Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2213-1272
  • E-ISSN: 2213-1280
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



While lexical and discourse strategies of hate speech have widely been studied hitherto, there is limited research devoted to the contribution of grammatical and morphological aspects to verbal aggression. This paper provides a corpus-assisted analysis of slang morphological means used in verbal aggression. The focus is on four compound families (, , , ), which are often used in slang to form compound words referring to specific groups, such as homosexuals, fools, or ineffectual people. The paper adopts a morphopragmatic approach to investigate three pragmatic meanings/functions – namely, derisive, critical, and offensive – of slang words in situations of conflict. The combination of quantitative and qualitative analyses of data drawn from the (COCA) shows the frequency of the morphological processes, their privileged genres and contexts, as well as their negative potential and face-threatening power.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Allen, Irwing L.
    1998 “Slang: Sociology.” InConcise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. byJacob L. Mey, and R. E. Asher, 878–883. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Amiot, Dany, and Edwige Dugas
    2021 Combining Forms and Affixoids in Morphology. InThe Oxford Encyclopedia of Morphology, ed. byRochelle Lieber. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available athttps://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780190682361.001.0001/acref-9780190682361-e-569
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersson, Lars G., and Peter Trudgill
    1990Bad Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer, Laurie
    2017Compounds and Compounding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108235679
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235679 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bazzanella, Carla, Claudia Caffi, and Marina Sbisà
    1991 “Scalar Dimensions in Illocutionary Force.” InSpeech Acts: Fiction or Reality?, ed. byIgor Ž. Žagar, 63–76. Ljubljana: Institute for Social Sciences.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Booij, Geert E., and Matthias Hüning
    2014 “Affixoids and Constructional Idioms.” InExtending the Scope of Construction-based Grammar, ed. byRonny Boogaart, Timothy Colleman, and Gijsbert Rutten, 77–106. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110366273.77
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110366273.77 [Google Scholar]
  7. Caffi, Claudia
    2001La mitigazione: un approccio pragmatico alla comunicazione nei contesti terapeutici. Munster: Lit.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cantero, Mónica
    2003La morfopragmática del español. München: LINCOM Europa.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Crocco Galéas, Grazia
    1992Gli etnici italiani: Studio di morfologia naturale. Padova: Unipress.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, Jonathan, Paul Iganski, and Abe Sweiry
    2017 “Linguistic Impoliteness and Religiously Aggravated Hate Crime in England and Wales.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict5 (1): 1–29. 10.1075/jlac.5.1.01cul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.1.01cul [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies, Mark
    2008–Corpus of Contemporary American English(COCA). Available athttps://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Demata, Massimiliano
    2021 “Keeping the Threat out: Trump’s Discourse, the Wall and the ‘Other’.” Altre Modernità25 (5): 270–286.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dressler, Wolfgang U., and Ferenc Kiefer
    1990 “Austro-Hungarian Morphopragmatics”. InContemporary Morphology, ed. byWolfgang U. Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer, and John R. Rennison, 69–77. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110874082.69
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874082.69 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dressler, Wolfgang U., and Marianne Kilani-Schoch
    1994 Morphopragmatique interactionnelle: les formations en -o du français branché. InNatural Morphology – Perspectives for the Nineties, ed. byLivia Tonelli, and Wolfgang U. Dressler, 31–52. Padua: Unipress.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dressler, Wolfgang U., and Lavinia Merlini Barbaresi
    1986 “How to Fix Interfixes?” Acta Linguistica Hungarica361: 53–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. 1987 “Elements of Morphopragmatics.” InLevels of Linguistic Adaptation, ed. byJef Verschueren, 33–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.6.2.04dre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.6.2.04dre [Google Scholar]
  17. 1994Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German, and Other Languages. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110877052
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877052 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dumas, Bethany K., and Jonathan Lighter
    1978 “Is Slang a Word for Linguistics?” American Speech531: 5–17. 10.2307/455336
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455336 [Google Scholar]
  19. Eble, Connie
    1996Slang and Sociability: In-Group Language among College Students. Chapel Hill-London: The University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Erjavec, Karmen, and Melita P. Kovačič
    2012 “‘You don’t understand, this is a new war!’ Analysis of Hate Speech in News Web Sites’ Comments.” Mass Communication and Society15 (6): 899–920. 10.1080/15205436.2011.619679
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2011.619679 [Google Scholar]
  21. Green, Jonathon
    2020Green’s Dictionary of Slang. Digital Edition, https://greensdictofslang.com/
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hamilton, Mark A.
    2012 “Verbal Aggression: Understanding the Psychological Antecedents and Social Consequences.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology31 (1): 5–12. 10.1177/0261927X11425032
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X11425032 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kádár, Dániel Z., Vahid Parvaresh, and Puyu Ning
    2019 “Morality, Moral Order, and Language Conflict and Aggression: A Position Paper.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict7 (1): 6–31. 10.1075/jlac.00017.kad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00017.kad [Google Scholar]
  24. Kilani-Schoch, Marianne, and Wolfgang U. Dressler
    1992 “Prol-o, intell-o, gauch-o et les autres. Propriétés formelles de deux opérations du français parlé.” Romanistisches Jahrbuch431: 65–86. 10.1515/9783110244991.65
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110244991.65 [Google Scholar]
  25. Knoblock, Natalia
    2017 “Xenophobic Trumpeters: A Corpus-assisted Discourse Study of Donald Trump’s Facebook Conversations.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict5 (2): 295–322. 10.1075/jlac.5.2.07kno
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.5.2.07kno [Google Scholar]
  26. Mattiello, Elisa
    2008An Introduction to English Slang: A Description of its Morphology, Semantics and Sociology. Monza: Polimetrica.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. . forth. “Language Aggression in English Slang: The Case of the -o Suffix”. InGrammar of Hate: Morphosyntactic Features of Hateful, Aggressive, and Dehumanizing Discourse ed. by Natalia Knoblock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108991841.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108991841.003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Mattiello, Elisa, and Wolfgang U. Dressler
    2018 “The Morphosemantic Transparency/Opacity of Novel English Analogical Compounds and Compound Families.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: An International Review of English Studies531: 67–114. 10.2478/stap‑2018‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.2478/stap-2018-0004 [Google Scholar]
  29. Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia
    1997 “Modification of Speech Acts: Aggravation and Mitigation.” InProceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists, ed. byBernard Caron, Electronic Edition, paper n. 0353. Oxford: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2001 “The Pragmatics of the ‘Diminutive’ -y/ie Suffix in English.” InNaturally! Linguistic Studies in Honour of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, ed. byChris Schaner-Wolles, John Rennison, and Friedrich Neubarth, 315–326. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. 2006 “Morphopragmatics.” InEncyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. byKeith Brown, 2nd edn, Volume81: 332–335. Oxford: Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00133‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00133-4 [Google Scholar]
  32. Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia, and Wolfgang U. Dressler
    2020 “Pragmatic Explanations in Morphology.” InWord Knowledge and Word Usage: A Cross-disciplinary Guide to the Mental Lexicon, ed. byVito Pirrelli, Ingo Plag, and Wolfgang U. Dressler, 405–451. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110440577‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110440577-011 [Google Scholar]
  33. Miró-Llinares, Fernando, Asier Moneva, and Miriam Esteve
    2018 “Hate is in the Air! But where? Introducing an Algorithm to Detect Hate Speech in Digital Microenvironments.” Crime Science7 (1): 1–12. 10.1186/s40163‑018‑0089‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-018-0089-1 [Google Scholar]
  34. Munro, Pamela
    ed. 2001U.C.L.A. Slang 4. Los Angeles: Department of Linguistics, University of California.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Oksanen, Atte, James Hawdon, Emma Holkeri, Matti Näsi, and Pekka Räsänen
    2014 “Exposure to Online Hate among Young Social Media Users.” InSoul of Society: A Focus on the Lives of Children and Youth, ed. byM. Nicole Warehime, 253–273. Bingley: Emerald. 10.1108/S1537‑466120140000018021
    https://doi.org/10.1108/S1537-466120140000018021 [Google Scholar]
  36. Scalise, Sergio
    1986Generative Morphology. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110877328
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877328 [Google Scholar]
  37. 1988 “The Notion of ‘Head’ in Morphology”. Yearbook of Morphology11: 229–245.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Sornig, Karl
    1981Lexical Innovation: A Study of Slang, Colloquialisms and Casual Speech. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pb.ii.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pb.ii.5 [Google Scholar]
  39. Stenström, Anna-Brita
    2000 “From Slang to Slanguage: A Description Based on Teenage Talk.” InMi a szleng?, ed. byTamas Kis, 89–108. Debrecen: Kossuth Lajos University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Stenström, Anna-Brita, Gisle Andersen, and Ingrid K. Hasund
    2002Trends in Teenage Talk: Corpus Compilation, Analysis and Findings. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.8 [Google Scholar]
  41. Stevens, Christopher M.
    2005 “Revisiting the Affixoid Debate. On the Grammaticalization of the Word.” InGrammatikalisierung im Deutschen, ed. byTorsten Leuschner, Tanja Mortelmans, and Sara de Groodt, 71–83. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110925364.71
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110925364.71 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tarasova, Elizaveta, and José A. Sánchez Fajardo
    . forth. “Adj+ie/y Nominalisations in Contemporary English: From Diminution to Pejoration.” InGrammar of Hate: Morphosyntactic Features of Hateful, Aggressive, and Dehumanizing Discourse ed. by Natalia Knoblock. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Warren, Beatrice
    1990 “The Importance of Combining Forms.” InContemporary Morphology, ed. byWolfgang U. Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer, and John R. Rennison, 111–132. Belin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110874082.111
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874082.111 [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang, Ziqi, David Robinson, and Jonathan Tepper
    2018 “Detecting Hate Speech on Twitter Using a Convolution-LSTM Based Deep Neural Network.” InThe Semantic Web, ed. byAldo Gangemi, Roberto Navigli, Maria-Esther Vidal, Pascal Hitzler, Raphaël Troncy, Laura Hollink, Anna Tordai, and Mehwish Alams, 745–760. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10843. Springer Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑93417‑4_48
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93417-4_48 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): compound families; English slang; morphopragmatics; verbal aggression
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error