Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper responds to the call for more comparative research across online social media platforms (Graham and Hardaker 2017, 808) and examines discourse across two such platforms, YouTube and Reddit. More specifically, it attempts to investigate whether the affordances of these platforms have an impact on the amount and form of impoliteness employed by their users.

Data on a highly contested topic (the July 2018 wildfires in Attica, Greece) is studied both qualitatively and quantitatively. First, small but representative samples are qualitatively analyzed on the basis of the two major impoliteness types: implicational and conventionalized and their subcategories. In addition, swearword keywords extracted by means of corpus analysis tools are analyzed. It is shown that YouTube involves a great deal of (conventionalized) impoliteness (Culpeper 2011a) which could be due to factors such as the total absence of moderation, of post length limit and of detailed personal profiles as well as the presence of videos as stimuli for interaction. Considerably less impoliteness appears on Reddit, whose forum-like nature makes it a place that mostly invites civil interaction. Implicationally impolite (Culpeper 2011a) posts outnumber conventionally impolite ones, perhaps owing to the heavy moderation, the existence of public profiles and the size and coherence of the user community. It is concluded that, due to their characteristics, platforms seem to attract a certain userbase with its own motives and mindset, which in turn shape the impoliteness found within them.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Agarwal, Nitin, Huan Liu, Sudheendra Murthy, Arunabha Sen, and Xufei Wang
    2009 “A Social Identity Approach to Identify Familiar Strangers in a Social Network.” InProceedings of the Third International ICWSM Conference. San Jose, California, United States: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI): 2–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, Kelsey, Giuseppe Carenini, and Raymond T. Ng
    2014 “Detecting Disagreement in Conversations Using Pseudo-monologic Rhetorical Structure.” InProceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing – EMNLP 2014. Doha, Qatar: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL): 1169–1180. 10.3115/v1/D14‑1124
    https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1124 [Google Scholar]
  3. Angouri, Jo, and Theodora Tseliga
    2010 “‘you HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!’: From E-disagreement to E-impoliteness in Two Online Fora.” Journal of Politeness Research6(1):57–82. doi:  10.1515/jplr.2010.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michal Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
    2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society19(3):273–306. doi:  10.1177/0957926508088962
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962 [Google Scholar]
  5. Benson, Phil
    2016The Discourse of YouTube: Multimodal Text in a Global Context. New York: Taylor and Francis. 10.4324/9781315646473
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315646473 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bergstrom, Kelly
    2011 “‘Don’t Feed the Troll’: Shutting down Debate about Community Expectations on Reddit.com.” First Monday16(8):1–9. doi:  10.5210/fm.v16i8.3498
    https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i8.3498 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2014 “Conflict Management in Massive Polylogues: A Case Study from YouTube.” Journal of Pragmatics73:19–36. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bou-Franch, Patricia, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
    2012 “Social Interaction in YouTube Text-based Polylogues: A Study of Coherence.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication17(4):501–521. doi:  10.1111/j.1083‑6101.2012.01579.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01579.x [Google Scholar]
  9. Bousfield, Derek
    2008Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.167
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.167 [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyd, Michael S.
    2014 “(New) Participatory Framework on YouTube? Commenter Interaction in US Political Speeches.” Journal of Pragmatics72:46–58. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
    1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Originally published as Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. InQuestions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, edited by Esther Goody, 56-289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chandrasekharan, Eshwar, Mattia Samory, Anirudh Srinivasan, and Eric Gilbert
    2017 “The Bag of Communities: Identifying Abusive Behavior Online with Preexisting Internet Data.” InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ’17. Denver, United States: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM): 3175–3187. 10.1145/3025453.3026018
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026018 [Google Scholar]
  13. Culpeper, Jonathan
    2011aImpoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
  14. 2011b “Politeness and Impoliteness.” InPragmatics of Society, edited byKarin Aijmer and Gisle Andersen, 393–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214420.393
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214420.393 [Google Scholar]
  15. Derks, Daantje, Agneta H. Fischer, and Arjan E. R. Bos
    2008 “The Role of Emotion in Computer-mediated Communication: A Review.” Computers in Human Behavior24(3):766–785. doi:  10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dynel, Marta
    2012 “Swearing Methodologically: The (Im)politeness of Expletives in Anonymous Commentaries on YouTube.” Journal of English Studies10(1):25–50. doi:  10.18172/jes.179
    https://doi.org/10.18172/jes.179 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2014 “Isn’t it Ironic? Defining the Scope of Humorous Irony.” Humor27(4):619–639. doi:  10.1515/humor‑2014‑0096
    https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2014-0096 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2015 “The Landscape of Impoliteness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research11(2):329–354. doi:  10.1515/pr‑2015‑0013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0013 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2018 “Theoretically on Mock Politeness in English and Italian.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict6(1):149–165. doi:  10.1075/jlac.00007.dyn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00007.dyn [Google Scholar]
  20. Ermida, Isabel
    2013 “‘A Beached Whale Posing in Lingerie’: Conflict Talk, Disagreement and Impoliteness in Online Newspaper Commentary.” Revista Diacritica27(1):95–130.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Frobenius, Maximiliane, and Cornelia Gerhardt
    2017 “Discourse and Organization.” InPragmatics of Social Media, edited byChristian R. Hoffmann and Wolfram Bublitz, 245–274. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. doi:  10.1515/9783110431070‑010
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431070-010 [Google Scholar]
  22. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar
    2010 “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” InHandbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, edited byRotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey: Information Science Reference. doi:  10.4018/978‑1‑61520‑773‑2.ch035
    https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch035 [Google Scholar]
  23. Georgalou, Mariza
    2017Discourse and Identity on Facebook. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Graham, Sage L., and Claire Hardaker
    2017 “(Im)politeness in Digital Communication.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, edited byJonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh and Dániel Z. Kádár, 785–814. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑37508‑7_30
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_30 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hardaker, Claire
    2010 “Trolling in Asynchronous Computer-mediated Communication: From User Discussions to Academic Definitions.” Journal of Politeness Research6(2):215–242. doi:  10.1515/jplr.2010.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011 [Google Scholar]
  26. Harris, Sandra
    2001 “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society12:451–472. doi:  10.1177/0957926501012004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012004003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hatzidaki, Ourania
    2011 “Greek Men’s and Women’s Magazines as Codes of Gender Conduct: The Appropriation and Hybridisation of Deontic Modality.” InLiving with Patriarchy – Discursive Constructions of Gendered Subjects across Public Spheres, edited byDanijela Majstorovic and Inger Lassen, 113–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/dapsac.45.08hat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.45.08hat [Google Scholar]
  28. Herring, Susan C.
    2008 “Computer-mediated Discourse.” InThe Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited byDeborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi E. Hamilton, 612–634. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kiesler, Sara, Jane Siegel, and Timothy W. McGuire
    1984 “Social Psychological Aspects of Computer-mediated Communication.” American Psychologist39(10):1123–1134. doi:  10.1037/0003‑066X.39.10.1123
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.10.1123 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ksiazek, Thomas. B., and Limor Peer
    2016 “User Comments and Civility on YouTube.” InThe Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies, edited byBob Franklin and Scott A. Eldridge, 244–252. London: Taylor & Francis. 10.4324/9781315713793‑25
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315713793-25 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lange, Patricia G.
    2014 “Commenting on YouTube Rants: Perceptions of Inappropriateness or Civic Engagement?” Journal of Pragmatics73:53–65. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch
    2011 “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics43(10):2578–2593. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  33. Meredith, Joanne
    2017 “Analysing Technological Affordances of Online Interactions Using Conversation Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics115:42–55. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Mills, Richard A.
    2018 “Pop-up Political Advocacy Communities on Reddit.com: SandersForPresident and The Donald.” AI and Society33(1):39–54. doi:  10.1007/s00146‑017‑0712‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0712-9 [Google Scholar]
  35. Moor, Peter J., Ard Heuvelman, and Ria Verleur
    2010 “Flaming on YouTube.” Computers in Human Behavior26(6):1536–1546. doi:  10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.023 [Google Scholar]
  36. Murthy, Dhiraj, Sawyer Bowman, Alexander J. Gross, and Marisa McGarry
    2015 “Do we Tweet Differently from our Mobile Devices? A Study of Language Differences on Mobile and Web-based Twitter Platforms.” Journal of Communication65(5):816–837. doi:  10.1111/jcom.12176
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12176 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mutz, Diana C.
    2015In-your-face Politics: The Consequences of Uncivil Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.23943/princeton/9780691165110.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691165110.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Papacharissi, Zizi
    2002 “The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere.” New Media and Society4(1):9–27. doi:  10.1177/14614440222226244
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614440222226244 [Google Scholar]
  39. Reeves, Byron, and Clifford C. Nass
    1996The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Schegloff, Emanuel A.
    1991 “Reflections on Talk and Social Structure.” InTalk and Social Structure, edited byDeirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, 44–70. Berkley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sifianou, Maria
    2012 “Disagreements, Face and Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics44(12):1554–1564. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.009 [Google Scholar]
  42. Signorelli, Julia
    2022 “Of Pumpkin Spice Lattes and Hamplanets: The Venting Genre as Support and Subversion on Reddit’s r/FatPeopleStories.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. 10.1075/jlac.00067.sig
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00067.sig [Google Scholar]
  43. Singer, Philipp, Fabian Flöck, Clemens Meinhart, Elias Zeitfogel, and Markus Strohmaier
    2014 “Evolution of Reddit: From the Front Page of the Internet to a Self-referential Community?” InProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web – WWW 2014. Seoul, South Korea: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM): 517–522. 10.1145/2567948.2576943
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2567948.2576943 [Google Scholar]
  44. Subtirelu, Nicholas C.
    2017 “Donald Trump Supporters and the Denial of Racism: An Analysis of Online Discourse in a Pro-Trump Community.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict5(2):323–346. doi:  10.1075/jlac.5.2.08sub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.2.08sub [Google Scholar]
  45. Suran, Melissa, and Danielle K. Kilgo
    2017 “Freedom from the Press? How Anonymous Gatekeepers on Reddit Covered the Boston Marathon Bombing.” Journalism Studies18(8):1035–1051. doi:  10.1080/1461670X.2015.1111160
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2015.1111160 [Google Scholar]
  46. Sydnor, Emily
    2018 “Platforms for Incivility: Examining Perceptions across Different Media Formats.” Political Communication35(1):97–116. doi:  10.1080/10584609.2017.1355857
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1355857 [Google Scholar]
  47. Taleghani-Nikazm, Carmen
    2012 “Politeness in Computer-mediated Communication.” InThe Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, edited byCarol A. Chappelle, 4463–4468. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:  10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0918
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0918 [Google Scholar]
  48. Taylor, Charlotte
    2017 “The Relationship between Irony and Sarcasm: Insights from a First-order Metalanguage Investigation.” Journal of Politeness Research13(2):209–241. doi:  10.1515/pr‑2015‑0037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0037 [Google Scholar]
  49. Vergis, Nikos, and Marina Terkourafi
    2015 “The M-word: A Greek Collocation between Solidarity and Insult.” InInterdisciplinary Perspectives on Im/politeness, edited byMarina Terkourafi, 41–70. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/aals.14.03ver
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.14.03ver [Google Scholar]
  50. Watts, Richard
    1989 “Relevance and Relational Work: Linguistic Politeness as Politic Behavior.” Multilingua8:131–166. doi:  10.1515/mult.1989.8.2‑3.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.1989.8.2-3.131 [Google Scholar]
  51. Young, Li-Yin
    2018 “The Effect of Moderator Bots on Abusive Language Use.” InProceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence – PRAI 2018. Kean University Union, United States: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM): 133–137. 10.1145/3243250.3243257
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3243250.3243257 [Google Scholar]
  52. Zappavigna, Michele
    2012Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How we Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): impoliteness; irony; online discourse; Reddit; social media platforms; YouTube
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error