1887
Volume 9, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper explores the misogynistic abuse against female Chilean politicians who openly supported a pro-choice bill that allowed the access to abortion in limited circumstances. We analysed the verbal abuse targeted at these politicians during the legislation of the abortion bill (2015–2017) and the linguistic and discursive patterns of online abuse. To that end, we collected tweets from this legislation period and created a subset with specific milestones of the parliamentary debate. Further, we undertook a corpus-assisted analysis of the data, focusing on collocations and keywords, which were then analysed in the light of van Leeuwen’s (2008) framework on the representation of social actors and legitimation strategies. Results evidence that violence against women in power can take forms other than the explicit sexual, physical, and psychological threats that are commonly identified. Violence targets these women as it is claimed that they are unsuitable to legislate for allegedly having tolerated and protected crime. Therefore, the corrective function of abuse takes the form of legal actions against their crimes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00056.per
2021-03-04
2021-05-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alam, Zainab
    2021 “Violence against Women in Politics: The Case of Pakistani Women’s Activism.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. 10.1075/jlac.00052.ala
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00052.ala [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvares, Claudia
    2018 “Online Staging of Femininity: Disciplining through Public Exposure in Brazilian Social Media.” Feminist Media Studies18 (4): 657–674. doi:  10.1080/14680777.2018.1447336
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447336 [Google Scholar]
  3. Amnesty International
    Amnesty International 2019 “Abortion Laws in the US – 10 Things You Need to Know.” August31 2019 https://bit.ly/34xKUbj
  4. Anderson, Kristin. L., and Jill Cermele
    2014 “Public/Private Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict2 (2): 274–293. doi:  10.1075/jlac.2.2.05and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.2.05and [Google Scholar]
  5. Anthony, Laurence
    . AntConc (version 3.5.8). Windows. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baker, Paul
    2004 “Querying Keywords: Questions of Difference, Frequency, and Sense in Keywords Analysis.” Journal of English Linguistics32 (4): 346–359. doi:  10.1177/0075424204269894
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424204269894 [Google Scholar]
  7. 2006Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Baker, Paul, and Tony McEnery
    2005 “A Corpus-Based Approach to Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in UN and Newspaper Texts.” Journal of Language and Politics4 (2): 197–226. doi:  10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak [Google Scholar]
  9. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michael Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society19 (3): 273–305. doi:  10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bernstein, Basil
    1986 “On Pedagogic Discourse.” InHandbook for Theory and Research in the Sociology of Education, ed. byJohn Richardson, 205–290. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Blofield, Merike
    2006The Politics of Moral Sin: Abortion and Divorce in Spain, Chile and Argentina. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Borchorst, Anette
    1994 “Welfare State Regimes, Women’s Interests and the EC.” InGendering Welfare States, ed. byDiane Sainsbury, 26–44. London: Sage. 10.4135/9781446250518.n3
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250518.n3 [Google Scholar]
  13. Butler, Judith
    1997Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Caneva, Hernán A.
    2019 “Disputas por el Aborto en Argentina: Análisis Crítico de Discursos en Dos Organizaciones (2014–2016).” Ph.D. diss., Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Centre for Reproductive Rights
    Centre for Reproductive Rights 2019 “The World’s Abortion Laws.” AccessedAugust 30, 2019. https://reproductiverights.org/worldabortionlaws
  16. Cohen, Stanley
    2011Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203828250
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828250 [Google Scholar]
  17. De Beauvoir, Simone
    2017El Segundo Sexo (15th ed.). Buenos Aires: Debolsillo.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Drange, Eli-Marie D.
    2019 “No me banco la gente así. Un estudio comparativo del uso de palabras coloquiales y malsonantes en conversaciones informales en tres comunidades de habla hispanohablantes (‘I don’t like people like that.’ A comparative study of the use of colloquial and coarse language in informal conversations in three Spanish-speaking communities).” Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies10 (1): 1–13. doi:  10.15845/bells.v10i1.1502
    https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v10i1.1502 [Google Scholar]
  19. Drange, Eli-Marie D., Ingrid Kristine Hasund, and Anna-Brita Stenström
    2014 “‘Your mum!’ Teenagers’ Swearing by Mother in English, Spanish and Norwegian.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics19 (1): 29–59. doi:  10.1075/ijcl.19.1.02dra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.1.02dra [Google Scholar]
  20. El Desconcierto
    El Desconcierto 2016 “Informe de DD.HH. alerta que médicos chilenos dificultan la esterilización voluntaria de mujeres (Human Rights report warn Chilean doctors hinder voluntary sterilization for women).” El Desconcierto, November7 2016 https://bit.ly/2OtoxhD
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Esposito, Eleonora
    2021 “Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. 10.1075/jlac.00051.int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00051.int [Google Scholar]
  22. Fagetti, Antonella
    1986 “La moral cristiana y el aborto (Christian morality and abortion).” MA diss., Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Foucault, Michael
    1977Language, Counter-Memory, Practice. NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gómez Molina, José Ramón
    2003 “El insulto: una aproximación sociolingüística (Insults: A Sociolinguistic Approach).” InLengua, variación y contexto: estudios dedicados a Humberto López Morales, ed. byFrancisco Moreno Fernández, 639–653. Madrid: Arco/Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Graells-Garrido, Eduardo, Mounia Lalmas, and Ricardo Baeza-Yates
    2016 “Encouraging Diversity- and Representation-Awareness in Geographically Centralized Content.” InProceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, ACM New York, March 2016, 7–18. 10.1145/2856767.2856775
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2856767.2856775 [Google Scholar]
  26. Graells-Garrido, Eduardo, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, and Mounia Lalmas
    2020 “Every Colour you are: Stance Prediction and Turnaround in Controversial Issues.” InProceedings of the WebSci ’20: 12th ACM Conference on Web Science, ACM New York, July 2020, 174–183. doi:  10.1145/3394231.3397907
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3394231.3397907 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hardaker, Claire, and Mark McGlashan
    2016 “‘Real Men don’t Hate Women’: Twitter Rape Threats and Group Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics91: 80–93. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hernández Campoy, Juan Manuel
    1993 “Dialectología tradicional, sociolingüística laboviana y geolingüística trudgilliana: Tres aproximaciones al estudio de la variación (Traditional dialectology, Labovian sociolinguistics and Trudgillian geolinguistics: Three approaches to the study of variation).” ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística. Universidad de Alicante9: 151–181. doi:  10.14198/ELUA1993.9.08
    https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA1993.9.08 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hunston, Susan
    2002Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
  30. Jane, Emma A.
    2014 “‘Back to the Kitchen, Cunt’: Speaking the Unspeakable about Online Misogyny.” Continuum – Journal of Media & Cultural Studies28 (4): 558–570. doi:  10.1080/10304312.2014.924479
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.924479 [Google Scholar]
  31. Jane, Emma
    2016 “Online Misogyny and Feminist Digilantism.” Continuum30 (3): 284–297. doi:  10.1080/10304312.2016.1166560
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1166560 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kádár, Daniel, Vahid Parvaresh, and Puyu Ning
    2019 “Morality, Moral Order, and Language Conflict and Aggression.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict7 (1): 6–31. doi:  10.1075/jlac.00017.kad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00017.kad [Google Scholar]
  33. KhosraviNik, Majid, and Eleonora Esposito
    2018 “Online Hate, Digital Discourse and Critique: Exploring Digitally-Mediated Discursive Practices of Gender-Biased Hostility.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics14 (1): 45–68. doi:  10.1515/lpp‑2018‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2018-0003 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kissling, Elizabeth A.
    1991 “Street Harassment: The Language of Sexual Terrorism.” Discourse and Society2 (4): 451–460. doi:  10.1177/0957926591002004006
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926591002004006 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kopytowska, Monika
    2021 “Xenophobia, Misogyny and Rape Culture: Targeting Women in Cyberspace.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict: Special Issue on Critical Perspectives on Gender, Politics and Violence. 10.1075/jlac.00054.kop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00054.kop [Google Scholar]
  36. Lagarde, Marcela
    2005Los cautiverios de las mujeres: Madresposas, monjas, putas, presas y locas (Women’s captivity: Mother-wives, nuns, whores, prisoners and insane). Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Lycarião, Diógenes, and Marcelo Alves dos Santos
    2017 “Bridging Semantic and Social Network Analyses: The Case of the Hashtag #precisamosfalarsobreaborto (‘we need to talk about abortion’) on Twitter.” Information, Communication & Society20 (3): 368–385. doi:  10.1080/1369118X.2016.1168469
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1168469 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ministerio de Salud
    Ministerio de Salud, Fija directrices para los servicios de salud sobre esterilización femenina y masculina, Res. 2326 exenta, November30 2000, bcn.cl/23itf
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ministerio de Salud
    Ministerio de Salud, Regula la despenalización de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en tres causales, Ley Número 21.030, September, 23 2017, bcn.cl/222kz
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Morán Faúndes, José. M.
    2017De vida o muerte. Patriarcado, heteronormatividad y el discurso de la vida del activismo “pro-vida” en la Argentina (On life and death. patriarchy, heteronormativity and the discourse of life in pro-life activism in Argentina). Córdoba: Centro de Estudios Avanzados.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mulvey, Laura
    1989 “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” InVisual and Other Pleasures, ed. byLaura Mulvey, 14–26. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑19798‑9_3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19798-9_3 [Google Scholar]
  42. Navarrete, Camila
    2014 “¿Por qué algunos políticos ‘juran’ y otros ‘prometen’? (Why do some politicians ‘swear in’ and others ‘promise’)”. Bio Bio, March11 2014 https://bit.ly/2pUBjfm
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Nussbaum, Martha C.
    1995 “Objectification.” Philosophy & Public Affairs24 (4): 249–291. doi:  10.1111/j.1088‑4963.1995.tb00032.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x [Google Scholar]
  44. 2010 “Objectification and Internet Misogyny.” The Offensive Internet, ed. bySaul Levmore, and Martha C. Nussbaum, 68–87. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. O’Connell, Ciara, and Christina Zampas
    2018 “The Human Rights Impact of Gender Stereotyping in the Context of Reproductive Health Care.” Gynecology & Obstetrics144 (1): 116–121. doi:  10.1002/ijgo.12693
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12693 [Google Scholar]
  46. Page, Ruth, David Barton, Johann Unger, and Michele Zappavigna
    2014Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315771786
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771786 [Google Scholar]
  47. Partington, Alan
    2006 “Metaphors, Motifs and Similes across Discourse Types: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) at Work.” InCorpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. byAnatol Stefanowitsch, and Stephan Th. Gries, 267–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid, and Charlotte Taylor
    2013Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.55
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.55 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rohlinger, Deana
    2006 “Friends and Foes: Media, Politics, and Tactics in the Abortion War.” Social Problems53 (4): 537–561. doi:  10.1525/sp.2006.53.4.537
    https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2006.53.4.537 [Google Scholar]
  50. Rojas, Darío
    2012 “Huevón como marcador del discurso en el español de Chile: Huellas de un proceso de gramaticalización (Huevón as a discourse marker in Chilean Spanish: Traces of a grammaticalization process).” Revista de Humanidades (25): 145–164.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Schlosberg, Jason
    2001 “Judgment on ‘Nuremberg’: An Analysis of Free Speech and Anti-Abortion Threats Made on the Internet.” Journal of Science & Technology Law – Boston University52 (7): 52–80.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Sepúlveda, Raquel
    2017 “Un análisis histórico sobre los modelos mentales que entregan los políticos en el debate sobre la ley de la despenalización del aborto en Chile (A historical analysis of politicians’ mental models on the debate about the de-criminalization of abortion in Chile).” MA diss., University of Bergen.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Simon, Roberto
    2019 “From Scandal to Reforms: Chile’s Unusual Breakthrough.” Americas QuarterlyJuly22 2019 https://bit.ly/2OL6vpJ
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Stenström, Anna-Brita
    2006 “Taboo Words in Teenage Talk: London and Madrid Girls’ Conversations Compared.” Spanish in Context3 (1): 115–38. doi:  10.1075/sic.3.1.08ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.3.1.08ste [Google Scholar]
  55. Stubbs, Michael
    2001Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Sundén, Jenny, and Susanna Paasonen
    2018 “Shameless Hags and Tolerance Whores: Feminist Resistance and the Affective Circuits of Online Hate.” Feminist Media Studies18 (4): 643–656. doi:  10.1080/14680777.2018.1447427
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447427 [Google Scholar]
  57. Taylor, Charlotte, and Anna Marchi
    2018Corpus Approaches to Discourse. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Thompson, Laura
    2018 “‘I Can Be your Tinder Nightmare’: Harassment and Misogyny in the Online Sexual Marketplace.” Feminism & Psychology28 (1): 69–89. doi:  10.1177/0959353517720226
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517720226 [Google Scholar]
  59. Vaggione, Juan M.
    2005 “Reactive Politicization and Religious Dissidence: The Political Mutations of the Religious.” Social Theory and Practice31 (2): 165–188. doi:  10.5840/soctheorpract200531210
    https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200531210 [Google Scholar]
  60. van Leeuwen, Theo
    2008Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195323306.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  61. Vivanco, José. M.
    2018 “A Backward Step for Reproductive Rights in Chile.” Human Rights Watch, April16 2018 AccessedSeptember 3, 2019. https://bit.ly/33sRhuS
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Williams, Timothy, and Alan Blinder
    2019 “Lawmakers Vote to Effectively Ban Abortion in Alabama.” The New York Times, May14 2019 https://nyti.ms/33oM5bz
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Zappavigna, Michele
    2012Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00056.per
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00056.per
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error