Introduction

References

1. Alim, H. Samy
   2009 “Straight Outta Compton, Straight aus München: Global Linguistic Flows, Identities, and the Politics of Language in a Global Hip Hop Nation.” InGlobal Linguistic Flows: Hip Hop Cultures, Youth Identities, and the Politics of Language, edited by H. Samy Alim , Awad Ibrahim and Alastair Pennycook , 1–22. New York and London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Androutsopoulos, Jannis K. , and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
   2003 “Discourse Constructions of Youth Identities: Introduction.” InDiscourse Constructions of Youth Identities, edited by Jannis K. Androutsopoulos and Alexandra Georgakopoulou , 1–25. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.110.01and
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.110.01and [Google Scholar]
3. Askehave, Inger , and Anne Ellerup Nielsen
   2005 “Digital Genres: A Challenge to Traditional Genre Theory.” Information Technology & People18 (2): 120–41. 10.1108/09593840510601504
   https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840510601504 [Google Scholar]
4. Baker, Paul , Costas Gabrielatos , Majid KhosraviNik , Michal Krzyzanowski , Tony McEnery , and Ruth Wodak
   2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society19 (3): 273–306. 10.1177/0957926508088962
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
5. Bousfield, Derek
   2008 “Impoliteness in the Struggle for Power.” InImpoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited byDerek Bousfield and Miriam Locher, 127–153. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bucholtz, Mary , and Kira Hall
   2005 “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies7 (4–5): 585–614. doi:  10.1177/1461445605054407
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407 [Google Scholar]
7. Clark-Parsons, Rosemary
   2018 “Building a Digital Girl Army: The Cultivation of Feminist Safe Spaces Online.” New Media & Society20 (6): 2125–2144. doi:  10.1177/1461444817731919
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731919 [Google Scholar]
8. Culpeper, Jonathan
   1996 “Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics25: 349–67. 10.1016/0378‑2166(95)00014‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
9. Culpeper, Jonathan
   2005 “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link .” Journal of Politeness Research1: 35–72. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35
   https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35 [Google Scholar]
10. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2008 “Reflections on Impoliteness, Relational Work and Power.” InImpoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher , 17–44. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2010 “Conventionalised Impoliteness Formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics42 (12):3232–3245. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007 [Google Scholar]
12. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011 Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
13. Fairclough, Norman
    2010 Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2010 “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” InHandbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, edited by Rotimi Taiwo , 540–563. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 10.4018/978‑1‑61520‑773‑2.ch035
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch035 [Google Scholar]
15. Garcés Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2018 “Globalization, Transnational Identities, and Conflict Talk: The Superdiversity and Complexity of the Latino Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics134: 120–133. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.02.001 [Google Scholar]
16. Holmes, Janet
    2005 Politeness and Postmodernism – An Appropriate Approach to the Analysis of Language and Gender?Journal of Sociolinguistics9 (1): 108–17. 10.1111/j.1360‑6441.2005.00284.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-6441.2005.00284.x [Google Scholar]
17. Hyland, Ken
    2009 Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Jarvis, Huw , and Marta Szymczyk
    2010 “Student Views on Learning Grammar with Web- and Book-based Materials.” ELT Journal64 (1): 32–39. 10.1093/elt/ccp006
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp006 [Google Scholar]
19. Kecskes, Istvan , and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2013 “Editorial.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict1 (1): 1–7. 10.1075/jlac.1.1.01kec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.1.01kec [Google Scholar]
20. Lazar, Michelle
    Ed. 2005 Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Gender, Power and Ideology in Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230599901
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901 [Google Scholar]
21. Litosseliti, Lia
    2010 “Introduction.” InResearch Methods in Linguistics, edited by Lia Litosseliti , 1–5. London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Locher, Miriam A. , and Richard J. Watts
    2008 “Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behaviour.” InImpoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher , 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Looft, Ruxandra
    2017 “#girlgaze: Photography, Fourth Wave Feminism, and Social Media Advocacy.” Journal of Media & Cultural Studies31 (6): 892–902. doi:  10.1080/10304312.2017.1370539
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2017.1370539 [Google Scholar]
24. Martin, Jim R. , and Peter R. R. White
    2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
25. Ogiermann, Eva , and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2019 “Im/politeness between the Analyst and Participant Perspectives: An Overview of the Field.” InFrom Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness: Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives, edited by Eva Ogiermann and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich , 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108182119.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182119.001 [Google Scholar]
26. Prensky, Marc
    2001 “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1.” On the Horizon9 (5): 1–6. doi:  10.1108/10748120110424816
    https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816 [Google Scholar]
27. Reisigl, Martin , and Ruth Wodak
    2001 Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Rentschler, Carrie A.
    2014 “Rape Culture and the Feminist Politics of Social Media.” Girlhood Studies7 (1):65–82. doi:  10.3167/ghs.2014.070106
    https://doi.org/10.3167/ghs.2014.070106 [Google Scholar]
29. Soror, Sameh , and Rees Kassen
    2014 “Co-Chairs’ Foreword.” InThe Global State of Young Scientists, edited by Irene Friesenhahn and Catherine Beaudry , 7. https://globalyoungacademy.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/GYA_GloSYS-report_webversion.pdfLast accessed onNovember 26, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sunderland, Jane
    2010 “Research Questions in Linguistics.” InResearch Methods in Linguistics, edited by Lia Litosseliti , 9–28. London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
31. van Dijk, Teun A.
    1998 Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
32. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2004 “Racist Discourse.” InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Race and Ethnic Studies, edited by Ellis Cashmore , 351–355. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
33. van Dijk, Teun A.
    2006 “Ideology and Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Political Ideologies11 (2): 115–140. 10.1080/13569310600687908
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908 [Google Scholar]
34. Wodak, Ruth
    2007 “Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry.” Pragmatics and Cognition15: 203–225. doi:  10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.15.1.13wod [Google Scholar]