1887
image of ‘Slut I hate you’
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Adopting a Critical Discourse Analysis perspective, this paper seeks to explore the conflict emerging from the ways YouTube users index, reaffirm or challenge gender ideologies by examining 2,304 YouTube comments posted in response to the misogynistic Greek pop song ‘Slut I hate you’. Our textual analysis draws on the Discourse-Historical Approach, focusing on the lexicogrammatical choices and discursive strategies employed for the positive presentation of the self and the negative presentation of the other. Our findings suggest that: (a) there is a dialectic relationship between the gendered representations of the videoclip and the gender ideologies indexed by individual YouTube users; (b) the discursive negotiation of gender ideologies in anonymous, asynchronous and polylogal discussions is a highly polarised and antagonistic discourse activity, with most comments under the videoclip of the song falling under two broad categories, i.e. those sustaining and those challenging gendered aggression and patriarchal discourses; (c) although both groups resort to common discursive strategies (e.g. nomination and predication strategies that legitimise the authority of the in-group and delegitimise the out-group), they differ significantly in their argumentation and intensification/mitigation strategies, which allows commenters to take sides in a polarised debate and index their gender ideologies; (d) due to the pervasive power of dominant ideologies across all levels of context, the democratic and subversive potential of conflict on YouTube is limited but not pointless as counter-discourses may still gain visibility.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00065.sag
2021-06-04
2021-12-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bou-Franch, Patricia
    2014 “An Introduction to Language Aggression against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict2 (2): 177–182. doi:  10.1075/jlac.2.2.00int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.2.00int [Google Scholar]
  2. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2014a “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics73:19–36. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  3. 2014b “Gender Ideology and Social Identity Processes in Online Language Aggression Against Women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict2 (2): 226–248. doi:  10.1075/jlac.2.2.03bou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.2.2.03bou [Google Scholar]
  4. Colliver, Ben, and Adrian Coyle
    2020 “‘Risk of Sexual Violence against Women and Girls’ in the Construction of ‘Gender-neutral Toilets’: A Discourse Analysis of Comments on YouTube Videos.” Journal of Gender-Based Violence. doi:  10.1332/239868020X15894511554617
    https://doi.org/10.1332/239868020X15894511554617 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cosper, Caitlin
    2022 “Patterns of Conflict Speech and Young Adult Feminist Identity Construction on Tumblr.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Delis, Panagiotis
    2022 “Impoliteness in Hip-Hop Music: African American and White artists’ Racist and Sexist Rhetoric.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Drosos, Nikos, and Alexander-Stamatios Antoniou
    2019 “Attitudes toward Women Managers and Female Authority: An Empirical Study among Women Managers in Greece.” InWomen, Business and Leadership, Gender and Organisations: New Horizons in Management series, edited byAlexander-Stamatios Antoniou, Cary Cooper and Caroline Gatrell, 362–378. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:  10.4337/9781786432711
    https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432711 [Google Scholar]
  8. European Institute for Gender Equality
    European Institute for Gender Equality 2017 “Cyber Violence Against Women and Girls.” AccessedJuly 3, 2020. https://eige.europa.eu/rdc/eige-publications/cyber-violence-against-women-and-girls
  9. European Institute for Gender Equality
    European Institute for Gender Equality 2019 “Gender Equality Index.” AccessedJuly 25, 2019. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2015/EL
  10. Fairclough, Norman
    1992 “Discourse and Text: Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society3 (2): 193–217. doi:  10.1177/0957926592003002004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2010Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fischer, Peter, and Tobias Greitemeyer
    2006 “Music and Aggression: The Impact of Sexual-Aggressive Song Lyrics on Aggression-Related Thoughts, Emotions, and Behavior toward the Same and the Opposite Sex.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin32 (9): 1165–176. doi:  10.1177/0146167206288670
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206288670 [Google Scholar]
  13. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2010 “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” InThe Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, edited byRotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey: Information Science Reference. doi:  10.4018/978‑1‑61520‑773‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2 [Google Scholar]
  14. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Maria Sifianou
    2019 “Im/politeness and Discursive Pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics145: 91–101. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.03.015 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ging, Debbie, and Eugenia Siapera
    2018 “Special Issue on Online Misogyny.” Feminist Media Studies, 18 (4):515–524. doi:  10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hardaker, Claire, and Mark Mcglashan
    2016 “'Real Men Don’t Hate Women’: Twitter Rape Threats and Group Identity.” Journal of Pragmatics91: 80–93. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  17. Hatzidaki, Ourania
    2020 “'An Equal Right to Comment’: Metapragmatic Negotiation of (Im)politeness Norms in a Confrontational Greek YouTube Polylogue Discussing Online Public Female Nudity.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. doi:  10.1075/jlac.00037.hat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00037.hat [Google Scholar]
  18. Jane, Emma Alice
    2014 “‘Back to the Kitchen, Cunt’: Speaking the Unspeakable about Online Misogyny.” Continuum28 (4): 558–570. doi:  10.1080/10304312.2014.924479
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2014.924479 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jurasz, Olga, and Kim Barker
    2019 “Online Misogyny: A Challenge for Digital Feminism?” Journal of International Affairs72 (2): 95–113.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kosyfologou, Aliki
    2018 “Gendered Aspects of the Austerity Regime in Greece: 2010–2017: Austerity, Gender Inequality and Feminism after the Crisis in Greece.” ROSA-LUXEMBURG-STIFTUNG, AccessedOctober, 10, 2019. https://www.rosalux.eu/publications/gendered-aspects-of-the-austerity-regime-in-greece-2010-2017/
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kourniakti, Jessica
    2017 “From Fascist Overload to Unbearable Lightness: Recollections of the Military Junta as Kitsch in Postdictatorial Greece.” Journal of Modern Greek Studies35 (2): 339–368. doi:  10.1353/mgs.2017.0023
    https://doi.org/10.1353/mgs.2017.0023 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lange, Patricia G.
    2006 “What is your Claim to Flame?” First Monday, 11: n. pag. doi:  10.5210/fm.v11i9.1393
    https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v11i9.1393 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee, Eun-Ju
    2007 “Deindividuation Effects on Group Polarization in Computer-Mediated Communication: The Role of Group Identification, Public-Self-Awareness, and Perceived Argument Quality.” Journal of Communication57 (2): 385–403. doi:  10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2007.00348.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00348.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2011 “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics43 (10): 2578–2593. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  25. Milliken, Mary, Kerri Gibson, Susan O’Donnell, and Janice Singer
    2017 “User-generated Online Video and the Atlantic Canadian Public Sphere: A YouTube Study.” Proceedings of the International Communications Association (ICA 2008), Montreal, Canada, May22–26.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Molyneaux, Heather, Susan O’Donnell, Kerri Gibson, and Janice Singer
    2008 “Exploring the Gender Divide on YouTube: An Analysis of the Creation and Reception of Vlogs.” The American Communication Journal10 (1): 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Murthy, Dhiraj, and Sanjay Sharma
    2018 “Visualizing YouTube’s Comment Space: Online Hostility as a Networked Phenomena.” New Media & Society21 (1): 191–213. doi:  10.1177/1461444818792393
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818792393 [Google Scholar]
  28. Papacharissi, Zizi
    2009 “The Virtual Sphere 2.0: The Internet, the Public Sphere and beyond.” InThe Handbook of Internet Politics, edited byAndrew Chadwick and Philip Howard, 230–245. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rasmussen, Eric, and Rebecca Densley
    2017 “Girl in a Country Song: Gender Roles and Objectification of Women in Popular Country Music across 1990 to 2014.” Sex Roles76(3–4): 188–201. doi:  10.1007/s11199‑016‑0670‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0670-6 [Google Scholar]
  30. Richardson-Self, Louise
    2018 “Woman-Hating: On Misogyny, Sexism, and Hate Speech.” Hypatia33 (2): 256–72. 10.1111/hypa.12398
    https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12398 [Google Scholar]
  31. Reicher, Steve, Russell Spears, and Tom Postmes
    1995 “A Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Phenomena.” European Review of Social Psychology6: 161–198. doi:  10.1080/14792779443000049
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000049 [Google Scholar]
  32. Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
    2001Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Rotman, Dana, Jennifer Golbeck, and Jennifer Preece
    2009 “The Community Is Where the Rapport Is – on Sense and Structure in the Youtube Community.” Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies, 41–50. 10.1145/1556460.1556467
    https://doi.org/10.1145/1556460.1556467 [Google Scholar]
  34. Thelwall, Mike, and Amalia Mas-Bleda
    2018 “YouTube Science Channel Video Presenters and Comments: Female Friendly or Vestiges of Sexism?” Aslib Journal of Information Management70 (1): 28–46. doi:  10.1108/AJIM‑09‑2017‑0204
    https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-09-2017-0204 [Google Scholar]
  35. van Zoonen, Liesbet, Farida Vis, and Sabina Mihelj
    2011 “YouTube Interactions between Agonism, Antagonism and Dialogue: Video Responses to the Anti-Islam Film Fitna.” New Media & Society13 (8): 1283–1300. doi:  10.1177/1461444811405020
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811405020 [Google Scholar]
  36. Weitzer, Ronald, and Charis E. Kubrin
    2009 “Misogyny in Rap Music: A Content Analysis of Prevalence and Meanings.” Men and Masculinities12 (1): 3–29. doi:  10.1177/1097184X08327696
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X08327696 [Google Scholar]
  37. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, South African Medical Research Council
    World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, South African Medical Research Council 2013Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization. www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/9789241564625/en/
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00065.sag
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/jlac.00065.sag
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error