related Video Comments on YouTube: A Case of Sexualization of Women and Gendered Hate Speech?” Communication Research Reports36(3): 254–264. 10.1080/08824096.2019.1634533
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2019.1634533 [Google Scholar]
  15. Esposito, Eleonora
    2021 “Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. 10.1075/jlac.00051.int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00051.int [Google Scholar]
  16. Gee, James Paul
    2005 “Semiotic Social Spaces and Affinity Spaces: From the Age of Mythology to Today’s Schools.” InBeyond Communities of Practice: Language, Power and Social Context, edited by David Barton and Karin Tusting , 214–232. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610554.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610554.012 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ging, Debbie , and Eugenia Siapera
    2018 “Special Issue on Online Misogyny.” Feminist Media Studies18(4): 515–524. 10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345 [Google Scholar]
  18. Harjunen, Hannele
    2016Neoliberal Bodies and the Gendered Fat Body: The Fat Body in Focus. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315583976
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315583976 [Google Scholar]
  19. Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) and Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE)
    Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) and Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) 2018 “Sexism, Harassment and Violence Against Women in Parliaments in Europe.” https://www.ipu.org/resources/publications/issue-briefs/2018-10/sexism-harassment-and-violence-against-women-in-parliaments-in-europe
  20. Jane, Emma
    2014 “‘Your a ugly, whorish, slut’ – Understanding E-bile.” Feminist Media Studies14(4), 531–546. 10.1080/14680777.2012.741073
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.741073 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2016 “Online Misogyny and Feminist Digilantism.” Continuum30(3): 1–14. 10.1080/10304312.2016.1166560
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1166560 [Google Scholar]
  22. 2018 “Gendered Cyberhate as Workplace Harassment and Economic Vandalism.” Feminist Media Studies18(4): 1–17. 10.1080/14680777.2018.1447344
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447344 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jewitt, Carey , and Rumiko Oyama
    2000 “Visual Meaning: A Social Semiotic Approach.” InThe Handbook of Visual Analysis, edited by Theo van Leeuwen and Carey Jewitt , 134–156. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KhosraviNik, Majid
    2018 “Social Media Techno-Discursive Design, Affective Communication and Contemporary Politics.” Fundan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences (ePub ahead of Print), 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. KhosraviNik, Majid , and Eleonora Esposito
    2018 “Online Hate, Digital Discourse and Critique: Exploring Digitally-mediated Discursive Practices of Gender-based Hostility.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics14(1): 45–68. 10.1515/lpp‑2018‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2018-0003 [Google Scholar]
  26. KhosraviNik, Majid , and Johann Unger
    2016 “Critical Discourse Studies and Social Media: Power, Resistance and Critique in Changing Media Ecologies.” InMethods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 3rd edn, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer , 205–234. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. KhosraviNik, Majid , and Mahrou Zia
    2014 “Persian Nationalism, Identity and Anti-Arab Sentiments in Iranian Facebook Discourses: Critical Discourse Analysis and Social Media Communication.” Journal of Language and Politics13(4): 755–780. 10.1075/jlp.13.1.08kho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.13.1.08kho [Google Scholar]
  28. KhosraviNik, Majid , and Nadia Sarkhoh
    2017 “Arabism and anti-Persian Sentiments on Participatory Web: A Social Media Critical Discourse Study (SM-CDS).” International Journal of Communication11: 3614–3633.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kress, Gunther , and Theo van Leeuwen
    2002 “Colour as a Semiotic Mode: Notes for a Grammar of Colour.” Visual Communication1(3): 343–368. 10.1177/147035720200100306
    https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100306 [Google Scholar]
  30. Krook, Mona Lena
    2020Violence against Women in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190088460.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088460.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuperberg, Rebecca
    2021 “Incongruous and Illegitimate: Antisemitic and Islamophobic Semiotic Violence against Women in Politics in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. 10.1075/jlac.00055.kup
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00055.kup [Google Scholar]
  32. Manne, Kate
    2017Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190604981.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190604981.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mantilla, Karla
    2013 “Gendertrolling: Misogyny Adapts to New Media.” Feminist Studies39(2): 563–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Moor, Peter J. , Ard Heuvelman , and Ria Verleur
    2010 “Flaming on YouTube.” Computers in Human Behavior26(6): 1536–1546. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023 [Google Scholar]
  35. Murthy, Dhiraj , and Shubham Sharma
    2018 “Visualizing YouTube’s Comment Space: Online Hostility as a Network Phenomena.” New Media & Society21(1): 191–213. 10.1177/1461444818792393
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818792393 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nussbaum, Martha
    2010 “Objectification and Internet Misogyny.” InThe Offensive Internet, edited by Saul Levmore and Martha C. Nussbaum , 68–87. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Partington, Alan , and Charlotte Taylor
    2018The Language of Persuasion in Politics. An Introduction. London and New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Pihlaja, Stephen
    2014Antagonism on YouTube: Metaphor in Online Discourse. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Powell, Anastasia , and Nicola Henry
    2017Sexual Violence in a Digital Age. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑58047‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58047-4 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rasulo, Margaret
    2021 “Are Gold Hoop Earrings and a Dab of Red Lipstick enough to get even Democrats on the Offensive? The Case of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. 10.1075/jlac.00057.ras
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00057.ras [Google Scholar]
  41. Rego, Richard
    2018 “Changing Forms and Platforms of Misogyny. Sexual Harassment of Women Journalists on Twitter.” Media Watch9(3): 472–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Rotman, Dana , Jennifer Golbeck , and Jennifer Preece
    2009 “The Community is where the Rapport is – On Sense and Structure in the YouTube Community.” InProceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 41–50. 10.1145/1556460.1556467
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1556460.1556467 [Google Scholar]
  43. Sarkeesiaan, Anita
    2015 “Stop the Trolls. Women Fight Back Online Harassment.” Women in the World. YouTube video.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Scott, Jennifer
    2019 “Women MPs Say Abuse Forcing them from Politics.” BBC News. October 31.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Thompson, Laura
    2018 “‘I Can Be your Tinder Nightmare’: Harassment and Misogyny in the Online Sexual Marketplace.” Feminism & Psychology28(1): 69–89. doi:  10.1177/0959353517720226
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517720226 [Google Scholar]
  46. Titley, Gavan , Ellie Keen , and László Földi
    2012Starting Points for Combating Hate Speech Online: Three Studies about Online Hate Speech and Ways to Address it. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Van der Pas, Joanna Daphne , and Loes Aaldering
    2020 “Gender Differences in Political Media Coverage: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Communication70(1): 114–143. 10.1093/joc/jqz046
    https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz046 [Google Scholar]
  48. van Leeuwen, Theo
    1999Speech, Music, Sound. Basingstoke: Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑27700‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27700-1 [Google Scholar]
  49. 2005Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. 2006 “Towards a Semiotics of Typography.” Information Design Journal14(2): 139–155. 10.1075/idj.14.2.06lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.14.2.06lee [Google Scholar]
  51. Zeiter, Kirsten , Sandra Pepera , Molly Middlehurst , and Derek Ruths
    2019Tweets that Chill: Analyzing Online Violence Against Women in Politics. National Democratic Institute. https://www.ndi.org/sites/default/files/NDI%20Tweets%20That%20Chill%20Report.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00053.esp
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00053.esp
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Critical Discourse Studies; misogyny; multimodality; social media; women MPs; YouTube
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error